Nonsense Statements
and Quotations
of Barack Obama
(Part Two)
compiled by
Victor Edward Swanson,
publisher
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
copyright c. 2017
Version 164
(January 20, 2017)
(Draft Version)
On November 4, 2012, Barack Obama was elected to be the President of the United States of America for the second time, though most Americans knew little of what Barack Obama was and is, especially since many reporters and news anchors purposely worked to keep quiet about what Barack Obama was and is, and, then, it was at least known to a few that Barack Obama was a bad man, being a communist and black radical and more that is bad (as good historians will shown in the years go come). Over the next four years, more and more evidence came out about Barack Obama's bad nature, and some of it was contained within the words that he spoke in public, and during the four years, I showed off many things that Barack Obama had said in a document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama (which you can reach by using this Quotes link), and through the document, I analyzed what Barack Obama had said, and one main feature that shows up to a person who reads the document is that Barack Obama is a perpetual liar, and that is the sign of a bad man. Despite all the evidence of what Barack Obama is that was available on November 6, 2012, many Americans decided to vote "yes" for Barack Obama again, giving him the ability to be the U.S. President for a second term, and that shows that many Americans--millions of Americans--are either ignorant or evil; yes, many millions of Americans voted for a man with a defective mind and a man with low moral values and even a man with mental illness, one sign of which is continual lying. I will not stand down from my statement that Barack Obama is a bad man and a man with a mental illness, given that I not only prove the statement in my document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama but also in other documents that I have posted and have available to everyone at the website for The Hologlobe Press. Barack Obama is a man not to be praised, not to be applauded, not to be followed, not to be bowed to, not to rise up for, et cetera. Barack Obama is a man to be feared and a man to be hated. Now, you have before your eyes Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama (Part Two), and it shows more evidence of what Barack Obama is through my examining and analyzing what Barack Obama has said in public. To persons who dislike that I put down their so-called leader or messiah or king known as Barack Hussein Obama, I say--"Go suck on drywall!" Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States of America and The United States Constitution, and I will be proven right in the future, especially when millions of good Americans come to hate their country, to hate this country because of what it was turned into by Barack Obama and his evil or ignorant followers--an enslavist's paradise.
Here are statements and quotations from Barack Obama during his second term as the U.S. President, truly only some of all that I could present (there comes a point when I get tired of dissecting each speech for all the nonsense and lies contained within):
January 21, 2013 (at the second public presidential inauguration event for Barack Obama in Washington, D.C.):
"...We the people still believe...." [On Sunday, January 20, 2013, Barack Obama took the oath of office for the U.S. Presidency for the second time officially, and on Monday, January 21, 2013, Barack Obama took part in the public--unofficial--swearing-in event in Washington, D.C. When Barack Obama is in public, he makes a speech, which is filled with nonsense and idiocy and lies, and the speech for this event was filled with nonsense and lies. The set of words presented in quotation marks is only one of the pieces of nonsense that Barack Obama spoke during this inauguration speech, and several times, Barack Obama used this set of words in the speech, and the speech was done to make Barack Obama look as if he was concerned with and upheld the idea of "We the people...." from The United States Constitution. The speech was fluff and lacked substance, which is a commonplace style for Barack Obama's speech. I learned nothing from the speech about what he was going to do for the next four years, and I heard, for example, the same Marxist claptrap (which is not good stuff), and so did the audience, which often clapped upon hearing things that had no meaning and made no sense. Barack Obama sold an unclear vision for the country once again, allowing the listeners to create visions in their minds that had no connection to what Barack Obama was really trying to teach. A lot of the sets of words passed along by Barack Obama during the speech made me think--What the hell does this mean?]
"...We have always understood that when times change so must we, but fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges, that preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action...." [What hell does this mean? This set of words from Barack Obama is nonsense. There is a lesson about writing that I learned years ago--from a version a book entitled Modern American Usage (the informal title)--and the lesson is, if a reader has to struggle to figure out the meaning of what was written, then the writer has failed. Barack Obama set up a clouded image here, which only idiots will quote in the future. But a reader of this set of words from Barack Obama does have to wonder what actual "freedoms" that each person has in the country--which come from The United States Constitution--have to do with "collective action". "Collectivism"--this is something and nonsense that is pushed along by "enslavists" (such as communists) to get people to act like sheep and follow the ways and the dictates of the federal government fully for the "good of the whole," no matter how bad the ways and dictates are for the "individual." The "enslavist"--who is a bad type of politician--pushes the idea that you must see that only the politician knows what is good for the society and everyone. That is nonsense, since politicians are basically stupid people, having poor general knowledge about the world, being specialities on politics (such as about how to be elected and how to make deals to get laws passed). Remember: Politicians get their jobs through elections, which are for the most part popularity contests that do not take into count the true intelligence, especially general broad intelligence, of persons, and Barack Obama is good proof of that, having created no companies or jobs for people or having made nothing, such as with drill presses or welding units, and, in fact, he has had no such job like that of a dress maker, an airplane pilot, a broching-machine specialist, a tax acountant, a police officer, a firefighter, a secretary, a freighter pilot, an engine builder, a plasterer, plumber, et cetera.]
"...America's possibilities are limitless, for we possess all the qualities that this world without boundaries demands--youth and drive, diversity, and openness, an endless capacity for risk and a gift for reinvention. My fellow Americans, we are made for this moment, and we will seize it so long as we seize it together...." [What the hell does this mean? All countries have "youth" and people with "drive." What does "diversity" have to do with limitless possibilities, and what does "openness" have to do with the "capacity for risk and a gift for reinvention"? This set of words from Barack Obama is nonsense. And you should see Barack Obama was once again selling "collectivism"--subjugation to the federal government or to him.]
"...We believe that America's prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class. We know that America thrives when every person can find independence and pride in their work, when the wages of honest labor liberate families from the brink of hardship. We are true to our creed when a little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else because she is an American, she is free, and she is equal not just in the eyes of God but in our own...." [What the hell does "can find independence...in their work" have to do with anything, especially the so-called "middle class" to which Barack Obama had brought out in the previous sentence and the idea of thriving?]
"...So we must harness new ideas and technology to remake our government, revamp our tax code, reform our schools, and empower our citizens with the skills they need ta work harder, learn more, reach higher...." [Well, here, Barack Obama did it again. Barack Obama once again noted publicly that he wants to "remake our government." What type of government does he want? Over last four years, Barack Obama has already violated his oath of office by violating parts of The United States Constitution. By the way, in truth, what dictates that Barack Obama has made that go against The United States Constitution need not be followed. To me, it looks as if Barack Obama has been working to make a one-party government for the country--such as a communistic dictatorship.]
"...But while the means will change, our purpose endures. A nation that rewards the effort and determination of every single American--that is what this moment requires, that is what will give real meaning to our creed...." [What the hell is this nonsense? It is not up to the federal government of the United States of America to reward people for doing something or other, and it is not possible for a federal government to make sure that everyone is rewarded in life. Anyway, what type of reward was Barack Obama referring to?]
"...We must make the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit, but we reject the belief that America must choose between caring for the general that built this country and investing in the generation that will build its future...." [What the hell is this crap? To date, Barack Obama has not really put in writing any true proposals to reduce the yearly deficit of the federal government and the overall "federal debt," which for the 2012 fiscal year was about 7,000-billion dollars (which included general expenditures and big liabilities, such as Social Security). The general-budget debt right now for the country is 16,000-billion dollars, and it is rising every day. And since the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was made law, the cost of a health plan has not gone down, though Barack Obama had pushed the idea before the bill was passed that the cost would go down. And because of the tax provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, the costs are going to rise and rise--more taxes on the so-called middle class are coming through this disasterous law.]
"...We do not believe that, in this country, freedom is reserved for the lucky or happiness for the few...." [What the hell is this crap? Under the law--at least for the moment till Barack Obama and his associates completely cancel out The United States Constitution--"freedom" exists for every person equally in the country. In this country, "happiness" is not bestowed on only a few, such as because of law. Why did Barack Obama even say this set of words?]
"...The commitments we make to each other through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security--these things to not sap our nation, they strengthen us. They do not make us a nation of takers, they free us to take the risks that make this country great...." [What the hell does this mean? In essence, Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security as they are structured are falling apart and are bankrupt. Barack Obama has made no proposals to save them from falling apart completely and crashing the economy of the country greatly.]
"...We the people still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and more powerful storms...." [Here Barack Obama was trying to sell the people--the audience--that he was going to save the world! He will change the climate! He will stop man from killing the planet! All the idiots who heard the words were probably happy to hear Barack Obama shout these words. I know there is no big "manmade climate change." The world has had big fires in the past, and it always will, especially when old forests, which have not been harvested, go up in flames from a lightning strike and become big fires. People who watch television documentaries about world history, such as some aired under the umbrella title called Nova, which get shown on PBS, can hear about how the climate of the world has changed over the eons, and man did not cause the changes and man could not stop the changes. Men and women are too small, though there are billions on the planet, to change the climate, such as that caused the sun (Sol). And Barack Obama passed along undocumented nonsense about "more powerful storms." What storms are more power in relation to what storms of the past? Incidentally, man can barely predict the weather that will hit a particular place next week, let along next month, next year, or any years ahead, so how can man predict that bigger storms are coming in the decades to come (especially when man does not have all the facts about what will cause the storms and drive the storms). Here, Barack Obama tried to sell again the big lie about climate change and what man can do to save the planet.]
"...The path toward sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult, but America cannot resist this transition. We must lead it! We cannot secede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries. We must claim its promise! That's how we will maintain our economic vitality and our nation treasure--our forests and waterways, our crop lands, and snow-capped peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. That's what will lend meaning to the creed our fathers once declared...." [What the hell is this mess? There are a number of things that I could cover here, but I will only cover one. "Forests--these have trees and other plants, and over time, trees and plants grow and die out, and trees can fall over and rot, and to maintain the health of a forest, man does have to cut down trees and let new trees grow. So Barack Obama's theme in this set of words, though not spoken, was "wind turbines." What do wind turbines have to do with maintaining forests and waterways and crop lands and, especially, "snow-capped peaks". In addition, you should see Barack Obama was working to get you to accept the country will have to have less energy and was working to get you to accept and not resist what he wants to do, though what he wants to do is based on junk science and lies about climate change.]
"...Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote...." [What the hell is this? How is anybody going to stop long lines from happening. So goes life. I would be happy not to have long lines at the checkout counter at the grocery store or, especially, the driver's license bureau, where long waits are commonplace, especially on a Monday in a big city area. What the hell can Barack Obama do to stop long lines from existing in anything?]
"...Being true to our founding documents does not require us to agree on every contour of life. It does not mean we all define liberty in exactly the same way or follow the precise same path to happiness. Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time, but it does require us to act in our time...." [For one, Barack Obama through this set of words brings up the subject of "liberty." I have learned, yes, some people have a different definition of "liberty" than I do. "Enslavists" see "liberty" as the ability to do what they want to do with and to other men; for example, an "enslavist"--who is a bad person--feels the politician should be free to do whatever to the citizen, and that is "liberty" and "freedom" for that politician. What definition of "liberty" did and does Barack Obama have in mind?]
[Note: You will learn more about Modern American Usage: A Guide by seeing my document entitled Writing Advice from the publisher of The Hologlobe Press, Victor Edward Swanson, which can be reached by using this link: Writing.]Sunday, January 27, 2013 (a guest on 60 Minutes):
"...In some cases, that may make it a little bit less exciting, but it will be a whole lot better for players, and those of us who are fans maybe won't have to examine our consciences quite as much...." [Around the time that this set of words was spoken by Barack Obama, the topic was violence in football, such as in college football and the National Football League. You should see that the quotation shows off Barack Obama's pushed to have the fans examine their consciences about why they put up with what goes on in college-football games and NFL-football games, particularly the hard hitting. What Barack Obama was doing was trying to set a moral compass or define moral values for people. However, Barack Obama is no type of man who should be followed on the topic of morality. For one, Barack Obama is a perpetual liar, and that is a sign of a moral failure in a person, even a U.S. President. Barack Obama is also morally defective since he has used illegal drugs, such as cocaine. Barack Obama's talk about morals and morality is garbage, since the man is garbage. By the way, also a guest on this edition of 60 Minutes was Hillary Clinton (who, for the past four years, had been the U.S. Secretary of State), and both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are yet covering up what they did or did not do in relation to the attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya, in September 2012, and you can learn more about the subject by seeing my document entitled The "Benghazi Killings Scandal": A Short Information-and-Status Report, which can be reached by using this Benghazi link. And while I am on the topic of violence here, I must noted that, a few days ago, the Barack Obama administration announced that women will soon serve on the front lines of battles, and such fighting is violence. Incidentally, many people around the world will see and ridicule the U.S. military as a "prissy" military, having women fight the battles instead of men, and that means the U.S. military will take a psychological hit because of the change in policy and be downgraded, and some of those that will like that are radical Islamic terrorists, and Barack Obama's talking about football and working to reduce the violence of the game could be working to make men in America even more like women and more soft in the mind, which will make them weaker in real battle, having less stamina to fight the enemy.]Sunday, February 3, 2013 (an interview with Scott Pelley during The Super Bowl Today on CBS-TV, shown before the Super Bowl would be broadcast):
"...The question is, if we're gonna be serious about reducing our deficit, can we combine some smart spending cuts--'cause there's still some waste in government--can we reform, ah, our health-care programs in particular--because we spend a lot more on health care than every other country does and we don't get better outcome--so there's a lot of waste in the system, and, ah, there are things we can do ta reduce health-care costs, and can we close some loopholes and deductions that folks who are well connected and have a lot of accounts and lawyers can take advantage of so they end up paying lower rates than, ah, you know a bus driver or a cop, ah, can we close some of those loopholes?...." [The whole set of words is filled with nonsense, but I will only show up one big piece of crap. Notice--Barack Obama put down the medical system in the country--"...we spend a lot more on health care than every other country does and we don't get better outcome...." The United States of America has the best health-care system, which is why people from other countries do come here for health care. Plus, what does what is spent on health care here have anything to do with what is spent in other places? Go look at the teeth of many of the people in China and North Korea and Cuba and many countries in Africa, et cetera--maybe, they do not spend enough. In essence, Barack Obama put down black doctors, Jewish doctors, white doctors, Hispanic doctors, Catholic doctors, American Indian doctors, Asian doctors, women doctors, young doctors, old doctors....]
"...Yes...." [The answer was tied to a question about whether or not gays should be allowed in the Boy Scouts. I say that such an entity as the Boys Scouts should be able set its own rules about who or who may not join, and such an entity should be able to exclude some people if it wants to based on logical rules. You do not get everything in life that you want, and if an entity has rules that exclude you, so it goes in life. Anyway, the rules of exclusion tied to the gays and lesbians at the Boy Scouts do not lead to the deaths of gays and lesbians or to the starvation of gays and lesbians or the ability of gays and lesbians to make money or live well or travel around the country....]
"...Well, because I think that, ah, you know, my attitude is that gays and lesbians should have, ah, access and, and, ah, opportunity, ah, the same way everybody else does in every institution and walk of life...." [This answer was what Barack Obama gave after a "Why?"-type question from Scott Pelley following Barack Obama's "Yes." answer. I say to Barack Obama--"Bullshit!" Gays and lesbians have opportunities to get jobs, enter restaurants and museums, and be seen equally under the law, et cetera, and that does not mean gay guys have the right to be in the Boy Scouts as mentors or leaders or anything. I ask--When do you reach the point where clubs and such can no longer set their own rules anymore and they have to abide by the rules pushed on them by government or the courts? Hey, how come I cannot be a member--the only male member--of an all women nudist camp, where all the women are erotics and well shaped and would have my sexual feelings on high alert?]
"...The reason that the economy shrank a little bit--despite the fact that housing's recovering, manufacturing is gonna strong, car sales are up--ah, you know, true is that, ah, overall, there were a lot of positive signs in the economy. The big problem was defense spending was cut twenty-two percent. It was the biggest drop in forty years. And it was very abrupt, and it had to do with, ah, you know, with folks being worried about the possible impacts of the 'fiscal cliff' and what goes on here in Washington. And what I've said repeatedly is, eh, you know, Washington cannot co, continually operate under a, a, a cloud of crisis. That freezes up consumers. It gets businesses worried. We, we can afford these self-inflicted wounds...." [Here is more "bullshit." The shrinking of the economy in the previous quarter has no tie to the American people's worrying about the 'fiscal cliff," which was a phony cliff, since the real "fiscal cliff" has yet to come--the big economic crash of the country caused by Barack Obama and many members of the U.S. Congress, who are spending the citizens of this country into debt. Was defense spending cut twenty-two percent in the previous quarter? The big cut in defense spending is coming up this year!]Tuesday, February 5, 2013 (a little press conference in the White House):
"...Economists and business leaders from across the spectrum have said that our economy is poised for progress in 2013, and we've seen signs of this progress over the last several weeks--ah, home prices continue to climb, car sales that are at a five-year high, manufacturing has been strong, and we've created more than six-million jobs in the last 35 months. But we've also seen the effects that political dysfunction can have on our economic progress, drawn-out process for resolving the 'fiscal cliff' hurt consumer confidence...." [Barack Obama lied again--several times. There has not been a net increase of six-million jobs in the country. The public's consumer confidence was not hurt by the talk of the "fiscal cliff." In addition, what proof does Barack Obama have that "Economists and business leaders from across the spectrum have said that our economy is poised for progress in 2013...", given in the last business quarter of the country, there was a shrinkage in the GDP. Of course, Barack Obama is an evil yet resourceful man--if there is any increase in economy in the next quarter--a non-strinkage of any type--he can claim his statement was correct, though it was not based on truth related to the idea that "Economists and business leaders from across the spectrum..." had provided him with information. To Barack Obama, what is "across the spectrum"? Who did he survey? What idiots around him--his spectrum--did he survey? I hear crap!]
"...We've been reminded that, while it's critical for us to cut wasteful spending, we can't just cut our way to prosperity. Deep indiscriminate cuts to things like education and training, energy, and national security will cost us jobs, and it will slow down our recovery. It's not the right thing to do...." [Here, Barack Obama's words are more crap from an insane mind. Education and training--this set of stuff is done through local taxes related local communities or the state in which the communities exist and is not the national matter. You do not pay the federal government for energy (related to, for instance, electricity or gas)--you pay local companies, such as co-ops, private entities or businesses, et cetera. Where is the evidence of a great recovery? Remember: The last quarter of business for the country saw a down turn, the first down turn reported in, for instance, the last three years. What are "deep indiscriminate cuts"? Barack Obama has actually pushed for no real cuts in the federal budget in the last four years! Also, Barack Obama has been cutting the military budget--which has ties to national security. Yes, I have provided more proof through this paragraph and the previous paragraph that we have a killer in the White House--a killer of minds and a killer of countries (and you are urged to see my document entitled We Have a Killer in the White House -- A Killer of Minds and a Killer of Countries: And His Goal is to be King of the World, which can be reached by using this link: Killer).]Tuesday, February 12, 2013 (a State of the Union speech from the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives):
"Thank you...." [On Tuesday, February 12, 2013, the American people--if they wished--got to see or hear a killer give a speech in the U.S. House of Representatives--a speech called a "State of the Union Address"--and the man who gave the speech was Barack Hussein Obama. The speech was highly boring, since it was nothing more than a collection of words and phrases that had been spoken in similar ways in the last four years, such as in previous "State of the Union Addresses," and it was a type of speech that could have been put together from pieces of past speeches that had been printed out on pages of paper, which then had gotten cut up and pasted together in fifteen minutes. The speech was not "historic" or original, and it is very likely it will never be remembered because it had nothing that stood out as new. As usual for a speech from Barack Obama, Barack Obama lied in the speech and spoke idiocy and used the same old Obama clichés.]
"...Tonight, thanks to the grits and determination of the American people, there is much progress to report...." [Liar! During the speech, for example, Barack Obama did not report that, in the previous economic quarter, there was a downturn, and the previous quarter was that in which the country had the holiday buying season, when, for instance, companies take on more employees usually, though often only temporary employees, to help handle holiday sales.]
"...After years of grueling recession, our businesses have created over six-million new jobs...." [Crap! Since Barack Obama became the U.S. President, the job universe of the country has gotten smaller, and there are somewhere around eight-million fewer jobs in the country. In addition, for the last few years, the federal government has lied about the job picture by using a smaller job-universe figure in calculations, making it seem unemployment has been dropping.]
"...So, today, we have cleared away the rubble of crisis...." [Bullshit! The big economic crash, which is being caused by the government overspending, has yet to hit. The country is thousands and thousands and thousands of billions in debt.]
"...And we can say with renewed confidence that the state of our union is strong...." [Liar! And many people in the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives clapped and clapped, as they did other times, though what they were clapping for was lies and idiocy.]
"...It is our unfinished task to make sure that this government works on behalf of the many, not just the few...." [Bullshit! This is idiocy. How has the government worked for "just the few" in the past? Barack Obama put out an idiot statement. The government neither works for the many nor for the few, as Barack Obama means it. Really, the government has never worked for either the many over the few or the few over the many in the past. But, of course, the federal government has been around to work for everyone by providing, for one, military security.]
"...The American people don't expect government to solve every problem...." [Here is one of those often-said themes from Barack Obama. It is nothing but filler. It is meaningless crap.]
"...But we can't ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and the most powerful...." [This is another of those often-said themes, which is bullshit. Barack Obama pushed for more government spending and got it, and the debt that was the result of the overspending, such as on nonsense things like giving out big loans to defective solar-energy companies that had no chance of paying back the loans and went bankrupt, was not caused by the so-called "wealthiest and the most powerful." Here, Barack Obama was trying to make it seem he had nothing to do with causing the problem and was trying to push for the idea of taking more money from people so that it covers his overspending.]
"...Most Americans--Democrats, Republicans, and Independents--understand that we can't just cut our way to prosperity...." [Bullshit! This is one of those idiot pieces of thought. It is used just to push for more taxation. When the federal government cuts back in spending, which it has not done in the least--not real cuts to spending--in ages, the citizens have less taken from them, which gives him more to work with to do better in their lives as they see fit and which gives businesses more money to work with, such as to hire more employees.]
"...Already the Affordable Care Act is helping to slow the growth of health-care costs...." [This is set of words comes from a deceptively evil mind. The cost of health-care premiums have been going up (and the facts are available on the Internet), and Barack Obama had said, before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was past, that the cost of premiums would go down. Barack Obama is a liar again! And it is well known, for the average person, the cost of health care is going to rise, because more taxes are going to be put on the person in relation to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, such as additional taxes on wheelchairs and other medical devices.]
"...So let's set party interests aside and work to pass a budget that replaces reckless cuts with smart savings and wise investments in our future...." [I have to show up this idiocy. In over three years, the federal government has not--because of the Democratically controlled U.S. Senate--passed an official budget as required by federal law; there have only been continuing resolutions past. Barack Obama's statement is all bullshit. His words are just meaningless words.]
"...Deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan...." [This is useless crap.]
"...Everyday, we should ask ourselves three questions as a nation. How do we attract more jobs to our shores? How do we equip our people with the skills they need to get those jobs? And how do we make sure that hard work leads to a decent living?...." [First, why should we be worried everyday about having companies from other countries come into the country to create job? Barack Obama has been blocking American companies--through federal laws--from creating more jobs. We should ask everyday--How can more Americans create jobs? Most of the new jobs should be created by companies based here and started up by Americans, as has been the rule for over two centuries. Of course, it looks to me as if Barack Obama is pushing hard to get you to accept only foreigners can start up new jobs in the country or accept that more and more of the country should be taken over by foreigners. Second, for the most, people equip themselves to get jobs by getting skills, such as by going to school or by teaching themselves skills at home or whatever--it is mostly up to them and it will always be up to them. Third, the standard of living in the country has been rising since the country was founded, and the federal government has not been instrumental in that. What does Barack Obama mean by a "decent living"? It should to me as if Barack Obama would like to be a dictator and determine everyone's pay, and one man's setting the pay scale of all people does not work and can never work. How can the federal government "make sure"? It sounds like more laws and coercion and penalties for businesses.]
"...Nothing that I'm proposing tonight should increase our deficit by a single dime!...." [So, look at the idiocy that that is. If Barack Obama is proposing something--which means the government has to spend more--then how could there not be more deficit? One answer is--he will spend more and more and more and simply tax more and more and more. The government breaks even all the time (supposedly), and the citizens are poorer! Of course, I can joke. Yes, the deficit will not increase by a "single dime," since it will increase by two dimes or three dimes are one-hundred dimes or 1000-billion dimes.... Why is he proposing more spending if we are already in debt?]
"...But over the last four years, our emissions of the dangerous carbon pollution that threatens our planet have actually fallen. But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change!.... [Yes, here is idiocy of the highest degree. Barack Obama pushed the idea that man is going to change the weather and change the world and change the sun. It is all crap from Barack Obama! Climate change has existed for eons, and the continents have moved, and, for example, the glaciers have more out from the poles and back, et cetera. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Living things are made of carbon. Carbon is in the dirt. The planet is dirty, and it will always be dirty. A man is a tiny little speck on the planet, and Barack Obama is so tiny he cannot do shit about the weather or the world or the sun and all. What the hell can be done, such as by a pissy little man like Barack Obama, to stop climate change? Anywhere, there is no evidence that "man" is changing the climate of the planet or is so-called killing the planet? Barack Obama thought is nothing more than nonsense from a sick mind.]
"...It's true that no single event makes a trend, but the fact is the twelve hottest years on record have all come in the last fifty...." [Are the twelve years the hottest years for the time of the planet--which has been around for billions of years? Who cares! His statement is no proof that man is causing increased temperatures--if his statement is true--his statement is simply a statement thrown out in to the air. His statement is purposely misleading to sell crap.]
"...Heat waves, droughts, wildfires, floods--all are now more frequent and more intense!...." [Bullshit!]
"...We can choose to believe that super-storm Sandy and the most-severe drought in decades and the worst wildfires some states have ever seen were just a freak coincidence, or we can choose to believe in the overwhelming judgment of science and act before it's too late...." [By the way, the jackasses in the audience clapped at this one. But it is all crap! Again, this is not a statement that proves anything. Anyway, the manmade-climate-change idea has been proven to be a hoax [and you are urged to see my document entitled "CAP AND TRADE" and Carbon Dioxide Facts and Nonsense, which can be reached by using this Carbon link]. But Barack Obama who is pushing to have complete control of the industrial sector of the economy continues to push the lie hard. There is no truthful "overwhelming judgment of science" anywhere to be read or seen. Barack Obama lied!]
"...Let's put people back to work rebuilding vacant homes and rundown neighborhoods...." [What a bunch of shit! So the federal government is going to spend more money to, for instance, build houses and places like Detroit, a dead city, in which the culture is decayed, such as because of Democrats' policies that killed the black family and local government corruption and blacks' push for hatred against whites, which drove people out to other cities. (Since at least the 1960s, the Democrats have had all sorts of housing projects--"the projects"--and so many have been failures because those who get the stuff, in essence, for free have no real incentive to keep the stuff in good order.) By the way, I have reported on the website for The Hologlobe Press, how many blacks in Detroit consider and want to keep Detroit--their city, only a black city, et cetera. Until the culture is fixed in defective places, no amount of money will build up neighborhoods that are culturally defective. Barack Obama just pushed out the idea of taxing some people more so that he can give the money to others for free. And nothing will be solved!]
"...Today, the organization that attack us on 'Nine-eleven' is a shadow of its former self....." [Maybe it is. But Barack Obama did not mention how he helped promote the Muslim Brotherhoods' take over in Egypt, which has a government that now clearly hates Israel. In fact, groups like the Muslim Brotherhood--a known terrorist organization that is very large--seems to be consolidating power in the Middle East and Northern Africa, and that means more tyranny--Sharia (a bad Islamic political system)--for people in the Middle East and Northern Africa.]
"...We also kn, know that progress in the most impoverished parts of our world enriches us all, not only because it creates new markets, more stable order in certain regions of the world but also because it's the right thing to do. And in many places, people live on little more than a dollar a day. So the United States will join with our allies to eradicate such extreme poverty in the next two decades by connecting more people to the global economy, by empowering women, by giving our young and brightest minds new opportunities to serve and helping communities to feed and power and education themselves...." [Okay, look at this shit from a Barack Hussein Obama. First, did you know Barack Obama has a half brother in Africa who has an income that is like that which Barack Obama hinted at in the quoted material, and did you know Barack Obama has not really done anything to help the half brother? It looks as if Barack Obama is now working to get the American public to give up more taxes and help out his half brother. A lot of the poverty that humans are enduring on the planet is because how the government systems within which they live treat them, such as the old tribal cultures. In Africa, tribal fighting is commonplace, and there are roving gangs in some countries, and the societies are so consumed by fights between groups of peoples--generally speaking, different groups of blacks--that nothing gets done, and when people do things, the things get torn down or stolen. In North Korea, the people as a whole are poor because they are stuck in the tyranny of the communist dictators. So Barack Obama is now pushing the idea that we give our money to the rest of the world and solve "poverty." The Democrats in the United States of America, such as the defective Reverend Jesse Jackson, have been fighting "poverty" in the United States of America for decades, and it is all crap. How is "poverty" going to be solve around the world. Of course, a person can see that Barack Obama is working as, in essence, an international citizen or a citizen of the world, and it looks as if Barack Obama is working to gain enough clout so that he might become the King of the World (voted in through some system tied to the communist-controlled United Nations). Oh, yes, I have this to pass along--A person can deduce Barack Obama might be pushing to have more Americans volunteer--maybe under duress--and do work in other countries, and I bring up the idea of "duress," since he pushed the idea of "giving our young and brightest minds new opportunities to serve....". We do not need to created any "new opportunities," such as through something do by government, which could be duress or more spending.]
"...And we will stand steadfast with Israel in pursuit of security and a lasting peace...." [Liar!]
"...And all this work depends on the courage and sacrifice of those who serve in dangerous places at great personal risk--our diplomats, our intelligence officers, and the men and women of the United States arm forces. As long as I'm commander-in-chief, we will do whatever we must to protect those who serve their country abroad, and we will maintain the best military the world has ever known...." [And here is the set of words that I could not wait to talk about. At the website for The Hologlobe Press, you will find a document entitled The "Benghazi Killings Scandal": A Short Information-and-Status Report, which can be reached by using this Benghazi link. The document shows that this statement from Barack Obama is a shallow and worthless statement, and, in fact, it shows that Barack Obama cannot be counted on to send U.S. military help to Americans who end up under attack or under fire in foreign countries, such as at a U.S. embassy or U.S. consulate. On September 11, 2012, Islamic terrorists attacked the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, and the terrorists killed several Americans (such as a U.S. ambassador) and injured others, and Barack Obama gave no orders to help the Americans under attack, which was proven in hearings in the U.S. Congress recently, such as on February 7, 2013. In addition, I add that Barack Obama has not really done anything to protect the United States of America at the border between the United States of America and Mexico, such as by getting rid of the drug smugglers and gangs that are running almost free in parts of southern Arizona, and I add that Barack Obama had a gun-running program in operation--called "Fast and Furious"--that led to the death of at least one American (a U.S. border agent) and a number of innocent Mexicans (it was an operation that a smart person understands was designed to help Barack Obama push for more gun control in the United States of America). We have a bad man as the U.S. President. Fully, I say that, in essence, we have a killer in the White House, and on February 12, 2013, Americans watched him and heard him give a "State of the Union Address" and pass on lies and crap!]
"...Thank you. God bless you. And God bless these United States of America."Thursday, February 14, 2013 (during a video interview related to the "Fireside Hangout" event tied to Google+):
"...The next steps, though, are gonna be more challenging, and, you know, some of this is ideological, some of it is economic, eh, and it's not all partisan. Ah, I have to tell you that, ah, there are some Democrats, for example, who, ah, represent states or districts that are heavily reliant on old power plants and are more heavily manufacturing based, and the truth is that, if you produce, ah, power using old power plants, you're going to be emitting more carbon but to operate those plants means energy's gonna be a little bit more expensive, at least on the front end...." [By the way, the theme--on the surface--is producing electricity. So what does the statement mean? It means Barack Obama is going to keep pushing the false idea that man is killing the planet by using carbon-based fuels and pushing the idea that we have to get rid of using carbon-based fuels, such as coal, and that means Barack Obama will continue to push to shut down power plants that use coal (from which most of the electricity is the country comes) and will continue to push to penalize through taxes or other money-stealing ways power companies that use carbon-based fuels to produce electricity, and that means the price of electricity will go up, which will affect everyone and will affect most the poor. Barack Obama has no alternative way to produce as much electricity as can be produced by power plants that use carbon-based fuels, given Barack Obama has done nothing really to promote the using to nuclear power plants and the building of more nuclear power plants. Wind turbines and solar panels cannot match what can be produced by nuclear power plants and coal-based power plants (you are urged to see my document entitled The Power and the Power Killers: Energy in the United States of America, which can be reached by using this Power link). In addition, Barack Obama showed that he is well aware he is going to drive up the price of electricity--purposely--and that it will put a burden on people. Also, Barack Obama reported that prices will go up on the so-called "front end," but he did not report that prices will go up on the "back end" too, since the demand for electricity, which will not be produced as abundantly as needed, will drive prices up and since the penalties and legislation against power companies will forever drive up prices or drive up the prices all across the board--the "front end" and the middle and the "back end." Some say that Barack Obama is working to create a "utopia," such as a completely clean "utopia," where there is no dirt, but the planet is dirty and will always be dirty, and I say that Barack Obama may be giving the impression that he is working to create a "utopia," but he is really working to create only a utopia for himself, which involves an "enslavism" system of government, in which he is protected from all others by having the power of government to protect him and in which he can provide himself with gains more than all others can have with as little work as possible, and I say that he cannot be creating a utopia for others if he is well aware what he is doing will give pain to others--millions of others. Barack Obama likes to hurt people, such as for revenge of some type, and Barack Obama has nothing to lose by inflicting pain on others and suppressing others--it is all about his self-preservation.]Tuesday, February 19, 2013 (at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building in Washington, D.C.):
"...Republicans in Congress face a simple choice. Are they willing to compromise to protect vital investments in education and health care and national security and all the jobs that depend on them or would they rather put hundreds of thousands of jobs and our entire economy at risk just to protect a few special-interest tax loopholes that benefit only the wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations? That's the choice!...." [The theme of the three quotations that make up this section is the "Sequester," which was an agreement made by the U.S. Congress and Barack Obama to have automatic cuts in spending by the federal government, especially to the military, go into effect in March 2013. The "Sequester" has nothing to do with education, since education is a local matter and state matter and student matter (by the way, in theory, if the government issues a student loan, it is not an "investment," and it is not money lost forever, since the student who gets the loan is supposed to pay back the loan, so, in essence, there is not real limit on the issuing such loans that could be affected by the "Sequester"). Barack Obama mentioned "tax loopholes," which are incorrectly defined by Barack Obama--the truth is "tax loopholes" are simply legal deductions and such that taxpayers get to take on their taxes. If the so-called "tax loopholes" that Barack Obama was hinting at are removed from the tax laws, and extra money drawn in from people will hardly reduce the national debt figure, a good portion of which--some 6,000-billion dollars--he was and is responsible for. Anyway, the economy is not going to crash because a little bit of extra money related to so-called "loopholes" is not taken in as tax from people, but the economy will crash if the federal government does not truly cut back in spending (some of which is being used to prop up mismanaged state and local government programs, such as mismanaged retirement programs). Think--What "investments" was he talking about or what does he mean? The federal government does not make "investments" in education and health care, but the federal government does and is supposed to spend taxpayer money on national security, which cannot be called an "investment." Also, you can see that Barack Obama was putting all the blame on the Republicans for what might happen, though he pushed for the "Sequester" idea. Really, Barack Obama put up a false "choice." Barack Obama was and is pushing Republicans to agree to having more taxes taken from the citizens of the country and to not making any real cuts in the federal-government budget. The federal government wastes a lot more money each year than what the so-called "tax-loopholes" amount is. A person must keep in mind--Barack Obama is aware how much revenue is taken in each month, so he should be aware he can only spend so much each month and not go in debt, and that is a rule of economics.]
"...Now, Congress allows this meat-cleaver approach to take place. It will jeopardize our military readiness. It will eviscerate job creating investments in education and energy and medical research. It won't consider whether we're cutting some bloated program that has outlived its usefulness or a vital service that Americans depend on every single day. It doesn't make those distinctions...." [What? Barack Obama pushed the idea that he considers the "Sequester" as a "meat-cleaver approach," and, in the set of words, he tried to blame the U.S. Congress for it. He pushed for it; he put the "meat-cleaver" approach into the mix of possibilities.]
"...Emergency responders, like the ones who are here today--their ability to help communities respond to and recover from disasters will be degraded. Border patrol agents will see their hours reduced. FBI agents will be furloughed. Federal prosecutors will have to close cases and let criminals go. Air traffic controllers and airport security will see cutbacks, which means more delays at airports across the country. Thousands of teachers and educators will be laid off. Tens of thousands of parents will have to scramble to find child care for their kids. Hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose access to primary care and preventive care, like flu vaccinations and cancer screens. This is not an abstraction! People will lose their jobs. The unemployment rate might tick up again...." [This set of words is a collection of crap--it is over the top and unbecoming a U.S. President. Let me show you two pieces of nonsense. Again, teachers and educators will not be laid off because of a cut in the federal budget, since they are paid from money that is tied to state taxes and local taxes, especially property taxes. Second, I thought Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and it was going to lead to everyone getting health care and everyone getting primary care and everyone getting preventive care, so how can he say that "Hundreds of thousands of Americans will lose access to primary care and preventive care...."? Anyway, it is publicly known the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is going to lead to reduced medical care for people, especially seniors, so that spending by the federal government can be controlled.]
"...And already the treat of these cuts has forced the Navy to delay an aircraft carrier that was supposed to deploy in the Persian Gulf...." [This statement deals with the U.S.S. Harry Truman, and Barack Obama was trying to push the idea that, if the "Sequester" goes into effect, though it is publicly known the "Sequester" would only involve about $44-billion in spending (the federal government wastes at least $125-billion every year, the aircraft carrier would not be deployed. The idea from Barack Obama was nonsense. Surely something else could be cut. More on the topic can be learned by seeing "133. Some more of the Barack Obama administration's thuggism is exposed" in my document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama (Part Two), which can be reached by using this Quotes2 link.]
