A Collection of Words--Just Words--
That Show Dangerous People
by
Victor Edward Swanson,
publisher
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
copyright 2008
October 27, 2008
(Version 2)
In a document entitled THOUGHTS AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual woman and the individual man, which is available through the Internet--particularly at the Web site of The Hologlobe Press--I talk about "like minds get together" in one section. In essence, the thought for that section is people with like minds or like ideas or like thoughts get together. For instance, dishonorable people get together because honest people will not get involved with or will not stay associated with dishonorable people, or thieves get together with thieves and not non-thieves. This short document shows some statements made by people who are or were linked in the way in which they think politically, and the statements show foolishness and ignorance or more in the speakers, and all the people whose quotes appear within this document should always be remembered by an individual who reads the words, and, really, the words show how the people are linked in communism and socialism.
I begin by noting that Saul D. Alinsky wrote Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals (or, simply, Rules for Radicals), which was published in 1971, and it was a book that Saul D. Alinsky--a communist--dedicated to Lucifer..
Here is text from Rules for Radicals: "..This failure of our younger activists to understand the art of communication has been disastrous. Even the most elementary grasp of the fundamental idea that one communicates within the experiences of his audience--and gives full respect to the other's values--would have ruled out attacks on the American flag. The responsible organizer would have known that it is the establishment that has betrayed the flag while the flag, itself, remains the glorious symbol of America's hopes and aspirations, and he would have conveyed this message to his audience. On another level of communication, humor is essential, for through humor much is accepted that would have been rejected if presented seriously....
In April 2008, Barack Obama made a speech at a fundraiser in San Francisco, California, and some of his words were: "...You go into some of these small town in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 21 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion, or antipathy to people who aren't like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations...."
Here is text from Rules for Radicals: "...As an organizer I start from where the world is, as it is, not as I would like it to be. That we accept the world as it is does not in any sense weaken our desire to change it into what we believe it should be--it is necessary to begin where the world is if we are going to change it to what we think it should be. That means working in the system..."
In May 2008, Barack Obama addressed graduating students at Wesleyan University, and one of his statements was: "...Our collective service can shape the destiny of this generation...Individual salvation depends on collective salvation."
Here is text from Rules for Radicals: "...The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive--but real--allies of the Haves....The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be...."
On August 25, 2008, Michelle Obama spoke words to the audience of the Democratic National Convention, and some of her words were: "...Barack stood up that day...and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about 'The world as it is' and 'The world as it should be...."
In September 2008, Judi McLeod wrote a piece for CanadaFreePress, which had statements made by the son of Saul Alinsky, who was a "community organizer" in Chicago and a professed communist, and some of what Judi McLeod presented were words of the son: "...'Barack Obama's training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness,' Alinsky Jr. wrote to the Globe. 'It is an amazingly powerful format and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.'" Judi McLeod also had in her piece these words from the son of Saul Alinsky: "'I am proud to see that my father's model for organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday...'"
On September 17, 2008, Joseph Biden (the U.S. vice-presidential candidate of the Democratic Party) appeared on Good Morning America (a weekday show on ABC-TV), and he made a number of statements, and here is one statement related to having wealthier people pay more taxes: "...It's time to be patriotic...time to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut..."
Here is text from Rules for Radicals: "...Through People's Organization these groups discover that what they considered primarily their individual problem is also the problem of others, and furthermore the only hope for solving an issue of titanic proportions is by pooling all their efforts and strengths. That appreciation and conclusion is an educational process."
It was on Anderson Cooper 360, a cable show, that James Carville (a Democratic political commentator or "pundit") made horrific statements related to racism and possible race riots, and the words, which were offered on October 7, 2008, were: "...Now let me be clear here, if Obama goes in this race with a 5-point lead and losing this election, the consequences are--bull, man. ...I mean I don't think that's going to happen, but I think David it's a point to bring up. But you stop and contemplate this country if Obama goes in and he has a consistent five point lead and loses the election, it would be very, very, very dramatic out there."
Here is text from Rules for Radicals: "...It is not enough to elect your candidates. You must keep the pressure on. Radicals should keep in mind Franklin D. Roosevelt's response to a reform delegation, 'Okay, you've convinced me. Now go on out and bring pressure on me!' Action comes from keeping the heat on...."
On Sunday, October 12, 2008, Barack Obama, answering a question from "Joe the Plumber" about how taxes under Barack Obama's tax plan would increase, said, "...It's not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everyone who is behind you, that they've got a chance for success too. My attitude is if the economy's good for folks from the bottom up, it's gonna be good for everybody....I think when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."
Here is text from Rules for Radicals: "..."The third rule of the ethics of means and ends is that in war the ends justifies almost any means...."
It was on Sunday, October 19, 2008, that General Colin Powell (formerly a general of the United States of America) made a number of statements before the cameras of Meet the Press, a weekly show on NBC-TV, and here are some the statements:
"...On the Obama side, I watched Mr. Obama and I watched him during this seven-week period [it dealing with the economic crisis]. And he displayed a steadiness, an intellectual curiosity, a depth of knowledge and an approach to looking at problems like this and picking a vice president that, I think, is ready to be president on day one...."