"...So my door's open. I've put tough cuts and reforms on the table. I'm willing to work with anybody to get this job done. None of us will get a hundred percent of what we want. But nobody should want these cuts to go through, because the last thing our families can afford right now is pain imposed unnecessarily by partisan recklessness and ideological rigidity here in Washington. As I said a the 'State of the Union,' the American people have worked too hard too long rebuilding from one crisis to see their elected officials cause yet another one...." [In the last four years, Barack Obama has pushed the same fake theme about his door being open a number of times, as you can see in Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama. He has not put any real "cuts" or useful cuts on paper since January 20, 2009, but he has sort of hinted at reducing by bits some automatic spending; however, I had better say that he indeed has pushed for big cuts in the budget for the military, and, in fact, it was Barack Obama who pushed for the "Sequester" idea, which will make big cuts to the military budget. Then, I come to an interesting set or words--"...the last thing our families can afford right now is pain imposed unnecessarily by partisan recklessness and ideological rigidity here in Washington...." In the set of words, Barack Obama talked about imposing unnecessary pain on families. Barack Obama is causing pain to American families through his policies, some of which are contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, both of which are economic disasters, and, with those two laws as laws, Barack Obama actually now has the power to completely control all businesses in the country as a dictator and spend taxpayer money without the supervision of the U.S. Congress (and you can learn about that horror by seeing my document entitled Through "Obamacare" and "Dodd-Frank," the Takeover of the United States of America by "Enslavists"--Barack Obama and His Democratic Party Cohorts--is Nearly Complete (Information from Mark R. Levin), which can be reached by using this Takeover link). And then we have to keep in mind--It was many members of the U.S. Congresses since the late 1970s--mostly Democrats--who were instrumental in causing the economic crash of around 2008, and it has been basically the Democrats who have pushed the federal government into highly overspending over the last four years or so. Yes, I do not want the politicians--especially the Democrats--to cause another crisis. Cut your spending, Barack Obama!]
"...I have to say that, though, so far at least, the idea that the Republicans have proposed asks nothing of the wealthiest Americans or biggest corporations, so the burden is on first-responders or seniors or middle-class families...." [Liar! The burden is not only on "first-responders and seniors and middle-class families"--everybody pays taxes, and the wealthiest pay amounts of tax that are more than most people make in a year. Barack Obama's overspending put debt burden on everyone--rich and poor and all! Barack Obama's comment is bullshit, especially since the taxes in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 are going to hit middle-class families hard, and the rise in health-care premiums are and will hurt middle-class families, and that is the burden he put--by making the law a law--middle-class families!]
"...They [the Republicans] slashed Medicare...." [Liar! The Patient Protection and Affordable Act of 2010, which was put together by the Democrats really, cut and cuts Medicare! Barack Obama signed the bill into law, so he cut spending related to Medicare. He did it! The Republicans did not cut Medicare.]Thursday, February 21, 2013 (on the telephone doing in interview with Al Sharpton on Al Sharpton's radio show):
"...Well, eh, eh, my sense is that their [the Republicans'] basic view, ah, is nothing is important enough to raise taxes on wealthy individuals or corporations, ah, and they would prefer to see these kinds of cuts that could slow down our recovery, ah, over closing tax loopholes, ah, and, and that's the thing that binds their party together at this point...." [Look closely at the idiocy and nonsense pushed by Barack Hussein Obama. No person or business can spend and spend endlessly, because the business or person will run out of money and go in debt--and debt is bad--and to get out of such bad situation when if happens, the person will have to cut back in spending and work more hours or get a higher paying job or get another job, and when such a bad case happens to a business, the business will have to go out of business and sell off assets or will have to sell more products or services, or the business will have to raise the prices of the products and services, which might cause the customers to go to other businesses, which have lower prices, which will kill the business. In the case of the federal government, the federal government cannot keep spending and spending and spending beyond what it takes in, because it puts the citizens of the country in debt since the citizens are ultimately responsible for the government's debts. A U.S. president who spends more than the amount of revenue that comes into the federal government (such as in taxes on individuals and businesses (which are owned and run by the citizens and are, in essence, the citizens) is bankrupting the citizens of the country. At any given time, the U.S. president knows how much revenue is coming in as taxes, and, in essence, so-called rich people and all others are already paying taxes at stated rates (only so-called poor can be paying no taxes, having not enough income), and when a U.S. president then purposely over spends greatly and then says that the rich are not paying enough to cover the bills that he is racking up, you have a defective U.S. president. What happens with such a bad U.S. president is the U.S. President will ask for higher tax rates on people to cover his overspending, and yet he will continue to overspend, and then he will ask for even higher tax rates to cover his over spending, and it comes to the point when people have very little money to use on themselves, such as to start businesses and do other things (such as take vacations). The good citizens of the country know a U.S. president has to be blocked from putting them into bankruptcy or making them poor to satisfy the wishes of a U.S. president who has no limits on how much money the U.S. president can spend through the federal government. Remember: The money spent by the federal government does not belong to the U.S. president, who is an employee of the citizens. The good citizens say--That is enough taxation. The good citizen says--Stop. In addition, a bad U.S. president always pushes the issue that more has to be taken from the rich, which is done to get others to hate the rich instead of him and his bad actions, and he has to get the more from the rich--whatever "rich" means--since he cannot get anything more from those persons who have no money or have been put out of work by him by already taxing the companies that they worked for out of business. So, now I get to the quoted material. How can any person (such as a Republican) only--only--have a main goal in life that is about not taxing the rich or not taxing the rich more and more and more? Barack Obama pushed the idea that the Republican Party is only about stopping people--especially the so-called rich--from being taxed more. What Barack Obama suggested in the quotation is that the group of people who want to stop him from taxing and taxing and taxing, even the so-called rich, into bankruptcy are bad people. Barack Hussein Obama suggested people who limit him on how much he can tax people are bad people. That is crap! Since January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama has added at least 6,000-billion to the federal debt (I do not include the tens of thousand-billions related to unfunded liabilities). Keep in mind that the so-called rich (not in government jobs) did not cause the big, big, big national debt--the politicians, especially the Democrats (who are not known for holding back in spending), caused the big, big, big federal debt. By the way, it is well known the federal government wastes billions in spending every year. Yet, Barack Hussein Obama pushed the crap that Republicans are only concerned with not having the so-called rich pay more. In essence, Barack Hussein Obama is like a bad father. A family falls apart when a bad father as the head of the family spends and spends till the family is bankrupt; all the members of the family are hurt by the father's defective actions and made poor. Look at the quotation one more time. Barack Hussein Obama pushed the idea that the federal government's not taking in higher taxes would hurt "our recovery". I report, as history shows, that the federal government's taking in more taxes and spending more money does not in the long run cause a "recovery." Only people through working--creating things and making things--create a recovery. The federal government creates almost nothing; it may fund the making of some roads, but it does not make cars and dresses and dinners and suits and lawn mowers and pencils and milk bottles and almost everything else. For the ignorant, I have to report--No real "cuts" were involved in what was being talked about at this time (such as by Barack Obama in the quoted material), and what was being talked about was a slight reduction in the automatic increases in spending by the federal government. Barack Hussein Obama was lying about "cuts." Barack Hussein Obama is a bad father and is an evil man, purposely bankrupting the citizens of the United States of America! He is a killer! By the way, Al Sharpton--a black man--has been nothing more in his life than a racist black and community agitator, and his speech pattern is like that of thug, but, of course, that is the type of man that appeals to Barack Hussein Obama.]Saturday, February 23, 2013: (an recorded address):
"...Are Republicans in Congress really willing to let these cuts fall on our kids' schools and mental health care just to protect tax loopholes for corporate jets?...." [Okay, the theme is the "Sequester" thing again, which has already been talked about in this document. Notice his talk about corporate jets. Wow! Well, let us move on to a bit more.]
"...Are they really willing to slash military health care and the border patrol just because they refuse to eliminate tax breaks for big oil companies?...." [Well, what shit Barack Obama spoke. First, it has been proven and reported, even by "liberal" members of the media, that the "Sequester" idea came out of the White House and not the U.S. Congress. Second, exempted from the "Sequester," if it were to go through are, for instance, SSI, Social Security, Medicaid, Children's Health Care program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and programs tied to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and that is information from the Congressional Research Service. Third, "big oil" companies do not get subsidies! [Dinan, Stephen. "Furloughs are looming, but feds are still hiring." The Washington Times, 25 February 2013, 1:36 a.m.; Editorial Board of The Washington Post. "Sequester offers President Obama time to lead." The Washington Post, 25 February 2013, 6:53 p.m.; Starr, Penny. "Obama's Pay Check Exempted from 'Sequester.'" CNSNews.com, 25 February 2013.]]Tuesday, February 26, 2013 (at Newport News Shipbuilding Company in Newport News, Virginia):
"...People have been saying--Well, maybe, we'll just give the President some flexibility, he can make the cuts the ways he wants, and that way, it won't be as damaging. The problem is, when you're cutting eighty-five-billion dollars in seven months, which represents over a ten-percent cut in the defense budget in seven months, there's no smart way to do that. Do I close funding for the disabled kid or the poor kid? Do I close this Navy shipyard or some other one? And the broader point is, Virginia, we can't just cut our way to prosperity...." [Okay, here we go again, looking at crap from Barack Obama. The way that the "Sequester" law is written, Barack Obama, right now, is the only person who gets to decide on what cuts are made if the "Sequester" goes through. So you can see Barack Obama passed on one lie. The "Sequester" does not involve $85-billion; it involves only about half of $85-billion. Barack Obama lied again. By the way, the federal government has at least $125-billion in wasteful spending each year, as noted by the Government Accounting Office (as noted in relation to 2010). Incidentally, on Wednesday, February 27, 2013, on the MSNBC show called Morning Joe, a well-known liberal media man named Bob Woodward would happen to say (in relation to not deploying an aircraft to the Middle East)--"...a kind of madness...." [that topic fits in with what Barack Obama said on February 19, 2013, which you can see by seeing the fourth paragraph in the entry for February 19, 2013]. Notice on this day how Barack Obama used the scare tactic involving children, though there is no reason for any cuts to be made in government programs tied to helping special-needs children. And once again, Barack Obama used a stock theme--a nonsense theme--about "...we can't cut our way to prosperity....".]Wednesday, February 27, 2013 (at the Business Council dinner in Washington, D.C.):
"...Now, I should point out, and I'm sure you've heard from, ah, a number of experts and economists that, ah, this is now a cliff, ah, but it is a tumble downward. Ah, it's conceivable that, in the first week, the first two weeks, first three weeks, first month that unless, ah, your business is directly related to the Defense Department, ah, unless you live in a town that is directly, ah, impacted, ah, by a military installation, ah, unless your a family that now is trying to figure out where ta, um, to keep your kids during the day because you just lost a Head Start ...." [So, Barack Obama was out giving another defective speech. For weeks, Barack Obama had been pushing the idea to everyone in the country that the country was going to fall apart if the "Sequester" was to go into effect, and I note that, actually, the country was not going to fall apart because of the "Sequester," but Barack Obama had pushed his lie, and then, on this day, Barack Obama pulled back, trying to sell the idea now that a person may not see any crash right way, but a downturn was coming. Yes, on this day, Barack Obama was working to sell the idea that, if the "Sequester" were to go into effect, which was only tied to about $44-billion (about half of which was tied to the military), there would be a downward turn in the economy that would be seen sometime. However, the economy is dead, right now. Remember: It was public knowledge on this day that the economy took a downturn in the previous business quarter--there was a loss and no growth. Also on February 27, 2013, it was well know that the federal government was going to release the latest economic data about the country, and if bad economic news were to be issued, Barack Obama could put the blame any bad news on people's knowing the "Sequester" could hit, and that had made people cut back in economic activity, causing a downturn in the economy. Of course, if the "Sequester" were to go into effect, because there had been no agreement to stop the "Sequester" from going into effect, Barack Obama could blame the Republicans in the U.S. Congress for doing nothing (though nothing really bad was going to happen anyway), and while Barack Obama had been pushing that idea that cutting back in spending by the federal government by having the "Sequester" go into effect would hurt the economy, Barack Obama had been getting people ready to be against any proposed cutbacks to spending that could come from the upcoming "continuing resolution" discussion, the whole event of which would involve a lot more money than was involved win the "Sequester" idea, and, according to Barack Obama, if a little bit of money tied to the "Sequester" could cause problems for the country, Barack Obama could work to sell the idea that the "continuing resolution" should not involve cutbacks to spending because the cutbacks would be bad. To kill the economy of the United States of America, which I see as Barack Obama's mission, Barack Obama must have no cutbacks to federal government spending and must pull in more and more taxes from the people of the country, which Barack Obama calls "revenues." No limits on spending by the federal government and high taxes on the citizens bankrupts the citizens and kills a country. And that is the workings of the mind of a killer--Barack Obama!]Friday, March 1, 2013 (a press event at the White House focusing on the budget cuts tied to the "Sequester"):
"...I told them [some U.S. Congress members] these cuts will hurt our economy, they'll cost us jobs, and, to set it right, both sides need to be willing to compromise...." [Barack Obama--a killer--came before the press and some television viewers or radio listeners around midday on Friday, March 1, 2013, and it was another event in which Barack Obama passed along lies, passed along clichés, and passed along nonsense, and the event, which began with a statement segment followed by a question-and-answer segment, was another boring affair, a part of which was the result of his long and slow and labored answers to questions, and one thing that Barack Obama worked to do through the event was make it seem U.S. Congress was the problem and he was not the problem (though, since the theme was the "Sequester," he had been instrumental in making the "Sequester" something that exists, which gave him control of what would actually be cut. To me, the event was another event in which Barack Obama was working to see the idea that, if the country had a one-party government with a single leader, the country would be better off and the people would be better off, since the leader would be able to get things done, not being hindered by, for example, a U.S. Congress (particularly Republicans, who hold a political view that is tied to something that is opposite to what Barack Obama believes in, such as communism). By the way, Barack Obama said that the budget cuts were "severe budget cuts." The country is going deeper and deeper in debt at an alarming pace--because of Barack Obama's policies--and yet he called the budget cuts tied to the "Sequester" as "severe budget cuts." Can you imagine what the real budget cuts that are really needed will be called? So when you see the quoted material from Barack Obama, you have to wonder what will happen when the economy crashes, caused by overspending and never actually cutting spending. There comes a time when a government has to stop spending and has to be limited in the amount of spending that it can do, and the United States of America has passed that point. When the real crash hits, many more people who have jobs that are tied to government spending and many people with jobs that are not tied to government spending will have a hellish time.]
"...Now, ah, what's important to understand is that not everyone will feel the pain of these cuts right away. The pain, though, will be real. Ah, beginning this week, many middle-class families will have their lives disrupted in significant ways...." [It is obvious some people tied to government contracts, such as in the military construction industry, will be affected, but Barack Obama pushed the idea that "many" people "will have their lives disrupted." How many is "many" in Barack Obama's sentence? Barack Obama did not make it clear, but it seems to be millions and millions, at least in the ways that it is presented. "Many" is a tricky word, and Barack Obama purposely used it since it can be vague but can be millions and millions. Anyway, Barack Obama hinted that in the future "everyone" will feel the pain.]
"...The longer these cuts remain in place, the greater the damage to our economy...." [So, it looks as if Barack Obama was selling the idea that the federal government's spending can never be cut and should never be cut, and that is idiocy, since you get a federal government with deeper and deeper debt and a crash.]
"...So economists are estimating that, ah, as a consequences of this 'Sequester,' that we could see growth cut by over one half of one percent. It will cost about seven-hundred-fifty-thousand jobs at a time when we should be growing jobs more quickly...." [Job growth in the "private sector" is terrible already because of his policies, and it is in the "private sector" where things are created, and it is the "private sector" that drives the economy..]
"...None of this is necessary. Ah, it's happening because a choice Republicans in Congress have made...." [Here is only only of those instances in which Barack Obama worked to make the Republicans the enemy, even though he pushed for the "Sequester" idea to be made.]
"...They've allowed these cuts to happen because they refuse to budge on closing a single wasteful loophole to help reduce the deficit. As recently as yesterday, they decided to protect special-interest tax breaks for the well-off and the well-connected, ah, and they think that that's apparently more important than protecting our military or middle-class families from the pain of these cuts...." [Barack Obama's using these words shows the sickness of his mind, given, for example, he has been pushing for cuts to the military and has cut the military already. For idiots and the naive I say--Generally speaking, in the United States of America, the Republicans support the military, and the Democrats do not. That is fact, and that is history! In addition, there was only recently a tax increase on the so-called rich. Barack Obama's theme is crap!]
"...I don't think that's too much to ask. I don't think that is partisan. It's the kind of approach that I've proposed for two years. It's what I ran on last year. The majority of the American people agree with me in this approach, including, by the way, a majority of Republicans. We just need Republicans in Congress to catch up with their own party and their country in this...." [This is idiocy stuff. What does "majority" mean to Barack Obama? The theme is his "balanced approach" theme, which is vague and Americans do not understand and cannot really define. So he reported that the majority of Americans agree with him, though most Americans are vague about what "balanced approach" really is. Keep in mind--nearly half the voting public did not vote for him in November 2013. Here, Barack Obama tied to sell crap again!]
"...Ah, I was pleased to that the House passed the Violence Against Women Act yesterday. Ah, that is a big win for not just women but for families and for the American people. It's a law that's going to save lies and help more Americans live free from fear. It's somethin' that we've been pushing on for a long time...." [Oh. Maybe. What new things--bad things--are now in the law? There are bad new things!]
"...Ah, the vast majority of economists agree that the problem, when it comes to deficits, is not discretionary spending--it's not that we're spending too much money on education, it's not that we're spending too much money on job training, ah, or that we're spending too much, ah, money rebuilding our roads and our bridges. We're not! Ah, the problem that we have is a long-term problem in terms of our health-care costs, ah, and programs like Medicare...." [Bullshit! The government has "discretionary spending" (which is actual yearly controlled budget stuff) and what can be called "non-discretionary spending" (which, for example, is tied to such things as Social Security and Medicare). The debt from "discretionary spending" each year is now running at at least 1,300-billion dollars. That is bad, very bad. This year, the "non-discretionary spending" is running at about 5,000-billion dollars over budget. What idiots were Barack Obama using as his "majority of economists"? Barack Obama had to be lying. The debt tied to "discretionary spending" is a big, big, big problem.]
"...And the one key to this whole thing is trying to make sure we keep in mind who we're here for. We are not here for ourselves. We're not here for our parties. We're not here ta advance our electoral prospects. We're here for American families...." [Such a bullshitter Barack Obama is, as this statement shows.]
"...This, this, this is a room of smart, this is a room full of smart folks...." [And the bullshit just kept on coming. Here, Barack Obama was sort of buttering up the media members in the room. Yes, they may be smart, based on grades received in school. But I contend, as a rule, they are evil, pushing the lies that come from Barack Obama regularly and pushing for "enslavism" for the country. Go look at how many people in the room--most of whom were Democrats--covered this event and what they said about the event. You can expect to see crap from the people at such places as ABC, The Associated Press, CBS, Detroit Free Press, Los Angeles Times, MSNBC, NBC, The New York Times, Politico, and The Washington Post.]
"...Ah, ye, ye, ye, ye, ya know, the, ah, ah, ah. I mean, Jessica, I, I, I am not, ah, ah, dictator, I'm the president...." [I say in jest--Here was one of Barack Obama's smooth moments. He could barely get the idea out. Maybe, he had trouble because his subconscious wants to be a dictator. I can say that Barack Obama was working to sell the idea to people that he would never want to be a dictator and was working to get people in the habit of scoffing at the idea that he would ever act as a dictator or want to be a dictator.]
"...We could put a lot of people back to work right now building our roads and bridges...." [Barack Obama went back to this defective theme. Ugh! Ugh! I say in jest--Yes, let us get everybody out on the roads building roads, only building roads.]
"...But if Congress comes to its senses a week from now, a month from now, three months from now...." [Here, Barack Obama was hinting that Congress is insane, but I report that I have determined that Barack Obama is insane--a person who is willing to hurt millions of persons, as Barack Obama is doing, and the person likes to hurt millions of persons, the person is quite insane.]Wednesday, March 13, 2013 (a recorded interview for ABC-TV or ABC News, such as for Good Morning America (on ABC-TV), with interviewer George Stephanopoulos):
"...No, I think that there's a possibility. Look, balancing the budget in part depends on how fast you grow. You remember. You were in the Clinton administration. The reason that you guys balanced it was a combination of tax hikes, some spending cuts, and the economy grew. And so, ya know, my goal is not to chase a, a balanced budget just for the sake of balance, my goal is--How do we grow the economy, put people back to work, and, if we go that...." [Okay, how much nonsense did you see within this set of words from Barack Obama? You should have seen the nonsense about balancing the budget and growing the economy. Consider--So, if there is no growth or very little growth, you balance the budget mostly by cutting spending, especially when you are considering the over spending that Barack Obama is doing every year, which is more than $1,000-billion a year. Get it? Yes, Barack Obama passed along more flap doodle.]
"...You know, I have to say this was not, ah, a decision that went up to the White House, but what the Secret Service explained to us was that they're gonna have to furlough some folks. What furloughs means is that people lose a day of work and a day of pay, and, you know, the question for them is, ya know--How deeply do they have to furlough their staff and is it worth it to make sure that we got White House tours? That means you've got a whole bunch of families who are depending on a paycheck who suddenly are seein' a five or ten percent reduction in their pay. Well, what I'm asking them is--Are there ways, for example, for us to accommodate school groups, ah, you know, who may have traveled here with some bake sales, can we make sure that, ah, kids potentially can still come to tour?...." [The answer related to a question about closing the White House tour program because of the "Sequester," a tour program that costs about $74,000 a week to run, and the answer was fluff and nonsense, which, if you paid attention to it and tried to think about it while the other parts of the interview were fading away from memory or other parts were going on, you might have missed the big idiocy presented at one point, which I cover in the next paragraph.]
"...No, ah, we're not gonna balance the budget in ten years...." [So when are you going to balance the budget--in fifteen years, in twenty years, in forty years, in eighty years, never, while at the moment the federal debt is continually expanding? During the interview, Barack Obama also said that there was no immediate debt crisis. So, do you think Barack Obama will ever cut back on spending?]Wednesday, March 13, 2013 (in Washington, D.C., at Organizing for Action dinner):
"...This idea has been viewed with puzzle some, ah, both the suspicion and, and, ah, people have been puzzled, ah, about what it is we're trying to do, because the usual idea is well this must just be a mechanism to try to win the next election in 2014. Ah, and, ah, what we've tried to explain to people is is that, ah,--No, I actually just want to govern at, at least for a couple years, but I also want to make sure that the voices of ordinary people are heard in the debates that are gonna be takin' place...." [Around this time, Mr. Rush Limbaugh was working with the idea that Barack Obama has been working to be seen as not "governing" and to be seen as an outsider in Washington, D.C., and to Mr. Rush Limbaugh, this statement seemed to confirm Mr. Rush Limbaugh's idea that that has been Barack Obama's plan, but I have a different take on the what Barack Obama has been doing, but it will not be talked about here, and I put this material in this document for my future use.]Tuesday, March 19, 2013 (at the St. Patrick's Day Reception in White House in Washington, D.C.):
"...Looking out on this room, it's clear just how much America owes to our brothers and sisters from across the Atlantic and how many of us--ah, myself included--wouldn't be here if it were not for the brave souls who set off for the New World with no earthly idea of what awaited them...." [What the heck was this? The people who left Europe and such to head North America knew, though hard work was before them, they were heading to a better life, that which was no under "enslavism." So Barack Obama put out crap here.]
"...It's a reminder of just how many trials the people of Ireland have endured--hunger and troubles to the economic challenges of recent years. It's yet another reason why we need to build an immigration system for the twenty-first century, one that works...." [And, here, Barack Obama pushed crap, given the country has had immigration laws for decades, though the in the 1960s, during the U.S. President Lyndon Johnson days, the Democrats pushed through an immigration law that had a feature now referred to as "chain migration." It is a horrible law immigration feature. Look it up! We need to get rid of the "chain migration" feature! We need to control the quotes related to how many persons get in to the country from where each year. And we need to deport those who entered the country illegally!]Wednesday, March 20, 2013 (a press event in Israel):
"...Look, the opening premise to your question was, ah, that, having failed to achieve peace in the Middle East in my first term, ah, that I must have screwed up somehow...." ["Screwed up"--this is something that I have never heard a U.S. president say in public. I say--Barack Obama's using "screwed up" in public shows how much of a gutter man Barack Obama is. Using some of Barack Obama's words, I do note that Barack Obama is a "screw up."]
"...I, I will tell ya--I hope I'm a better president now than when I first came into office...." [Eck!]Thursday, March 21, 2013 (in Jerusalem):
"...The days when Israel can seek peace simply with a handful of autocratic leaders--those days are over. Peace will have to be made among peoples not just governments. Known, no single step can change over night what lies in the hearts and minds of millions. No single step is gonna erase years of history and propaganda, but progress with the Palestinians is a powerful way to begin while sidelining extremists who thrive on conflict and thrive on division. You would make a difference...." [So, Barack Obama was over in Israel, and he talked and talked, and this piece of text is one part. I will not say much about this quoted material. You will learn more in this section that will make you wonder what Barack Obama means by "extremists."]
"...Put yourself in their shoes. Look at the world through their eyes. It is not fair that a Palestinian child cannot grow up in a state of their own...." [Here, Barack Obama had Israelis students before him in the audience, and Barack Obama was working to teach them to sympathize with the enemies who are working to tear down and destroy Israel. If you can make a person sympathize with the enemy or have sympathy for an enemy, the person might not fight back hard against the enemy when the person has to. See how Barack Obama sold the idea of being sympathetic by using children.]
"...Four years ago, I stood in Cairo in front of an audience of young people. Politically, religiously, they must seem a world away, but the things they want--they're not so different from what the young people here want...." [Since the speech was given in Cairo about four years ago (and parts of the speech can be seen in my document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama), Egypt has come under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical religious group, which is working to push "enslavism"--particularly Sharia--on the world, especially the Middle East and Israel. The Israelis do not want a world of "enslavism," as I do not, which is why they are in conflict with people who have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood--Palestinians. Ask yourself--Do the people of Cairo (Egypt) want the same things that the people of Israel do? Barack Obama passed on crap!]
"...Remember this. Israel is the most-powerful country in this region. Israel has the unshakable support of the most-powerful country in the world. Israel is not going anywhere. Israel has the wisdom to see the world as it is--but this is, this is in your nature--Israel also has the courage to see the world as it should be...." [Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals--this is the title of a book published in the United States of America in 1971, and it was the work of Saul Alinsky, a communist and a pusher of enslavism, and Saul Alinsky is today, as he has been for decades, a hero of communists and other enslavists. In the United States of America, "radicals" who are tied to the title of the book written by Saul Alinsky are people who dislike The United States Constitution and the main system of government that is the United States of America because it blocks enslavists from being like dictators and like bad persons. The material that is provided in quotations for this paragraph is made up of a theme that exists in Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, which is a book that is designed to teach "radicals" how to damage and destroy a society like the United States of America so that they can become the political leaders and the "elites"; the evidence is particularly clear in the part of the quoted material that goes--"Israel has the wisdom to see the world as it is...Israel also has the courage to see the world as it should be...." A person has to wonder--What is the way that world should be and by whose determination? It seems Barack Obama was pushing the idea that the world should be what he thinks it should be, and Barack Obama was teaching the idea that his listeners should take up the idea of what he wants the world to be. But Barack Obama is a "radical," as history shows (and documents at my website (The Hologlobe Press) show), and his way of the world seems to be a weaker Israel, if not a completely gone Israel.]
"...That's where peace begins, not just in the plans of leaders but in the hearts of people, not just in some carefully designed process but in daily connections, that sense of empathy that takes place among those who live together in this land and in this sacred city of Jerusalem...." [Oh, here is more of that "sympathy" thing again--particularly "empathy" for the enemy.]
"...Let me say this as a politician--I can promise you this--political leaders will never take risks if the people do not put them to take some risks. You must create the change that you want to see...." [So, in essence, Barack Obama went to another country--Israel--and did his "community organizing" thing in public, using what he had learned in Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals about pushing people, pushing people, pushing people to follow him and take up his ways of life. Notice the world "change." "Change"--this word in commonly used by Barack Obama and other communists, like Saul Alinsky (who, by the way, is long dead). Remember: Barack Obama ran for U.S. president around 2008 on the "Hope and Change" idea, and his "hope and change" was and is to "fundamentally change" the United States of America, which means to get rid of the United States of America as it was meant to be by other men (better men than he is).]Thursday, March 28, 2013 (at the White House):
"...Tears aren't enough. Expressions of sympathy aren't enough. Speeches aren't enough. We've cried enough. Know enough heartbreak...." [Here, a cold-hearted man--Barack Obama--ran off more bullshit, trying to evoke emotions in his listeners while trying to push for tougher gun-control laws in the country, which, if enacted, will help protect him and other enslavists since it will be harder for good citizens of the country to fight back if they are enslaved even more, especially to the point when hard tyranny is evident.]Friday, March 29, 2013 (at Miami, Florida):
"...We're gonna fix our economy. We're gonna fix our immigration system. We are gonna make sure that our young people get a great education. We're gonna protect them from being victims of gun violence. We are gonna make sure that everybody in this country has a fair shot and doin' their fair share...." [With voice raised, as if announcing a proclamation, Barack Obama rattled on with just more words--and it is all meaningless, given it came from a perpetual liar.]Monday, April 8, 2013 (in Hartford, Connecticut):
"...We hugged our kids more tightly. We asked--What could we do as a society to help prevent a tragedy like that from happening again? And as a society, we decided that we have to change. We must! We must change!...." [The reason that Barack Obama was in Hartford was to push to have tougher gun-control laws enacted by the federal government. The theme may have been gun control, but a person who is well aware of what Barack Obama is and what Barack Obama has been doing to the country over the last four years or so is well aware of what Barack Obama was trying to do with the final three sentences in the quoted material. Barack Obama was pushing the idea that the country must--must--continue to transform from a country that is based on The United States Constitution to what he wants the country to be, which never gets explained or outlined by Barack Obama. A smart person knows, though, Barack Obama has been and is working to create a country that is based on "enslavism" or has an "enslavism" form over government--a government with an all-powerful government or a government with no limits on what it can do, especially to the citizens. The smart person will not only see the three sentences that I have already talked about in the quoted material and see that they do indeed mean what I have talked about but also will read and come to understand the third sentence for what else it was designed to do. The third sentence in the quoted material--"And as a society, we decided that we have to change."--was used to push out a lie. Where did Barack Obama get the idea that "we" wanted the country to change? No vote on such a "change" was taken. Who is the "we"? Based on no data or information, Barack Obama pushed propaganda in the third sentence.]
"...I've also heard some in the Washington press suggest that what happens to gun-violence legislation in Congress this week will either be a political victory or defeat for me. Connecticut, this is not about me! This is not about politics! This is about doin' the right thing for all the families who are here that have been torn apart by gun violence! That's what this is about! This is not about politics! This is not about politics! This is about these families and families all across the country who are saying let's make it a little harder for our kids to get gunned down!...." [I say that it is always about politics and him to him, and this is one of those instances in which Barack Obama had to try to convince people that it is not about him and politics, though it is all about him and politics, and a person should wonder why Barack Obama would even have to bring up the theme that it is not about him or politics.]Tuesday, April 16, 2013:
"...protect our people...." [On Tuesday, Aprl 16, 2013, Barack Obama spoke before press at around 11:30 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time), and three words that he spoke make up the start of this section. Look at the set of words. The topic is the citizens of the United States of America. Notice how the sete of words hints at the government's possession of the citizens of the country--in his mind. Barack Obama did not say "protect our fellow citizens" or "protect the citizens of the United States of America." Listen for Barack Obama's use of "our people" in the future. Barack Obama seems to think the government owns you, but that is the way of, for example, the communist.]Wednesday, April 17, 2013 (in Washington, D.C.)
"...One common argument I heard was that this legislation wouldn't prevent all future mas, massacres. And that's true! As I've said from the start, no single piece of legislation can stop every act of violence and evil. We learned that tragically just two days ago. But if action by Congress could have saved one person, one child, a few hundred, a few thousand, if it could've prevented those people from losing their lives to gun-violence in the future while preserving our Second Amendment rights, we had an obligation to do...." [A little before Barack Obama spoke these words, the U.S. Senate had voted on some amendments and had failed to pass them, and the amendments dealt with gun control in the country; one amendment was related to background checks (which, for the most part, already exist). Here, Barack Obama was pushing the issue that we have to have more laws, and the laws are needed to prevent people from being insured or killed by guns in the country. Legislation cannot stop shootings! Consider: A woman can get a "restraining order" set up against a former husband or against someone else--who happens to be threatening her--but that piece of paper does not necessarily mean that the woman will be safe, since a piece of paper cannot protect her (it is a piece of paper). A law--set down on a piece of paper--cannot guarantee the health or safety of a person. Notice how Barack Obama used a set of words that set up a "what-if-it-could" idea--"...But if action by Congress could have...." His set of words does not mean that it is possible for any legislation to save one person. Barack Obama was simply throwing out something to dream about. Think about this--If you could create a law to save a life from gun violence, would your law really save someone? Guns exist, and guns have to exist in a country that is to be a "free country" so that the people--the citizens--will be able to protect themselves from bad people, who can end up being bad politicians (like Hitler and Mao). The "two days ago" referred to the bombings at the Boston Marathon on Monday, April 15, 2013, during which three persons had been killed, and I bet you are unaware that, before the bombings took place, Barack Obama had cut the budget of the Office of Bombing Prevention from $20-million (as it had started out in the George W. Bush administration) to $11-million (Martosko. "Obama administration has SLASHED budget for domestic bombing prevention by 45 per cent, says former Homeland Security Assistant Secretary." The Daily Mail (Great Britain), 16 April 2013, 17:02 EST (updated 18:02 EST)). (By the way, "...But if action by Congress could have saved one person, one child, a few hundred, a few thousand, if it could've prevented those people from losing their lives to gun-violence in the future while preserving our Second Amendment rights, we had an obligation to do...." is a goofy and illogical sentence, which you can examine but I will not.)]
"...But instead of supporting this compromise, the gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill. They claimed that it would create some sort of Big Brother gun registry, even though the bill did the opposite. This legislation, in fact, outlawed any registry...." [I have proven through this document and the document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama that Barack Obama is a liar--a perpetual liar. Through the quoted text, look who called others liars. It is general knowledge that the Democrats, like Barack Obama, are working to create a gun registry. Do you trust Barack Obama? At the very least, Barack Obama put out misleading information, since, for one, information exists that shows the proposed bill, which had been rejected in a vote in the U.S. Senate, would have led ultimately to a gun registry (Addington, David S. "Schumer-Tooney-Machin Gun Control Legislation: Bad Law on Federal Gun Registry." Heritage.org (The Foundry), 11 April 2013, 3:44 p.m.; Kapur, Sahil. "Ted Cruz Admits Background Check Bill Doesn't Seek To Create Gun Registry." talkingpointsmemo.com, 17 April 2013, 11:58 a.m.; Lee, Tony. "BREITBART NEWS' AWR HAWKINS: FEDS NEED GUN REGISTRY FOR UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS." breitbart.com, 14 April 2013.; Rosario, Katherine. "TOOMEY-SCHUMER GUN BILL CONTAINS POTENTIAL CAVEAT TO GUN REGISTRY PROHIBITION." Heritage Action for America, 11 April 2013.). But Barack Obama used the time to put down and make seem evil the "gun lobby"/"allies," which is a group made up of, for instance, citizens who want to be able to have guns to protect themselves from bad people. Plus, how can Barack Obama use "willfully lied"? I have found evidence and have given you evidence of how the bill, if it would have passed, could have indeed led to the creation of a gun registry.]
[Note: During the speech, Barack Obama seemed to be angry that he had lost the day, but I am unable to show the anger through this document (I saw the speech as a boring scolding speech), and some people, such as Rush Limbaugh, have put forth the argument that Barack Obama wanted gun stuff to pass in the U.S. Senate (which was controlled by the Democrats) so that the stuff would be taken up in the U.S. House of Representatives (which was controlled by the Republicans), where it would probably fail, and then Barack Obama would be able to blame the Republicans that stricter gun-control measures had not been passed when more gun violence took place.]
"...A majority of Senators voted 'yes' to protecting more of our citizens with smarter background checks. But by this continuing distortion of Senate rules, a minority was able to block it...." [Okay! Stop! There was no "continuing distortion of Senate rules..." Votes are taken, and if not enough people vote to, for example, pass something, the something does not get passed. There was no distortion of any rules. Barack Obama passed along crap here!]
"...All that happened today was preservation of the loop hole that lets dangerous criminals buy guns without a background check...." [Crap! Liar! Background checks to not stop criminals from getting guns. Background checks are avoided by criminals, who can in the "black market" or in back alleys or wherever buy stolen guns or buy guns smuggled in to the country.]Thursday, April 25, 2013 (at the dedication of the George W. Bush Library in Dallas, Texas):
"...Seven years ago, President Bush [George W. Bush] restarted an important conversation by speaking with the American people about our history as a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants. And even though comprehensive-immigration reform has taken a little longer than any of us expected, I'm hopeful that, this year, with the help of Speaker Boehner, some of the senators, members of Congress who are here today that we bring it home for our families and our economy and our security and for this incredible country that we love, and if we do that it will be in large part thanks to the hard work of President George W. Bush...." [Ugh? What the heck is that? For one, Barack Obama's theme was inappropriate, given the focus of the event was not about passing legislation (which was about Barack Obama ultimately) but was about dedicating the George W. Bush Library (which was about George W. Bush). In addition, Barack Obama brought up nonsense--I report that comprehensive-immigration reform has nothing to do with "security" or the "economy."]Tuesday, April 30, 2013 (a little press conference):
"...The Affordable Care Act--Obamacare--ah, has, ah, now been, ah, with us for three years. It's gone through Supreme Court tests. It's, ah, gone through efforts to repeal...." [First, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was made law in March 2010, but it does not really go into effect until 2014. Second, the main U.S. Supreme Court test was a sham. Third, there has no to real work in the U.S. Congress to defund--let alone "repeal"--the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. In the quoted material, Barack Obama passed along crap.]
"...But I think the main message I wanna to give ta the American people here is, despite all the human cry and, ah, you know, sky-is-falling, ah, predictions about this stuff, if you've already got health insurance, then that part of Obamacare that affects you, it's pretty much already in place...." [And here Barack Obama passed along more crap, and you should never forget this set of words, and you should recall the words when you discover how your health care changes for the worse in the near future, such as through higher cost and in your inability to choose your doctor.]Friday, May 3, 2013 (a speech before Mexican college students at the National Museum of Antrophology in Mexico City, Mexico):
"...Our attitudes sometimes are trapped in old stereotypes...." [Oh.]
"...Some Americans only see the Mexico that is depicted in sensational headlines of violence and border crossings. And let's admit it--some Mexicans think that America disrespects Mexico or thinks that America is trying ta impose itself on Mexican sovereignty or just wants ta wall ourselves off. And in both countries, such distortions create misunderstandings that make it harder for us to move forward together. So, I've come to Mexico because I think it's time for us to put the old mindsets aside. It's time to recognize new realities, including the impressive progress of today's Mexico...." [Ugh?]
"...We understand that much of the root cause of violence that's been happening here in Mexico, from which so many Mexicans have suffered, is the demand for illegal drugs in the United States. We also recognize that most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States. Many of you know that, in America, our constitution guarantees our individual right to bare arms, and, as President, I swore an oath to uphold that right, and I always will. But at the same time, as I've said in the United States, I will continue to do everything in my power to pass commonsense reforms that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people that can save lives here in Mexico and back home in the United States. It's the right think to do...." [So, Barack Obama blamed the U.S. for killings in Mexico. That is crap. The Barack Obama administration worked to get American guns in to the hands of thugs and such in Mexico during Barack Obama's first term at a U.S. president. It was "Fast and Furious." It is a scandal! People died. And yet Barack Obama passed on this set of words--this crap.]
"...The immigration system we have in the United States, right now, doesn't reflect our values...." [Okay. The immigration system that the U.S. has, right now, is set up so that people who enter the country illegally--against federal immigration laws--are foreign criminals. That is the way it should be! But Barack Obama says that such a system "doesn't reflect our values." What was Barack Obama talking about? Does Barack Obama think that there should be no penalties for people who enter the country illegally. Other countries have laws about who may and may not enter? It is a universal rule and "value." What type of "value" does Barack Obama want? By the way, Barack Obama took the State of Arizona to court when the State of Arizona tried to enforce the basic themes of U.S. immigration laws. I ask again--What are the "values" that Barack Obama wants?]Sunday, May 5, 2013 (at Ohio State University):
"...Unfortunately, you've grown up hearing voices that incessively [incessantly] warn of government as nothing more than sep, separate, sinister entity that's at the root of all our problems. Some of these same vo, voices also do their best to gum up the works. They'll warn that tyranny's always luring just around the corner. You should reject these voices, because what they suggest is that our brave and creative and unique experiment in self-rule is somehow just a sham, with which we just can't be trusted...." [Here, you have clues to an evil man who works to teach crap about the nature of man, especially the nature of bad people. Bad people--especially very bad people--exist in the world, though not in great numbers, but it does not take many bad people to enslave millions of people, and proof can be found in the histories of Germany and China (and there are many other countries that I can list). Even in the United States of America, bad people have existed, such as U.S. President Woodrow Wilson (a self-proclaimed "progressive"), who thought, as the U.S. president, he should be able to act like a dictator, and, today, it is obvious Barack Obama is working like a dictator (proof of which exists in many of the documents that exist at the website for The Hologlobe Press). Here, in the quoted material, you can see a man who was working to teach several detective ideas. For one, Barack Obama was working to teach people to not fear government. Remember: Government is made up of people, and, as history shows, not all people can be expected to be good people, such as like those who do not perpetually lie (which, as history shows, Barack Obama does do). In addition, Barack Obama was working to suggest people who warn that governments or politicians can become tyrannical and dictatorial are nothing more than "voices" in the wind, like wisps in the wind, which should be disregarded like dust bunnies. Also notice how Barack Obama suggested the "voices" are something that--in his mind--"unfortunately" have existed or exist, and that should make you realize Barack Obama dislikes the idea that there have been and can be "voices" that disagree with him. You must keep in mind--A government can originally be set up basically as a non-tyrannical entity, which was how the United States of America was set up, based on The United States Constitution, which was designed to block politicians from becoming dictators over the citizens of the country, but a government can be changed for the worse--purposely--by people who wish to be dictators and the like (they do things, such as enact giant confusing laws, that are tyrannical and they dare people to challenge their tyrannical acts, which, if not challenged, go into effect). Just because the United States of America was set up with The United States Constitution, it does not mean that all politicians will follow it faithfully forever, and history shows that some politicians in the country have indeed violated The United States Constitution, one of whom has been Barack Obama. In the end, a person has to ask the self--Why would a U.S. President, in this case Barack Obama, even have to bring up the theme presented in Barack Obama's set of words and try to teach young minds not to be wary of governments (politicians)? A good person can get the feeling that Barack Obama is involved in changing the country fundamentally and has to work to teach people to look away and not pay attention. Tyranny is always lurking around the corner because bad people are always working toward their evil ends. That is the way of an evil mind--that with the head of Barack Hussein Obama!]
"...And that's precisely what The Founders left us--the power, each of us, to adapt to changing times. They left us the keys to a system of self-government, the tools to do big things and important things together that we could not possibly do alone...." [I will say one thing here--The Founders did not set up The United States Constitution, which defined the main structure of the country or defined what the government could not do to the citizens, as something that would create an entity that would be involved in doing big things or making big things, especially exclusively, as Barack Obama seemed to be hinting at, and I add that big things have been done by private enterprise for decades, such as the making of buildings and bridges and the roads and cities, and, anyway, notice how Barack Obama was putting down the idea of a person's doing things alone, as if it is bad when a non-government-linked person does not do things in league with a government (an individual--not tied to government--can get a lot of non-government people together and create industries, such as the automobile industry and the oil industry).]Thursday, May 9, 2013 (at Manor New Tech High School near Austin in Texas):
"...Every once a while, I'm gonna need your help to lean on your elected representatives and say--Hey, let's do somethin' about this! Even if you don't like it politically, if it's a good idea, let's go ahead and support it. So, sometimes I'm gonna need constituents to pressure their members of Congress to do the right thing. But where I can, I'm just gonna go ahead and take action on my own...." [So, Barack Obama is at a high school, and most of the students will not be able to vote for several years. Such individuals should be busy studying and learning and doing things other than putting pressure on the members of Congress. Yes, they can take time out of life to pay attention to the political scene, but they should not be taking time to "lean" on elected representatives on behalf of Barack Obama, especially if what Barack Obama is pushing politically, such as communism, goes against the political beliefs of people who support The United States Constitution. Notice how Barack Obama pushed the idea that, even if the something is not liked politically, the listeners before him should still support it--if it is a good idea. But how can a political idea from Barack Obama, which is politically opposite The United States Constitution, be good and be something to support? For instance, communism is bad, so how can good people support it. What the hell is Barack Obama doing at a high school pushing such a theme that he pushed?]Monday, May 13, 20013 (a press conference with the Prime Minister of England):
"...I first learned about it from the same news reports that I think most people learned about this. Ah, I think it was on Friday. And, ah, eh, th, this, this is pretty straight forward. If, in fact, IRS personnel engaged in, ah, the kind of practices that have been reported on and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that's outrageous. And there's no place for it. If you've got the IRS operating in anything less than a neutral and nonpartisan way, then that is outrageous. It is contrary to our traditions. Ah, and people have to be held accountable. And it's got to be fixed. So, ah, we'll wait and see what exactly, ah, all the details and facts are. But I've got no patience with it. I will not tolerate it! And we'll make sure, ah, that we find exactly what happened on this...." [The topic is an IRS scandal in which the IRS was targeting "conservative" groups and "Tea Party" groups for harassment when applying to be recognized as non-proft tax-exempt entities, and the set of words from Barack Obama is more nonsense from Barack Obama, and you can learn more about the subject by seeing entry "139" in the document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this History link.]
"...The whole issue of this of, of talking points frankly throughout this process has been a sideshow. Immediately after this event happened, we were not clear who exactly carried it out, how it had occurred, what motivations were. It happened at the same time as we had seen, ah, attacks on U.S. embassies in Cairo as a consequence of this film. The emails that you elude to were provided by us to congressional committees. They reviewed them several months ago, concluded that, in fact, there was nothing afoul in terms of the process that we had used, and suddenly, three days ago, this gets spun up as if there's somethin' new to the story. There's no there there...." [The topic here is the "Benghazi Killings Scandal," as I call the event, and, in essence, what Barack Obama mentioned about "Benghazi" was nonsense, and he told lies, which should not be surprising to anyone, and a person can learn more about the "Benghazi Killings Scandal" by seeing my document entitled The "Benghazi Killings Scandal": A Short Information-and-Status Report, which can be reached by using this Benghazi Link.]
"...If this was some effort on our part to try ta downplay what had happened or tamp it down, that would be, ah, a pretty odd thing that, three days later, we end up putting out all the information that, in fact, has now served as the basis for everybody recognizing that this was a terrorist attack. Who executes some sort of coverup or effort to tamp things down for three days? So the whole thing defies logic, frankly, has a lot to do with political motivations. We've had folks who've challenged Hillary Clinton's integrity, Susan Rich's integrity, Mike Mullen and Tom Pickering's integrity. It's a given that mine gets challenged by these same folks...." [I note that, for many days after the attack in Benghazi took place (on September 12, 2012), Barack Obama and his associated told lies, such as the one in which it was pushed that a "video" sparked the attack.]
"...We don't have time to be playing these kinds of political games here in Washington. We've got a whole bunch of people in the State Department who consistently say: You know what?--I'm willing to step up, I'm willing ta, to put myself in harm's way because I think that this mission is important in terms of serving the United States and advancing our interests around the globe. And, and, and so we, we dishonor them when, you know, we turn things like this into a political circus...." [American citizens died in Benghazi on September 12, 2013, and at the moment, the American public has yet to know where Barack Obama was during the roughly seven-hour attack--it has not been reported by Barack Obama or anyone where Barack Obama was, and the finding out why no rescue attempt was set in motion by Barack Obama--the only person, as the U.S. President, who can order a military force tied to the United States of America to entry another country--is not part of a "political circus."]Thursday, May 16, 2013 (another press conference):
"...I can assure you that I certainly did not know anything about the IG report before the IG report had been leaked through the press. In terms of the White House and reporting, I think that you've gotten that information from Mr. Carney and others. I promise you this that, the minute I found out about it, my main focus is making sure we get the thing fixed...." [Well, Barack Obama appeared before the press, and as usual, his appearance before the press was delayed--Barack Obama never seems to be on time or start talking at the time a press event is originally scheduled, and Barack Obama appeared with the Prime Minister of Turkey (who is a radical Islamist, a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia law and "enslavism" forms of government), and this was one answer related to the topic of the IRS scandal, in which, between 2009 and 2012, the IRS harassed "Tea Party" groups and "conservative" groups trying to become official non-profit tax-exempt entities.]Tuesday, May 28, 2013 (at the "Jersey Shore," where a hurricane hit some months ago):
"...Governor Christie and I just spent some time on Point Pleasant Boardwalk. I got a chance to see the world's tallest sandcastle being built. Ah, we played some touch-down fever. I got to say Christie, ah, got it in the tire the first try, although I did pay for this throws...." [I say--"So what!" And he passed on other fluff. Did he pass on lies? Let us see.]
"...Seven months ago, I promised you that your country would have your back. I told you we would not quit until the job was done. And I meant it. I meant it...." [I have heard that the "Jersey Shore"--off the main track--is not so good.]Thursday, June 6, 2013 (in Palo Alto, California at a Democratic Party fund-raiser):
"...We don't think government can do everything. We don't think that top-down solutions, ah, are the right way to go. We believe in the free market. We believe in the light touch when it comes ta, ah, regulations. We don't want to tax...all businesses out of business...." [It is amazing to me that Barack Obama decided to say this--A U.S. President should not have to say it, unless the U.S. President is trying to sell the idea to do a coverup of what he is actually doing.]Friday, June 7, 2013 (at the Fairmont Hotel in San Jose, California):
"...Because quality care is not something that should be a priviledge--it should be a 'right.' In, in the greatest country on earth, we gotta make sure every single person, ah, that needs health care can get it...." [Okay, this section is made up of two main themes, and the first covers the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, doing that in four paragraphs, the first of which is this paragraph. First, right before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 would become law (in March 2010), no law existed in the country that stated some people did not have to be given health care or stated that hospitals and doctors could refuse to give health care to people, and, basically, people were not being refused treatment in the country (if people did not have a health-insurance plan, they paid for care through means of cash or through an installment plan or by having fund-raisers (if the expense was going to be great) or setting up other ways in which to pay for care). Second, what does Barack Obama mean by saying, in essence, "quality care" "should be a right"? How is "quality care" as a "right" fulfilled? What is a government's definition of "quality care"?]
"...A lot of the opponents of the Affordable Care Act said--You know, they had all kinds of the sky-is-falling doom-and-gloom predictions that not only would the law fail but what we'd also see is costs would skyrocket for everybody. Well, it turns out we're actually seeing that, in the states that have committed themselves to implementing this law correctly, ah, we're seeing some good news. Competition and cho, and choice are pushing down costs in the individual market just like the law was designed to do...." [Okay, maybe, in some states for a short while, the costs will come down for health-insurance plans for some people, because the people will buying into a "health care exchange" operated by government; however, it is already known health-care costs--such as health-care-insurance premiums--are rising because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.]
"...There are a lot of people who currently get health insurance through their employers--the eighty-five who are already out there--and they may be saying--Well, if, if this law's so great, why is it that my premium still went up? Well, ah, part of what's happening, ah, across the country is that, in some cases, more employers may be shifting more costs through higher premiums, ah, or, ah, higher deductibles or higher co-pays, and so there may still be folks who are out there feeling increased costs not because of the Affordable Care Act but because, ah, those costs are being passed on to workers, ah, or insurance companies in some cases even...." [This statement is bullshit, and I say that it is "bullshit" from a piece of man who is shit.]
"...By the way, all of this is what the Republican Party has now voted thirty-seven times to repeal, ah, at least in the House of Representatives. Ah, and my suggestion to them has been let's stop refighting the old battles and start working with people like the leaders who are on stage here today to make this law work...." [You can see here that, although Barack Obama lies about law and what it is doing, though it has not fully been enacted, Barack Obama wants you not to fight it anymore and let it stand as it is, which, I say, is "shit," and I do not listen to a man who is shit.]
"...Now, with respect to the Internet and, ah, emails, this does not apply to U.S. citizens and it does not apply to people living in the United States, and again in this instance, now only is Congress fully apprised of it, but what is also true is that FISA Court has to authorized it...." [Basically, the remainder of this entire section has Barack Obama addressing the theme that people think the federal government has been monitoring telephone calls in mass, such as those tied to Verizon. Now, this statement from Barack Obama and what statements from Barack Obama that I list in the remainder of this section show a collection of nonsense, and there is a logic problem. I think that the statement noted in this paragraph from Barack Obama is a lie, but let us pretend it is not a lie. Barack Obama hinted that the government has not been monitoring U.S. citizens or people living in the U.S., and the issue should end there, yet Barack Obama had to bring up (as you will see) in his speech, for instance, that U.S. citizens have to put up will less privacy, giving the impression that, indeed, calls of U.S. citizens have been monitored, and he noted or hinted that "encroachments" happened, which seems to mean there were encroachments on privacy related to U.S. citizens. Barack Obama flip-flopped in the speech or !]
"...When it comes to telephone calls, nobody is listening to your telephone calls. That's not what this program's about, as was indicated, ah, what, ah, the intelligence community is doing is looking at phone numbers and durations of calls. They are not looking at people's names...." [Okay, I note the statement.]
"...The modest, ah, encroachments on privacy that are involved in getting phone numbers or duration without a name attached and not looking at content, ah, that on, ah, you know, net, ah, it was worth us doing. Now, sa, some other folks might have a different assessment of that, but I think it's important to recognize you can't have a hundred-percent security and also then have a hundred-percent privacy and zero inconvenience...." [Read the quoted material in the previous two paragraphs and then read this quoted material again. See what I mean?]
"...My assessment and my team's assessment, ah, what that they help us prevent terrorist attacks....." [By the way, what "assessment" (that is, what research) did Barack Obama do?]
"...Ya, da, da, we're gonna have to make some choices, ah, as a society...." [I ask--To Barack Obama--a highly self-centered man--who are "we" in "we're"?]
"...I, I, I wanna to be very clear, some of the, ah, hype that we've been hearing over the last day or so--nobody's listening to the content...." [So the federal government gathered a bunch of information and never went on to listen to any calls. Okay, I note that. Now, where is all this information being stored--where are the servers? There have to be a lot of servers that the American public is paying for--through taxes and such--to store all the information, which could be used easily against citizens who support The U.S. Constitution and are opposed to Barack Obama, a thug and a killer. The federal government may not be listening to calls yet, but everything with Barack Obama is changable--daily.]
"...This program, by the way, is fully overseen not just by Congress but by the FISA Court, a court specially put together to evaluate classified programs to make sure that the Executive Branch or government generally is not abusing them and, there, it's being carried out consist with...." [Over the last few years at least, the U.S. Congress as a whole has shown itself to be a defective institution, where about two-thirds of the members did not show themselves to regularly uphold The United States Constitution, and over the last few years at least, the U.S. Supreme Court has show itself to be defective since about two-thirds of it have been defective thinkers, especially when a ruling comes out (as it did in 2007) that notes that the federal government can regulate carbon dioxide (which plants need to live), which is idiocy. So, I do not expect, today, the U.S. Congress (still heavily saturated with communists and socialists and black radicals and other defective people) and the FISA Court to, for the most part, make good decisions and can do a good job overseeing anything. One of my rules of life is-- Just because a person is a judge or a member of the U.S. Congress, it does not mean the person is a good person or a good thinker, and, in fact, the odds are that the person is not, and it is only known well what a person is by seeing how many defective decisions the person has made.]
"...And if people can't trust not only the Executive Branch [which is, in essence, Barack Obama, since he has complete control of the Executive Branch] but also don't trust Congress and don't trust, ah, federal judges to make sure that we're abiding by The Constitution, due process, and rule of law, then we're gonna have some problems here...." [I show in this section that Barack Obama is a liar, and I say--We have a problem!]Monday, June 10, 2013 (in Washington, D.C.):
"...Women are now the primary source of income for nearly 40 percent of American families--forty percent, almost half. That's not something to panic about or be afraid about. That's a sign of the progress and stride that we've made. But what it does mean is that, when more women are bringing home the bacon, ah, they shouldn't just be gettin' a little bit of bacon...." [Here is more shit from a man with shit in his mind. When more and more women are head bread-winners, it means fewer and fewer men are in the families and, for one, are teaching boys to learn to control their animal natures and to learn to grow up to be good men, and when more and more women are head bread-winners, there is less time for women to nurture children. And there are more things wrong with the concept of having women as the primary source of income, but I will leave it unsaid.]Wednesday, June 19, 2013 (at the Brandenburg Gate, Berlin, Germany):
"...With the global middle class consuming more energy every day, this must now be an effort of all nations, not just some, for the grim alternative affects all nations--more severe storms, more famine and floods, new waves of refugees, coast lines that vanish, oceans that rise...." [Here is evidence of an insane man unleashing his mind on the world now!]Tuesday, June 25, 2013 (at Georgetown University):
"...I'm open to all sorts of new ideas...." [Bullshit! You are not! You lie!]
"...2012 was the warmest year in our history...." [Bullshit! It was not. You lie!]
"...But I do want to be clear. Allowing the Keystone Pipeline to be built requires a finding that doing so would be in our nation's interest, and our national interest will be served only if this project does not significantly exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution...." [Bullshit! "Carbon pollution"--this set of words is idiocy, since "carbon," which makes up plants and animals and which is tied to a portion of what is carbon dioxide (which is used by plants to live), is not a pollutant, unlike "carbon monoxide." You lie! By the way, only an idiot would not see that this set of words from Barack Obama shows that Barack Obama is going to block the creation of the Keystone Pipeline, shown in the idea that "significantly exacerbate" is vague and can mean anything and can have an ever-changing meaning.]Thursday, June 27, 2013 (in Senegal, which is a country in Africa):
"...I have not called President Xi [Chinese Premier Xi Jinping] personally or Putin [Russian President Vladimir Putin] personally, and the reason is because, ah, number one, I shouldn't have to. This is something that routinely is dealt with, ah, between law-enforcement officials in various countries, and this is not, ah, exceptional from a legal perspective...." [The subject was Edward Snowden, who in mid-June 2013 became the focus of a man hunt, because it was alleged he had had given out something like security secrets about the country to foreigners, and he was charged with espionage by the federal government, and--publicly--it was reported that the federal government was working to bring Edward Snowden, who was being called a traitor by people in the country, to trial in the country. It seemed--at least to the public--that the U.S. was not getting anywhere in trying to extradite Edward Snowden from other countries, and when such a thing happens, I expect a U.S. President will get involved in calling the country in which a wanted person who is considered a high-profile traitor is staying or hiding out and in working out some agreement that results in the wanted person being extradited to the America. Now, remember: Barack Obama did nothing to help Americans under siege in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012 (which I talk about in the document called The "Benghazi Killings Scandal": A Short Information-and-Status Report, which can be reached by using this Benghazi link). In this case, I have to wonder why, if Barack Obama believes Edward Snowden is a traitor or a high-profile enemy of the country, Barack Obama would not get involved in clearing the way in getting Edward Snowden extradited. So, if Edward Snowden is a something like a traitor, maybe Barack Obama is glad Edward Snowden released secret information to the world because the release of the information hurts the United States of America, and history shows Barack Obama is working and has been working for some time to hurt the United States of America. If Edward Snowden is not something like a traitor, Barack Obama could still push the issue that he is so that the issue remains in the press as a distraction story (and Barack Obama can do nothing so Edward Snowden remains an issue in the news longer). Of course, it could be Barack Obama does not want to get involved because he is lazy, and his doing something means he has to do work, or it could be Barack Obama does not want to get involved in talking with foreign leaders who might--he already wells knows--consider him a fool or whatever. I can think of other possible reasons. For now, I report that I do not know the reason for Barack Obama's inaction. It is odd that Barack Obama was not getting involved.]
"...These programs, which I believe make Americans safe, ah, help make America safe, and that I believe draw the appropriate balance, um, right now, ah, are generating a lot of questions in the press and in the American public, and I want to make sure that, ah, everybody--Congress, ah, opinion leaders, and our government officials--feel confident that the laws are being obeyed, that there's strong oversight, and that, ah, the American people don't have the 'Big Brother' who's snooping into their business...." [The theme was the federal government's collecting telephone-related information on the citizens of the United States of America. Keep it in mind for future reference. Today, though, it sounds like crap.]Monday, July 1, 2013 (at Cape Town University, South Africa):
"...So today I'm proud to announce a new initiative. We've been dealing with agriculture. We've been de, dealing with health. Now, we're gonna talk about power. Power Africa--a new initiative that will double access to power in sub-Saharan Africa, double it...." [Wow! This sounds great! Wow!]
"...And in partnership with African nations, we're gonna develop new sources of energy...." [What the hell is this crap? Barack Obama has been pushing--for at least five years--the idea that a new energy sources are going to be developed in the United States of America, but there has been nothing done really--he has been closing down the coal industry and he has not promoted the nuclear-energy industry and it has been shown in solar-energy initiatives in the United States of America have been a fraud. I say--It is all a sham that he is spreading to the remainder of the world. However, it is a way to take money from someone, maybe someone in the United States of America, and give it for free to other places in the world, especially places in Africa run by communists and other dictators (in essence, thugs like him).]
"...Africa, we're gonna all have to work together to find ways in which collectively we reduce carbon, but we make sure that there's some differentiation so that countries that are very wealthy, ah, are expected to do more and countries that are still developing, you know, obviously they shouldn't be resigned to poverty simply because, ah, you know, the West and Europe and America got there first. That wouldn't be fair. But everybody's gonna have to do something. Everybody's gonna have to make some important choices here, and, you know, I expect that it's gonna be your generation that helps lead this, because, if we don't, it's gonna be your generation, ah, that suffers the most. Ah, ultimately, if you think about all the youth that everybody's mentioned here in Africa, if everybody's raising living standards to the point where everybody's got a car and everybody's got air conditioning and everybody's got a big house, ah, well, the planet will boil over unless we find new ways of producing energy...." [Here is a great example of a shit-head mind with shit-head thoughts. Let me have fun. Do you know one way to get all the carbon off the planet? We mine it and whatever and put in on rockets and send it off in to space. Yeah! We're save! Now, let me get serious. America has only been around since the 1700s. Societies on the African continent have been around for centuries and centuries, and yet the societies remained crap--tribal and poor--and that's because of the nature of the societies. The societies in Africa have been developing for centuries and centuries, but political systems--designed with crap ideas--have kept the people poor. But, in essence, if people on the African continent improve their lives, Barack Obama will put them down because they will "boil" the planet, so,. I guess, that means do not improve your lives, everybody in Africa, or you will kill yourselves and the planet. Also, Barack Obama does not push improvement for the people of Africa because improvement will "boil" the planet, and yet he was pushing to create more energy at the same time. What the hell circulates in his defective mind? Oh, if we get rid of carbon, there will be no humans, no animals, no plants, no bugs.... And ask yourself--What source or what crystal ball does Barack Obama have or use to say that the planet is going to "boil" if Africans improve their lives?]Monday, July 8, 2013:
"...We've gotta have the brightest minds to help solve our biggest challenges, and it's a reminder that in this democracy, we the people recognize that this government belongs to us, and it's up to each of us and everyone of us to make it work better. We can't just st, stand on the sidelines. We can't take comfort in just being cynical. Ah, we all have a stake in government success, because the government is us. And we're, we're doin' things right when we're tracking weather more effectively, that saves lives, ah, for folks, ah, who are in the path...." [Okay, let us look at some of the nonsense in this set of words from Barack Obama. First, the citizens of the United States of America make up the country of the United States of America, and, for example, the land makes up the country. Second, the structure of the federal government of the country is defined mainly by The United States Constitution, and the citizens of the country are not the government--the citizens elect people who take up government jobs and are supposed to run the government on behalf of the citizens. Third, a person does not have a stake in the "government" succeeding if the government is evil and bad or if the people running the government are evil or bad, but a person does have a stake in the country succeeding. Fourth, Barack Obama pushed an idea--which is sort of hidden from clear understanding--that you are the government and should be working toward achieving Barack Obama's goals without challenging the goals, even if they are bad, and Barack Obama was pushing the idea that a person should be working to see that Barack Obama succeeds by following blindly and willingly the ways of Barack Obama.]
"...Almost every president from Herbert Hoover to Ronald Reagan had this authority to redesign the federal government--the Executive Branch--to deliver services better, just like very business owner seeking to make sure his or her company keep pace with the times. Currently, we do not have that capacity, and so I'm gonna keep on doing what we can administratively...." [A statute created by a U.S. Congress and a U.S. President would need to be enacted in order to let a U.S. President reorganize the federal government--particularly the Executive Branch (one of the three main branches of the federal government)--at will, which could include making new parts and expanding at will the Executive Branch. That idea--letting one man build the federal government at will--is a bad, bad, bad idea for the country. Look at one truly evil deed that a U.S. President, such as a communist-type or insane-type U.S. President (like Barack Obama), could do if able to reworked the Executive Branch at will--A U.S. President could create a brand new secret police force and a police force directly beholden only to the U.S. President, like a "Gestapo"-type police force. In addition, a U.S. President who might hold the power to change the Executive Branch at will could shut down entities of the federal government that might not be strictly loyal to the U.S. President. Also a U.S. President who might hold the power to change the Executive Branch at will could at a whim redefine the workings or the mission of an agency or department, though the name of the agency or department could stay the same, and the workings or mission could redefine an agency or department into something that is truly bad and evil in nature. You can see in the words spoken by Barack Obama that he is advocating for "change" or really the ability to "change" the government at will. That comes from the mind of an evil man--an enslavist! Plus, a person has to see Barack Obama hinted in the quotation that, if he does not get the power, he will do whatever he can administratively on his own, which may mean and can mean violating The U.S. Constitution, which he has done in the past and which he had gotten away with because he has gone unchallenged (such as by the leaders of the Republican Party in the U.S. Congress, who should have put up a challenge). Note: By the way, a news-type entity called "McClatchy" posted an article called "Linchpin for Obama's plan to predict future leakers unproven, isn't likely to work, experts say" on Tuesday, July 9 2013, and the story noted how an Executive Order from Barack Obama of October 2011 is now having what is called the "Insider Treat Program" have federal employees informing, such as to insider-threat offices, on fellow employees, based on reasons that are really crappy, such as if a person is maybe going through a divorce or seems agitated, and the degree to which it is being promoted makes me think of how fascist Germany (of the 1930s or so) and communist China has citizens spying on other citizens and children spying on parents, and it is a sign of evil in the federal government on the United States of America today--all based around Barack Hussein Obama [Landsay, Jonathan S., and Marissa Taylor. "Linchpin for Obama's plan to predict future leaders unproven, isn't likely to work, experts say." McClatchy, 9 July 2013.].] If you read Barack Obama's quotation again, you should see he was trying to equat government with business, but I note that businesses are not governments that have to be in what might be called a "democratic country" so Barack Obama was setting up a defective comparison. And you should see Barack Obama was working to make you feel his having the abillity to change government at will will to lead to the government's ability to "deliver services better," and there is no proof in history that that need happen.]Friday, July 19, 2013 (an unscheduled appearance before the press at the White House):
"...When, ah, Trayvon Martin was first shot, ah, I said that this could have been my son. Ah, ah, another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me...." [Barack Obama made an unscheduled appearance before the press, and one reason was, probably, on the following day, some people (especially blacks), such as some in Detroit, were going to take part in public gatherings in cities around the country that were designed to push the federal government to take up a civil-rights case against George Zimmerman, who had recently been found to have indeed acted in self-defense in the killing of a young man called Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Florida, and a smart person understands--given a U.S. president should not be involved in speaking about a court case, especially a local court case, in which a jury has made a decision--Barack Obama appeared to purposely push racial hatred. The members of main media--the communistic entities and such--and Democrats, such as Barack Obama, were pushing the idea that George Zimmerman, who was a Hispanic-type man, was a "white Hispanic" so that the shooting and killing of Trayvon Martin, who was black, could be seen as a "white" against "black" crime. Barack Obama pushed in this appearance the idea that "blacks" should take up arms (though not necessarily literally) against whites. And that is the way of a killer, a man who likes to hurt other people!]
"...There's a lot of pain around what happened here. I think it's important to recognize that, ah, the African-American community is looking at this issue through, ah, a set of experiences and, ah, a history that, ah...." [Notice "set of experiences" in the set of words from Barack Obama. A smart person understands Barack Obama was pushing--implying--the idea that over the history of the country "blacks" have been given trouble regularly, such as slavery and discrimination, from "whites." That implication shows Barack Obama was pushing racial hatred and was working to rile up blacks in the country and get them to take part in the rallies that were supposed to happen around the country the following day.]
"...There are very few African-American men in this country who haven't had the experience of being followed when they were shopping at a department store. That includes me! There are very few African-American men who haven't had the experience of walking across the street and hearing, ah, the locks click on the doors of cars...." [Notice Barack Obama pushed the idea that people are always afraid and leery of blacks. Well, I have been in a parking lot of a mall, and when I approached a vehicle, I have heard the locks click, indicating a person was wary of me, not knowing me. People can be wary of strangers--black, white, and whatever--especially in a metropolitan area where the crime rate can be high. Yes, Barack Obama pushed the idea that only blacks hear those locks click on vehicles, which, to him, is a sign of racism or racists. The theme that Barack Obama pushed shows that he is a black racist and a man who pushes for racial hatred--blacks against whites.]
"...There are very few African-Americans who haven't had the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman clutching her purse, ah, nervously...." [And Barack Obama kept pushing and pushing and pushing the crap. I have been on elevators with women, and they have almost always seemed leery of me, not knowing me. That is the nature of people. By the way, the women that I have been on elevators with have been black, white, and whatever.]Monday, July 22, 2103 (at a rally):
"...It's gonna be the kickoff to what is essentially several months of us trying to get Washington and the press to refocus on the economy. It'll be a pretty good speech. But as we've learned--I've given some pretty good speeches before--and then things still get stuck here in Washington. Which is why I'm gonna need your help. How do we keep people involved? And naturally it's not going to be as full of razzmatazz as a campaign...." [Well, on Monday, July 22, 2013, Barack Obama let people know he was going to give a bunch more speeches in the days to come, especially right up to September 30, 2013, when the 2013 fiscal year for the federal government ended and when the next fiscal year (2014) was about to begin--and Democrats and Republicans were going to fight over what the new budget should be. Notice Barack Obama worked to make listeners think he was trying to motivate others to think about the economy again. That is rot! For one, the press has nothing to do with making the economy actually work, and if the press focuses on the economy by writing a bunch of stories, it is all meaningless. Of course, Barack Obama probably pushed the idea so that the press will give up covering other things, such as the many scandals of the Barack Obama administration, such as the IRS scandal in which the IRS was, in essence, attacking "conservative" groups that wished to be regarded as non-profit entities. Well, the next entry starts off by looking at the first big speech of the campaign, which you will learn is nothing more than more nonsense from the defective mind of Barack Obama.]Wednesday, July 24, 2013 (at Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois):
"...With this endless parade of distractions and political posturing and phony scandals, Washington has taken its eye off the ball. And I'm here to say--This needs to stop...." [This section shows a number of examples of Barack Obama's teaching crap to the ignorant and, of course, lying and lying and lying, and this first paragraph shows a number of lies, one of which is the idea that there are an endless parade of "phony scandals". Since January 20, 2009, Barack Obama has been involved in numerous big true scandals, such as the "Benghazi Killings Scandal," in which Barack Obama--though he was a U.S. President, one duty of whom is to protect U.S. citizens aboard--did nothing to help protect those persons under attack in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012. A person has to ask--What are the "distractions" that Barack Obama talked about? He named nothing--he passed along crap.]
"...There are Republicans in Congress, right now, who privately agree with me on a lot of the ideas that I'll be proposing. I know, because they've said so, but they worry they'll face swift political retaliation for cooperating with me...." [I know there are "Republicans" who agree with Barack Obama's policies, which can be seen in some of my documents available on the Internet, especially those that show the "enemies" of the country in the U.S. Congress now and those of the recent past, and some of those "enemies" are U.S. Senator John McCain and U.S. Representative John Boehner, both of whom have acted like communists and socialists (who are temporarily restrained communists). But what is important, here, is Barack Obama pushed the idea that there are Republicans who would work with him if only there were groups, such as "conservative"-type groups, that support The U.S. Constitution, so Barack Obama was putting down "conservatives" again so that listeners can think of "conservatives" as enemies of the country, which is nonsense.]
"...And if you ask some of these folks--some of these folks [Republicans] mostly in the House--about their economic agenda, how it is that they'll strengthen the middle class, they'll shift the topic to out-of-control government spending, despite the fact that we've cut the deficit by nearly half as a share of the economy since I took office...." [Well, what crap do we have here? First, the federal government is in an out-of-control-spending mode, and it is like what Detroit did for decades (it was on Thursday, July 18, 2013, Detroit filed for bankruptcy, and it is the biggest bankruptcy filing in the history of the country). Second, Barack Obama has made no cut--made a true cut--in the deficit "as a share of the economy." Both themes from Barack Obama are crap.]
"...This is tried and true, despite the fact that our businesses have created nearly twice as many jobs in this recovery as businesses had in the same time in the last recovery when there was no Obamacare...." [I say in jest--"Say what, Willis?" I take the the quoted statement from an old television show called Diff'rent Strokes. The show was a comedy, and Barack Obama is a joke.]
"...better bargain for the middle class and the folks who are workin' to get into the middle class, an economy that grows from the middle out, not the top down--that's where I will focus my energy, not just for the next few months but for the remainder of my presidency. These are plans that I will lay out across this country...." [This statement shows the nature of this shit-head man--Barack Obama. A U.S. President cannot grow an economy from the "middle out." For one, people doing things make an economy grow, and if the federal government takes more and more taxes from them, people have less and less money to create businesses and jobs and products and services. Remember--The government creates nothing. If Barack Obama wanted to so-called grow the economy from the middle out, Barack Obama would push through taxes cuts, such as income-tax cuts for individuals and business-tax cuts for companies all across the board. Oh, I say--I see Barack Obama is going to "focus my energy" again. I am impressed--not.]
"...What makes us special, it's not the ability to generate incredible wealth for, for the few, it's our ability to give everybody a chance to pursue their own true measure of happiness...." [This statement is nothing more than class-warfare crap from a communist--an enslavist--which is what Barack Obama is, and the words are nonsense, and his theme does not make sense and is nonsense..]
"...But, right now, where we got a Washington, we've seen a sizable group of Republican lawmakers suggest that they wouldn't vote to pay the very bills that Congress rang up, and that fiasco harmed a fragile recovery in 2011...." [Here he goes again. The topic--which is not mentioned in this set of words from Barack Obama--is the "Sequester," which it must be remembered was his idea, and the amount of money involved in the "Sequester' was small, being only something like 44-billion dollars in an overall budget that is something like 1,300-billion dollars. Also, Barack Obama through the set of words was setting up the Republicans as those who would soon be working to hurt the country by not wanting to raise the "debt limit" again (which would allow the federal government to spend even more money that would drive up the debt of the country) or by not wanting to increase taxes. Remember--The current temporary federal-government-funding law expires on September 30, 2013, so a new law will soon have to be created to keep the government spending.]
"...Instead of doin' that, we've got folks who've insisted on leaving in place a meat cleaver called the 'Sequester' that's cost jobs. It's harmed growth. It's hurt our military. It's gutted investments...." [Look at the previous paragraph. The "Sequester" was in no way a "meat-cleaver"-type budget cut. Barack Obama lied again here!]
[Note: Oh, there would be a speech the following day, but I decided not to cover it in this document, guessing the speech would have the same themes as the speech of this day.]Tuesday, July 30, 2013 (in Chattanooga, Tennessee):
"...We can't be gettin' into a whole bunch of fads and pretend like, you know, ya roll back Obamacare and suddenly all these jobs are going to be created, because the middle class was strugglin' before I came into office. The middle class was losin' ground before I came into office. Jobs were gettin' shipped overseas before Obamacare was in place. So we got to be honest...." [So, Barack Obama was on the road (my documents that present quotes from Barack Obama since at least January 20, 2009, show how often Barack Obama is on the road, and, I sometimes think, he is on the road and is trying to show or convince everyone he is indeed the U.S. President--by being in public and on media reports. This time, in Chattanooga, Barack Obama passed along more crap. No one has suggested that the rolling back of "Obamacare" would immediately create jobs. "Obamacare" has to be killed since it is a killer law, in which the federal government will now get to determine--by denying or agreeing to health care--the life and death of each person in the country, especially the person who does not support "enslavism" (such as communism and Sharia, both bad political systems of which Barack Obama has shown he supports). Notice in this speech, I have presented several "ing"-type works that are missing the "g", and the reason the "g"s are missing is Barack Obama did not say the "g"s, talking like a street person who does not speak correctly--in other words, Barack Obama put on a show, acting like he was like what he thought his audience was like (and you will see other evidence of his fakery in the quoted material). In addition, "Obamacare" and the topic of shipping jobs overseas have no connection and are not related, and I say, in other words, Barack Obama tried to tie two topics together that cannot be linked logically and with any value of meaning. Oh, and I have just been "honest" with my sentences in this paragraph, which is something Barack Obama was not with his sentences.]Tuesday, August 6, 2013 (an appearance on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno):
"...I have no patience for countries that try to treat gays or lesbians or transgender persons in, in ways that intimidate them or are harmful to them...." [The date was Tuesday, August 6, 2013, which was several days after the federal government had closed around two dozen embassies--on a temporary basis--around the world, seemingly because the federal government had some information of a possible forthcoming terrorist strike, and during the previous few days, Barack Obama had made no public statement about the action taken, and then he appeared on a comedy show to talk a bit about the action and about a few other things. The theme of the quoted material, like that in the next paragraph, is Russia's stance on gas and lesbians in the Olympics for Russia, which will soon hold a Winter Olympics, where there is downhill skiing and ice skating and hockey and other winter-time sports. Yes, Barack Obama has "no patience for countries that try to treat gay and lesbians or transgender persons in, in ways that intimidate them or are harmful to them....", but he supports countries with government forms tied to Sharia or Islamic law, and in such countries, such as Iran, gays and lesbians are treated harshly. So once again, Barack Obama was on television pushing crap on the American people, especially the ignorant and defective who watch The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. In essence, Barack Obama brought serious matters to a comedy show instead of some type of formal setting, and that shows Barack Obama treats serious matters as a joke.]