"...This Bill Ayers situation that's been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign. But McCain says that he's a washed-out terrorist. Well, then, why do we keep talking about him? And why do we have these robocalls going on around the country trying to suggest that because of this very, very limited relationship that Senator Obama has had with Mr. Ayers, somehow, Mr. Obama is tainted. What they're trying to connect him to is some kind of terrorist feelings. And I think that's inappropriate...."Here is text from Rules for Radicals: "...Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins--or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom--Lucifer."
When a person puts the thoughts together, the thoughts make up a puzzle--a logic puzzle--that shows a collection of people who have like ideas that are dangerous to the individual, and the people connected to the ideas must be remembered and watched.
You may have thought the evidence of dangerous people was completed, but I add these several quotes--statements made by Barack Obama (which I first heard in audio form presented on The Mark Levin Show on October 27, 2008):
The Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that carries on till this day. And, dah, that the framers had that same blind spot. I, I don't think the two views are contraditory to say that say that it was a remarkable political document, ah, that paved the way for where we are now, and to say that it also, ah, reflected the fundimental flaw of this country that continues to this day.The quote might be slightly misdone, since the audio quality was weak, but it does show that Barack Obama seems to feel the U.S. Constitution is a defective document--It is the duty of a President of the United States of America to uphold the Constitution.One piece of audio that Mark Levin aired was audio taken from an interview that Barack Obama did one day in 2001 on WBEZ-FM, and after I heard the audio, I found text of the audio from the American Thinker (which is on the Internet), and here is a portion of the audio:
If you look at the victories and failures of the Civil Rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people so that now I would have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order. As long as I could pay for it, I'd be O.K. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and of more basic issues, such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in The Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the Federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the Civil Rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendancy to lose track of the political and community organizing and activitives on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.I urge you to read the previous paragraph several times till you see such things as Barack Obama's wish for "redistributive change" in the country and Barack Obama's belief the court should be involved in "redistributive change" (see: "...It [the supreme court] didn't break free from the essential constraints....).On October 27, 2008, Barack Obama said the following words to a cheering audience in Ohio, and the sounds of the scene--as I heard them through The Mark Levin Show--were like that of a movie in which a political candidate booms out his words as if he were the only savior to the masses:
In one week, we can choose hope over fear and unity over division--the promise of change over the power of the status quo. In one week, we can come together as one nation and one people and once more choose our better history. That's what's at stake. That's what we're fighting for. And it's in this last week you'll knock on some doors for me and make some calls for me and talk to your neighbors and convince your friends that you'll stand with me and fight with me and give me your vote, then I promise ya, we will not just win Ohio, we will win this general election, and together, we will change the country and we will change the world. God bless, you! God bless, the United States of America! Let's get to work!The quote may not be exactly right, because, for one, I had to choose the punctuation.###
Bibliography (of Internet articles):
"Obama 2001: Scrap the Constitution, spread the wealth." American Thinker (blog), 27 October 2008.
Brodsky, Adam. "BAM'S LAND OF LOSERS." (Subtitle: "HIS PATHETIC ADVICE TO GRADS".) New York Post, 30 May 2008, p. NA.
Gladnick. P.J. "James Carville Hints at Riots if Obama Loses Election." NewsBusters.com, 8 October 2008, p. NA.
Kapp, Bonney. "Obama to Plumber: My Plan Will 'Spread the Wealth Around.'" FOXNews.com, 13 October 2008, p. NA.
McLeod, Judi. "Saul Alinsky's son: 'Obama learned his lesson well.'" CanadaFreePress.com, 2 September 2008, p. NA.
Phillips, Melanie. "Obama, his Mentor Saul Alinsky, and what a 'community Organizer' is." The Spectator (UK), 9 September 2008, p. NA (The work contains material posted by readers of it).
Shiver, Kyle-Anne. "Obama's Alinsky Jujitsu." American Thinker, 8 January 2008, p NA.
Sweet, Lynn. "Colin Powell endorses Barack Obama on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Turned off by McCain focus on Ayers. Transcript." Chicago Sun-Times ,19 October 2008, p. NA.
Tapper, Jake. "Obama Allies Avoid Tying to Explain Most Controversial Part of His Remarks." ABCNews.com, Political Punch, 13 April 2008, 5:51 p.m.
Bibliography (of other Internet material):
"Michelle O; Lifts 'the world' from 'Rules for Radicals --Alinsky book (Obama, ethical)." City-Data.com, posted 26 August 2008.
"Rules for Radicals A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals." Connections Library, date: unknown (acquired on 25 October 2008).
Notes and more:
Note: On the Internet, this document is www.hologlobepress.com/words.htm.
Note: The first version of this document was posted on October 25, 2008.For further reading, you should see the
document entitled THOUGHTS AND
PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual
woman and the individual man, which
can be reached through this link: Logic.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Political Lessons for
the Individual Woman and the
Individual Man in the United States
of America, which can be reached
through this link: Lessons.Note: You are urged to see the many other
documents that exist at the Web site of The
Hologlobe Press, especially those that show
what Barack Obama is, a man with an ill mind
that dislikes the United States of America.To get to the "Site-Summary Page" of The
Hologlobe Press, you can use this link:
Summary.
To get to the main page of The Hologlobe
Press, you should use this link:
www.hologlobepress.com.
Note: Here are three books that an individual can see to learn more about Barack Obama:
The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media's Favorite Candidate by David Fresco
The Obama Nation by Jerome R. Corsi
Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy by John Fund.
###