"...They're athletes. They're there to compete. And if Russia wants to uphold the Olympic spirit, then every judgment should be made on the track or in the swimmin' pool or on the balance beam and people's sexual orientation shouldn't have anything to do with it...." [Notice Barack Obama had the wrong type of Olympics in mind while focusing on Russia and the gay and lesbians in the Olympics issue, and I say--The so-called great brain failed.]Wednesday, August 7, 2013 (at Camp Pendelton, California.):
"...Keeping our military strong means keeping our military families strong. Michelle and Vice President, dah, ah, ah, the, ah, Joe Biden's wife, Dr.Jill Biden--they've made this their mission...." [This was an incident of brain failure in Barack Obama, unable to remember the name of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's wife. By the way, when Barack Obama was on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno on August 6, 2013, Barack Obama made a number of thinking and speaking errors, but I did not present them in the prevous entry. Yes, the statement that I have here in this entry from Barack Obama from August 7, 2013, was a big failure of the brain.]Friday, August 9, 2013: (a press conference):
"...And this is how we're going to resolve our differences in the United States, through vigorous public debate, guided by our constitution, with reverence for our history of laws and with respect for the facts...." [Barack Obama--a truly rotten man, who was put in office again by more rotten people--held a news conference, and it had the usual format, and that format is he reads from teleprompters for about a quarter of the event and answers questions from reporters in boring fashion, and, of course, he passed along lies and lies lies and crap. This sentence from Barack Obama basically ended the reading part of the event, and, yes, it was crap, for many reasons. One reason it is crap is Barack Obama has violated The United States Constitution a number of times, as I show in the document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached by using this History link. And there has been no vigorous public debate with Barack Obama--he is a dictator type--and he cares nothing for the laws of the United States of America that he did not help make law or do not push enslavism on the good people of the country--the non-supporters of Barack Obama's defective way of life.]Saturday, August 17, 2013 (weekly recorded address):
"...There's also a group of Republicans in Congress working hard to confuse people and making empty promises that they'll either shut the health-care law or, if they don't get their way, they'll shut down the government. Think about that. They're actually having a debate between hurting Americans who will no longer be denied affordable health care just because they've been sick and harming the economy and millions of Americans in the process...." [Basically, the members of the Democratic Party created the bill that was named the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Law of 2010 and then sent the created bill to Barack Obama, and Barack Obama put his signature on the bill, which made the bill a law, and it is a rotten law, and it is a law that must be killed.]
"...A lot of Republicans seem to believe that, if they can gum up the works and make this law fail, they'll somehow be stickin' it to me, but they'd just be stickin' it to you...." [Notice, for one, Barack Obama worked to make people--his listeners--want to get involved in attacking Republicans since the Republicans were and are working to hurt Barack Obama no matter what. Barack Obama wanted listeners to be sympathetic to him and protect him. The tactic shows the nature of an evil mind, given that he is lying about the nature of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.]
"...I'm gonna to keep doing everything in my power to make sure this law works as it's supposed to, because in the United States of America, health insurance isn't a privilege, it's your right, and we're gonna keep it that way...." [I do not here talk about what a true "right" is or is not, and I only note something that you should pay attention to. Notice Barack Obama was being tricky with words. Barack Obama talked about "health insurance." Barack Obama did not talk about "health care." So, if you do not get health care in the future because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, it seems you cannot blame Barack Obama because he was only talking about "health insurance" (which is not "health care").]Friday, August 23, 2013 (in an interview on CNN):
"...Republicans after having taken forty votes to try to get rid of Obamacare, ah, see this their last gasp. Nobody thinks that good for the 'middle class.'...." ["Obamacare" (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010) is going to be rotten for, in essence, everyone not a part of the elite political class, which has been exempted (through an illegal action) from the law.]Tuesday, August 27, 2013 (in an interview on Tom Joyner's nationally distributed radio show):
"...Oh, he'd like that...." [The "he" is Martin Luther King Jr., and what the theme was was the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.]
"...Well, because, ah, ah, I think he understood that, ah, health care, health security, ah, is not a privilege, ah, it's something that a country as wealth as ours everybody should have access to...." [The theme is Martin Luther King Jr., a civil-rights figure in the United States of America. This set of words can be marked as those in which a bad man--a communist--helps turn another man into a communist figure. Barack Obama is a supporter of enslavism (such as communism and Sharia, which are tyrannical government systems). When Martin Luther King Jr. was alive, such as in the 1960s, he labeled himself a "Republican," and it was the day and age when "Republicans" did not stand for communism and socialism, which some "Republicans" do today, such as U.S. Representative John Boehner, U.S. Senator John McCain, U.S. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts, former U.S. General Colin Powell, and Governor of Michigan Rick Snyder. Barack Obama never knew Martin Luther King Jr. or talked with Martin Luther King Jr., since neither were alive at the same time. Yet, Barack Obama projected his thoughts about what Martin Luther King Jr. would have thought about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, which some people know is rotten law and many people have yet to learn is rotten law, and when those who do not yet know how bad the law is come to understand what the law is, at least some will hate Barack Obama linked Martin Luther King Jr. to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (by the way, around this time, a niece of Martin Luther King's was working to get at least a part of the law repealed, and that is fact). So what Barack Obama did in the quotation is tie Martin Luther King Jr. to "enslavism." That shows more of the rottenness of Barack Obama. Remember: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is already causing more people to end up with part-time jobs, lose their health-care-insurance plan, et cetera.]Wednesday, August 28, 2013 (at the Lincoln Memorial for the 50th anniversary of the "I have a dream" speech of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.):
"...Because they marched, city councils changed and state legislatures changed and Congress and, yes, eventually the White House changed...." [I do not reported or analyze this speech, and I simply note Barack Obama--an "enslavist" and a rotten man--ended up putting the stigma of communism and such on the face of Martin Luther King Jr., as history will show, and because of Barack Obama's action, Barack Obama has put the face of communism on the faces of blacks in America as history will show.]Wednesday, August 28, 2013 (on PBS):
"...Most of all, what I was thinking about was just, ah, what I talked about in the speech...." [This is part of the answer that is tied to a question about what Barack Obama was thinking at the time he was giving his speech at the Lincoln Memorial on Wednesday, August 28, 2013, and the next paragraph continues with some more of the answer.]
"...All these, ah, ordinary folks who did extraordinary things...." [Okay, take note of that, and move on to the next paragraph.]
"...There aren't that many examples in American history, maybe even world history, where you see naves and, ah, an seamstresses and porters and laborers who, ah, are able to fundamentally transform the most powerful country on earth...." [After breaking down the set of words spoken, I think Barack Obama was think about himself and not others at the time the speech was given--it was all about him--showing once again his self-centeredness and ill mind. The event at which Barack Obama was was supposed to be about Martin Luther King Jr. Yes, that is what I see and hear something bad in Barack Obama once again.]Wednesday, September 4, 2013 (at a joint press conference with the prime minister of Sweden):
"...First of all, I didn't set a 'red line.' The world set a 'red line.' The world's set a 'red line' when governments representing ninety-eight percent of the world's population said, ah, the use of chemical weapons are abort ["abort" is what the word sounded like but it may not be the word said] and passed a treaty forbidding their use even when countries are engaged in war. Congress set a 'red line' when it ratified that treaty. Congress set a 'red line,' ah, when it indicated that, dah, in a, ah, piece of, ah, legislation titled Syria Accountability Act that, ah, some of the horrendous things that are happening on the ground there, ah, need to be answered for. Ah, and, so, when I said, at a press conference, that my calculus about what's happening in Syria would be altered by the use of chemical weapons, which the overwhelming, ah, consensus of humanity says is wrong, um, that wasn't just something I kind of made up...." [The theme was Syria and a potential attack on some people in Syria and about his past note about crossing or not crossing "a red line" if some people used chemical weapons. On August 20, 2012, Barack Obama said: "...We cannot have a situation that chemical or biological weapons are falling into the hands of the wrong people. Ah, we have been very clear to the Assad regime but also to other players on the ground that a 'red line' for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons movin' around or being utilized. That would change my calculus...." You should see Barack Obama is a liar--when you examine the two sets of quotations. In addition, you should see Barack Obama was working to take all talk away from him and put in on everyone else, which becomes even more evident in the next paragraph of this section.]
"...My credibility is not on the line. The international community's credibility is on the line. And America and Congress's credibility is on the line because we give lip service to the notion that these international norms are important. How credible is the international community when it says this is an international norm that has to be observed?...." [Obama blames the world, and it seems to me, he might try blaming the universe soon.]Tuesday, September 10, 2013 (an address to the nation about Syria from the White House):
"My fellow Americans, tonight I want to talk to you about Syria--why it matters and where we go from here. Over the past two years, what began as a series of peaceful protests against the oppressive regime of Bashar al-Assad has turned into brutal civil war. Over a hundred-thousand people have been killed. Millions have fled the country. In that time, America has worked with allies to provide humanitarian support, to help the moderate opposition, and to shape a political settlement...." [This was the opening five lines to about a fifteen-minute speech, which was designed to talk about maybe taking military actions against the military of the government of Syria (headed by Bashar al-Assad), and a big reason to possibly attack was tied to chemical weapons (which it seems--maybe--had been authorized by Bashar al-Assad to be used by members of Bashar al-Assad's military, but it is unclear whether the use had been authorized or had not been authorized (so-called rogue members could have taken it upon themselves to use chemical weapons). The speech sort of presented the idea that Barack Obama might in the future push to have the U.S. attack forces loyal to Bashar al-Assad; over the last few days, Barack Obama had to give up a push to, for example, use the speech influence the U.S. Congress and the American people to let him attack those who support Bashar al-Assad and help those who are fighting against Bashar al-Assad and his associates (such as military members). For this section, I only show one of the defects in the speech. Notice Barack Obama said "moderate opposition." What does "moderate opposition" mean? It was known on this date that some of the fighters working against Bashar al-Assad and his associates were, in essence, tied to the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorist organization that is pushing for the world to be ruled by the laws of Sharia, which had recently gotten control of the government of Egypt and had recently been pushed out of control by the military in Egypt (which, for one, removed the most-recent president, who is closely tied to the Muslim Brotherhood). I argue the point that, given Barack Obama's ties to the Muslim Brotherhood or support for the Muslim Brotherhood in the past, Barack Obama lied about the opposition being "moderate opposition" and is working to help the Muslim Brotherhood take over Syria or at least portions of Syria. This speech left the door open on the issue of Barack Obama's making millitary strikes against the supporters of Bashar al-Assad.]Monday, September 16, 2013:
"...Up until now, Republicans have argued that these cuts are necessary in the name of fiscal responsibility, but our deficits are now falling at the fastest rate since the end of World War II...." [On this date, Barack Obama talked about the shooting at a Navy yard, but, as usual, he passed along crap, an example of which is the quoted material in this section."]
"...And in two weeks, the Affordable Care Act is gonna help millions of more people...." [And here is more bullshit!]
"...A lot of the...horror stories that were predicted about, ah, how this [the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010] was gonna shoot rates way up and there were gonna be 'death panels' and all that stuff--none of that stuff happened...." [Officially, the law has yet to go into effect fully, but history already shows, for example, that rates to buy health-care insurance have gone up for people, so once again Barack Obama passed along bullshit.]Friday, September 20, 2013 (at a Ford Motor Company plant in Kansas City, Missouri):
"...But that's the strategy they're [the Republicans are] pursuing--House of Representatives just voted on it today. What Congress is doing right now is important. Unfortunately, right now, the, the, the debate that's going on in Congress, ah, is not meeting the test of helpin' middle-class families. It's just, ah, they're, they're not focused on you. They're focused on politics. They're focused on tryin' to mess with me...." [From the uninformed and the people with idiot minds, Barack Obama tried to draw up sympathy for him by putting his "mess with me" idea in the speech, and that is a sign of a rotten man, since the tactic was and is inappropriate and not befitting a U.S. president.]Thursday, September 26, 2013:
"...For a long time, America was the only advanced economy in the world where health care was not a 'right' but a privilege. We spent more, we got less...." [Okay, here I go showing up the evil mind of a U.S. President once again, and the speech from which all the examples in this section was loaded with crap, and each paragraph that I show in this section has a bunch of nonsense, but since there is so much nonsense, I only show up one piece of nonsense in each. To start, I show up one bit of nonsense. Barack Obama said--"...We spent more, we got less...." That is bullshit. America has had the best health-care system in the world, and, for example, the people of the country developed more medical improvements than the peoples of any other country, leading the way in the creation and development and improvement of machines and medicines. Yes, Barack Obama spoke bullshit!]
"...I mean that th, th, th, th, they said that, that these rates would come in real high and everybody's premiums would, would be sky high, and it turns out--lo and behold--actually, the prices came in lower than we expected, lower than I predicted...." [This is bullshit from a bullshit mind. Around the time, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was being created, Barack Obama was pushing the idea that people would get to keep their doctors and keep their insurance and see rates go down about $2,500. Reports easily found on the Internet today show that this statement from Barack Obama is bullshit! Oh, by the way, notice how goofed up the start of the sentence is--that is how it was said.]
"...They said this would be a disaster in terms of jobs. There's no wide spread evidence that the Affordable Care Act is hurting jobs...." [Here is yet more bullshit! For one, news reports show people are getting their hours cut because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. Yes, Barack Obama spoke shit here!]
"...The Tea Party Republicans have taken it to a whole new level, because they're threatening either to shut down the government or shut down the entire economy by refusing to let America pay its bills for the first time in history, unless I agree to gut a law that will help millions of people. Think of, think about this--shutting down the government just because you don't like a law that was passed and found constitutional...." [Please see my document entitled Not Supreme in Nature -- The U.S. Supreme Court and the 'Obamacare' Decision: The Majority Pushed 'Enslavism" on the Country, which can be reached by using this Supreme link. By the way, Mark R. Levin reminded my on his nationally syndicated radio show on this day that, in the past, the U.S. Supreme Court found slavery constitutional and segregation constitutional. I note that the U.S. Supreme Court has passed rotten judgments in the past, because it has had rotten members.]
"...But the good news is I believe eventually they'll come around, because Medicare and Social Security faced the same kind of criticism...." [Today, Medicare and Social Security are almost bankrupt, and, by the way, Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (a.k.a. "Obamacare"), though the law was going to take a bunch of hundred of billions from Medicare, and, today, the amount being taken out of Medicare because the "Obamcare" is a little more than 700-billion dollars. You see this statement from Barack Obama as shit.]
"...We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America!...." [Well, the statement is not necessarily "bullshit" or "shit." In five days, in relation to this date, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 will really go into effect, and, in essence, it really starts of the process of allowing the federal government decide who gets health care and who does not, and that is a fundamental change in the country, which it like a country with an enslavism form of government, such as communist government, despite sort of having The United States Constitution as a basis. And the fundamental change was made possible for Barack Obama by the work of many corrupt and evil media members and many corrupt and evil people in the U.S. Congress, all the Democrats and some of the Republicans, such as John Boehner (a Republican who upholds the ways of socialism and communism) and John McCain (a Republican who upholds the ways of socialism and communism). You are strongly urged to see my document entitled It is a Matter of Self-Defense: The Individual Against the Federal Government of the United States of America, Especially the Killer Known as Barack Obama and the Other Democratic Party Politicians, which can be reached by using this Self-Defense link. Barack Obama--with helps from others--is turning the country into a rotten country, and that is no bullshit from me.]Monday, September 30, 2013:
"...The Senate has passed a bill that keeps the government open, does not have a lot of extraneous issues to it, that allows us then to negotiate a longer-term budget and address a range of other issues, but that ensures that we're not shutting down the government and we're not shutting down the economy, ah, at a time when, ah, a lot of families out there are just getting some traction and digging themselves out of the hole that we've had, ah, as a consequence of the financial crisis. And I've said before--Congress has two responsibilities, pass a budget...." [This comment is rottenness to a high degree, since, in essence, Barack Obama was working to teach nonsense to the idiots in his audience. Barack Obama pushed the idea that the entire economy was going to crash if the federal government were to shut down (though it would only be temporarily, and by, the way, it would only be a partial shutdown as being pushed by Republicans because, for one, the Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives had recently passed a bill to fund the federal government, except for the anything tied to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and I say again--and Republicans were and are not working to shut down the entire federal government. I state--The entire economy will not crash if the federal government were to shut down (which would only be temporarily), since businesses all over the country would still be up and running as usual, and that is the economy, given what the federal government does does not drive the economy. Barack Obama passed along more crap on his day, and that is the way of an evil mind. By the way, it was also on Friday, September 27, 2013, that Barack Obama made a speech and pushed the idea that a federal government shutdown (which would only be a partial shutdown since many systems, in essence, never get shutdown in a so-called "shutdown") would crash the "economy." Yes, when the federal government shuts down, the doughnut shops are still open, and the NFL is still up and running, and car dealerships are still doing business, and clothing stores are still open, and newspapers (such as the "communist rags" like The New York Times and Detroit Free Press) are still pushing out the nonsense for fees, and NBC News is still selling propaganda through its programming, and bars and restaurants are serving up wares, and factories of all types around the country are still churning out materials, and limestone, coal, and steel mines are yet open, et cetera.]Wednesday, October 2, 2013 (in an interview with John Harwood of CNBC for CNBC):
"...No, I think this time's different. Ah, I think they [Wall Street people] should be concerned. Ah, and, ah, I had a chance to speak ta some of the financial industry who came down for the, ah, typical trip, and I told them that, ah, it is, ah, not unusual for Democrats and Republicans to disagree--that's the way the Founders designed our government, ah...." [Here, a smart person can understand Barack Obama was trying to push the idea crap. First, the "Founders" did set out to design a federal government for the purpose of having "disagreements." The Founders set out to design a government that would block a person from becoming like a king or dictator over the people of the country. One main purpose of The United States Constitution is to be a blocking document. Second, Barack Obama was working to worry Wall Street--purposely--or Barack Obama was working to make the financial community of the country uneasy--purposely--though a federal government shutdown should not be something to really worry about, since a federal government shutdown does not shut down the country.]
"...Democracy's messy, but when you have a situation in which, ah, a faction is willing potentially to default on, ah, U.S. government obligations, ah, then we are in trouble...." [This portion of Barack Obama's interview followed the material that I present from Barack Obama in the previous paragraph. Notice the idea of "default." Barack Obama pushed the idea that the government would not be able to pay off obligations if there were a government shutdown, but also, as you cannot really see clearly here in this section, Barack Obama was also pushing the idea that there would be "default" if the debt ceiling was not raised. But, remember, the "debt ceiling" has nothing to do "default" stuff. "Debt ceiling" deals with taking on new debt. "Default" is not paying off current bills that come due (related to things already bought). Oh, did you notice Barack Obama thinks "democracy's messy," which is true for a man who wishes to be a dictator and have no limits on what he does, such as his ability to bankrupt a country and the people of the country, who ultimately are obligated to pay off the debts of the man. Oh, what "faction"--in Barack Obama's mind--is pushing for "default," which I have explained does not happen when the federal government shuts down partially and temporarily? Barack Obama called up an imaginary demon for the purpose of selling a lie about default!]
"...I think it's fair to say that, during the course of my presidency, I have bent over backwards to work with, ah, the Republican Party, and as purposely kept my rhetoric down..." [Bullshit!]Thursday, October 3, 2013:
"...An economic shutdown that results from default would be dramatically worse. In a government shutdown, Social Security checks still go out on time; in an economic shutdown, if we don't raise the 'debt ceiling,' they don't go out on time. In a government shutdown, disability benefits still arrive on time. In an economic shutdown, they don't ..." [Okay, here I have to step aside and give attention to someone else, since what I have to say may be thought of as something that I stole from someone else. It was during the evening of Thursday, October 3, 2013, that Mark R. Levin (the host of the nationally syndicated radio show called The Mark Levin Show) noted that Barack Obama was and is setting up that idea that he will violate The United States Constitution by raising--by himself--the debt ceiling for the federal government, which only the U.S. Congress can legally do. The "debt ceiling" supposed to put a cap on government spending so that the federal government--especially the Executive Branch of the federal government--is unable to spend money without limits. Mark R. Levin noted that, in a very short time, the issue of raising the debt ceiling will be tackled by the U.S. Congress and Barack Obama, and Mark R. Levin noted that, if the ceiling is not raised by the U.S. Congress, Barack Obama will do it anyway, and Mark. R. Levin noted that the main media and other communists and bad people (such as the high-ranking members of the Democratic Party) will praise Barack Obama and support Barack Obama because Barack Obama will have--it will be said, though it will be a lie--saved the country from default and economic disaster. That is enough from Mark R. Levin for now. I say again--If the debt ceiling is not raised, the federal government does not go into default, because money is always being taken in through taxes and such each day and it is enough money to pay off debts that come due each day. Remember: The "debt ceiling" has nothing to do with default, it has only to do with having the federal government go out a spend on something new or spend more money. Do you see how rotten Barack Obama is? Ask yourself--How far would Barack Obama go to be able to spend money at will and crash a country economically? Barack Obama has violated The Unied States Constitution a number of times already (as I show in my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached through this History link). No one or no group, such as the high-ranking members of the Republican Party in the U.S. Congress, has challenged Barack Obama for having violated The United States Constitution. Barack Obama has gotten away with illegal actions! I say that it is very likely Barack Obama will take up a criminal action and impeachable action--an act of treason--once again. Get ready!]Friday, October 4, 2013:
"...I've said I'm happy that negotiations with, ah, the Republicans and Speaker Boehner on a whole range of issues, but we can't do it, ah, with a gun held to the head of the American people...." [Only a shit man would say--as a U.S. President--such a gutter statement as "...with a gun held to the American people...." There is no gun being held to the American people with respect to the budget battle in the U.S. Congress. Barack Obama is the killer, as I show, for example, in my document entitled The "Benghazi Killings Scandal": A Short Information-and-Status Report, which can be reached by using this Benghazi link. In addiction, Barack Obama's people were involved in the "Fast and Furious" gun-running project around 2009--which is a national scandal--and people were killed because of that rotten project. In the budget battle, if Barack Obama wins and gets an increase in what he is able to spend, he will put the American people deeper in debt, and I say that that, for the American people, is like being shot in the face by Barack Obama.]Tuesday, October 8, 2013 (a press event):
"...The American people do not get to demand a ransom for doing their jobs. You don't get a chance to call your bank and say--I'm not going to pay my mortgage this month, unless you throw in a new car and an Xbox. And if you're in negotiations around buying somebody's house, you don't get to say--Well, let's talk about the price my goin' pay and if you don't give me the price, then I'm gonna burn down your house. That's not how negotiations work. In the same, members of Congress and the House Republicans in particular don't get to demand ransom in exchange for doing their jobs...." [So, on October 8, 2013, Barack Obama took part in an appearance before the press, and this speech, which was what it was, was given about week after the federal government had been in what was being called a "shutdown." If I look at the idiots in the general public for the moment, I can say that the idiots did not know the "shutdown" was a hoax; in fact, only about 17 percent of the federal government was actually in a "shutdown" ["Estimate shows 17 percent of government is actually shut down." FoxNews.com, 7 October 2013; York, Byron. "Where's sense of crisis in a 17% government shutdown." The Washington Examiner, 5 October 201, 1:01 p.m.]. By the way, on October 9, 2013, The Associated Press would bury in a story information that the approval rate for Barack Obama was at only about 37 percent [Woodward, Calvin, and Jennifer Agiesta. "Poll:: GOP Gets the Blame in Shutdown." The Associated Press, 9 October 2013, 3:30 a.m. EDT.]. The speech was rotten and loaded with lies, and it was loaded with nonsense, such as that presented in quotation marks in this paragraph. No U.S. president in history has ever said such words in public, which are words that a person can expected to come from slug of a man. I have never heard such a collection of words from any past U.S. president.]
"...Because it's called raising the debt ceiling, I think a lot of Americans think, ah, it's raising our debt. It is not raising our debt!...." [Well, here is one of the lies. Yes, basically, the action of actually raising the "debt ceiling" to a new number does not increase the debt. However, the only reason that the "debt ceiling" is raised is to spend money on new things. That increases the debt! Raising the "debt ceiling" does, in essence, increase the federal debt."
"...It does not add a dime to your debt...." [I say in jest--"Oh, right!"]
"...And I know there's been some discussion, for example, about, ah, my powers under the Fourteenth Amendment to go ahead, ah, ignore the debt-ceiling law. Ah, setting aside the legal analysis, what matters is that, if you start havin' a situation in which there's, there's legal controversy about, ah, the U.S. Treasury's authority to issue debt, um, the damage will have been done even if that were constitutional 'cause people wouldn't be sure. It'd be tied up in litigation for a long time. That's gonna make people nervous...." [This statement shows off the mind of a highly evil mind, that of which belongs of Barack Hussein Obama. In the matter of raising the debt ceiling--that limit that blocks him from buying new things and spending on new things--Barack Obama is in what can be called a win-win situation. If the U.S. Congress raises the debt limit, Barack Obama gets to take on new spending and sink the country more, and if the U.S. Congress does not raise the debt limit, Barack Obama will raise the debt limit unconstitutionally through some nonsense justification by himself and will spend more money and put the country deeper in debt, which really puts the American people more in debt because it is ultimately the American people who are beholden to pay off and give up money to pay debts ensured by the federal government, and in either case, Barack Obama gets to kill the citizens of the United States of America and kill a country. For those persons who are stupid, I must report that Barack Obama was correct in saying that, if he were to raise the debt ceiling through his own actions, such as through an Executive Order and if he were challenged in a court case, it would take a long time to resolve the case, and Barack Obama would have already succeeded in killing the country. Yes, Barack Hussein Obama is an evil man, and this set of words from Barack Hussein Obama shows it clearly.]
[Note: The Republicans in the U.S. Congress should not agree to raising the "debt ceiling" through any agreement. Barack Obama must either accept the fact that the "debt ceiling" is not raised or raise it on his own, which would be done in an unconstitutional manner. Let Barack Obama determine whether or not he will act unconstitutionally, violate the law, and be like a dictator. If Barack Obama takes it upon himself to raise the debt ceiling, the citizens of the country will then have more evidence of his rottenness and more reason to not follow him and his laws.]Monday, October 14, 2013 (at Martha's Table in Washington, D.C.):
"...It's not smart, it's not good for the American people to let America default...." [Barack Obama was out pushing that "default" crap again. The only way that the United States of America can go into "default" at this time in history is if Barack Obama--as the U.S. President--orders the Executive Branch people to, for instance, not pay off interest that comes due for payment or pay off on bonds that come due. The country will not "default" as Barack Obama suggests. It is a lie!]Wednesday, October 16, 2013 (makes a statement about the agreement about, for one, the debt-ceiling issue):
"...That's gonna be my focus. I'm looking forward, ah, to Congress doin' the same. But once again, I want to thank the leadership for coming together and getting this done. Ah, hopefully next time, ah, it won't be in the eleventh hour. Ah, one of the things that I've said throughout this process is we got to get out of the habit of governing by crisis. And, ah, my hope and expectation is everybody has learned that, ah, there's no reason why we can't work on the issues at hand, ah, why we can't disagree between the parties while still be agreeable, and, ah, make sure we're not inflicting harm on the American people when we do have disagreements...." [This is only a portion of the statement that was made, and the entire statement was filled with crap, and this portion is only a portion of the crap. For instance, Barack Obama did inflict harm on the American public that should not have been inflicted; in one case, Barack Obama made it hard for people--military men of World War II--to get to the World War II memorial in Washington, D.C., which normally has no barriers but was given barriers during the so-called federal-government shutdown (which was a fake shutdown for the most part). And history shows Barack Obama promotes "crisis."]Thursday, October 17, 2013 (makes another statement to the press, such as about the "debt-ceiling" issue):
"...Now, there's been a lot of discussion lately of the politics of this shutdown. But let's be clear--Ah, there are no winners here. These last few weeks have inflicted completely unnecessary damage on our economy. We don't know yet the full scope of the damage, but every analyst out there believes it slowed our growth...." [This is high-level bullsit from Barack Obama, and there was more in the statement that I chose not to cover. First, the federal-government shutdown was only a partial shutdown, only affecting 17 percent of the federal government. Second, the federal-government does not produce anything, such as products. Third, anytime a federal-government shutdown has occurred in the past, everybody who had pay temporarily held back got paid after the shutdown was over, and any government buying of services or products from the businesses that had to be halted, which always turned out to be temporarily, took off again after the shutdown had ended. Fourth, what is the source that gives Barack Obama credibility in saying "...every analyst out there believes...." See--Barack Obama pushed out more bullshit to teach bullshit to people. By the way, Barack Obama will--in the future--probably cite the federal-government shutdown when more information comes out that notes the economy is not doing well. That is how a defective man works, a garbage piece of man works.]Monday, October 21, 2013 (in the Rose Garden):
"...Through the marketplaces, you can get health insurance for what maybe the equivalent of your cell-phone bill or your cable bill...." [In life, a person has to make choices, such as (1) to buy health-care insurance and not buy something frivolous, such as cable-television service, or (2) to not buy health-care insurance and buy something frivolous. If a person has the ability to buy cable-television service, the person should be be subsidizes in relation to buying health-care insurance, and, especially, another person or other persons should not have to buy health insurance for the person who forgoes buying health-care insurance to buy cable-television service. Barack Obama's statement was nonsense, especially since health-care insurance is much more expensive than buying cell-phone service for most people. In addition, it a person has a cell-phone bill that is more than $300 or $400 or $500 a month--it is time for that person to cut back on calling people on the cell phone, such as when they are bored, and put money into a health-insurance plan. Notice that Barack Obama pushed the idea that the "health-care exchanges" (set up by some states to lead to the selling of health-care insurance) are "marketplaces" when "health-care exchanges" are not "marketplaces." The idea of a "marketplace"--as Barack Obama was implying--is the private sector of the economy where things are made and sold and prices are set by supply and demand and where there is competition amongst people.]
"...And that product is working. It's really good...." [Barack Obama--a perpetual liar--worked to sell the idea that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2013 is a good so-called "product." It is not a "product." It is a rotten law! And Barack Obama has no survey information that shows without a doubt that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is resulting in any "quality" and is leading to "good" services. Incidentally, Barack Obama does not use the so-called "product," not having to use it, so what is is experience with the so-called "product" that he talked about? Barack Obama has no experience with the so-called "product."]
"...So far, the national website--healthcare.gov--has been visited nearly twenty-million times...." [This statement with a statistic is rotten. Just because there are twenty-million hits to a website does not mean twenty-million persons went to the website. Reports in the news exist that the website has kicked people out while they were using it, so the people have to go back in. Some people went in only to see what the website looks like, such as reporters trying to determine how good the website system, especially since it has been public knowledge for a number of days that the website is defective. So Barack Obama pushed crap through the short set of words that I have put within quotation marks.]
"...Nobody's madder than me about the fact that the website isn't working as well as it should...." [Here Barack Obama confirmed--at least a little--that the website is defective, which I talked about in the previous paragraph. By the way, Barack Obama's sentence should have been "Nobody's madder than I am about...." instead of "Nobody's madder than me....". The "me" is wrong, Barack Obama!]Thursday, October 30. 2013 (a rally for "Obamacare" in Boston):
"...It is also true that some Americans who have health-insurance plans that they bought on their own through the old individual market are getting notices from their insurance companies suggesting that somehow because of the Affordable Care Act they may be losing their existing health-insurance plans. This has been the latest flurry in the news...." [On this day, Barack Obama was out again trying to sell as good the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and one again, he lied, even though, for example, he used "true" in the sentence that begins this section. I will not report in this section example upon example of news stories that I have heard or read since October 1, 2014, about the tens of thousands of persons or really the hundreds of thousands who have been pushed off their health-care plans because their plans do no meet the qualifications set down by the federal government--Barack Obama--in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and the stories are out there to see, and you can hunt them down yourself--Good historians will show in the future that I am right and Barack Obama is full of shit. The first sentence that I present in this section is a sloppy sentence. On part--"It is also true that some Americans who have health-insurance plans that they bought on their own through the old individual market are getting notices from their insurance companies suggesting" and "they may be losing their existing health-insurance plans...." makes sense (for the most part). The other part--"that somehow because of the Affordable Care Act"--is part that sets up the mess. The sentence should have been said as--"...It is also true that some Americans who have health-insurance plans that they bought on their own through the old individual market are getting notices from their insurance companies suggesting that because of the Affordable Care Act they are losing their existing health-insurance plans...." In the quoted material from Barack Obama, Barack Obama did a subtle job to hint that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 has had nothing to do with people losing their health-care insurance plans. In addition, the tone that he used to say the sentence--which I am unable to present through written text--also showed he worked to discount that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 has had anything to do with people losing their existing health-care insurance plans. Barack Obama tried to poo-pooed the news reports with "shit" from his mind.]
"...If you had one of these substandard plans before the Affordable Care Act became law and you really like that plan, you were able to keep it...." [In this sentence, which is a poorly a constructed sentence, Barack Obama pushed the idea that there had been substandard health-care plans in the marketplace before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was made law and people had been able to keep those substandard plans. By the way, who is Barack Obama--who was and is not schooled in the business of insurance--to say that there were "substandard" plans? What is a "substandard" plan? Barack Obama hinted that it was bad that people could keep those "substandard" plans in the past, and now, because of him, those "substandard" plans are getting wiped out, and, to him, that is good. By the way, today, because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, people who have the best plans available in the marketplace--as determined by, for instance, Barack Obama--are now penalized through a tax for having them--for getting the best plans that they could to take care of themselves--and I say that that is rotten and the sign of a bad country (you are urged to see my document entitled It is a Matter of Self-Defense: The Individual Against the Federal Government of the United States of America, Especially the Killer Known as Barack Obama and the Other Democratic Party Politicians, which can be reached by using this Self-Defense link). Yes, no matter whether or not you liked your plan or like your plan, you cannot have it--Barack Obama is going to save you from yourself! Really, Barack Obama is working to enslave your life to him! Such shit about life Barack Obama pushes each day! Barack Obama sentence should have been said to make it better constucted--"...If you had one of these substandard plans before the Affordable Care Act became law and you really liked that plan, you were able to keep it...." He should have said "liked" and not "like" in the sentence at least. And really the sentence should have been said as--"...If you had had one of these substandard plans before the Affordable Care Act was made law and you really had liked that plan, you had been able to keep it...."]Monday, November 4, 2013:
"...Now, if you had or have one of these plans before the Affordable Care Act came into law and you really liked that plan, what we said was--you could keep it, if it hasn't changed since the law was passed...." [This statement is bullshit of the highest degree! In my document entitled Nonsense Statements and Quotations from Barack Obama, there is evidence that Barack Obama said--You can keep your health-care plan. Each piece of evidence shows that he did not put qualifiers to the idea of keeping your health-care plan. By the way, here are the dates to see in that document--June 11, 2009, June 23, 2009, and June 29, 2012. I know Barack Obama many more times said that people would be able to keep their health-care plans--without having qualifiers attached--but I did not report those other times in the document, feeling there were other things to show. So, what Barack Obama did by speaking the words that I have within quotation marks for this section is lie to cover up a lie! By the way, around this date, many other Democrats were interviewed by the media--especially the communist media--and pushed along the same idea that Barack Obama did in the quoted material--noting there had been qualifiers tied to the idea about being able to keep health-care plans and that the qualifiers had been said. Those Democrats pushed out and spoke shit!]Thursday, November 7, 2013 (an interview with NBC News):
"...Well, first of all, I meant what I said, and we worked hard ta try to make sure that we implement it [the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010] properly, but obviously we didn't do enough, a good enough job, and I regret that. Ah, we're talking about five percent of the population who are in what's called the individual market--they're out there buying health insurance on their own--and a lot of these plans are sub-par plans, and we put in a clause in the law that said, if you had one of those plans, even if it was sub-par, ah, when the law was passed, you could keep it, but there's enough churn in the market that folks since then have bought sub-par plans, and now that may be all that they can afford, so even though it only affects a small amount of the population, you know, it means a lot to them obviously when they get, ah, this letter canceled, and, you know, I am deeply concerned about it, and I've assigned my team to see what can be do to close some of the holes and gaps in the law, ah, because, ya know, my intention is to lift up and make sure the insurance that people buy is affective, that it's actually going to deliver what they think they're purchasing, 'cause we know, before the law was passed, a lot of these plans people thought they had insurance coverage and then they find out that they had huge out-of-pocket expenses or women were being charged more than men. If you had pre-existing conditions, you just couldn't get it at all, and we are proud of the consumer protections we put into place. On the other hand, we also want to make sure that, ah, nobody is put in a position where their plan's been canceled--they can't afford a better plan, even though they'd like to have a better plan, and so we're gonna have to work hard, ah, to make sure that those folks, ah, are, you know, takin' care of." [NBC News--the communist news entity--had a big interview of Barack Obama on this date, and one again, Barack Obama pushed along crap. First, it is not only people with individual plans who are being hurt--companies are having to drop employees because the companies cannot deal with the law. Second, who is he to say that plans head by individuals--before they were forced to lose their plans by the law--were "sub-par plan"? Third, when you sign a contact for health-care insurance, you know exactly what you are getting--because it is in the contract. What crap said by saying people did not know what they had when they signed health-care-insurance contacts? By the way, it is not up to the U.S. President to see that insurance of any type is affective!
"...I regret very much that, ah, what we intended to do, which is to make that sure everybody is moving into better plans because they want 'em as opposed to because they're forced into them, ah, that, ya know, we weren't as clear as we needed to be, ah, in terms of the changes that we taking place...." [Boy, this does not make sense. So, what idiot-head--Barack Obama--was pushing here is he and his associates were working to get citizens to change to other plans because the citizens wanted to change plans or citizens wanted to be kicked off their plans so that they could get better plans? It does not make sense, especially since people are finding out they are ending up with plans that cost more and have much, much high deductibles! Yes, Barack Obama passed along crap in this set of words.]
"...Keep in mind that most of the folks who are gonna, who got, got these cancellation letters, they'll be able to get better care at the same cost or cheaper in these new marketplaces because they'll have more choice, they'll have more competition...." [Bullshit! The federal-government through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is determining what plans can be offered by insurance companies--and it is a limited range. So Barack Obama passed along crap again. In addition, who is Barack Obama--a perpetual liar--to say that a person will get better care?]
"...And I am sorry that they, ah, ya know, are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me. We've got to work hard to make sure that, ah, they know we hear them and that we're gonna do everything we can, ah, ta deal with folks who find themselves, ah, in a tough position as a consequence of this." [Bullshit!]
"...I think we in good faith have been trying ta take on a health-care system that has been broken for a very long time...." [Bullshit!]
"...And what we've been trying to do is ta change it in the least disruptive way possible. I mean keep in mind that they're were folks on the 'left' who would have preferred a single-payer plan. That would have been a lot more disruptive...." [Stop! History shows that Barack Obama has said that he wants a single-payer plan. Notice how in this set of words Barack Obama tries to make it seem he is not part of the "left." Yes, Barack Obama passed on more crap in this set of words.]
[Note: That is enough of the speech--I have not the time to see and hear more of the interview and pass on more here.]Thursday, November 14, 2013 (a press event at the White House):
"...Ah, yesterday, I, ah, the White House announced that, in the first month, more than a hundred-thousand Americans successfully enrolled in new insurance plans. Ah, is that as high a number as we would like? Absolutely not! But it does mean that people want affordable health care...." [Once again, Barack Obama passed along tons and tons of bullshit to the American people through a speech and a question-and-answer session with the press on November 14, 2013, which was about one month and fourteen days since the Patient Protection and Affordable Act of 2014 had really started to force people to buy health-care insurance, such as through a government-run website, and also Barack Obama reported what he was going to do to help people who had lost or were losing health-care insurance because of the law--though he did not report that the problem was the law, though it was indeed the law--through actions of the Executive Branch of the federal government, or he showed how he was violating the law of the United States of America, given he had no power as a U.S. president to make such changes to the law. Okay, the first piece of crap is within quotation marks. There is proof that those who are signing up are finding that costs are being hidden from them till late in the sign up process. People's wanting "...affordable health care..." has nothing to do with signing up.]
"...The bottom line is, in just one month, despite all the problems that we've seen with the website, more than 500,000 Americans, ah, could know the security of health care by January First, many of them for the first time in their lives...." [Notice Barack Obama used "could." Barack Obama did not use "would" or "will" instead of "could" in his statement. Just because a person has a health-care insurance policy, it does not mean treatment will come, especially since history in this country and history in other countries show, governments do not necessarily give good health care when people have health-care insurance, such as--to name only two places--in England and Cuba. Yes, Barack Obama played tricks with words in his statement.]
"...And to those Americans, I hear you loud and clear. I said that I would do everything I can to fix this problem, and today I'm offering an idea that will help do it. Already people who have plans that predate the Affordable Care Act can keep those plans, ah, if they've haven't changed. That was already in the law. That's what's called a 'grandfather clause.' It was included in the law. Today, we're gonna extend that principle both to people who've plans have changed since the law took effect and to people who bought plans since the law took effect. So state insurance commissioners still have the power to decide what plans can and cannot be sold in their states, but the bottom line is insurers can extend current plans that would otherwise be canceled into 2014 and Americans whose plans have been canceled can re-enroll in the same kind of plan. Ah, we're also requiring insurers to extend current plans to inform their customers of two things--one, that protections, ah, what protections these renewed plans do not include, number two, that the marketplace offers new options with better coverage and tax credits that might help you bring down the cost...." [This is rottenness. This shows Barack Obama has made orders that he is not allowed to make. Any changes have to be made by a U.S. Congress and a U.S. President through a bill that becomes a law.
"...It is important to understand the old individual market, ah, was not working well...." [Bullshit! This statement was made early in press event, and, later in the press event, he would make this same type of statement. Through this statement, Barack Obama lid and put down the health-care system of the United States of America before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 became law, when the federal government did not have complete control of the health-care system.]
"...Too often it works fine as long as you stay healthy. It doesn't work well when you're sick...." [Here, Barack Obama was talking about the health-care system before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was made a law. He lied in the statement, and he was trying to imply insurance companies did not pay off on claims in the past and people who had gotten sick got shafted by insurance companies. He passed on bullshit!]
"...So now we're gonna do everything to can to help the Americans who've received these cancellation notices, but I also want everybody to remember there are still forty-million Americans who don't have health insurance at all. Ah, I'm not going to walk away from forty-million people who have the chance to get health insurance for the first time, and I'm not gonna walk away from something that has helped the cost of health care, ah, grow at its lowest rate in fifty years...." [Bullshit! Liar! Before the law arrived, there had not been forty-million persons without health-care insurance. Next, the cost of health-care, such as insurance premiums, has gone up--and not at the slowest rate in fifty years.]
"...Ah, and it's important that we're honest and straightforward in terms when we come with, ah, a problem with, ah, these reforms and these laws, that we address them...." [The perpetual liar talked about being "honest" and "straightforward." Is that not a joke? Yes!]
"...Ah, we just came out of a shutdown and the possibility that, for the first time in over two-hundred years, we wouldn't pay our bills...." [Bullshit! The federal government would not have paid the bills if Barack Obama would not have followed by law of the country, such as by refusing to pay bills that came do, by getting parts of his branch of the federal government--the Executive Branch--to hold back payments (the Judicial Branch and the Legislative Branch are not involved in the day-to-day work of paying bills that come do). And the government shutdown was basically fake, only affecting about seventeen percent of the government.]
"...Ah, with respect to the pledge I made that, if you like your plan, you can keep it, ah, I think--and, you know, I've said in interviews--that, um, there is no doubt that the way I, ah, put that forward unequivocally, ah, ended up not being accurate, it was not because of my intention not to deliver on that commitment and that promise...." [Bullshit! I say in jest--"Yes, I believe you." Bullshit!]
[Note: That is all that I feel like covering. You can look for the rest of the crap yourself.]Thursday, November 21, 2013 (a press statement):
"...Today's pattern of obstruction is just, isn't normal. It's not what our Founders envisioned...." [The theme of the press statement was focused on the action taken in the U.S. Senate (mostly by Democrats) on this day that reduced the ability of a "filibuster" (used to block some appointments made by a U.S. President to high-level federal-government jobs) to work in the U.S. Senate by changing the number of votes needed to stop a "filibuster" of many types of nominees to the federal court system from 60 votes to a simple majority. In essence, through the quoted material for this section, Barack Obama was trying to sell the idea that there should not be any obstructions to what a U.S. President wants to do, even though The United Constitution was specifically set up with potential obstruction features so that a person could not become a U.S. president and work like a dictator. Oh, Barack Obama should have said--to be correct--"Framers" (the people who made The United States Constitution and not "Founders." So, as usual, Barack Obama passed along crap in his statement.]Tuesday, December 3, 2013:
"...Ah, I've always said I will work with anybody to implement and improve this law effectively. You got good ideas, bring 'em to me...." [This set of words is like that which he has used in the past, hinting that he would take into consideration the ideas of others and then never does, and it is shown to be nonsense through what he also said on this day, which is presented in the next paragraph of this section.]
"...But we're not repealing it [the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010], as long as I'm president. I want everybody to be clear about that...." [See? The law is rotten, and he has no intention of making changes to the law really, except if he must delay a few provisions--unconstitutionally through Executive Order or by getting agencies or departments of the Executive Branch to simply avoid following the law--so that opposing politicians cannot remove the law from the books before it really takes hold in the society and so that the Democrats (a.k.a. communists and the like) can win at least the next two national elections enough so that the law cannot be killed before it really takes hold in the society. A smart person is well aware Barack Obama has no intention of makes any real changes to the law.]
"...We believe we're a better country than a country where we allow everyday fourteen-thousand Americans to lose their health-care coverage...." [This is nonsense set of words. Today, insurance companies are being forced cancel policies--by the millions--since the policies do not meet the rules of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, which defines only a few accepted policies and which kills competition in the marketplace. Before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 would be made law, people did lose polices, since they may have left jobs (which may have had health-care policies tied to them), or they canceled their policies (deciding not to pay), or they left one state for another (which caused people to lose their policies since the policies could not be transferred from one state to another--based on law--resulting in the people having to new policies if they wanted to), et cetera. I know not if the "fourteen-thousand Americans" figure used by Barack Obama is accurate, given Barack Obama did not mention whose figure it is or how it was or is calculated (remember, Barack Obama will say anything, being a perpetual liar), but it matters not for discussion here that the figure is true or false, since Barack Obama did not mention how many of the "fourteen-thousand Americans" would jump into new plans later or did jump into new policies later.]
"...Now we may never satisfy the law's opponents. I think that's fair to say. Ah, some of them are rooting for this law to fail. Ah, that's not my opinion, by the way. They say it pretty explicitly. Um, some have already convinced themselves that the law has failed, ah, regardless of the evidence...." [What evidence is there that the law is going well? This is a bullshit statement! It is based on no facts that prove the point trying to be made.]
"...If you ask many of the opponents of this law what exactly they'd do differently, their answer seems to be--Well, let's go back to the way things used to be...." [Well, I would rather have the old system, and at least two improvements, as some Republicans (especially "conservatives") who have put forth over the last five years or so have said, and the two improvements would be to allow people to take, in essence, health-care policies from one state to another and to impose limits on frivolous malpractice suits, which raise the cost of medical care by raising the insurance costs on doctors and hospitals and make big money for lawyers.]
"...I'm gonna need some help in spreading the word. I need you to spread the word about the law...." [Here, Barack Obama was pushing this audience--which is most likely very ignorant of the true nature of the law--to go out and sell the supposed goodness of the law--that is a sign of true rottenness in the man.]Wednesday, December 4, 2013 (at the Center for American Progress in Washington, D.C.):
"...Starting in the late 1970s, this social compact began to unravel. Technology made it easier for companies to do more with less, eliminating certain job occupations. A more competitive world let companies ship jobs anywhere. And as good manufacturing jobs automated or headed off shore, workers lost their leverage, jobs paid less, and offered fewer benefits, as a trickle-down ideology became more prominent. Taxes were slashed for the wealthiest, while investments in things that make us all richer, like schools and infrastructure, were allowed to withered...." [This a collection of nonsense. Since the dawn of man, technology has changed things, even resulting in the loss of jobs, such as those involved in making chariots and in making cannon balls or whatever. In this set of words from Barack Obama, Barack Obama did not hint at what new types of jobs show up when old technology gets replaced; for instance, people used to make manual typewriters--those things that are passé, really starting to die out in the 1960s nd 1970s--and now people make computers. By the way, I wish somebody was still making "typewriter erasers" in this country. I cannot find new ones, and they are useful to me yet. Oh, ships on the Great Lakes, especially between the mid 1920s and the 1960s, used to have "radio compasses." Those are gone. Ships have GPS systems. People stopped making radio compasses, and today people make GPS units. Oh, well.]
"...Some of you may have seen last week, ah, the Pope himself spoke, ah, about this at eloquent length. 'How can it be,' he wrote, 'that it's not a news item when an elderly homeless person dies of exposure but it is news when the stock market loses two points.' But this increasing inequality is most pronounced in our country! And it challenges the very essence of who we are as a people...." [I shall make several points here. First, I come across news stories about people dying of exposure to the weather (it still happens in the country, though maybe not in Pope Francis' country). Second, people who are Catholics now have a problem--the Catholic Church used to be against communism, and now the Catholic Church is headed by Pope Francis, a clearly evident communist, shown in things recently said, such as "...Some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assumes that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world...." That thought from Pope Francis is idiot thought and rotten thought--Pope Francis is putting down "capitalism" and is pushing for "enslavism," in which governments control what people can have and can make and can keep, as is done in many countries--rotten countries with rotten political systems and with countless poor people (truly poor), not like the so called poor in this country. Third, what Barack Obama did was put down the United States of America, since people can become rich--like him--in the country, leaving others (such as do-nothings) behind economically, though the so-called poor in this country can have cars and houses and television sets and telephones and radios and can eat well, unlike the truly poor in other countries, especially those with tribal systems or communistic systems, examples of which are Cuba and North Korea and even Iran (in Iran, for instance, people cannot really dress up their homes--especially the outsides of their homes--for fear government people will take the homes away, saying the people have to much, and keep the homes for themselves).]
"...And for our economic security, it [the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010] needs to work...." [A health-care law in which the government becomes totally in control of the health-care for everyone in the country has nothing to do with "economic security," given such a law cannot provide or guarantee "economic security." Anyway, what is "economic security"" in Barack Obama's twisted mind? And already, it has been shown that the law does not provide "economic security," since it forces people to give up more of their earnings, such as by having to pay higher health-care insurance premiums--that is fact! A health-care law has nothing to do with "economic security"!]
"...If you [Republicans] don't like Obamacare--and I know don't--even though it's built on market-based ideas of choice and competition and the private sector, then you should explain how exactly you'd cut costs and cover more people and make insurance more secure. You owe it to the American people to tells us what you are for not just what you're against...." [Stick this up your ass, Barack! "Obamacare" (or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010) is not "built on market-based ideas of choice and competition and the private sector...." The government has set down the designs of the polices, and the government is even going to tax those who wish to have the high-end plans. There is no competition in the marketplace when the government sets the rules. Since 2009 at least, I have been aware of the alternatives to "Obamacare" that people have put forth, and here Barack Obama worked to suggested no alternatives have been presented. And that is the way of a shit-head man--Barack Obama.]Friday, December 20, 2013 (an "end-of-year" press conference at the White House):
"...This morning, we learned that, over the summer, our economy grew at its strongest pace in nearly two years, the unemployment rate has steadily fallen to its lowest point in five years, our tax code is fairer, and our fiscal situation is firmer with deficits that are now less than half of what they were when I took office...." [As usual, Barack Obama passed along lies and crap in the speech, beginning in the opening-statement portion of the event, which this set of quoted words comes from, as do all the pieces in this section. The piece from Barack Obama is bullshit. For example, the unemployment rate is down because the Barack Obama administration is fudging the statistics and not making it clear that the job universe is smaller than it used to be, even though the population is growing.]
"...The Affordable Care Act has helped keep health-care costs growing at their slowest rate in fifty years...." [Bullshit! The Internet is littered with news stories about how people are finding that deductibles amounts and premiums have jumped greatly. By the way, I have even heard stories about "liberals" who are shocked about what the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 has done to them--and it is not good.]
"...And you add that all you, and what it means is we head next year with an economy that's stronger, ah, than when we started the year...." [Bullshit! The federal debt has exploded more. That means trouble for the economy!]
"...More Americans are finding work and experiencing the pride of a paycheck...." [Bullshit! For many Americans, those who are finding work are finding that they can only get part-time work. Full-time-work jobs have not blossomed.]
"...Our businesses are positioned for new growth and new jobs...." [Bullshit! What data does he have to prove this statement? He just ran off the mouth.]
"...And I firmly believe that...2014 can be a breakthrough year for America...." [Bullshit! What data does he have to prove this statement? Once again he just ran off the mouth, and he even stumbled to get the rotten sentence spoken.]
"...Ah, it's a good start that, earlier this week, for the first time in years, both parties [the Democratic Party and the Republican Party] in both houses of Congress came together to pass a budget that unwinds some of the damaging Sequester cuts that created head winds for our economy. Ah, it clears the path for businesses and for investments that we need to strengthen our middle class, like education and scientific research...." [Bullshit! The new budget had put more taxes--such as "user" taxes--on the American people, and that does not help the middle class (Remember: Such taxes as those added through the bill affect the middle class mostly). The Sequester was not a "headwind" for the economy, and, in fact, it was a tiny cut back in spending by the federal government. The new bill allows the federal government to spend more money and put the country deeper in debt. The bill is rotten! By the way, it cut benefits to some military veterans, and that is a really rotten feature of the bill. Also scientific research really does not directly lead to a more prosperous middle class, since the more money that the federal government spends on research, the more that citizens have to pay in taxes to cover the costs or the more that the federal government goes in debt (anyway, over the history of the country, research is really spurred on by the private sector and not the federal government, and that is how the country got typewriters, telephones, cars, light bulbs, computers, et cetera).]Tuesday, January 7, 2014 (in Washington, D.C.):
"...Independent economists have shown that extending emergency unemployment insurance actually helps the economy, actually creates new jobs when folks like Catherine have a little more to spend ta turn up the heat in her house or buy a few extra groceries. That means more spending with businesses in her local community, which in turn may inspire that business ta hire to hire one more person...." [Here is more evidence of Barack Obama's defective mind, though some persons may only say that he was ignorant of what his words really mean or some persons may say that he was only lying. I say that Barack Obama is a defective man--a rotten man. Look at all the nonsense presented in the quoted material. Barack Obama pushed the idea that if the government gives people money (in the form of unemployment-insurance benefits)--which had been taken from others, such as in the form of taxes--it will increase economic activity and grow the economy, one feature of which is more hiring. That is nonsense, since in his example, money is taken from some persons, who then cannot spend it, and given to other persons. Of course, Barack Obama's idea could involve having the federal government print more money, which decreases the value on each piece of money as a whole in the country, since that new money is not actually tied to new assets being made and an increase in the overall wealth of the country. Then, a person has to wonder--Who are the "independent economists" and where is their evidence that extending emergency unemployment insurance is good for the economy? [By the way, the "emergency" idea is nonsense, since it really is tied to up to 99 months of benefits or nearly two years of benefits.] Oh, let me break in here with some related information. On December 5, 2013, the "Council of Economic Advisers"--which is a unit of the Executive Branch of the federal government and under the control of Barack Obama--issued a report of sorts, and one part of the report noted that "Failing to extend UI [unemployment insurance] benefits would put a dent in job seekers' incomes, reducing and costing 240,000 jobs in 2014" [Furman, Jason, and Betsey Stevenson. "New Report: The Economic Benefits of Extending Unemployment Insurance." Council of Economic Advisers, 5 December 2013, 09:00 a.m. EST.]. Yes, the statement in quotation marks in the previous sentence--which comes from Barack Obama and his associates and is tied to goings-on in the federal government to extend unemployment benefits to some people--pushes out the idea that, if unemployment benefits are not continued to be paid out, "240,000 jobs" will be lost, or the idea from Barack Obama is, if people are not paid to not work, "240,000 jobs" will be lost in the economy. In the material that exists in quotation marks to lead off this section, Barack Obama was teaching crap about life and the world, and that is the way of a defective man--a defective mind.]
"...But although the economy's been growing and we've been adding new jobs, the truth of the matter is that the financial crisis was so devastating that there's still a lot of people who are struggling, and, in fact, if we don't provide unemployment insurance [benefits], it makes it harder for them to find a job...." [And the shit from a shit-head mind just keeps on coming. Forget for a moment that laws made by the U.S. Congress (mostly made by the Democrats in the U.S. Congress) and by Barack Obama are hurting the economy. I could push the point well that the laws that I have in mind are doing damage. For now, look at the logic of what Barack Obama said. By the way, instead of saying "...there's still a lot of people....", Barack Obama should have said "...there are a lot of people...."; Barack Obama made a grammar error. In the material in quotation marks that heads this paragraph, Barack Obama pushed the idea that, if people do not get unemployment-insurance benefits--Barack Obama meant "benefits" even though he did not say the word--they will have a hard time finding jobs. That is idiocy! "Finding a job" and "unemployment-insurance benefits" are unrelated, or a person's getting or not getting unemployment-insurance benefits has nothing to do with getting a job. Barack Obama spoke shit!]Tuesday, January 14, 2014 (at the White House):
"...One of the things that I'll be emphasizing, ah, in this meeting is the fact that, ah, we are not just gonna be waiting for legislation in order to make sure, ah, that 'we're providing Americans, ah, the kind of help that they need. Ah, I've got a pen, and, and I've got a phone, ah, and I can use that pen to sign Executive Orders, ah, and take executive actions and administrative actions that move the ball forward, ah, in helping to make sure our kids are the best education possible, making sure that our businesses are getting the kind of support and help they need to grow and advance, ah, to make sure people are getting the skills that they need to get those jobs our businesses are creating. Ah, and I've got a phone that allows me to convene, ah, Americans from every walk of life--non-profits, businesses, the private sector, ah, universities, ah, to try to bring more and more Americans together around what I think is a unifying theme, making sure, ah, that this is country where, if you work hard, you can make it. And so one of the things that I'm gonna be talkin' to my Cabinet about is--How do we use all the tools available to us, not just, ah, legislation in order to, ah, advance, ah, a mission that I think unifies all Americans, ah, the belief that, ah, everybody's got to take responsibility, everybody's got to work hard, ah, but if you do, you can support a family, ah, and, ah, you know, meet the kinds of obligations that you have, ah, to yourself and your family but also to your communities and to your nation...." [These words were spoken before Barack Obama would head a meeting of his "Cabinet," and these words are loaded with nonsense, but I will only focus on only one main piece of nonsense. Barack Obama noted that he was going to work in "...making sure that our businesses are getting the kind of support and help they need to grow and advance...." There is nothing that a U.S. President can do to help businesses through Executive Orders! A U.S. President can help businesses by signing pieces of legislation--which have been passed first by a U.S. Congress--that actually help businesses, and the main ways to do that are to have pieces of legislation that reduce regulations or reduce taxes, and a U.S. President can hurt businesses by signing pieces of legilations--which have been passed first by a U.S. Congress--that actually hurt businesses, such as those that increase taxes or give businesses more rules to comply with. In the previous paragraph, I talk about "legislation"--"legislation" cannot be created and made law by a U.S. President alone. For a U.S. President to act in a legislative way is to violate law and The United States Constitution and act like a dictator. With what I have already stated clearly sticking out in your mind, ask yourself--What can a U.S. President do to ensure a person get skills of any kind? Government legislation does not create skills in a person. The person must work to gain skills, such as through a lot of reading and study or a lot of practice doing something. If you do nothing, you get no skills. Oh, did you notice Barack Obama mentioned "businesses" and "the private sector" in his little speech? "The private sector" is the business community or is made up of all the "businesses" and the country, and businesses are "the private sector." By the way, Barack Obama noted that he was going to gather a bunch of people together again--he has done that in the past and nothing useful has ever come out of any of those meetings (the meetings were all for show). And, incidentally, Barack Obama is a piece of shit of a man, and because he is, I would never take up any "mission" that he has in mind, especially a mission that he thinks "unifies all Americans." Barack Obama's judgment is defective! I do not follow a man whom I hate and whom good people should hate!]Friday, January 17, 2014 (at the White House):
"...Second, just as ardent civil libertarians recognize the need for robust intelligence capabilities, those with responsibilities for our national security readily acknowledge the potential for abuse as intelligence capabilities advance and more and more private information digitized. After all the folks as NSA [the National Security Administration] and other intelligence agencies are our neighbors. They're our friends and family. They've got electronic bank and medical records like everybody else. They have kids of Facebook and Instagram...." [The theme of the speech was tied to his--supposed--effort to rein in spying on the American public in general by the National Security Administration. Basically, Barack Obama is a perpetual liar. Really, Barack Obama is a rotten man and should not trusted! So, here, Barack Obama was working to convince people that the NSA would not spy on Americans anymore or in bad ways anymore, and he work to sell the idea that people should not worry so much since the NSA is made up of just regular Americans, who can live next door. Well, it must be remembered, for one, during the 1930s and 1940s, the Hitler government--the evil Nazi-controlled government--got neighbors to spy on neighbors and got neighbors to report on neighbors to the government--the purpose was to quell or put down dissent against the government (which was rotten and made up of highly rotten people). Other nations in the past have set up systems in which citizens report the ways of other citizens to the government so that people could be punished for their beliefs and such. Here, Barack Obama wanted people to feel that people at the NSA would not do something bad; yet, the NSA had already been caught doing bad stuff. In addition, Barack Obama has already done bad stuff against the country, as I show in numerous document that I have available on the Internet. Plus, a person must remember bad countries, such as the former Soviet Union, had have, in essence, secret police entities controlled by the leaders of the country--who are corrupt leaders and rotten leaders--and beholden to only the leaders of the countries--those entities have been used to attack citizens not loyal to the corrupt leaders and rotten leaders. On July 2, 2008, while on the presidential campaign trail, Barack Obama said: "...We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded...." The words said in 2008 by Barack Obama were said at a time when the country had countless civilian police agencies all over the country--from local police to state police--and, in essence, a civilian national security force was already in existence, and there was no need for another civilian police force. Yet, Barack Obama talked about creating another security force in 2008, and a smart person knew he was thinking of creating a security force strictly beholden to him. Yes, the part of speech on January 17, 2014, that which is quoted in this paragraph, was used to make people feel good about people in the NSA and accept NSA's spying on Americans in general, and that is even though the close associates around Barack Obama's are rotten people, as I show in numerous documents that I have available on the Internet--his associates are known tax cheats, lovers of Mao (the mass killer of Chinese in China), liars, supports of Sharia (the rotten political/religious system), et cetera.]Thursday, January 23, 2014 (a speech to mayors of cities):
"...Ah, where Congress, ah, is debating things and hasn't been able ta pull the trigger on stuff, ah, my administration is gonna move forward--we're gonna do, do it in partnership with all of you. Ah, I've got a pen, and I've got a phone, and that's all need because, with a pen, I can take executive actions, ah, with a phone, I can rally, ah, folks from around the country to help grow the economy and, ah, help restore opportunity...." [Here, Barack Obama was once again rallying support from his listeners--working to get them to accept his work to violate The U.S. Constitution and working to get them to go along with his work to violate The U.S. Constitution. In essence, Barack Obama was saying--Come along and join me in my effort! I note that the audience showed support through applause this time, and that is a sign of more rottenness--the mayors who clapped.]Saturday, January 25, 2014 (his weekly address, such as through the Internet):
"...Real men do not hurt women...." [The topic was domestic violence, but the topic can fit in with what Barack Obama has been doing since at least January 20, 2009--hurting men and women and children through the rotten laws and dictates ("Executive Orders") that he has been involved with. Barack Obama is no real man" or, really, is no "real good man." In fact, Barack Obama's actions shows that he is an "enslavist" who is willing to hurt countless people, even to the point of killing men and women and children, such as by backing those pushing Sharia and terrorism on the world.]Tuesday, January 28, 2014 (another "State of the Union" speech in the Chamber for the U.S. House of Representatives):
"...Thank you. Thank you. Thank you...." [And that is a portion of the beginning of another speech from Barack Obama. It was a "State of the Union" speech, but the speech really did not address the true state of the nation, such as by providing true facts about the economy or the unemployment rate. It was another lie session, and it was another session to push propaganda, but, of course, Barack Obama has a history of lying and pushing propaganda, which, by the way, is the way of communists and other like rotten people (and Barack Obama's background has ties to a lot of communists, such as Frank Marshall Davis (who had been in Chicago, Illinois, and in Hawaii, as had Barack Obama, and who is considered Barack Obama's mentor) and Valerie Jarrett's family and David Axelrod's family) For an example of a lie, I note that Barack Obama pushed the idea that the country has "...the lowest unemployment rate in over five years...." His statement is a lie, since it is based on fudged statistics, put out by the federal government. The job universe is smaller than it was five years ago--people are out of the workforce who should not be--so the calculation about the job-rate figure is nonsense. A U.S. president cannot really put people to work by signing bills into law; however a U.S. President can lower taxes on businesses, which helps gives businesses a chance to hire more workers, and a U.S. President can raise taxes, which takes money way from businesses that can be used to possibility expand and hire more workers (if there are enough more customers). Yet, Barack Obama pushed the idea--"Put those bills on my desk!..."--which he used to hint to the audience for the speech that his signing bills into law could get more people working. Once again, Barack Obama lied big time about "climate change," saying "...Climate change is a fact!..." The climate at a particular place is always changing--each day. Although Barack Obama noted that the debate is over on the issue of "climate change"--which to Barack Obama really is "manmade climate change" (based on past speeches from him)--the debate is not over. There is no evidence man is killing the planet. Barack Obama pushed communistic bullshit! Of course, he talked about "Obamacare" (or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010), and he passed along crap about his willingness to listen to other person's ideas of improving the law, which he has not done in relation to the bill or the law (especially from Republicans and "conservatives" since 2009 at least), and, in the speech, Barack Obama pushed this line--"...Let's see if the numbers add up...." However, a smart persons knows that the "numbers" related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 as promised by him have not and are not adding up--for instance, deductibles have been going up and costs for health care have been going up and the cost of health-care-insurance policies have been going up. And Barack Obama ran off a bunch of clichés and nonsense, such as "Opportunity is who we are." So that is a rough look at the rotten speech from me. The next three paragraphs provide thoughts from me on three particular parts of the speech, and that is all the time I wish to waste on what was said by a rotten man--Barack Obama.]
"...But what I offer tonight is a set of concrete practical proposals to speed up growth, strengthen the middle class, and build new ladders of opportunity into the middle class. Some require congressional action, and I am eager to work with all of you. But America does not stand still, and neither will I. So wherever and whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that's what I'm gonna do...." [Here, once again, Barack Obama hinted that he was going to act unconstitutionally, and through this set of words from Barack Obama, Barack Obama was working to get listeners to support him in his work to violate The United States Constitution or, he was working to get more and more people to accept his work to be like a dictator. Yet, a U.S. president cannot--through signing bills into law--expand opportunity for more American families or especially expand the middle class. For example, a U.S. President cannot give out more welfare benefits in an effort to raise people into the so-called "middle class." That is not the way to raise people up. People's economic standards increase by working, and people's economic standards increase by getting experience and rising up in the ranks of jobs. If a person does nothing, a person can expect to go nowhere and get nothing. That is life! Barack Obama passed along bullshit in several ways by saying--'''...I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families...."]
"...As Commander-in-Chief, I've have used force when needed to protect the American people, and I will never hesitate to do so as long as I hold this office. But I will not send our troops into harm's way unless it is truly necessary nor will I allow our sons and daughters to be mired in open-ended conflicts. We must fight the battles that need to be fought, not those that terrorists prefer from us, large-scale deployments that drain our strength and may ultimately feed extremism. So even as we ac, ah, actively and aggressively pursue terrorist networks through more targeted efforts and by building the capacity of our foreign partners, America must move off a permanent war footing...." [Well, Barack Obama--Mr. Shit-head--pissed me off with this set of words. Generally speaking, Barack Obama has been shutting down the U.S. military over the last five years or so, such as by delaying decisions to put more troops into the field to protect other troops already in the ground, and he has been working to cut the budget of the U.S. military. By the way, in general, the Democratic Party has been undermining the U.S. military since the Vietnam War (in the 1960s and early 1970s). But the first line of the quoted material made me think of the "Benghazi Killings Scandal," in which Barack Obama did nothing to help Americans under siege in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012, and, in fact, four Americans were killed because Barack Obama did nothing. I say that, in essence, he helped kill the four Americans. To learn more about the "Benghazi Killings Scandal," you are urged to see my document entitled The "Benghazi Killings Scandal": A Short Information-and-Status Report, which can be reached by using this Benghazi link. Here is more that pissed me off. Really, in this section, what Barack Obama was telegraphing to enemies around the world is the U.S. is no longer going to really be involved to blocking or stopping rotten countries from doing rotten things to others. Considered--How does a person determine whether or not a military action will end up being a so-called "open-ended conflict"? In recent, years, many actions taken by the U.S. have sort of ended up as so-called "open-ended conflict" because Democrats in the U.S. Congress (communists and other such bad people) have been undermining the ability of the U.S. military to conduct military business properly (such as strike fully). The Democrats have acted as enemies of the U.S. and have helped the enemies. And to say that a military action taken by the U.S. feeds "extremism" is nonsense and shit. The "extremism" is out there, such as those to are involved in pushing Sharia on the world--they are killers and insane, and they are leading a war on non-followers of Sharia. And the quoted words in this paragraph from Barack Obama show more that he is working against the interests of the United States of America.]
"...Today, women make up about half our workforce, but they still make seventy-seven cents for every dollar a man earns. That is wrong. And in 2014, it's an embarrassment. Women deserve equal pay for equal work. Now, she deserves to have a baby without sacrificing her job. A mother deserves a day off to care for a sick child or a sick parent without running into hardship. And--you know what?--a father does, too. It is time to do away with workplace policies that belong in a Mad Men episode. This year, let's all come together--Congress, the White House, businesses from Wall Street to Main Street--to give every woman the opportunity she deserves, because I believe when women succeed, America succeeds...." [The "Mad Men" part of Barack Obama speech was supposed to be funny, and it seems it got passed around the Internet greatly after it had been said. The whole section, to me, was fluff and a part of pandering to women. I do not believe the figure about "seventy-seven percent" is right. Women are usually in lower skilled jobs than men are, and you cannot compare dissimilar jobs and the pay involved with the dissimilar jobs. I am a type of man who believes a family should be made up of man and a woman, and the woman (the mother) should be involved in spending as much time as possible with young children, while the man (the father) is busy working, and I do not believe young child should be passed on to others to be raise, such as politicians--the federal government. Because mothers should be involve with nurturing young children, which has been the way or the rule of the humans for millions of years, women cannot get as much experience in the workforce and get as a rule in as high as positions as men can. Barack Obama's set of words made my think his mind was set on the idea that single-mother families is the way the country should be. I say that single-mother families is bad and should be discouraged--women should not have children if the children cannot be supported or cared for. By the way, I say that the big push of the feminist revolution (pushed along by lesbians and men-hating women and women who do not like what nature made them) since the 1960s or so has helped break up families by pushing more women in the workforce and out of nurturing duties for younger children, made women hate what they are and what their lives are (since they have had to be mothers and take on the crap that men have had to deal with at jobs), have made men the enemies of women and made men enemies of women (since each person in the workforce has had more competition for each job), and has taken children away from properly nurturing when young. Because the time used in the workplace for women is very likely to be less than the time used by men is as a rule, it is not fair that men get paid less or equally than women get paid for spending more time working and trying to get higher in the ranks of the workplace. If you look a man and a women doing the same job, the two may get the same pay or they may not--what has to be taken into account is the quality of the work of both and time on the job of both. Barack Obama's work through the quoted words was nothing more than community organizing and getting people--especially women--all worked up over vagueness and unclear themes and flap doodle and unrelated things, and that is bad. And what really bothers me about Barack Obama's bringing up the theme of this quoted material is he is working to get the federal government involved in setting the pay scale for workers in the country--in all jobs--and it is a really, really, really bad idea to have the federal government involved in setting pay scales. It is another sign to me of the rottenness of Barack Obama.]
[Note: I watched the speech live through the ABC-TV, and I mostly saw Democrats being shown in the audience, and such an weird and ugly and freaky group was shown.]
[Note: Something very rotten was put forth in the speech--"MyRA." It is supposed to be sort of a retirement vehicle for investors. But for several years, the Barack Obama administration has been buying up debt, such as bonds, working to prop up the economy and Wall Street. It is a scam. Now the Barack Obama is working to get the American public to buy these "MyRA" bonds so that the American public will take on the debt. It is rotten!]Thursday, January 30, 2014:
"...Ah, well, sometimes the government will screw up. The buck stops with me. You know, I, I have to look there and say--Well, how, how'd we screw that thing up? And we got to go in and fix it...." [Well, I say that, under Barack Obama, the federal government is a screwed-up entity and a dangerous entity. Barack Obama has been instituting rotten political ideas into the federal government, such as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and he was been undermining the security of the country--he has not protected the southern border of the country, and he supports followers of Sharia (actually putting them in his administration and making such persons advisors for him), and he has done so much more that is rotten. I say that the federal government is rotten as a rule today (as good history writers will show in the decades to come, though their works for years could be suppressed). Really, what Barack Obama said through the quoted material is all nonsense and fluff, and what Barack Obama said was even done, it seems, to teach people into thinking he has had nothing to do with any screw-ups by the federal government and teach people he is always right and has to go in and fix things wrecked by others. I report that Barack Obama fixes nothing for the better--either lacking knowledge to fix it well or wanting to fix it in a rotten way purposely.]
"...It is my firm belief that we can get immigration reform done this year. Ah, and I don't want to presuppose that we can't. Ah, obviously, if at some point, we see that it's not getting done, I, I'm gonna look at all options ta make sure we have a rational smart, ah, system of immigration, but, ah, I'm gonna do everything I can in these coming months ta if we can get this over the finish line, and I think we actually can ge, can get it done...." [Here, the topic is immigration reform, and Barack Obama showed that he is willing to do things not in conjunction with the U.S. Congress, as he is supposed to. By the way, the country already has immigration laws, and, for one, the Barack Obama administration has not been following them.]
"...While Congress decides whether or not its gonna extend unemployment insurance for these Americans, we're gonna go ahead an act. We know it works. Ah, and we're gonna ahead, ah, and, and see what we can do without additional legislation to make, ah, some, some serious dents in the long-term unemployment problem...." [Here, the topic is unemployment insurance, and Barack Obama showed that he is willing to do things not in conjunction with the U.S. Congress, as he is supposed to.]
"...Well, I don't think that's very serious...." [This sentence is tied to a question in which Barack Obama was asked what his thoughts were about Republicans working to rein him in from acting in a non-constitutional manner, such as by their working to get something called the "Stop Act" passed, and Barack Obama finished the thought in the next paragraph that I present.]
"...Every president, ah, engages in executive actions. In fact, ah, we've been very disciplined and, ah, sparing in terms of...." [This shows off Barack Obama's rotten mind. Executive actions, such as "Executive Orders," that have been used by past presidents have not been such that contradict real law or try to change real law--passed by a U.S Congress and a U.S. President. Barack Obama has used "executive actions," as he put it, to make law and rewrite law. Barack Obama has acted like a traitor, knowing full well what he has been doing is illegal, and I say that Barack Obama's so-called laws need not be followed. For a person to follow Barack Obama's so-called laws is to commit treason and be a traitor to the country.]Friday, January 31, 2014 (at the White House):
"...Well, today, I'm directing every federal agency to make sure we are evaluating candidates on the level, without regard to their employment history because every job applicant deserves a fair shot...." [At first glance at the quoted material, a person should ask--What the hell does that mean? Generally speaking, the theme was tied to people who have been out of work for a while and how the longer a person is out of work the harder it is to get a job. By the way, the theme was also about reinstating unemployment benefits, which had run out, and, by the way, before Barack Obama began the U.S. president, unemployment benefits were not up to around two-years in duration (I remember they used to be set up for around four months or so). In essence, Barack Obama in the speech was trying to give out more unemployment benefits, which would hold people over in this day and age when his policies are killing jobs in the country and keeping jobs from being created--the "job university" is smaller than it was before Barack Obama became the U.S. president. But let me get back to the quoted material. So when a person looks at the quoted material, a person can think--The federal government is going to hire people--or maybe "more people"--who are not qualified because the federal government will overlook things in people's employment history that should make them not so likely to be chosen for jobs, all in the hopes of giving people a "fair shot." What is this "fair shot" all about? I do not know. A person is either qualified for a job or is not. Even if a person is qualify for a job, it does not mean the person should get the job, since many qualify persons can apply for the same job. "Fair shot" has nothing to do with getting a job really. Incidentally, has not the federal government had criteria related to employment procedures for decades, such as those tied to not discrimnating against job applicants? The answer is "yes." It can be said that Barack Obama was only trying to make it so that people would not be blocked from getting jobs because they were out of work for a while, but I say that the theme goes beyond that--It will be more about giving jobs to people who do not qualify for the jobs, having not worked to learn things that they should know, such as reading well, and about blocking, for instance, "whites" from getting jobs and from putting "blacks" over "whites." I report that Barack Obama's history shows that he is a black racist. All Barack Obama was doing was working to lower the standards for jobs in the federal government, which will make the federal government even more crappy.]Sunday, February 2, 2014 (an interview during the Super Bowl XLVIII Pregame Show on Fox TV with Bill O'Reilly, which was a live event for about ten minutes):
"Great to be with you." [These were Barack Obama's first words in the interview.]
"...I think we all anticipated there'd be glitches 'cause anytime technology, a new program rolling out, there's gonna be some glitches. I don't think, ah, I anticipated or anybody anticipated, ah, the degree of the problems with the website...." [This was a part of the answer to a question related to when did he know the health-care web site roll out was going to be a problem, and the answer was flap doodle.]
"...Now it's [the health-care website is] working the way it's supposed to, and we've signed up three-million people...." [Uhm.]
"...This, this is one that, ah, I regret--and I've said I regretted--in part because we put in a grand-father clause in the original law saying that, in fact, you were supposed to be able to keep it. It obviously didn't cover everybody that we needed to, and that's why we changed it so that we further grand fathered in folks, and many people who thought originally when they got that cancellation...." [The theme here was Barack Obama's having told people that, for example, they would be keep their health-care insurance plans after Obamacare became law and whether or not his having told that to people was his biggest mistake so far.]
"...Bill, Bill, Bill...." [Bill was working hard it seems, trying to get Barack Obama to trip himself up, and, here, Barack Obama was trying to get a word in.]
"...That is in, inaccurate. We, we revealed to the American public exactly what we understood at the times. The notion that we would hide the ball for political purposes when a week later, we all said, in fact, there was a terrorist attack taking place--the day after I said it was an act of terror--that wouldn't be a very good cover up...." [The theme was the attack by terrorists on Americans, four of whom ended up dead, in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11, 2012, and Barack Obama and his associates pushed out in words in public around the time that a video (related to Muslim society or culture) was the reason for the attack, and the video was not the problem.]
"...These kind of things keep on surfacing, in part, because you and your TV station will promote them...." [Here, Barack Obama was giving a hint there was no real IRS scandal and what was or is a problem was or is Bill O'Reilly and the Fox News Channel who were or are simply pushing a non-issue at the public, such as to keep or gain higher viewer ratings--Barack Obama was trying to hint to the viewing audience that Bill O'Reilly and the Fox News Channel were or are the problem.]
"...I don't think we have to fundamentally transform the nation...." [A letter from a female in California was read by Bill O'Reilly and her theme was--Why do you feel it is necessary to fundamentally change the nation? In Barack Obama's response, Barack Obama gave a lie. Even before Barack Obama would take office as the U.S. President, Barack Obama pushed the idea in public that he was soon to fundamentally change the country. Okay, it was October 20, 2008, and Barack Obama said--"We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America." And since he ended up in the office of the U.S. presidency, he has violated his oath of office and has violated The U.S. Constitution.]
"I enjoyed it." [These were Barack Obama's final words.]Monday, February 10, 2014 (at "Monticello" (the former home of Thomas Jefferson):
"...That's the good thing about being President, I can, I can do whatever I want...." [The "Monticello" referred to is the former home of Thomas Jefferson, the historic figure of the United States of America history. Barack Obama was at the place with, for one, the president of France. Thomas Jefferson and the others who were involved in creating the main structure of the United States of America did not want to have a "president" who could do whatever the president wanted to do--they would have created an "enslavism" society. In the United States of America, the U.S. president does not have unlimited power and cannot do anything! But Barack Obama thinks he can do anything, even if it means violate his oath of office and The United States Constitution.]Sunday, February 16, 2014 (interviewed by Charles Barkley for the TNT television network):
"...I like it. I don't mind. And, and I tell you in five years from now when everybody's sayin'--Man, I'm sure glad we got health care--there're gonna be a whole bunch of people who won't call it 'Obamacare' anymore 'cause they don't want me to get the credit...." [This the answer to a question about whether or not Barack Obama likes the term "Obamacare."]
"...We've like to encourage more young people to sign up, partly because, since they're healthier, their premiums are actually generally gonna be fairly cheap...." [This is bullshit from Barack Obama. Generally speaking, young people will be paying into the system and will get nothing in return, since young people are very unlikely to not file claims--they usually will not be sick enough to have to make a health-care visit and have care paid by insurance. Anyway, it is already public knowledge that Obamacare health-care policies have high co-pays and high deductibles, meaning, in most cases, when a young person goes for care of the body, the entire care will be paid for out of pocket by the young person.]
"...It's just part of growin' up is makin' sure you're takin' care of your body, takin' care of your health...." [The theme was getting and having a health-care insurance policy, and I state--A person does not need a health-care insurance policy to care for the self and watch over the health of the self!]
"...We're gonna pull together--private philanthropists, ah, foundations, working with governors and mayors and churches and non-profits--and we're just gonna focus on young ma, young men of col, color, and, and, and find ways in which we can create more pathways to success for them...." [First, this statement shows that Barack Obama is a black racist--he is the U.S. President, and he is supposed to focus on helping the country and all people, but he is going to focus on only helping young black men. Second, what other pathways can be created? Basically, many young blacks have not learned to read and write, and that is not because of "whites"--it is because other blacks have helped keep them stupid, such as by pushing the idea that they should not learn the "white" way, such as learn proper use of English (which is used by all types of peoples in the country), and that has been going on since at least the 1960s. Third, so it seems Barack Obama is going to pressure businesses and other entities to give blacks special treatment, even if they do not deserve it (Oh, you are urged to see the "150" entry in my document called A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which shows Barack Obama's push to get schools to not expel disruptive black students or unruly black students from school or classrooms, and the process involves coercion and thuggery, and it was started up clearly in January 2014, and you can reach the document by using this History link.)]Tuesday, February 18, 2014 (at a Safeway Distribution Center in Upper Marlboro, Maryland):
"...We're gonna double the distance our cars and light-trucks can go on a gallon of gas by twenty-twenty-five. We're gonna double it! That means--that's big news--what it means is you got fill up every two weeks instead of every week. And that saves the typical family more than $8,000 at the pump over time. I'm assuming you can use $8,000 that you're not payin' at the gas station...." [So Barack Obama flapped his gums again and passed along crap. Barack Obama passed along a figure of $8,000. How did he come up with that figure? Barack Obama seemed to be looking at a period of a little more than ten years. Barack Obama's prediction is made without having any idea of what fuel is going to cost over the ten years or so--surely, the price will go up and down and generally go up overall. What will be the high figure? What will be the low figure? Barack Obama's estimate of savings is useless information--based on no facts and no reality. Oh, it is all "big news." What is the "big news"? Barack Obama passed along no facts or information about a finished accomplishment. Barack Obama only made a guess about the future, which was based on no facts. So what is the "big news"? And then I get to idea of "doubling" the distance that cars and trucks are going to get. Why did he choose the year 2025? Oh, well. But what knowledge does Barack Obama have to say that vehicles will be able to double the distance traveled on a gallon of gasoline by 2025? In physics, it takes a certain amount of energy to move a mass. There is a point where you just cannot get more miles a gallon related to a certain size of mass (a certain type vehicle). To get better miles a gallon, you then have to reduce the size of the vehicle. If the vehicle ends up with less mass, it will probably get smaller, and that means people will not be able to move as much material, such as food, for each trip, and that means people will have to make more trips. Oh, what is a "typical family"? Barack Obama did not define what a "typical family" is in his mind in relation to his so-called calculation. And there is that old joke about "assume" (which you may never have heard). When you use "assume," you make an ass out of you and me (or an ass out of "u" and "me"). Barack Obama used "assume," and I say that makes him an "ass."]Thursday, February 27, 2014 (the official announcement of "My Brother's Keeper"):
"...When I was their age, I was a lot like them. I didn't have a dad in the house. And I was angry about it, even though it didn't necessarily realize it at the time. I made bad choices. I got high without always thinking about the harm that it could do. I didn't always take school as seriously as I should have. I made excuses. Sometimes I sold myself short. I can see myself in these young men. And the only difference is that I grew up in an environment that was a little bit more forgiving, so when I made a mistake, the consequences were not as severe...." [Okay, on this date, Barack Obama announced his initiative (though it may not actually been created by him) to supposedly make the lives of young black males and young Hispanic males better by spending money one them (money that was going to come from, for instance, businesses and foundations), and the thing was called "My Brother's Keeper." By the way, the thing was not designed to help women or to help young men who were not black or Hispanic. I can argue well that, in essence, the idea shows of Barack Obama's racist nature, excluding whites and asians at least. By the way, it must be kept in mind that Barack Obama is a support of Islam, especially Sharia (the rotten political system masquerading as a religion), and the Islamic religion, especially Sharia, makes women second-class citizens over men. Now, the quotation tied to Barack Obama in this section has nonsense (such as "...I can see myself in these young men....", given he did not grow up really in a black community in the United States of America and given he grew up in Indonesia and Hawaii), and it even has something that does not make sense (particularly "...I didn't have a dad in the house. And I was angry about it, even though it didn't necessarily realize it at the time....", which shows he was angry about it but he was not angry about it or something). The important part to remember is--"...I got high without always thinking about the harm that it could do...." Mind-altering drugs do affect the brain adversely, and the effects last forever, and at the time that he got "high", he knew getting high could hurt him. I ask--So you are going to tell me Barack Obama's mind has not been damaged by mind-altering drugs? I think it is damaged!]Tuesday, March 4, 2014 (at Powell Elementary School, Washington, D.C.):
"...The budget that I sent Congress this morning lays out how we'll implement this agenda in a balanced and responsible way. It's a road map for creating jobs with good wages and expanding opportunities for all Americans...." [Okay, Barack Obama went to an elementary school--an elementary school--to give a speech about the budget proposal that he has sent the U.S. Congress for consideration, and it is a budget-spending scheme for the federal government that is rated at almost $4,000-billion. It is an incredible amount of money. And the budget also has more tax increases! It is shit from a shit-head man with a shit-head mind, as only the two sentences presented within quotations marks show. How is spending nearly $4,000-billion expand wages for Americans, since the federal government is not making products or providing services, such as hair cuts, which will allow the federal government to pay higher wages to employees? Anyway, because the budget increases taxes, people will have less money to spend on things or to make things on their own. Since the government does not create things really, how is the federal government going to increase the opportunity for people to be this or that by taking more money away from them in taxes and spending more on whatever that has nothing to do with creating things? The budget is no "road map" for anything! It is all shit! I guess Barack Obama went to the elementary school to push his idea to children so that the children would then push his idea on to their parents.]
"...And at a time when our deficits been cut in half, ah, it allows us to meet our obligations to future generations without leaving them with a mountain of debt...." [This is more shit from a shit-head man. The budget takes money away from people--through increased taxes--so they will have less to spend on things and less to put away in savings, and if financial trouble comes for a person, the person could got into debt because the person will have no reserve money to draw on. And since the budget proposal is nearly at $4,000-billion, it is very likely the federal debt will increase in the long run, and the debt of the federal government is something that must be paid off ultimately by the people of the country, and that is a fact of life. By the way, at the moment, the country already has a mountain of debt for young people, and if unfunded obligations are not taken into account, the federal debt is a little over $17,000-billion. That is a mountain of debt that future generations will indeed have to deal with!]
"...Right now, our tax system provides benefits to wealthy individuals who save, even after they've amassed multi-million-dollar retirement accounts...." [I must begin by noting that Barack Obama's idea of "rich" or "wealthy" is vague, though he hints at "...multi-million-dollar retirement accounts...." and really rich people, but I have come to learn that "rich" and "wealthy" can be related to a person who earns a little over $100,000 a year--the definition of "rich" and "wealthy" for the Democratic Party has been lowered regularly over the last few decades. Now I ask--What the hell is this shit--the statement--from the shit-head man? Barack Obama is putting forth the idea that it is bad to save money for the future or is maybe even a crime to save or putting forth the idea that the federal government should not allow some people to save money or should reduce their ability to save money--because the government does not get more money from people! I report that people have money to save (for the future)--maybe--once they have been taxed for the year, and that means, after a person pays taxes and pays off bills, the person might have something left that can be put away as savings. Also, Barack Obama is putting forth the idea that he should determine how much a person should be allowed to save, and that is idiocy and a rotten idea. And then a person has to ask in relation to what was said--What "benefits" does the federal government give to a person who "saves"? That is nonsense thought or more shit from a shit-head mind! I remind you that money that a person saves in a bank or other investment is actually used by others to do things, such as build things, and the money that is saved in a bank or whatever provides the saver with, for instance, "interest" earnings or "dividend" earnings, and that is good for the people and the country. Oh, hold it! I am not done. When a person--just an average person--has a retirment account it can end up with a value above a million dollars, but that money might have to last for twenty years or thirty years--till the person dies--and the money might have to care for a spouse. What was the value of Barack Obama's "multi-million-dollar" idea? Why is a "multi-million-dollar" amount bad? At least, the person who has a good retirement amount does not have to be on welfare!]
"...By closing that loophole, we can help create jobs...." [Here is yet more shit from the shit-head man with a shit-head mind. How does the federal government's taking more money from people in taxes--which Barack Obama wants you to think will happen when a loophole in the tax code (federal law created by a U.S. Congress and a U.S. president) is closed--create jobs, given Barack Obama will not be starting businesses or expanding businesses with the additional money that he takes away from people? Really, the "loophole" idea is nonsense, since the law at present allows people to save money if they can. If a person has money to save, it was not possible because a "loophole" exists in federal tax law.]
[Note: I report as a reminder--Each section of this document could be longer, since each time Barack Obama speaks, he passes along a lot of shit, but I am not going to report all the shit since I could never get anything else done.]Thursday, March 6, 2014 (at a concert at the White House):
"...Instead of singing about love and pain, forgiveness and acceptance to a church audience, they sang about them to the world, and the world had never heard anything like it. When Aretha first told us what R, S, P, E, C, T meant to her...." [Barack Obama was introducing Aretha Franklin (a singer) to the audience at the event when he stumbled and mumbled away. Barack Obama could not spell out correctly one of Aretha Franklin's biggest hits "Respect"! Yes, Barack Obama just could not get any "respect" out. But Barack Obama probably does not know why "respect" is truly given out to a person. And, certainly, Barack Obama has shown himself to be a man who deserves no "respect"--and "rspect" (as he would say).]Thursday, March 13, 2014 (at the White House, signing yet another dictate):
"...In this year of action, while Congress decides what it's gonna do--whether if it's gonna do anything about this issue, and I hope that it does, and I know Democrats are pushin' hard to get, dah, minimum-wage legislation passes--ah, I'm gonna do what I can on my own to raise wages for more hard-working Americans...." [Yes, Barack Obama can affect the wages of companies that are doing work for the federal government--I guess.]
"...So a few weeks ago, I signed an Executive Order, requiring federal contractors to pay their employees a fair wage of at least ten dollars and ten cents an hour. Today, I'm gonna use my pen to give more Americans the chance to earn the over-time pay that they deserve...." [And my guess is companies will simply cut back on giving people over-time work, so people will make less, and Barack Obama once again screws up the lives of people.]Friday, March 14, 2014 (interview for WedMD):
"...I think a lot of people may end up being pleasantly surprised because for a large portion of, ah, those folks, health insurance may end up costing a hundred dollars or less...." [This is more shit from a shit-head mind, given it has already been proven people are paying more now for health-care policies, and this lie from Barack Obama is something that you should never forget.]
"...It may end up costing less than your cable bill or your cell-phone bill...." [This is yet more shit from a shit-head mind, given it has already been proven people are paying more now for health-care insurance policies, which people can expect will be higher than the costs of cell-phone bills and cable bills are and will ever be.]
"...There are other countries that have...government-run health care or have a single-payer plan, in which case, ah, the government controls much more tightly, ah, how health care is distributed. There are pluses and minuses with having a private-insurance system...." [Yes, other countries have government systems in which the government has the final say about who does and who does not get health care, and that allows "enslavists" (bad politicians and government people) to decide who and who does not get care, and those are killer societies! Barack Obama in this little interview never noted what is bad about the federal government controlling the health-care system of a country--the minus stuff. I state that, actually, there are few minuses of a private-health care system compared with a government-run health-care system.]
"...For the average person, many of the folks who do not have health-insurance initially...they're gonna have to make some choices, and they might have to switch doctors, in part because they're saving money...." [Barack Obama with this sentence tried to make people listening to him believe average people--we, the people--are actually the ones who are going to make the ultimate choice about switching doctors or not, and that is bullshit, since the health-care law (informally called "Obamacare") is causing doctors to back out on caring for patients that they had cared for in the past and the health-care law is forcing people out of health-care plans and into health-care plans that do not allow them to keep their favorite doctors. And then Barack Obama brought out the crap that people will be switching doctors to save money, but I note that people will not be choosing to change doctors to save money.]Monday, March 17, 2014:
"...I have signed a new Executive Order that expands the scope of our sanctions. As an initial step, I'm authorizing sanctions on Russian officials...." [So the theme is, in essence, Russia's takeover of a portion of Ukraine and what the United States of America--Barack Obama--was putting forth as a penalty on Russia for the takeover action, and the penalty was basically putting sanctions on a few handfuls of Russian officials, which means nothing, given really the Russian officials will be affected in no way--they can get money or food or prostitutes or whatever anywhere else in the world.]
"...And if Russia continues to intervene in Ukraine, then we stand ready to post further sanctions...." [In 1994, the United States of America and Russia were involved in an agreement focusing on Ukraine in which Ukraine's borders would be recognized and maintained for, in essence, all time, and Ukraine would cut back on some arms that it held, and so the Russians violated the agreement, and Barack Obama proposed no penalty or and what penalty was presented as a penalty was idiocy, and I say in jest that, if Russia continues on, Barack Obama will punish Russian officials more and not let the Russians officials see any sex shows from American television.]Tuesday, March 25, 2014 (at The Hague in the Netherlands):
"...With respect to Mr. Romney's, ah, assertion that, dah, Russia's our number-one geopolitical foe, the truth of the matter is that America's got a whole lot of challenges. Russia is a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbors, not out of strength but out of weakness. They don't pose the number-one national security threat to the United States. Ah, I continue to be much more concerned when it comes to our security with the prospect of, ah, a nuclear weapon goin' off in Manhattan...." [Oh, boy! What can I say?. Is Barack Obama actually concerned about a nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan? Is Barack Obama more concerned on a day-to-day basis about a nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan than about what Russia is doing? There is something wrong with Barack Obama's thinking. When I look at the statement again, I wonder if Barack Obama is pushing Russia to be even more of a threat--to get bigger and become a bigger power by taking over more territory currently held by other countries. I state--For the world to come under the control of a single entity, such as some type of international government, maybe headed by a dictator, the world of countries has to be consolidated into a few blocks. Maybe, Barack Obama wants Russia to take over other countries. Maybe, Barack Obama wants Russia to be bigger than the United States of America is. Then again, for Barack Obama to control a big region of the world, he must get control of the United States of America as a dictator and get control of Canada and take in territory that is Central America and South America, the latter region of which is going more communistic every day. Remember--Barack Obama is a communist. Barack Obama said--"...not out of strength but out of weakness...." What the hell is that? That is foolishness. That set of eight words from Barack Obama makes no sense. Okay, maybe a person can argue Barack Obama does not see Russia as the "number-one" threat, but Russia is a big threat, and a bomb going off in Manhattan certainly should not be the number-one threat or a bigger theat than that which is Russia. I have to note--Something makes me think Barack Obama cares not that Russia is taking over other countries, even if those countries have protection treaties with the United States of America. There is something rotten going on in Barack Obama's mind about this issue!]Wednesday, March 26, 2014 (in the European country known as Belgium):
"...We know that there will always be intolerance, but instead of fearing the immigrant, we can welcome it. We can insist on policies that benefit the many not just the few, that an age of globalization and dizzying change opens the door of opportunity to the marginalized and not just a privileged few. Instead of targeting our gay and lesbians brothers and sisters, we can use our law to protect their rights. Instead of defining ourselves in opposition to others, we can affirm the aspirations that we hold in common...." [There are many topics I could present here in relation to what Barack Obama has in these lines, but I will only put forth one. Does it not sound as if Barack Obama is on the campaign trail again? But this time, it looks to me as if he is working to be elected king of the world.]Tuesday, April 1, 2014 (a press event at the White House with Vice President Joe Biden at his side):
"...Thank, you....." [Once again, Barack Obama--the man whom good people must learn to hate--got up before the press and the American people and lied and lied and worked to teach the faux goodness of his rotten mind, and the event was held so that he could tout that idea that some seven-million persons had signed up for "Obamacare." But Barack Obama is a liar, and the statistics are defective. And the whole event was yet another propaganda moment in American history from the worst U.S. President in American history, a man shown to be a perpetual liar, a man who is a supporter or enslavism forms of government (such as communism and Sharia), and a man who can be tied to the killings of at least some Americans and Mexicans (such as in relation to the "Benghazi Killings Scandal" and the Fast and Furious Scandal"), and given illegal mind-altering do affect the mind of any user and given Barack Obama has admitted in public his having used illegal mind-altering drugs, he is a man with a defective brain and mind.]
"...Six months ago today, a big part of the Affordable Care Act kicked in, as healthcare.gov and state-insurance marketplaces went live, and millions of Americans finally had the same chance to buy quality affordable health care and the peace of mind that comes with it as everybody else. Last night, the first open-enrollment period under this law came to an end, and despite several lost weeks out of the gate because of problems with the website, seven-point-one-million Americans have now signed up for private insurance plans under through these marketplaces--seven-point-one...." [That was the first main idea pushed out by the killer--Barack Obama--and history (in the future) will show that the figure is a lie, put together by a corrupt federal government.]
"...So, no, the Affordable Care Act hasn't completely fixed our long-broken health-care system...." [This is bullshit from the shit-head mind--The country did not have a long-broken health-care system!]
"...But this law has made our health-care system a lot better--a lot better...." [Bullshit!]
"...There's no good reason to go back [to what existed before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was imposed on the people of America]...." [Everything has been corrupt or a lie about the law--from the creation of the law in the U.S. Congress to what Barack Obama was doing in the speech, a part of which was designed to put down public support for killing the law at all costs.]
"...I don't get it! Why are folks [Republicans or whatever] workin' so hard for people to not have health insurance?...." [I have the answer to the question. First, Barack Obama's question is defective. People are not working to stop people from having health insurance. People--like me--are working hard to kill a law that will allow the federal government, which can easily become filled with corrupt and rotten people, from telling people when they can no longer get health care because of their age or economic conditions or whatever, which happens in countries with government-controlled health-care systems (that is a fact). A bad country is any country in which the government has the final say about health care for the citizens, and with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is place, and the United States of America is turning in to a rotten country. Given I have shown that Barack Obama and people around him are rotten, I ask--Why would a good person want him and them to have the final say about what health care that the person may have? The law is rotten, and the people behind it are rotten!]
"...Many of the tall tales about this law have been debunked!...." [Bullshit!]
"...But the debate about repealing this law is over!...." [Why is the debate over? Is it over because a bad man says that it is? No! No bad man tells me what to do!]
"...You know, in the end, history is not kind to those who would deny Americans their basic economy security...." [I state that this statement from Barack Obama will be shown to fit Barack Obama. Just wait and see! He is a killer of people and countries. Even now, people are losing jobs because of Barack Obama's political policies, and the phony unemployment number that exists at this point--put out by the corrupt federal government--does not show it. In the future, the truth will be revealed, and history will not be kind to Barack Obama. I certainly will not be kind to Barack Obama, a killer of millions.]Thursday, April 10, 2014 (at Austin, Texas):
"...Yes, it's true that, despite laws like the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act and Medicare, our society is still racked with division and poverty. Yes, race still colors our political debates. And there have been government programs that have fallen short. In a time when cynicism is too often passed off a wisdom, it's perhaps easy to conclude that there are limits to change, that we are trapped by our own history...." [The speech given by Barack Obama was tied to the signing of the Civil Rights Act stuff in the 1960s, which, though signed by U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson (a Democrat), was really pushed into law by the work of Republicans (few Democratic Party-associated members of the U.S. Congress voted to pass the Civil Rights Act as a bill that could be forwarded on to the U.S. President to be signed or not signed). Now, when you look at only this set of quoted text from Barack Obama's speech, many rotten features show up easily. "Medicare" has nothing to do with the "Civil Rights Act" and the "Voting Rights Act"--it is a different subject from the other two. The "Civil Rights Act and the "Voting Rights Act" have no ties to "poverty"--poverty is poverty and is not caused or helped by the "Civil Rights Act" or the "Voting Rights Act." Already, you should see Barack Obama passed along a collage of unrelated things and nonsense thought. Barack Obama showed himself as wanting to further see the idea that race hatred is big in the country--in fact, since Barack Obama can be called "black," he was hinting that people are creating political turmoil for him or fighting against him because he is "black." That is the "political debate" topic he was covering in the quoted material. Yes, Barack Obama wanted and wants a person to think--If a person opposes him, that person is doing it out of race hatred [a certainly not because he is actually an "enslavist," particularly, for instance, a pusher of communism and Sharia and the like, all of which are rotten political systems]. "Cynicism" is never "wisdom"--"cynicism" is "cynicism," and "wisdom" is "wisdom." So what the hell was Barack Obama saying by tying "cynicism" together with "wisdom"? It did not make sense, and it does not make sense. And then we get to the big one. The United States Constitution was designed to put limits on politicians, such as to block politicians from acting like dictators, such as by having unlimited power over the citizens. Yes, The United States Constitution is a part of the history of the United States of America, and, in the final part of the quoted material, Barack Obama showed off, though indirectly or not so clearly, his dislike for The United States Constitution, since it limits him and holds him back from doing more, which a good person would hope he would never be allowed to do or get away with doing. Incidentally, many government programs have fallen short or have failed, and especially many big-deal government programs have fallen short or have failed. The black family in the United States of America has been destroyed by the Democrats since the early 1960s who have pushed through welfare stuff. Also, Social Security is, in essence, bankrupt, because the federal government has stolen from it (and not really made sure money was actually being saved for the people), and Medicare and Medicaid are, in essence, bankrupt, having been poorly run by the federal govern. Oh, there is big fraud and corruption in the the big-deal government systems. All in all, Barack Obama showed in the speech more of his dislike for the United States of America because it is a place where he cannot yet act like a dictator and work easy to become--I say--the king of the world.]Friday, April 11, 2014 (speaking before people of the National Action Network, a communistic black/black racist group headed by Reverend Al Sharpton):
"...The right to vote is threatened today in a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights Act became law nearly five decades ago. Across the country, Republicans have led efforts to pass laws making it harder not easier for people to vote...." [Basically, Barack Obama was putting down efforts by good people, such as conservative Republicans, to remove corruption from voting in the United States of America, such as by making it harder to non-qualified people, such as dead people and foreigners, to vote. People--basically only Republicans--have been working to get voter rolls clear of people who are registered to vote in more than one city. A big way to stop voter fraud is to have voter-identification cards with photographs. Democrats dislike "photo-ID" stuff related to voting because it reduces fraud and corruption. Here, in the quoted material, a person can see a U.S. President who supports voting fraud and corruption.]
"...I want to be clear--I am not against reasonable attempts to secure the ballot!...." [Liar!]
"...There has to be rules in place. But I am against requiring an ID that millions of Americans don't have. That shouldn't suddenly prevent you from exercising your right to vote...." ["Picture ID" or "photo ID" things are available for free to every American in the country! People need a "picture ID" or "photo ID" to open a bank account, to buys things on credit, to cash a check, to get a driver's license, to buy insurance, et cetera. Yet, Barack Obama is against "picture ID" things or "photo ID" things. By the way, people who are unable to get out to vote--right on voting day--because of mobility problems can vote through the "absentee ballot" process. Also, by the way, what is Barack Obama's nonsense about "suddenly"? People have a lot of time before elections take place to get proper identification--people have had to show identification for decades.]
"...It is wrong to change our election rules just because of politics. It is wrong to make citizens wait for five, six, seven hours just to vote!...." [This set of words from Barack Obama was nothing more than filler and flap doodle.]Sunday, April 27, 2014 (in Malaysia):
"...You know, I think that the Prime Minister [of Malaysia] is the first to acknowledge that, ah, Malaysia's still got some work to do, ah, just like the United States, by the way, has some work to do, ah, on these issues. Ah, Human Rights Watch probably has a list of things they think we should be doing as a government...." [The focus of the press conference was "human rights." Generally speaking, "human-rights" wrongs are mass starvations of people, mass killings, subjugation of women, torture, false imprisonment, et cetera, which are things that go on in Third World dictatorship countries and communistic countries. The United States of America has no prisons--like the gulags of North Korea and China--in which anti-enslavists (people opposed to communism) are being held and tortured for simply beginning against communism and the communistic leaders, and, in this country, women are not held down in society or thought of a second-class citizens, as happens in countries based on Sharia, such as Iran, and women and men can easily travel all over the country (maybe in their own cars) without having to show papers of where they are and where they are going every day, et cetera. So, in the statement, Barack Obama once again showed himself to be a rotten, rotten man. First, he put down his own country while visiting another country. Even a rotten leader (a rotten man) of a country plays up the rotten leader's country and does not talk it down; for instance, Cuba is a rotten country, but the leader of Cuba--Fidel Castro--does not publicly put down his country while on a trip to another country. (Remember--Communistic countries involve violence and coercion by the government on the people.) Second, Barack Obama was once again working to teach lies. Generally speaking, people of other countries know little of the United States of America, such as that it is a country based on The United States Constitution, which is designed to block people from becoming dictators over the United States of America, and many of the people of other countries can only guess that the United States of America is like so many other countries of the world, which, for example, have rotten politicians (communistic dictators), have corrupt police entities (to which people must pay bribes), and have not the ability to speak out in public against their political leaders, and people of other countries might think the United States of America has prisons with political prisoners in jail who are tortured regularly (basing their information on what the people have heard goes on in their countries or neighboring countries). For Barack Obama to hint that the United States of America is involved in "human rights" violations is to tell lies and teach ignorance and hatred to the already naive and uninformed. By the way, some people in the United States of America might think that having a law to have every voting person in the United States of America hold a voter identification with photograph is some type of "human-rights" issue or "civil-rights" issue, but it is not! Yes, Barack Obama was working to give the impress that the United States of America is a bad place, like a place in which people are held and tortured in prison regularly or women are mistreated. That is the sign of a rotten, rotten man. In addition, it seems Barack Obama was giving the impression that he was working to get rid of the "human-rights" wrongs that are going on in the United States of America and that he should be looked at as someone to admire. Remember--Since the United States of America is not a country with "human rights" violations, like those to which Barack Obama hinted, Barack Obama is a person who deserves no praise, since he is not going anything. By the way, some people in the United States of America might think a "human-rights" wrong in the country is that not everyone has the same amount of money or gets paid exactly the same, but that is not a "human-rights" wrong! In addition, history shows that Barack Obama is pushing "enslavism" on the people of the United States of America and hurting the people of the United States of America, such as through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and I say that Barack Obama is guilty of "human-rights" violations!]Friday, May 2, 2014 (a press conference in the Rose Garden at the White House):
"...We've learned that our businesses created 273,000 new jobs last month. All told, our businesses have now created 9.2-million new jobs over fifty consecutive months of job growth. The grit and determination of the American people are moving us forward. There's plenty more that Congress should be doing, from raising the minimum wage to creating good construction jobs rebuilding America. And I wanna work with them wherever I can, but I keep acting on my own wherever I must to make sure every American who works hard has the chance to get ahead...." [This is more bullshit from a shit-head mind--that of Barack Obama. First, new entities reported that job increase was "288,000", and that shows Barack Obama gets things wrong. What number Barack Obama used is not the major matter to think about, though. What Barack Obama did not note was that 800,000 persons left the job market in April 2014. So, there was a net loss of employed people in the country--512,000. By the way, I note that a good job-rate-increase number should be at least 400,000 (in the plus). Second, raising the minimum wage does not increase the number of jobs. Third, Barack Obama said that he wants to work with the U.S. Congress, but he reported that he plans to continue to work on his own to make sure Americans get ahead, but I report that there is nothing that a U.S. President can do to help a person get ahead--the person must do work and gain skills and knowledge, which leads to a person getting better jobs and better pay. Fourth, I report that Barack Obama did not note that the jobless rate fell to 6.3% because he is fudging the statistics, not noting that 800,000 persons left the job force or not taking into account in the statistics that 800,000 left the work force. Fifth, the 9.2-million figure is suspect, given, for instance, some of those persons over that fifty-month period probably left their jobs or got laid off or got fired, and that makes the 9.2-million figure somewhat useless. ["Jamrisko, Michelle. "Hiring in U.S. Kicks Into Higher Gear as Unemployment Plunges to 6.3%." Bloomberg, 2 May 2014, 1026 a.m. ET; Mun, Ylan Q. "U.S. economy adds 288,000 jobs in April; jobless rate falls to 6.3 percent." The Washington Post, 2 may 2014.]]Tuesday, May 6, 2014 (at the White House):
"...What this climate as, ah, assessment does is really hopefully educates the public that this is not some faraway thing. We can do something about it...." [On Tuesday, May 6, 2014, a special event was held at Barack Obama's house--the White House and such--that was called the "National Climate Assessment Event," which celebrated the release of a new reported on "climate disruption" associated with man, and it was a report saying that only "man" was involved in changing the climate, which the pushers of the "climate disruption" is a lie killing the world (the sun had nothing to do with any of the change, and the change in the molten core of the planet had nothing to do with it, et cetera). The event had a panel of seven persons blabbing away and talking about, for example, how seas are going to rise and farmers are seeing the effects. It was a propaganda event, which had a man named Dr. John P. Holdren, who said, for instance, that climate change is "not a distant treat....", as the emcee or master of ceremonies. By the way, Dr. John P. Holdren was hinting that the world was soon coming to an end. It was all nonsense, and I urge you to see, for instance, T.H.A.T. #120, which shows some of the idiocy of those persons pushing the climate-change idea tied to man and man's use of carbon-based fuels and giving off carbon dioxide. On Tuesday, Barack Obama gave a speech and passed along the same themes presented by the speakers at the "National Climate Change Event," such as the one statement that heads this paragraph. The statement is nonsense!]
"...This not just some pie-in-the-sky distant issue...." [Bullshit!]
"...This is something that already is affecting people who are getting hit by floods, increased wildfire, droughts...." [Bullshit!]
"...Climate change is already affecting Americans, all across the country, in every region, although in different ways...." [Bullshit!]
"...We also have a chance to turn back, ah, these rising temperatures, if, ah, we take some bold actions now!...." [Yes, I do urge you see see T.H.A.T. #120, since it shows some nonsense presented by two men--Jeffrey Sachs and Michael Oppenheimer--on Charlie Rose (a show broadcast on weekdays by PBS) on Monday, April 1, 2014, during an interview with the Charlie Rose, a communist supporter, and what Jeffrey Sachs said (such as we only have till December 2015 to do something or it is over) and Michael Oppenheimer said shows those persons who push the climate-change idea caused by man as truth are rotten people, and that makes Barack Obama is one of those rotten people.]
[Note: Every moment at every spot on the planet, the climate changes, and it is ever changing, and the change is, generally speaking, different at every spot.]Thursday, May 8, 2014 (in San Jose, California):
"...Republicans are patriots. They love their country. They love their families. They, they want America to thrive. But they are operating on a theory that time and again has proven to be wrong--the theory that says you're on your own, the theory that says if we just reward folks at the very top that everybody else is goin' do just fine...." [On Thursday, May 8, 2014, Barack Obama did some speaking in San Jose, California, such as at a DNC fund-raiser and at a Wal-Mart store, and this section has a portion of his rotten teaching. Notice the quoted material for this paragraph. It is rottenness, as are all the pieces presented in this section. There is no such thing as being "on your own"! However, you are born alone and will die alone. People are always doing something in conjunction with others in life, such as while running a business, when the business is involved with customers and other businesses and even the government, which imposes laws on people, many of which can be detrimental when put together by communists and other rotten people. That is all that I will say about the theme of the previous few sentences. I want to focus on something bigger--bigger in idiocy--presented by Barack Obama in the quoted material. Notice Barack Obama presented the idea of "reward." What is "reward" about in his presentation? By the way, Barack Obama is hinting at the so-called rich or well off in the set of words. Keep that in mind! Now, no one who is involved in, for example, running a business is "rewarded," as if people got together and said you are the one who gets to have the "reward," as if a prize is given out. For the business owner or operator, people--hundreds of people or thousands of people or millions of people--in the country decide to buy something or not buy something from the owner or operator. That is not "reward" action! That is business action. In some cases, not enough people buy from a business, and the business dies. In some cases, enough people buy from a business so that the business can keep running. In some cases, a lot of people buy from a business, and that business does really well, as did happen with what's-his face's Google thing (the creator of Google is rich). In addition, in the United States of America, the federal government does not hand out some type of "reward" to certain people. If you think the country is set up in some way so that some people get what they get because they were chosen to get the "reward," you are an idiot. Barack Obama theme about "reward' was more nonsense thought from a rotten mind that is working to teach idiocy and produce people who will hate achievers and love him and allow him to hurt others who might do better in life than he can!]
"...It's a theory that discounts the possibility of common action in order to make sure that opportunity is real for every American and not just some...." ["Common action"--that is the focus of my criticism of this sentence from Barack Obama. What does "common action" mean? Well, to him, it probably means the Republicans' theory does not want the federal government to be involved is deciding who gets to keep what and who gets to get what in the society. "Common action" is something that comes off that rotten theme about the "common good," which is rotten communistic thought. And then I return to the theme of the previous paragraph. When there is a business, hundreds or thousands or millions of persons are, in essence, when deciding to buy or not buy from the business, taking a "common action," which does not include the federal government intervention. And, to finish this paragraph, I state--There is no government that can take any action that can give people opportunity! Barack Obama's statement is a hallow statement]
"...On the big issues, on the core convictions, we're [the communists, like Barack Obama, are] on the right of the issues. On immigration, we believe in comprehensive immigration reform that gives people a chance and that would improve our economy...." [I will only make a note about one piece of idiocy in this set of words. To Barack Obama, "comprehensive immigration reform" means giving illegal aliens amnesty or American citizenship, though they are law breaks. So Barack Obama pushed forth the idea that, by giving law breakers citizenship, the economy will improve. There is no correlation of the ideas with the statment! Just because you give a person citizenship, you do not improve the economy. The two things are unrelated. Barack Obama's statement makes no logical sense!]
"...In climate change, we believe in science...." [This is bullshit! Barack Obama has shown he does not believe in science, given the manmade-global-warming idea has been shown to be a hoax by real scientists and he keeps pushing that idea that "climate change" is here now. Yes, Barack Obama's bullshit mind put out this bullshit! Look back at the entry for May 6, 2014.]Tuesday, May 12, 2014 (at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C., speaking before law-enforcement officials):
"...These are folks [illegal aliens] who are woven into the fabrics of our communities. Their kids are going to school with our kids. Most of them are not makin' trouble. Most of them are not causin' crimes. And yet, ah, we put them in this untenous position. And it creates a situation in which your personnel who got to go after gang bangers and need to be goin' after violent criminals and deal with the whole range of challenges and who have to cooperate with DHS around, ah, our counter-terrorism activities, you got to spend time dealin' with somebody who, ah, who's not to cause any trouble other than that fact that they were tryin' to make a living for their families. That's just not a good use of our resources. It's not smart. It don't make sense...." [Okay, let me look at this crap from Shit-head Barack Obama quickly. First, every country has laws dealing with "illegal aliens"--"illegal aliens" are people who are unlawfully in a country, having come from other countries. Second, during the week of Monday, May 11, 2014, some news entities--good news entities--were reporting how, in 2013, the Barack Obama administration released about 36,000 illegal aliens right before deportation proceedings and such were to be pushed through on the individuals, and in relation to the group of 36,000, there were 88,000 crimes tied to the group. For decades, one job of police officers has been dealing with "illegal aliens," because the police have been following existing law. You should understand Barack Obama has not been enforcing federal law, and Barack Obama even took Arizona to court for trying to enforce existing federal law, and through this speech, Barack Obama was pushing the idea that police should not uphold the laws of the country. Third, in at least California, children of illegal aliens are getting to go to school for free! That is rotten! Fourth, Barack Obama has his children--his two rotten daughters, being taught the ways of communism and other such rotten political systems--in a private school for elites, which does not have them going to school with illegal aliens. Fifth, it is the "illegal aliens" who put their children in "untenuous" positions, since it is the "illegal aliens" who knew they were breaking the law when they did what they did, and it is not "we" who put the children in "untenuous" positions.]
"...We've got this narrow window. The closer we get to the mid-term elections, the harder it is to get things done around here. Now, I know, it's, it's hard to believe that things couldn't get harder, eh, eh, tha, that this place could get, get a little more dysfunctional, ah, but, you know, it's just very hard right before an election, so we got maybe a window of, ah, two, three, ah, months, to get the ball rolling in the House of Representatives...." [Here is another one of those Barack Obama stumble-bum moments, or, maybe, I should say it was yet another "dysfunctional" moment for Barack Obama.]Wednesday, May 13, 2014 (yet another speech at a bridge):
"...We are aiming to put every major infrastructure project on, on a public dashboard so everybody can go online, track our progress, hold us accountable, make sure things are comin' in on time, on budget...." [Here is another example of Barack Obama's passing along flap doodle--or lie--and he struggled to get it out.]Thursday, May 22, 2013 (at the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum):
"...I'll work with anybody who's focused on what we need to be focused on and what all the people who sent us to Washington are focused...." [Here is example of filler and flap doodle.]
"...But, ah, if Congress isn't going to act, then I'm gonna do whatever and, and, and any steps I can take.... [Here is an example of a screwed-up sentence.]Wednesday, May 28, 2014 (a speech to graduating students at West Point, the military academy):
"...We can't try to resolve problems in the South China Sea when we have refused to make sure that the Law of the Sea Convention is ratified by the United States Senate...." [This speech showed numerous reasons why Barack Obama is anti-American, a traitor to the country, and a danger for the good people of the country and the world. Right here, through this quoted set of words, Barack Obama outlined for the enemies of the country who are in foreign lands that they are "free" to take up the ways of "enslavists," such as take over foreign territories or lands--He will do nothing to get in their way. In addition, Barack Obama showed allies of the country, such as Japan and South Korea, that he does not stand for them and will not stand up for them if they are attacked. In addition, Barack Obama brought up the Law of the Sea Convention, which, in essence, if ratified by the U.S. Senate, would give away U.S. control of U.S. waters to the United Nations (which is controlled by "enslavists" (such as communists and anti-Ameicans) or international laws or treaties, and that shows his work to destroy the United States of America and put it under the control of rotten people, such as the followers of Sharia, which is a rotten political system disguised as a religion.]
"...I believe in 'American exceptionalism' with every fiber of my being, but what makes us exceptional is not our ability to flout international norms and 'the rule of law,' it's our willingness to affirm them through our actions...." [History shows--especially his public statements that note that he wants to "fundamentally" change the country--that his statement about his believing in "American exceptionalism" is lie, which is probably why the applause after his having said it as weak (which a person can prove to the self as truth by seeing video of the incident), and Barack Obama--who does not follow "the rule of law" in the United States of America, as history shows-- pushed out a lie by working to convince people that the United States of America does not follow "the rule of law" in international matters.]
"...That spirit of cooperation needs to energize the global effort to combat climate change, a creeping national security crisis that will help shape your time in uniform, as we are called on to respond to refugee flows of natural disasters and conflicts over water and food, which is why next year I intend to make sure America's out front in putting together a global framework to preserve our planet...." [So, as hinted at by Barack Obama, these new graduates of West Point will not have as their mission protecting the United States of America through military means but will have as their mission following ways of life imposed on good people of the world by those pushing the lie that is manmade climate change to the point of killing the planet, and Barack Obama will be that man who lead the way (maybe as the "chosen one") and will save the world! The man is evil! The man is insane! See it!]Thursday, May, 29 2014 (at the White House):
"...Before, ah, the, the awareness was out there when I was young and played football briefly, ah, there were a couple times I'm sure that, ah, that ringing sensation in my head, ah, and the need to sit down a while...." [On this day, the main topic was "concussions" in the sport of football. So, Barack Obama is concerned by some persons to be the smartest man in the world, so Barack Obama must have been the quarterback when he played football. Yes, I can see him throwing a football, as I can see him throwing a baseball (which you can see by looking at video of him on the Internet) and as I can see him roll a bowling ball (which you can see by looking at video of him on the Internet). Then again, he has publicly stated that he used mind-altering drugs in the past, so maybe he was only a "bench warmer," and he was using drugs one day when he fell off the bench and hit his head on a football. Then again, for a number of years when he was young, he was living in Indonesia, where "football" is actually "soccer." Maybe, he is confused about the sport that he was playing when his head was all filled with "ringing." I say, in truth, Barack Obama's speech was just more bullshit, and it was all laughable!]Tuesday, June 3, 2014 (in Warsaw, Poland):
"...In terms, ah, of potential threats, the release of the, ah, the Taliban who were being held in Guantanamo was conditioned on the Qatari's keeping eyes on them and creating a structure in which we can monitor their activities. We will be keeping eyes on them...." [On Saturday, May 31, 2014, Barack Obama exchanged one American (a soldier or former soldier who walked away from his post) for five high-ranking big-time Islamist killers being held by the United States of America, and it was a rotten trade, and now Barack Obama was working to convince people that the five bad guys would be watched carefully and closely in the future. It is all bullshit from Barack Obama. Plus, the trade was done illegally, given the trade was made while war is still going on (in relation to a law known as "Providing Material Support for Terrorism"). (You are urged to see entry number "158" in my document entitled A Little History of Barack Obama Events: A Show of Deconstruction, which can be reached through this History link.)]
"...And we have confidence that, ah, we will be in a position to go after them if, in fact, ah, they are engaging in activities that threaten our defenses...." [Bullshit!]Saturday, June 7, 2014 (an interview with Brian Williams of NBC News):
"...It was a unnamous decision, ah, among, ah, my principals in my government...." [The theme of the sentence was the trading of a U.S. deserter (Bowe Berghdahl) for five big-name Sharia-supporting killers. I have never before heard a U.S. president talk in terms of--"...my government...." Barack Obama showed off his dictator-like nature in what he said in the sentence provided. Also, Barack Obama showed off his belief that the U.S. government is "his government." And what Barack Obama said has to be attached to the actual act of what he did--He unlawfully freed five enemies of the United States of America. That shows me that Barack Obama is in league with the enemies of the United States of America. I say that Barack Obama is a traitor! (Remember: "The Benghazi Killings Scandal", which you can learn about through this link: Benghazi.]Tuesday, June 17, 2014 (at the GLBT Gala of Democrat National Committee):
"...Everybody's free to be who they are--that's a fight that brought all of us here today...." [Barack Obama was speaking before gays and lesbians and transexuals and such. Barack Obama is not to be "free" to be who he wants to be yet. The United States Constitution blocks him from being a dictator in full. In the United States of America, Barack Obama is not "free" to be who he wants to be. Of course, he already gets to be a perpetual liar, and he gets to hurt people or even help kill people (as the "Benghazi Killings Scandal" and the "Fast and Furious Scandal" show and as his work to install more Muslim Brotherhood people (terrorist-type people) in political control in the Middle East).]
"...Now you flash back ten years ago, maybe no single issue divided our country more than same-sex marriage...." [Oh, even up to a few years ago, Barack Obama was publicly stating that he was against same-sex marriage. So what is this crap that Barack Obama is saying? Plus, in 2004, same-sex marriage was not the big issue! Barack Obama lied once again.]Monday, June 23, 2014 (at the White House Summit on Working Families):
"...Anything that makes life harder for women makes things harder for families, that makes life harder for children. When women succeed, America succeeds!...." [Barack Obama did not really focus on "men" in the speech, as if men do not matter or as if he wanted to push the idea that "men" should not matter and should not be taken into account. I also say that, when men succeed, America succeeds! Of course, based on the quoted words, a smart person can get the feeling Barack Obama was trying to enforce the idea that Congress--especially "Republicans"--do not care about the family or about women. That is bullshit from a bullshit mimd. Yes, anything that makes life harder for men makes things harder for families, that makes life harder for children. I ask--It is possible to make things harder for only women, not affecting men at the same time? Oh, use Barack Obama's statement but put "blacks" in place of "women," and then use "Indians" in place of "women," and then use "teenagers" in place of "women," and then use "cooks" in place of "women," and the use "basket weavers" in place of "women," and then use "plumbers" in place of "women,"....]
"...As long as Congress refuses to act on these policies, we're gonna need you to raise your voices. We need you, we need you ta, to tell Congress--Don't talk about how you support families, actually support families, don't talk the talk, we want you to walk the walk. In the meantime, if Congress will not act, we're gonna need mayors to act, we'll need governors and state legislators to act. We need CEO to act. And I promise you, you will have a president who will take action to support working families!...." [When I heard this set of words, several thoughts came to mind. When Barack Obama was younger, he was doing "rallying" as an "activist" (pushing communism so that he could become a big man) before small crowds, and he probably like it. On this day, I could hear a man who really was getting thrill for the self through what was nothing more than doing "rallying" work. To me, Barack Obama sounded like a mentally sick man--a man on a "high." (Remember: Barack Obama's mind has been affected by using illegal mind-altering drugs in at least the past.) Again, Barack Obama was working to get people to act on his behalf to get something--the something was undefined really, as he had done when I was first running to be a U.S. president. Yes, I ask--The people should be raising their voices for what? And once again, Barack Obama should that he was going to act without Congress. Then a person has to keep in mind, to date, policies that Barack Obama has enacted into law hurt families, especially the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, one part of which will lead to families making the final decisions about what care will or will not be given to members of the families. Yes, about six years into Barack Obama's run as the U.S. president, Barack Obama is going to work for families. It is all bullshit from a bullshit mind!]Friday, June 27, 2014 (in Minneapolis, Minnesota):
"...Now, some of you may have read--So we take these actions, and then, now, Republicans are mad at me for taking these actions. They're not doin' anything, and then they're mad that I'm doin' something. I'm not sure which of the things that I've done they find most offensive, but they've decided they're gonna sue me for doing me job...." [This is bullshit! His statement makes me think--So, just because the U.S. Congress will not go out an kill people, he will, though it is not his job. That is sort of what he is saying. Barack Obama has no authority under law to do things that change law by himself, which he has been doing (which means there is no law since law can be changed at a whim and at any moment and on and on and on....). If you do something that is wrong, you are doing something, and you are wrong. If a person who is at work does not work within the rules or within the job description, then the person is not doing what the job description allows, and that means the person is a goof up and not doing right. In Barack Obama's case, Barack Obama is doing stuff that is against the law, and he is doing wrong.]
"...I, you know, I mean, I might have, I might have said in, in, in the heat of the moment during one of these debates--I want to raise the minimum wage, so sue me when I do--but I, I didn't, I didn't think they were going to take it literally...." [So boldly Barack Obama mocks others while he is selling and teaching nonsense.]
"...If, if you watch the news--You just see, okay, Washington is a mess! And the basic attitude is everybody is just crazy up there. And, but if you actually read the find print, it turns out that, the things you care about, right now, Democrats are promoting. And, and we're just not getting enough help. And my message to Republicans is--Just join us, get on board. If you're mad at me for helpin' people on my own, then why don't you join me, and we'll do it together, we'll do it together. I'm happy to share the credit...." [I have several points in mind, but I will only make two public. Here is rotten man, who is selling the idea that, he is doing things, though--I say--actually rotten things, and so join in with him (he is knowingly doing wrong and yet selling others on joining him). In addition, he lied again, working to sell the idea that he would "share the credit"--Barack Obama shares nothing with Republicans. Okay, I will make another point. Where is the proof that Barack Obama--whose history shows that he is not altruistic--is helping people? It is more bullshit!]
"...I want to work with ya [Republicans in the U.S. Congress], but you have to give me something!..." [Liar!]
"...They [Republicans, especially "conservatives"] don't do anything, except block me and call me names...." [The shallow little boy spoke again--it was not the way of an adult or what an adult U.S. president should be like.]
"...If they [Republicans] were more interested in growin' the economy for you and the issues that you're talkin' about, instead of tryin' ta mess with me, then we'd be doin' a lot better...." [The nasty little boy spoke again--it was not the way of an adult or what an adult U.S. president should be like.]Monday, June 30, 2014 (at the White House):
"...Today, I'm beginning a new effort--fix as much of our immigration system as I can on my own without Congress...." [The dictator speaks!]
"...But the problem is that our system [the immigration system] is so broken, so unclear...." [The liar speaks!]
"...We, we, we call the Bill the 'Crust Master' because, ah, his pies--I don't know what he does--if he puts crack in them...." [The shit-head man speaks!]
[Note: This section shows three simple examples of why Barack Obama is unpresidential, is an "enslavist," and is a man from the gutter, a low-class uncool ghetto-type thug.]Thursday, July 10, 2014 (in Austin, Texas):
"...Everybody knows I love Austin, Texas. I...every time I come here, I, I tell ya how much I love it. I love Austin. I love the people. I love the barbecue, which I will get right after this. Like music. I've got good memories here. I've got good friends. It is great to play at the Paramount. I think I've finally, I finally made it, I finally arrived. I've enjoyed the last couple of days...." [While Barack Obama was staying these words, Texas was being inundated with illegal children from places south of the Mexico/United States of America, and Mexico was involved in pushing the children in to Texas, and U.S. Congressmen were being blocked from seeing and recording (such as in photographs) what was going on at the places where the children were being processed or whatever in Texas, and it was being reported that children (illegal aliens) had bad diseases, and it looked as if some children were criminal types. It must be remembered--Barack Obama has made public announcements since January 2009 that he is not going to deport people, and his policy has been instrumental in leading to the children's arrivals. Yes, Barack Obama was in Texas, and the question was--Why was he not visiting the processing centers where the children were and why were no photographs of the processing centers being issued to the public. I say that something rotten was going on while Barack Obama spoke his words. I can see children (illegal aliens) with bad diseases, and I can see security people at the processing centers making fake documents (with, for instance, faked ages) for children, and I can see teen thugs and crooks being processed to be sent out to places in the country to stay (see my document entitled Michigan Travel Tips #123, which can be reached through this Travel #123 link). And Barack Obama offered flap doodle to people in Austin, Texas.]Thursday, July 24, 2014 (at the L.A. Technical College):
"...Let's everybody get together--Democrats and Republicans--to deter companies from rushing to take advantage of this tax loophole, and let's make sure that we're rewarding companies that are investing and paying their fair share here in the United States. And this is not a partisan issue. Just ten years ago, a Republican-led Congress cracked down on corporations movin' off-shore tax havens...." [Okay, can you guess what he is talking about? Well, the theme is companies having parts in other countries or moving operations to other countries, such as to get out of paying the high corporate taxes in the United States of America--Businesses are going to countries where they still have to pay taxes but not so high taxes. There is no tax loophole! Now, look at the next paragraph to get a idea of where Barack Obama's rotten mind in going.]
"...And I'm not interested in punishing these companies. I'm interested in economic patriotism...." [Okay, what the hell is "economic patriotism"? It is used to get his listeners to side with him--that is, to put down companies that want to get out from under the pressure of an oppressive political system (taxation system) related to the United States of America. Yes, Barack Obama pushed the idea--You are not patriotic if you try to leave for a better place, and you are not patriotic if you do not accept and put up wit the rotten business climate existing in the United States of America (where you could go out of business). Now, look at he next paragraph.]
"...In the meantime, we need to stop companies from renouncing their citizenship just to get out of paying their fair share of taxes...." [Here, Barack Obama shows he wants to be able to tell companies they cannot leave without penalty, though they are already being unfairly penalized through high taxes (the United States of America has one of the highest taxes rates on corporations in the world, and companies based in the United States of America that make money in other countries can end up being taxed twice on the same dollar--in the country where the money was earned and in the United States of America. By the way, a person must keep in mind that companies pay taxes in other countries so it is not as if, when a company leaves the U.S., that it is getting out of paying taxes--somewhere. To survive, some companies leave, and companies that cannot leave the oppressive taxing rules can shut down.]Thursday, July 31, 2014:
"...We need a Congress that's willing to get things done. We don't have that right now! In the meantime, ah, I'm gonna do whatever I can and whenever I can to keep this country's promise alive for more and more of the American people...." [Presented with this material, a smart person can determine Barack Obama is trying to sell the ideas that (1) Congress is getting nothing done (if it is not passing things that Barack Obama wants passed) and (2) he is going to continue to violate the rules of the country and do what he pleases without working with Congress (as he is required to do). And then a person has to wonder--What "promise" was Barack Obama talking about and how can he keep "it" [the "promise"] alive? Anyway, history shows Barack Obama is killing the "promise," such as by pushing great debt on the country, putting coal-related businesses out of business, pushing bad laws related to the fake idea of climate change on businesses, working to swamp the country with illegal aliens, et cetera.]Wednesday, August 7, 2014 (in Washington, D.C., during the U.S.-African Leaders Summit):
"...Ah, and even among countries that generally have strong human-rights records, there are, ah, there are areas where there are problems--that's true of the United States, by the way...." [From Monday, August 4, 2014, through Wednesday, August 6, 2014, Barack Obama--a supporter of terrorist entities, such as the Muslim Brotherhood and affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood (which promotes and pushes for Sharia (a rotten political system masquerading as a religion) for the world)--hosted a gathering of leaders of countries on the African continent (the U.S.-African Leaders Summit) in Washington, D.C. Some of the leaders have bad or very bad human-rights records, based on doing great harm to great numbers of peoples, and yet Barack Obama made no hint in public to show even the slightest displeasure with the bad leaders, as former U.S. Presidents have. In addition, Barack Obama tried to give the impression that the United States of America is a country with a human-rights record that is not unlike that of bad countries in Africa, such as those in which people are kept poor and are unable to feed themselves--it is because of the ways of life practiced by the leaders that result in misery for the people. Incidentally, Barack Obama has a history of supporting dictator-types, such as the leaders of Cuba and Venezuela. During the event, Barack Obama promised more money (coming from the American public) to the African cause, such as for the lives of the dictators.]Thursday, August 28, 2014 (in Washington, D.C.):
"...I don't want to put the cart before the horse. We don't have a strategy yet. I think, ah, what I've seen in some of these, ah, ah, news reports, ah, suggests that, ah, folks are gettin' a little further ahead, ah, of where we're at than where we currently are. Um, and I think that's not just my assessment but the assessment of our military as well. We need to make sure that we got clear plans, and we're developing them, and at that point, I will consult with Congress and make sure their voices are heard...." [The theme is "ISIS" or "ISIL", an Islamic group of killers and pushers of Sharia (the rotten political system) in the general Iraq area (at least). I say that the Executive Branch of the federal government--headed by the U.S. president--has had plans to deal with all sorts of problems around the world, or there have been general themes about how to deal with problems around the world, and ISIS is not a problem that showed up only yesterday or a few days ago. Yet, Barack Obama--a supporter of Sharia, as history shows or his actions show--has no plot about dealing with ISIS "yet." But when Barack Obama gets a plan, he will "consult with Congress," though history shows and his actions show he is willing to do things--unconstitutionl things--without help from he U.S. Congress. The quoted material sounds like more nonsense and shit from a shit-head man.]]
"...The idea that the United States or any outside power would perpetually defeat ISIS, ah, I think is unrealistic. Ah, as I've said before--I think I said it in the previous, ah, press conference--our military is the best in the world. We, we can rout ISIS on the ground and keep a lid on things temporarily, but then as soon as we leave, the same problems come back again, so we've go ta, we've got ta make sure that Iraqis understand, in the end, they're gonna be responsible for their own security...." [Once again, the theme is "ISIS" or "ISIL". I guess not all rotten people in the world can be gotten rid of, but it is possible to knock the rottenness out well, as was done by the United States of America and its associates (such as Australia, Canada, England, Ireland, and Scotland) with the rotten heart of Germany in the mid-1900s, which included Adolph Hitler, and with the rotten heart of Japan in the mid-1900s. If rottenness is not confronted and beaten down from time to time, it does nothing but grow. ISIS--a pusher of Sharia--will not simply go away. By the way, I state--When you do a half-hearted job to knock something down or to solve a problem, the problem is indeed likely to come back, and since January 2009, Barack Obama--as history shows--has done less than a half-hearted job in such places as Iraq and Afghanistan.]
"...We are not, ah, taking military action to solve the Ukrainian problem. Ah, what we're doing is to mobilize the international community to apply pressure on Russia. Ah, but, I think, it is very important to recognize that, um, a military solution to this problem is not going to be forthcoming...." [The theme is Russia's invasion of Ukraine. I put this material in this document so that it can be seen at some time in the future, when things will be different. We will see what develops in the world--with so-called sanctions and how the sanctions hurt Russia.]Sunday, September 7, 2014 (on Meet the Press with Chuck Todd):
"...Number one, I have been consistent about why this is important. The country's going to be better off if we have an immigration system that works, that has strong border security, that, ah, is, has, has streamlined our legal immigration systems so the best and the brightest who want to stay here and invest here and, and create jobs can do so, ah, that families can be unified, and that a system where the millions of people who are here in many cases for a decade or more who have American kids, who are neighbors, often times our friends, can have a path to get legal by paying taxes and gettin' above board, paying a fine, learning English if they have to...." [The theme is immigration policy, and it was one topic covered during a broadcast of Meet the Press with Chuck Todd, and it was the twelfth time Barack Obama was on the program. First, why should a person believe Barack Obama statement that "The country's going to be better off...."? What makes Barack Obama statement worthwhile? Barack Obama has not proved himself over time to be a person whose judgment on anything should be trusted! There has been immigration laws in the country for decades, and Barack Obama has violated them [as some of my other documents available on the Internet show), and Barack Obama has blocked Arizona from upholding U.S. immigration law, such as by taking the state to court. In addition, Barack Obama has done nothing since January 20, 2009, to really secure the border! The "millions of people who are here" [as presented in Barack Obama words) are violators of U.S. immigration law--they are illegal aliens. You can see Barack Obama message in the words presented to you is all nonsense.]
"...The good news is--we, we have bipartisan support for that. We have a Senate bill that would accomplish that. The House Republicans refuse to do that, and what I said to them was--If you do not act on something that's so commonsense that you got labor, business, evangelicals, law enforcement--we got people across the board supporting it--then I'm gonna look for all the legal authorities to act. What we've now done is lay the ground work for that. Jay Johnson, the head of Department of Homeland Security, has presented me preliminary, ah, ah, you know, ideas in terms of how we can take executive action, and what I've determined is I want to make sure we get it right. I want to make sure, number one, that all the 't's...." [There is nothing legally that a U.S. President can do to change immigration law--not through "Executive Order" and not through any means!]
"...I'm going to act because it's the right thing for the country, but it's going to be more sustainable and more effective if the public understands what the facts are on immigration, what we've done on, on unaccompanied children, and why it's necessary. And, you know, the truth of the matter is that...." [How is the public doing to understand the truth? Barack Obama is a liar. Many in the public will have their heads filled with lies about the subject. Yes, who says that a perpetual liar--Barack Obama--knows what is the right thing for the country. Yes, Barack Obama is going to act illegally--to him, it is the "...right thing for the country....".]Wednesday, September 10, 2014 (an address to the nation about "ISIS" or "ISIL"):
"My fellow Americans...." [On Wednesday, September 10, 2014, Barack Obama spoke to the nation, and the speech was designed to explain what Barack Obama was supposedly going to do about an entity informally called "ISIS" or "ISIL", which is a Islamic (Sharia-focused) terrorist entity of the world, especially the Middle East. In essence, "ISIS" is a brother to the Muslim Brotherhood, which has spawned a number of offshoots that are terrorist groups. The Muslim Brotherhood and all the offshoot groups are working to put all the peoples of the world--especially those who are considered the peoples of the "Western Nations," especially the people of the United States of America--under the rules of Sharia (Islamic Law). "Sharia" is nothing more than a rotten political system, though it is promoted as a "religion," and "Sharia" often involves coercion and violence against the citizens by the rulers ("clerics"), who are really nothing more than rotten people in all cases, given they promote the ways of "Sharia"--Sharia promotes the killing of "gays" and the subjugation of women (women are always second-class citizens to men), and Sharia has more that is rotten, one piece of which is the lack of free speech against Allah and Sharia and the rulers by the citizens. Some societies or entities based on Sharia are less violent than others, but Sharia-based entities are rotten, and "ISIS" is certainly one of the worst entities, such as by its showing willingness to behead people who are against it. Now, history shows that Barack Obama is an ally of Sharia-based entities, and one showing of that is his support for the rulers of Iran when there were big summer protests by citizens in Iran related to an election and the rulers put down the citizens with violence and his support for the Muslim Brotherhood, members of which have regularly visited the White House and members of which got support in Egypt around the time that a leader in Egypt was pushed out of office and a Muslim Brotherhood man ended up the leader (through an election of some form) [the Egyptian military quickly pushed the Muslim Brotherhood man out of power for his oppressive rules and actions]. In essence, "ISIS" is a threat to other entities based on Sharia, and one reason is "ISIS" is willing to kill other Muslims, and another reason is "ISIS" can give "Sharia" a bad public image by being too violent in the trek to push Sharia on the world--Some entities supporting Sharia wish to be more stealth like in pushing Sharia on the world, and any entity that gives Sharia a highly bad public image hinders those who wish for Sharia for the world but wish to push it through less violent means.]
"...Now, let's make two things clear. ISIL is not Islamic. No religion condones the killing of innocents...." [Here, Barack Obama pushed along bullshit. ISIL is "Islamic." ISIL is based on "Sharia." By the way, Sharia-based nations may cut off people's hands for bad deeds, such as theft. Sharia is a way of life that supports or condones violence against non-followers of Sharia (an "enslavism" form of government)! I say that Barack Obama's words presented within this paragraph were used to separate "ISIS" from "Sharia" and other Sharia-based entities to protect the image of "Sharia" and make "Sharia" not seem so bad. I have come to understand Barack Obama supports Sharia for the world, and ISIS is a treat to Barack Obama's work to fundamentally change the United States of America and impose "enslavism" (such as a mixture of Sharia and communism) on the peoples of the United States of America.]
"...If you threaten America, you will find no safe haven...." [Okay, Barack Obama did push the idea that he was going to do something about ISIS or ISIL. Yet, it must be remembered Barack Obama is not currently really protecting the border of the United States of America along the property that is Mexico. In fact, since January 20, 2009, Barack Obama has hindered efforts to protect the United States of America and keep undesirables out, such as drug smugglers and people with bad diseases and even Sharia-loving and communism-loving people, who are anti-United States Constitution (an anti-communism document and anti-Sharia document).]
"...My administration has also secured bipartisan support for this approach here at home. I have the authority to address the threat from ISIL. But I believe we are strongest as a nation when the president and Congress work together...." [You have been given three sentences from Barack Obama in this paragraph. I put the first two in to lead up to the one sentence that you should see and study. Since January 20, 2009, Barack Obama has often worked without U.S. Congress, and he has not seemed to mind--He has made Executive Orders to do illegal actions, and Barack Obama has even put down the U.S. Congress. Yes, Barack Obama passed along bullshit by saying--"...I believe we are strongest as a nation when the president and Congress work together....".Tuesday, September 16, 2014 (the speech event at the CDC is about ebola):
"...First and foremost, I want the American people to know that our experts here at the CDC and across our government agree that the chances for an ebola outbreak here in the United States are extremely low. We've been taking the necessary precautions including working with countries in West Africa to increase screening at airports so that someone with the virus doesn't get on a plane for the United States...." [On September 30, 2014, the CDC had to make a public announcement that the first case of ebola was in the United States of America--in a man (named Thomas Eric Duncan) in Texas. Soon thereafter, the CDC had to announce that a U.S. nurse had ebola. Soon thereafter, the CDC had to announce that another nurse had ebola. Barack Obama is shit!]Wednesday, September 24, 2014 (a speech before the General Assembly of the United Nations):
"...America has plenty of problems within its borders. This is true! In a summer marked by instability in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, an old world also took notice of the small American city of Ferguson, Missouri, where a young man was killed and a community was divided. So, yes, we have our own racial and ethnic tensions. And like every country, we continually wrestle with how to reconcile the vast changes brought by globalization and greater diversity with the traditions we hold dear. America's not the same as it was one-hundred years ago...." [On Wednesday, September 24, 2014, the big story of the day was "ISIS" (or "ISIL" or whatever it is called at the moment), which was a Sharia-based group in, for instance, the Middle East, which was trying to take over Iraq and other lands and was killing and beheading people, and, in essence, the United Nations was gathered to take up the matter, but Barack Obama had to pass along in a speech, the words that I have put in quotation marks in this paragraph. First, the killing of a black young man in Ferguson, Missouri, was not an international story. Second, the story about the shooting, which may or may not contain in the future n a court case against the shooter (a police officer), was and is not over, and, by the way, it is known that the victim was no wonderful young man (as some people falsely push), and, in fact, for instance, the young man (Michael Brown) had marijuana in his body at the time of the shooting, and, given that, a U.S. President should not make any comment since there may not have been any wrong done by the police officer), especially to an international crowd. Third, it seems Barack Obama mentioned the incident (the shooting) so that he could put down the United States of America or make the United States of America look bad (every day, there is a shooting in the country somewhere--especially a black against a black), or Barack Obama wanted to compare the shooting incident (the facts of which are not fully know, especially by people outside the United States of America) with the ISIS problem, which might have been to make the shooting incident seem worse than it was. Fourth, what does the shooting of Michael Brown have to do with "...the vast changes brought by globalization and greater diversity with the traditions we hold dear...."? There is no connection! The statement from Barack Obama is nonsense. Barack Obama's bring up the incident in Ferguson should not have been done--it was a bad action by Barack Obama or an inappropriate action. Of course, maybe, Barack Obama had to put down the United States of America so that his listeners will not tie him tightly to the United States of America (and see him as the United States of America as it was founded and should be) and not vote for him to be the dictator of the world in the future--Barack Obama is showing his work to ruin the United States of America, which many members of the United Nations--which is a rotten entity--would like.]Sunday, September 28, 2014 (on 60 Minutes):
"...Well, ah, I, I, I think, ah, our head of, ah, the intelligence community, ah, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that, I think, they underestimated, ah, what had been taking place in Syria...." [On Friday, September 26, 2014, Steve Kroft did an interview with Barack Obama, and the interview appeared on the episode of 60 Minutes (on CBS-TV) on Sunday, September 28, 2014. The material within quotation marks in this paragraph is what Barack Obama said in response to a question about how did ISIS people (terrorists) get where they are (that is, get in control of the lands that have gotten control of and get as strong in the roughly Iraq region of the Middle East as they have). After the interview aired, many people were saying that Barack Obama was putting blame on the intelligence community, and the people were not happy, given they were aware information about ISIS had been passed along up the chain of command to the office of the president for more than two years, and people were publicly saying that Barack Obama did not read the reports or did sort of read the reports but did not get serious about of the reports [Houck, Curtis. "ABC, CBS Ignored News That the Intelligence Community Actually Did Warn Obama About ISIS Threat." Newsbusters.org, 29 September 2014, 9:44 EDT; Martosko, David. "Obama has had accurate intelligence about ISIS since BEFORE the 2012 election, says administration insider." MailOnline (of The Daily Mail in the United Kingdom), 29 September 2014, 10:23 EST (updated 17:42 EST); Rose, Norvell. "What This Leading Liberal Website Just Said About Obama Could Send Dems Into A Midterms Panic." Westernjournalism.com, 29 September 2014.]. I note--Since January 20, 2014, there have been news reports that Barack Obama was not attending meetings of, in essence, his security team. By the way, notice how Barack Obama's sentence shows a man who is not confident about what he is saying. It must be remembered--The United States of America has an intelligence-gathering system that involves thousands of persons (nearly two-dozen agencies are involved in compiling, in essence, each report or briefing book), and, for decades, U.S. presidents have received regular reports about what is happening around the world and what problems are showing up or exist [On Monday, September 29, 2014, Mark R. Levin, during his nationally syndicated radio show (The Mark Levin Show) had a man (whose identity had to be kept secret) as a telephone-call-in interviewee, and the man called "John" well knew how reports were put together, and John noted that some 70,000 documents with intelligence information are written every year, which get used to put together the reports for, for instance, Barack Obama]. I report that some people say that Barack Obama is "over his head" in the job as the U.S. president, and some people say that Barack Obama is disengaged as the U.S. president, and some people say that Barack Obama is so smart that the job as the U.S. president bores him. I disagree with the assessments presented in the previous sentence. Since January 20, 2014, Barack Obama has worked to cut back on the budget for the U.S. military (while increasing the budgets of, in essence, everything else of the federal government, which has ballooned the overall federal budget to what can be called the breaking point), and Barack Obama has put in place "rules of engagement" with enemies that are rotten (and help the enemies of the United States of America), and Barack Obama did nothing to protect Americans during the "Benghazi Killings Scandal" [which you can learn about through my document entitled The "Benghazi Killings Scandal": A Short Information-and-Status Report, which can be reached through this Benghazi link], and Barack Obama has regularly met with members of the Muslim Brotherhood (a terrorist entity pushing for Sharia for the world to which ISIS has ties), such as at the White House, and Barack Obama worked to get the Muslim Brotherhood in control of Egypt, and Barack Obama delayed for months--a delay time that I say was unnecessary--the decision to send U.S. reinforcements to Afghanistan (though U.S. military were pushing for reinforcements), and Barack Obama has shown support for the leaders in Iran, whose way of life follows the ways of Sharia (Islamic law), such as when there were protests against what appeared to be a corrupt election in Iran. I say that Barack Obama supports followers of Sharia who are working to impose Sharia on the world, especially throughout the Middle East and northern Africa under one governing entity and on the United States of America. I say that Barack Obama does not necessarily care about any intelligence reports, siding with the enemies of the country (especially those who are pushing Sharia and enslavism for the world) and not wishing waste time seeing them, given he has no intention of using the reports as part of a decision to attack the enemies, and I say that Barack Obama is doing what he can to delay actions against the enemies of the country (especially those who are pushing Sharia and enslavism for the world), which allows the enemies to get more of what they want or get more of what they want done before any actions against them might start, and when something bad happens as the result of Barack Obama's delaying actions against Sharia-based terrorists, Barack Obama has to make it seem others are at fault so that he does not get seen as siding with the enemies. Oh, by the way, I have heard that Barack Obama avoids having people report directly to him in person about intelligence matters (at least) so that, later, people cannot end up testifying in public (such as at a congressional-committee hearing) that they reported something directly to him in person.]
"...Here's what I'm gonna tell the American people. When I came into office, our economy was in crisis. We had, ah, unemployment, ah, up at ten percent. It's now down to six point one...." [Barack Obama pushed out big lies during the interview on 60 Minutes, but Barack Obama lies regularly. The unemployment rate is not at six-point-one percent! Since January 20, 2014, the Barack Obama administration has changed the way in which the unemployment rate is calculated, and the unemployment rate (what can be called the basic unemployment rate figure that gets reported) is now a false number (the Barack Obama administration uses a "job universe" figure that is smaller than it was, for instance).]
"...They, they don't feel it. And the reason they don't feel it is because income and wages are not gonna up. There are solutions to that. If we raise the minimum wage, if we make sure women are getting paid the same as men for doin' the same work, if we are rebuilding our infrastructure, if we're doin' more to invest in job training for people...." ["Do people feel it [the economy getting better]?"--this was the question to which the words in quotation marks pertain (as an answer). The words from Barack Obama are nonsense. Raising the minimum wage--to simply raise the minimum wageto not make people better feel the economy is improving, and when the minimum wage is increased (for some persons), it means prices for things must go up, and that means people have to pay more for things. Generally speaking, wages can go up for employees at a company when the company has customers and has an increase in customers. Barack Obama pushed out the idea that people are not feeling the improvement in the economy because women do not get paid the same as men do for the same amount or type of work. That is nonsense! Laws already exist on the books to block discrimination in wages. Where is Barack Obama going to find all these women who are not getting paid properly? Job training is no solution, and, anyway, it is not up to the federal government to provide job training! For instance, if one particular person gets some job training, it does affect the wage earned by anyone else, whose wage goes up if the company at which the person works becomes able to pay more. Ask yourself--What does Barack Obama mean by "invest" more in job training? That means the federal government has to spend more money it seems to me, and that means it is more federal debt. For years, Barack Obama has talked about "infrastructure" and "shovel-ready jobs." It is all nonsense. Barack Obama thinks that putting more people in road-building work increases the wage of a hair dresser, a broaching-machine operator, a janitor, an accountant, a baseball player in the minor leagues, a furnace installer, a writer of books, a glass blower, a circus performer, et cetera. Through the quoted material, Barack Obama passed along more idiocy and more crap!]Thursday, October 2, 2014 (at Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois):
"...I actually believe that capitalism is the greatest force for prosperity and opportunity the world has ever known...." [This set of words from Barack Obama may make up the biggest lie that he has ever told in his life. Or maybe he does believe it, and he hates that it is, which is why he works to destroy businesses and the idea of capitalism. Maybe, Barack Obama thinks that he can do better than capitalism, which is why he want control! The man is rotten!]
"...I believe in private enterprise, not government...." [Then again, maybe, this set of words makes up the biggest lie ever told by Barack Obama in his life--his life that has been rotten for many, many others.]Thursday, October 2, 2014 (at the annual gala of the Hispanic Caucus Institute):
"...The moment I act [on giving amnesty to people who are illegally within the country], and it will be takin' place between the November elections and the end of the year, opponents of reform will roll out the same old scare tactics...." [Yes, Barack Obama, through the words given within quotation marks, announced that he is going to violate his oath of office once again--and give amnesty to illegal aliens through an illegal act. By the way, ask youself--Why does Barack Obama have to wait till after the elections of November 2014? Violate the law the country now--what is wrong with that, instead of putting it off? Whenever the action by Barack Obama takes place, violation of the law is violation of the law.]Wednesday, October 15, 2014 (another press event about ebola):
"...if they're done properly, they work, ah, but we have to make sure that understandably certain local hospitals may not have that experience, ah, are, ah, walking, walked through that process as carefully as possible, and we've got to make that this rapid-response team...." [On October 15, 2014, Barack Obama gave a speech about ebola before the press, and he answered no questions from the press, and once again Barack Obama passed along idiocy. Here, Barack Obama did not outline plans to stop people from countries with ebola troubles from entering the country. Oh, Barack Obama did outline that a special rapid-reponse-medical team was being created (which reminded me of some fictional television program, in which a team of fighters of some type--maybe crime fighters--flies around the country in a jet and tries to solve problems). Such a piece of crap Barack Obama is. And did you notice Barack Obama's goof up while speaking, which is shown within the quotation marks. You are urged to see the entry for September 30, 2014.]Wednesday, November 5, 2014 (a press event for about one hour):
"...So to everyone who voted, I want you to know I hear you. To the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process yesterday, I hear you to...." [These two sentences from Barack Obama can seem to be vague, but a person can come up with a meaning. If you look at the first sentence, you should hear, as I hear--"I hear you, but it does not mean I will pay attention to you....". If you look at the second sentence, you should hear, as I hear--"I hear you, and I know you actually are on my side, but you did not vote because you felt this past election was a no win for you because, for instance, the Republicans' big money was going to buy the election--I know you are the majority and you want what I am doing, such as give you equal pay, a higher minimum wage, et cetera. Yet, a person, such as you, has to wonder--Did Barack Obama actually hear the two-thirds in his mind and did Barack Obama believe really it was a vote for him? It is bullshit, but it is the sign of a defective mind, an insane mind.]
"...So, I plan on spending every moment of the next two-plus years doing my job the best I can to keep this country safe and make sure more Americans share in its prosperity...." [Bullshit!]
"...I'm eager to work with the new Congress to make the next two years as productive a possible...." [Bullshit!]
"...And whether it's immigration or climate change or making sure our kids are going to the best possible schools ta making sure that our communities are creating jobs...." [During the opening segment of the event, Barack Obama rattled off clichés and nonsense in an open speech, and he showed that he is still pushing the same of crap and lies, such as "climate change." The set of words within the quotation marks showed off something else. Notice that Barack Obama hinted that the federal government should be involved in "making sure our communities are creating jobs." "Communities" do not create jobs! Individuals in communities, in which they have chosen to be, create jobs, as best they can, giving all the hindrances to making businesses viable, such as federal-government intervention and defective laws, such as tax laws. During the set of words, Barack Obama was working to teach bullshit--that federal government is involving in making sure communities create jobs!]
"...Before the end of the year, we're gonna, ah, take whatever lawful actions that I can take that I believe will improve the functioning of our immigration system, that will allow us ta surge additional resources to the border...." [Okay, let us examine what the shit-head man said. First, there are no lawful actions that Barack Obama can take--any changes in the immigration system of laws must be done with the U.S. Congress and the U.S. President, and a U.S. President can do nothing alone. Second, Barack Obama has not been following the existing laws related to the immigration system and he has even taken Arizona to court to stop Arizona from enforcing the laws of the immigration system. Barack Obama said more bullshit.]Friday, November 14, 2014 (in a country informally called Myanmar, Asia):
"...This project is--It is providing the ability of Canada to pump their oil, send it through out land, down to the Gulf, where it will be sold everywhere else. It doesn't have an impact on U.S. gas prices...." [Here is more rotten talk from Barack Hussein Obama, the rotten man. To get the project built, which is the Keystone Pipeline, individuals will have to build it, and they will get paid to build it. That means people get jobs and money. To get the project built, states will receive money or fees, and states will receive money probably regularly in some for because the pipeline exists. When the pipeline exists, it will have to be watched over and serviced (such as the pumps), and that means people will be needed to do the work. Who cares were the gas is sold and used? The companies that process the oil into gas will have jobs for doing the work and will get paid. In addition, when more gasoline hits the world marketplace, that can reduce the prices of gas around the world because of the rule of "supply and demand." Who says none of the gasoline will be sold and used in the United States of America? Barack Obama's tactic of lying is more rottenness! The project helps Canadians, too, by making their work to sell oil easier and getting money in their pockets. Yes, Barack Obama passed along shit once again! By the way, I see it as his attack on the United States of America and Canada--He also once again attacked Canada, an ally of the United States of America.]
[Note: Although Barack Obama has been pushing out for years the idea that he is a believer of the manmade-global-warming idea or the manmade-climate-change idea--to the point that man is killing the planet--I say that he cares not about global warming or climate change, given three day previous to talking about the the Keystone Pipeline to the press on November 14, 2014, Barack Obama had made some type of agreement with the Chinese, in which Barack Obama was going to press for a bigger reduction of carbon-dioxide emissions in the United States of America and the Chinese were going to do nothing till 2030 [if then], which means, China, which produces some 30 percent of the daily output of carbon dioxide in to the air, will get to do nothing to reduce emissions and the United States of America will have to cut back on using carbon-based fuels even more, and that exposes Barack Obama's crap.]Sunday, November 16, 2014 (at the end of the G-20 Summit in in Brisbane, Australia):
"...No. I, I did not [deceive the American public about the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010]. Ah, ah, I just heard about this--I, I get well briefed, dah, before I come out here--ah, the, the fact that some adviser who never worked on our staff, ah, expressed an opinion that, ah, I completely disagree with, with, ah, in terms of the voters is no reflection on actual process that was run...." [I start by noting that the "[deceive the American public about Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010]" is a set of words made by me to make the first few words understandable, and I note, for decades, writers have use brackets with words within them to indicate thought that was not actually said by the person being quoted, which makes the quoted material understandable. Now, this section presents a running set of words from Barack Obama, which is cut up into several sections. The topic is Jonathan Gruber's comments made in October 2013 at the University of Pennsylvania--the man noted how the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was a fraud in the way it was put together, and the fraud was worked hard to make the "individual mandate" not get scored by the CBO as a tax. [Note: You should see "Special Note #106" of my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be reached by using this link: Health.] Keep in mind--Jonathan Gruber was a main force in getting the Patient Protection and Affordable Care At of 2010 constructed. Notice how Barack Obama noted that the man referred to--Jonathan Gruber--was not "...on our staff....". What "staff" was Barack Obama talking about? The bill was put together by the U.S. Congress or really the Democratic Party of the U.S. Congress with support from the White House. It is fact that Jonathan Gruber was involved in making the law, as he had been with the health-care law for the State of Massachusetts, and Barack Obama's note about Jonathan Gruber's not being on the "staff" is useless information and is used to make it seem the White House has no ties to Jonathan Gruber. We know Jonathan Gruber was not on his staff. Next, I first learned about the statement by Jonathan Gruber on Monday, November 10, 2014, and, yet, Barack Obama was only learning about the statement, in essence, now (some six days after I had heard the statement for the first time), though Barack Obama is supposedly well briefed on things. Next, what does the following statement mean--"...ah, the, the fact that some adviser who never worked on our staff, ah, expressed an opinion that, ah, I completely disagree with, with, ah, in terms of the voters is no reflection on actual process that was run...."? What does "in terms of the voters" have to do with the remainder of the thought? It is a collage of crap from Barack Obama, and I have more to point out.]
"...We had a ye, year-long debate, Ed....." [Liar! There was no debate! The American public was not involved in the process really. The Democrats shut out the Republicans from the debate process in the U.S. Congress (such as by locking the doors of the room used to, for example, "mark up the fill," and facts can be found in my document entitled National Health Care and Mass Failure: The Reasons it is a Dead Issue, which can be reached by using this link: Health.]
"...I mean go back and look at your stories. One thing we can't say is that we did not have a lengthy debate about health care in the United States of America or that it was not adequately covered. I mean I would just advise all, ah, ah, every press outlet here--Go back and pull up every clip, every story, and I think it'll, it's fair to say that there was not a, a provision in the health law that was extensively debated, ah, and was fully transparent...." [And shit just kept flowing out of Barack Obama's shit-head mind and mouth.]
"...Now, there were folks who disagreed with, ah, some of these various positions. Ah, it was a tough debate. Um....." [The stumble-bum or stumble-mouthed Barack Obama kept going, and this segment should make a person notice--What does person's disagreeing with "various positions" have to do with the main question, which was focused on wondering whether or not Barack Obama deceived the American public?]Thursday, November 20, 2014 (an announcement about immigration and about his orders to the country about immigration):
"...Today, I want to talk....." [Again, Barack Obama appeared before the American public to speak, and, as usual, Barack Obama spoke nonsense and lies, and Barack Obama did it from the White House (with a bust of Abraham Lincoln visible in the background). The speech was to announce what he was going to do to help fix a "broken" immigration system. It must be remembered--Barack Obama and others have purposely not followed existing federal immigration law, and that was one reason the immigration system was "broken." Really, the announcement was an event that showed off Barack Obama's decision to not follow federal immigration law and to get at least all the people in the Executive Branch of the federal government to not follow existing federal immigration law, and also since people in the federal government were not going to follow existing federal immigration law, it was forcing others in the country, such as state officials like police officers, to forget about some immigration laws since the federal government was not going to act on things that state officials might do that would otherwise lead to things that federal-government officials would be obligated to do, such as deport a person who should be deported. Barack Obama was pushed lawlessness! And Barack Obama worked to appear friendly and nice and good to the audience, though he was violating The United States Constitution. By the way, before the speech would be given, supporters of Barack Obama pushed out the idea that, what he was doing, he was able to do because it had been done in the past, such as by U.S. President Abraham Lincoln in the 1860s and by U.S. President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s. However, I note that what Barack Obama was doing was nothing like what U.S. President Abraham Lincoln did or U.S. President Ronald Reagan did; for example, what U.S. President Abraham Lincoln did was proclaim slaves in, in essence, the states fighting the "Union" and the abolishment of slavery "free" (the proclamation did not apply to the "free" states of the "Union," and U.S. President Ronald Reagan had actual "legislation" (enacted by the federal government) backing him up. On November 20, 2014, Barack Obama announcement that he was doing something that had never been done before by a U.S. President--in essence, follow his own law. Incidentally, Barack Obama used the word "debate" several times during the speech, trying to say that the immigration thing was a "debate" we should be having, and yet no "debate" was going on really, since he was not acting in response to the results of a "debate"--it all was a single-mind action on his part.]
"...Today, our immigration system is broken, and everybody knows it...." [Bullshit! The system is broken because federal officials, such as Barack Obama, broke the immigration system by not following the law. And that is the truth and everybody knows it!]
"...When I took office, I committed to fixing this broken immigration system, and I began by doing what I could to secure our borders...." [Bullshit! For instance, Barack Obama took the State of Arizona to court to stop the State of Arizona from doing what the federal government--Barack Obama--was not doing. And that is the truth, and everybody knows it!]
"...Until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority to take as president--the same kind of actions taken by Democratic [Party] and Republican [Party] before me--that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just...." [Bullshit!]
"...We expect people who live in this country to play by the rules....." [And Barack Obama had the gall to say this, though he is not playing by the rules and following existing federal law. By the way, when Barack Obama was sworn into office as the U.S. President, he wore to uphold the laws of the United States of America, and a U.S. President is obligated to uphold the laws noted in The United States Constitution. See that crap that Barack Obama is?]
"...So we're gonna offer the following deal...." [Barack Obama is offering a "deal," but he has no authority to offer a "deal." Notice that Barack Obama said "we're". Actually, Barack Obama should have said that "I'm gonna offer the following deal....", since he is behind the whole unconstitutional action. Oh, it looks as if federal law can now be passed out in "deals".]
"...I know some of the critics of this action call it 'amnesty.' Well, it's not! 'Amnesty' is the immigration system we have today...." [Bullshit! Notice how Barack Obama corrupted the language, particularly the definition of 'amnesty.' Basically, Barack Obama is giving criminals--people who have violated federal immigration law and are violating federal immigration law--freedom from prosecution for their violations. That is 'amnesty.']
"...The actions I'm taking are not only lawful, they're the kind of actions taken by every single Republican [Party] president and every single Democratic [Party] president for the past half century...." [Bullshit!]
"...Most Americans support that types of reforms that I've talked about tonight...." [Bullshit! Where is his proof about this statement?]
"...'Scripture' tells us we shall not oppress a stranger...." [And here was a gag statement. Barack Obama supports "Sharia," and his actions of the last few decades show that Barack Obama is a Muslim and supports the ways of Sharia over, for instance, Christianity. This statement that came from Barack Obama was bullshit! Incidentally, this statement said during a portion of the speech was designed to tear at the heartstrings of listeners and viewers, persuade them to take up with Barack Obama's action for he was helping a young woman whom he had in an example (a one-woman example that was supposed to make people think of many, many, many persons--it was a false idea about many, many, many persons). It was a tactical piece of crap.]
"...My fellow Americans, we are and always will be a nation of immigrants. We were strangers once, too. And whether are forebearers were strangers who crossed the Atlantic or the Pacific or the Rio Grande, we are here only because this country welcomed them in...." [Barack Obama hit the idea of how people have come in to the country in the past. I note--general speaking, since the 1800s, the rule has been that people have been allowed in to the country when they followed the procedures for getting in to the country and met requirements, such as proving that they had no bad diseases. In the summer of 2014, the federal government allowed a lot of people--mostly children--in to the country who had diseases, and news about the people having the diseases was purposely kept quiet as much as possible from the American public.]
"...Thank you. God bless you. And God bless this country we love." [And this was the closing bullshit from Barack Obama. Given what this section has in it and what the entire document has in it about Barack Obama, you are going to tell me that Barack Obama loves this country? The speech was bullshit from start to finish, and I did not even come close to exposing all the crap that I was in it.]Friday, November 21, 2014 (at Del Sol High School in Las Vegas, Nevada):
"...I've come back to Del Sol to tell you--I'm not giving up. I will never give up...." [And the little high schoolers cheered Barack Obama, though they are ignorant of what they were cheering for and what Barack Obama had done by using "Executive Orders" in relation to immigration.]
"...I will never give up...." [This was said with the cheers still going from what he had just said, as shown in the previous paragraph, and when he was done saying this set of words, the kids cheered more. And the kids chanted in a way that made me think about how audiences had cheered Adolph Hitler (of Germany) in the 1930s and 1940s during his speeches.]
"...So, so we're not, we're not giving up...." [What type of idiot--while being a U.S. President--says such nonsense?]
"...But until that day comes, there are actions that I have the legal authority to take that will help make our immigration system more fair and more just, and this morning, I began to take some of those actions...." [Here, Barack Obama was teaching crap and lies--to little children, who are unaware of his rottenness and the truth.]
"...This kind of thing has been done before. So when members of Congress question my authority to make our immigration system work better, I have a simple answer--Pass a bill...." [Okay, think about this. We know Barack Obama's actions are illegal and not constitutional. Here, Barack Obama is saying that his actions are illegal, so the U.S. Congress should pass a bill, which is the right way of going about things and the legal way of going about things. Barack Obama just admitted his actions have no standing in legality. And Barack Obama hinted that the U.S. Congress will have to pass what he wants or he will continue to do what he wants to do alone.]Monday, November 24, 2014 (a statement about a grand jury decision related to the death of a man called Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri):
"...And so we need to accept this decision was the grand jury's to make. There are Americans who agree with it, and there are Americans who are deeply disappointed, even angry. It's an understandable reaction...." [On November 24, 2014, a grand jury announced a decision related to the shooting of a man called Michael Brown by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, and the grand jury announced that, in essence, the shooting and killing of Michael Brown was justified, given it had been shown Michael Brown, who, by the way, had had a mind-altering drug in his system at the time of the shooting, was an aggressor who was working to do harm to the police officer, and soon after the announcement was made, Barack Obama made an appearance before the press to comment on the decision. The words within quotations marks for this paragraph show off more crap from the mind of Barack Obama. It has been shown that Michael Brown was a piece of crap of a man--and he was a big man, bigger than the police officer was to whom he had been doing violence. So, there is no reason for anyone to be angry with the decision--at the time of the shooting of Michael Brown, Michael Brown was crap and he was involved in doing crap and harm--and Barack Obama's statement that it is an "understable reaction" hints that he is working to keep bad people stirred up emotionally--to think the decision was false and rotten. In addition, Barack Obama pushed out--"...we need to accept this decision was the grand jury's to make....". What does Barack Obama mean--"...we need to accept...."? Barack Obama made it sound as if it should not have been the grand jury's decision to make, maybe hinting that the grand-jury system is flawed and bad, and it seems to me Barack Obama would rather have had his corrupt and racist U.S. Attorney General (Eric Holder) make the decision.]
"...Finally, we need to recognize that the situation in Ferguson speaks to broader challenges that we still face as a nation...." [How? Why? What? The Michael Brown incident has nothing to do with the remainder of the country. Michael Brown was a screw-up, a fuck-up. He got killed! And so it goes in life when you are a screw-up or a fuck-up! Shut up, Barack Obama!]Tuesday, November 25, 2014 (in Chicago):
"...But what you're not paying attention to is the fact that I just took an action to change the law...." [The topic was immigration and Barack Obama's order to the Executive Branch to not enforce existing federal law--it was as "Executive Order"--and the words were said by Barack Obama after an audience member had sort of protested or heckled Barack Obama for having not giving out full amnesty to a bunch of people--illegal aliens (criminals). Barack Obama did not change any law! He did not! What Barack Obama did is choose once again to not follow existing real law, and Barack Obama is making a part of the federal government--his controlled part--not follow federal law. The audience cheered one Barack Obama had said these words. And it was all rottenness from the audience and from Barack Obama.]Monday, December 1, 2014 (in Washington, D.C.):
"...This is not a problem simply of Ferguson...." [On Monday, December 1, 2014, Barack Obama held a meeting behind closed doors that focused on a so-called problem at Ferguson, Missouri, that he is pushing to that public that is really a problem in many communities in the United States of America. Remember--The true trouble that took place in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 9, 2014, is that a rotten man named Michael Brown (who, for one, had marijuana chemicals in his body) attacked a police officer, and the police officer defended himself, which resulted in the death of Michael Brown, and, later, a grand jury pronounced--after having seen evidence presented about the event--that there was no reason to take the police officer to trial for any reason, and then people rioted, and a number of businesses (some of which were owned by blacks) were damaged or destroyed or stolen from. Yet, after the closed-door meeting, Barack Obama said the line that I have presented within quotation marks. A person has to ask--What problem was Barack Obama talking about? Michael Brown was a screw-up, and he got killed. The police officer was certainly not the problem. Barack Obama hinted that the problem at Ferguson--which he does not make clear or define anywhere in his speech--is a problem elsewhere in the country. The comment is all shit from a sick mind--he was working to promote the idea that there is racism in Ferguson and really in the United States of America, especially hinting that police officers are generally racist (if they are not black, of course). Yes, it was all bullshit from Barack Obama. Are you thinking Barack Obama was not hinting that the so-called problem--whatever it is--is national? Look at the follow-up line--presented in the next paragraph--to the line that is within quotation marks within this paragraph.]
"...This is a problem that is national...." [What problem is national? Barack Obama was selling the idea that there is great racism in the country. Barack Obama--as the U.S. President--was race baiting and promoting racial unrest!]
[Note: Over the previous two days or so in relation to December 1, 2014, close associates of Barack Obama's who are considered high-level civil-rights leaders (and they are black) gave speeches that were clearly designed to promote racial tension and unrest and even violence in the country, and yet Barack Obama did not denounces the people. For example, Louis Farrakhan (the leader of the Nation of Islam, an anti-Christian entity and a racist-against-whites entity) was at Morgan State University on November 29, 2016, and some of what he said (in long drawn-out sentences or phrases or sets of words) was--"...Watch now, because once it starts, it's on. You may not want ta fight, but you better get ready. Teach your baby how to throw the bottle, if they can't fight. We gonna die anyway, let's die for something...." and "...As long as they kill us and go to Wendy's and have a burger and go to sleep, they gonna keep killin' us...." and "...We want some of this earth, or we are gonna tear this god-damn country [apart]!...." This is the nature of Louis Farrakhan exposed once again--a nature that he has shown off for decades--and it is the nature supported by Barack Hussein Obama, another supporter of Islam--rotten Islam.]Wednesday, December 17, 2014 (in Washington, D.C.):
"...I believe in the flee, ah, free flow of information. Unfortunately, our sanctions on Cuba have denied Cubans access to technology that has empowered individuals around the globe...." [On December 17, 2014, Barack Obama announced that the United States of America and Cuba were in a new phase of a relationship. By the way, it was a day that Americans learned the United States of America--Barack Obama--exchanged one U.S. citizen in Cuba who had been in prison for three Cuban spies who had been held in the United States of America. For decades, the United States of America has imposed economic sanctions on Cuba--a communist nation, a police state, a non-free country, in which people may not speak freely, and Cuba is also a place in which the citizens do not have freedom to travel, such as in and out of the country, as Americans can do with the United States of America. The leaders of Cuba over the last five decades of so, such as Fidel Castro, have blocked people from creating businesses in Cuba, having wealth, doing things, et cetera. Around 2009, the country had a toilet-paper shortage, because the leaders have kept the people poor and have blocked businesses from doing things. And yet on December 17, 2014, Barack Obama pushed out the idea that the United States of America has blocked the people in Cuba from getting technology "that has empowered individuals around the globe....". Although the United States of America has had a trade embargo (sort of) going on with Cuba, Cuba was free to create things without the help of the United States of America--the citizens could have done for themselves if allowed, such as created a toilet-paper industry within the country. By the way, did you notice Barack Obama's quoted material had or has "flee" in it. It does because Barack Obama goofed up. Maybe it should be "flea" instead of "flee" [Note: Put in what you want]. And then I have to note that Barack Obama does not believe in the "free flow of information," given there is so much proof that he does things in secret--for instance, the creation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was created in secret.]Friday, December 19, 2014 (at a press conference in Washington, D.C.):
"...Black America in the aggregate is better off now than when I came into office...." [On Friday, December 19, 2014, in the afternoon, Barack Obama held a press conference, which started later than the time that it had been scheduled for (but Barack Obama is almost always late for such events), and the event started off with comments from Barack Obama, and then there was a question-and-answer session (the first six questions of which--at least--came from female news people). During the event, Barack Obama put down the idea that the Keystone Pipeline, if it were to be made, would help improve gas prices in the United States of America, saying, for example, the oil-industry is an international marketplace so nothing would change with the creation of the pipeline (though, as I know, the more product that becomes available in the marketplace, the more the price can come down, and that is the rule of supply and demand), and Barack Obama used the occasion to hint that there are racist police agencies in the country [and it hinted to me he is working to "nationalize" the police system in the country, taking control out of local governments], and Barack Obama pushed out the idea that the health-care system is better than it was (because of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, which I know is a rotten law, given, for one, it taxes some people for the type of health-care insurance that they buy, that which is considered a "Cadillac" plan, which is above roughly government-defined average), and Barack Obama pushed out that there are more jobs or the job picture is better today than it was [Note: It is well-known that the Barack Obama administration is fudging and faking the unemployment figures and the "job universe"]. Barack Obama passed along lies to everyone, as the quoted material for this paragraph shows. And Barack Obama even lied outright to so-called "Black America" or "Black Americans."]
"...Americans, ah, are better off than they were...." [Bullshit!]Wednesday, January 7, 2015 (on Air Force One):
"...What I'm also going to do is announce, ah, a proposal that I'm going to be making, ah, to make sure that community college is accessible for everybody. Put simply what I'd like to do is to see the first two years of community college free for everybody's who's willing to work for it. That's right--free for everybody's that willing to work for it. It's something we can accomplish And it's something that will train our workforce so that we can compete with anybody in the world...." [While Barack Obama was flying on Air Force One from the Detroit area (where, for one, he had given a speech at a Ford Motor Company plant, where he said that he saved the auto industry (which was a lie), though Ford Motor Company was not involved and though Barack Obama corrupted the federal bankruptcy laws (which, for instance, gave parts of General Motors and Chrysler to foreigners and took away what was due first to some bond holders or creditors (such as families)) to another speech location (Phoenix, Arizona), Barack Obama made a promotional video (in essence), which was designed to show off some more "freebies" that he wants to give some Americans. Community colleges are community-type entities, and it is commonplace for such entities to be two-year institutions that provide "associated degrees." So if Barack Obama is able to make community college free for everyone, what is likely to happen? First, the community-college industry will no longer be community-based--it will be federally controlled or it will be "nationalized," and that is bad (since more bad people--the politicians--will directly control more of the country) Second, there will be no real controls on costs, since there will be no competition (such as among communities and cities), and the federal government will control prices (and tax payers will have no controls on spending). Third, educational standards will be set by the federal government--and more socialism and communism will be taught--and it is every likely grade standards will fall because the federal government will not want to deny people the ability to be in community colleges. Fourth, when the federal government takes control of the community-college industry, the citizens of the country who pay taxes will be paying for people who should never be in community college or the citizens who pay taxes will ultimately be paying more taxes and that means the citizens will have less control of the money that they make or they will be forced to pay for others' lives, and that means that they will have to support, for one, some people who should never be in college (lacking the ability or lacking the real want to get better through college). Fifth, if people who go to community college begin to get free money, people who go to four-year high-level schools will want to get free tuition, and that means even more taxes will have to be taken from the Americans who work. Sixth, if more people end up going to college (such as those that should not be there), more school buildings will have to be built and maintained and more teachers will have to be hired and maintained. By the way, during the promotional announcement, Barack Obama smiled wonderfully while he worked to sell his crap! Billions and billions and billions more spending is what Barack Obama was putting forth. Also what Barack Obama suggested in the promotional speech is that so far community colleges have not be able to make it so that people can compete with anybody in the world. That is nonsense. And how does giving people free stuff make them better, or how does giving people free college tuition make them better able to compete in the world (when a person gets free stuff, the person is very likely not to work as hard in studies as when the person has to pay for something for the self)? The speech had a piece of rottenness--Notice Barack Obama said "...train our workforce....". That is communistic talk, in which the idea is that the government owns all workers. How do you like the idea that you are owned by Barack Obama? That is what Barack Obama was pushing as the way of life. In total, Barack Obama's hope is all rottenness for the country and the individual. By the way, ask yourself--What does Barack Obama mean when he noted that that a person will get free college tuition if the person is willing to work for it? It sounds like idiocy to me.]Tuesday, January 20, 2015 (a State of the Union speech):
"...It has been and still is a hard time for many. But tonight, we turn the page. Tonight, after a breakthrough year for America, our economy is growing and creating jobs at the fastest pace since 1999....." [Before you read this section, I have to make sure you are aware of The Communist Manifesto and Rules for Radicals (I use the informal or short names). These are guide books for bad people, or they are guide books for communists and socialists to destroy a non-communistic community or country or non-socialistic community or country and take over ruling the country (whatever it was). The books show how a bad person can pretend to be good to most people of a country while working to enslave the people and gain the highest society stature in the country and displace the current leaders. The two books give no advise on how to make other people better--the books are strictly designed to get rotten people in political power so that they can be catered to and achieve wealth and such on the backs of others. A big theme in the books is to destroy the wealth and wealth-creating ability of most of the people in the country and make the people dependent on the new rulers, and, generally speaking, the books push the idea that the "middle-class" (which is a communistic term) must be destroyed because really the power of a country comes from the efforts of what communists call the ":middle class." So on January 20, 2015, in the evening, a communist and supporter of Sharia (or Islamic Law, which is a horrible political system, like communism) known as Barack Hussein Obama gave another "State of the Union" speech as the U.S. president to the people of the United States of America. By the way, Barack Obama's deeds and actions of the last few decades show that he is indeed a communist and supporter of Sharia, and history shows that his deeds and actions of the last six years or so have indeed been breaking down what he would call the "middle class" of the country. In the speech on January 20, 2015, Barack Obama smiled and emoted, and he lied at times, and he passed on misleading information, and he worked to be convincing while lying, and he told of all the things that he wanted to do for--the "middle class." In fact, on the day, Barack Obama came up with a new pitch term--"Middle Class Economics." The term was used several times. There is no such thing as "Middle Class Economics." In life, people do things, if allowed to or not hindered by their government, and over time--such as decades--what Barack Obama calls the "middle class" can develop and be created, or it can come to the point where most of the people can take care of themselves and live good lives--and they do not have to be "rich" to do that. Yes, Barack Obama's entire speech was designed to sell the idea that he was going to enact more "Middle Class Economics" policies [Note: I say in jest--Even though the United States of America has gained the most productive and prosperous group of people in the world, the country just did not have many "Middle Class Economic" policies enacted or being used, so we need them]. Barack Obama talked about giving free tuition to people going to community colleges, which means he wants to force, for example, states and communities to give out free tuition, which means those entities will have to raise taxes on the so-called "middle class" to pay for teachers and all the rest (and that means some people will go to college who should not and that means grade standards will go down because teachers and administrators will want to keep young people in college to pay the wages of the more teachers and administrators). In the speech, Barack Obama talked about pushing to get states to pay out more money--in this case, for child care--which will mean, if adopted, states will be forced to tax citizens more (it is Barack Obama's underhanded way to force states to tax the people more). In the speech, Barack Obama brought up the idea that he is going to see to it that a woman gets the same pay as a man does for the same work done, even though it is already law that that be the case in the country. Barack Obama showed that he is against creating the Keystone Pipeline. Barack Obama did more with the speech, some of which will be showed in the remainder of this section. Overall, on January 20, 2014, Barack Obama passed along clichés and platitudes and bullshit and idiocy and lies.]
"...The unemployment rate is now lower than it was before the financial crisis...." [This is bullshit! Over the last six years, the federal government has changed the ways in which the unemployment rate is figured, and, in essence, it can be said that the federal government has been "cooking the books" and deceiving Americans, especially the ignorant. In addition, many of the jobs that have been created are not full-time jobs [Note: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is a law, and it is a rotten law, and one part of the law notes that employers have to offer health-care plans if employees work more than 30 hours a week, and that features can block people from getting full-time work, since companies cannot afford to offer health-care plans]. By the way, some 92-million Americans are not working, and many should be or are physically able to, but many have given up looking for jobs. The "job universe" in the country has become smaller in the last six years.]
"...More of our people are insured than ever before....." [Here is one statement to note that more people have health-care insurance now, but that is nonsense, since, for one, while some have gained, such as those who never had health-care insurance, many have lost their insurance, forced to go to part-time work.]
"...The shadow of crisis has past! The State of the Union is strong...." [This is bullshit! "Crisis"--this referred to the economic crash or crisis. The "State of the Union" is not strong, given, for instance, more than 92-million America are not working, and many of those person should be, and somewhere above 40-million persons are using food stamps, and that is a sign of rottenness (the food-stamp use is the highest in history).]
"...It's now up to us to choose who we wanna be over the next fifteen years...." [This statement is one that can be defined as flap doodle, since it means nothing.]
"...We will accept an economy where only a few of us do spectacularly well or will we commit yourselves to an economy that generates rising incomes and chances for everyone who makes the effort?...." [Over the history of man, most people at a given moment do not to spectacularly well but they have lived. If you look at the history of the United States of America, only a few have done spectacularly well at any given moment in time, but since the founding of the country, most of the people who do not do spectacularly well have found life has been getting better and better--for instance, cities have become better, housing has gotten better (going from, for instance, sod houses to brick house with running water), water-treatment have been developed, road systems have been created, et cetera. Not everyone can be like Bill Gates, since such people who "do spectacularly well" get that way through so many things of life just coming about so that the people can "do spectacularly well," such as by creating something new, like a software operating system or a variation of a software operating system that gets used by millions and millions of persons. There is no way in which a politician can get everyone to "do spectacularly well." No law can be created to get everyone to "do spectacularly well." It is impossible! Anyway, if we reach a point where it might be said that everyone is doing "spectacularly well," then how can it be said that everyone is doing " spectacularly well," given all are the same?]
"...In two weeks, I will send this Congress a budget filled with ideas that are practical not partisan...." [To date, all the budgets that Barack Obama has sent to the U.S. Congress have been a mess and nonsense, and they were wiped out and not voted for or passed, even by the Democrats in the U.S. Congress, and everything that Barack Obama has sent to the U.S. Congress has also been clearly communistic or socialistic in nature--and that is partisan.]
"...America is number one is wind power. Every three weeks, we bring on line as much solar power as we did in all of 2008...." [So what if the U.S. it is "number one"? For one, Europeans are finding that "wind power" is a failure, and they are selling their stuff to people in the U.S. Wind power is nonsense in the long run, because it is not dependable at a given moment, and that is why, for instance, coal-based backup electricity-producing systems always have to be around. In 2008, the U.S. did not do much with wind power, so that means that today the U.S. is doing a little better than not much every three weeks.]
"...Today, we have new tools to stop taxpayer-funded bailouts and new consumer watchdog to protect us from predatory lending...." [Oh, boy! That new consumer protection entity--called the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (a creation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010--is rotten! In essence, it can be a free-wheeling entity, since, for one, it is not subject to oversight by the U.S. Congress, and getting the head of the entity out of the job has been set up to be nearly impossible. It is rotten, rotten, rotten! It is like an unrestricted entity than can do what it wants, freely. That is highly rotten!]
"...and in the past year alone, about ten-million uninsured Americans finally gained the security of health coverage...." [Here, Barack Obama passed along the misconception about health-care insurance again.]
"...Instead, we've seen the fastest economic growth in over a decade, our deficits cut by two-thirds, a stock market that has doubled, and health-care inflation at its lowest rate in fifty years...." [There are a bunch of problems in this set of words from Barack Obama. For one, the stock market has done well, because the Barack Obama administration has been keeping the stock market afloat through the input of money. The health-care inflation rate is faked. That is all that I will say.]
"...The verdict is clear--Middle Class Economics works...." [Here is the first use of Barack Obama's "Middle Class Economics" term in the speech.]
"...Expanding opportunity works. And these policies will continue to work as long as politics don't get in the way. We can't slow down businesses or put our economy at risk with government shutdowns or fiscal showdowns. We can't put the security of families at risk by taking away their health insurance or unraveling the new rules on Wall Street...." [Here, Barack Obama was trying to sell the idea that anything that he has already done should not be repealed or wiped out in the future. However, his sell has some problems, one of which I will note here. If the federal government were the be shut down by an action of the U.S. Congress or the U.S. president, which has happened in the past a number of times, such as during the days of Ronald Reagan as the U.S. president, it does not really hurt the business community. The government does not yet own the business community. If the federal government shuts down--which is really only a partial shut down really--businesses keep doing daily things as always.]
"...Tonight, together, let's do more to restore the link between hard work and growing opportunity for every American...." [What the hell does this mean? It is idiocy. The federal government can not "restore the link between hard work and growing opportunity for every American....". Think about it! What "link" was Barack Obama talking about?]
"...We set up worker protections--Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid--to protect ourselves from the harshest adversity...." [This statement was referring to what had been done in the past, and, today, because of rottenness done by politicians over the years, such as stealing from the so-called Social Security accounts of people and mismanagement, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are bankrupt, and because of them and other social programs, right now, what is called the "entitlement debt" of the country is well over 100-trillion dollars (or what is 100,000-billion dollars), and that is bad and a sign of coming death.]
"...That's what Middle Class Economics is--The idea that this country does best when everyone gets their fair shot, everyone does their fair share, everyone plays by the same set of rules...." [In relation to this statement, I only cover one point--"What does '...everyone does their fair share...' mean?" What is "fair share"? Who sets the standards of "fair share?" Barack Obama pushed out crap through his mouth.]
"...First, Middle Class Economics means helping working families feel more secure in a world of constant change. That means helping folks afford child care, college, health care, a home, retirement. And my budget will address each of these issues, lowering the taxes of working families and putting thousands of dollars back in to their pockets each year...." [If Barack Obama's budget will address these so-called problems, it can only mean, he wants to give some people, for example, free health-care, free college tuition, free child care, et cetera, and that means the federal government will have to pay out more, which means the federal government will have to tax more the people who work or the federal government will have to go more in debt--nothing is free.]
"...And that's why, that's why my plan will make quality child care more available and more affordable for every middle class and low-income family with young children in America by creating more 'slots' and a new tax cut of up to $3,000 per child per year...." [Notice: In this statement, Barack Obama pushed out the idea that it is now "middle-class" people and "low-income" people need to be given something free, but Barack Obama did not note that the tax cuts, if they come, have to be, in essence, off set by someone else paying.]
"...It's the right thing to do!...." [Over the years, Barack Obama has said this to make it seem that something is the right thing to do, though based on no "facts."]
"...And, and everyone in this Congress who still refuses to raise the minimum wage, I say this--If you truly believe you can work full time and support a family on less than $15,000 a year, try it!...." [This is bullshit! For one, if a person--particularly a woman--only makes $15,000 a year, that person should clearly be working to not be have a child, being unable to care for the child. A rule in life has been--If you can afford to care for a child, you should try to have a child or you can have a child, if you want.]
"...But for far too long, lobbyists have rigged the tax code with loopholes that let some corporations pay nothing while others play full rate. They've riddled it with giveaways that the super rich don't need while denying a break to middle-class families who do...." [Notice that Barack Obama is trying to say the demons are the "lobbyists." "Lobbyists" made the loopholes. That is bullshit! Congress people make the rules (usually), and they pass bills. If there are so-called "loopholes," which is a nonsense idea, it was Congress people who made them.]
"...Two-thousand-fourteen was the planet's warmest year on record. Now one year doesn't make a trend, but this does--fourteen of the fifteen warmest years on record have all fallen in the first fifteen years of this century. I've heard some folks try to dodge the evidence by saying they're not scientists, that we don't have enough information to act. Well, I'm not a scientist either. But--you know what?--I know a lot of really good scientists at NASA and at NOAA and at our major universities, and the best scientists in the world are all telling us that the activities are changing the climate, and if we don't act forcefully, we'll continue to see rising oceans, longer hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods, and massive disruptions that can trigger greater migration and conflict and hunger around the globe. The Pentagon says that climate change poses immediate risks to our national security. We should act like it!...." [Boy, there is a lot wrong with this. History shows that the operators of NASA and NOAA cannot be trusted, and one reason is NASA and NOAA was involved in "Climategate," which was the scheme to make weather data and make it seems global warming was true. In addition, people at some big-name universities in this country and in other countries, such as in England, were involved in "Climategate." The Pentagon people are military people, and they get their information about the weather from, for instance, NASA and NOAA, so if NASA and NOAA pass on bad information to the Pentagon, nonsense will come out of the Pentagon. How does climate change pose a risk to national security? By the way, since at least January 2009, Barack Obama has risked the national security of the country by not blocking illegal aliens from streaming in to the country, such as over the border between the country and Mexico. Really, what rotten people--such as communists--have been pushing about climate change is man is causing climate change, and the planet is going to die soon because of man, and it is all fake. I should say--How does fake climate change mean national security is at risk? [For fun, you should see my document entitled Television History and Trivia #129, which can be reached by using this T.H.A.T. #129 link, since it shows that, even in 1970, the rotten people in the television industry were already pushing out the lie that, because of man, the planet was going to die soon, and it has not happened, and the information that I want you to see is within the paragraph talking about It Takes a Thief (a television series starring Robert Wagner) and Glen A. Larson.]]
"...Better politics is one where we appeal to each other's basic decency, instead of our basic fears. Better politics is one where we debate without demonizing each other, where we talk issues and values and principles and facts...." [Here, Barack Obama was working to sell the idea that his politics are good, though they actually are not. Communism is shit, as history shows, such as today in Cuba and North Korea, and Sharia is shit, as history shows, such as in many places in the Middle East. If someone is pushing rottenness and shit, a good person should demonize that someone. An enemy is to be hated! That is a way of life! I state--Better politics is one in which good people knock down and fight back against rotten politics and rotten people, like Barack Obama. Notice Barack Obama said within the group of words in quotation marks--"....where we talk issues and values and principles and facts....". History shows that Barack Obama, who is a perpetual liar, does not tell the facts--he lies. Yet, Barack Obama pushed out the idea about "better politics."]
[Note: Barack Obama knows what the facts that are within The Communist Manifesto and Rules for Radicals and the goals of the two books, which are, for example, not designed to make other people better people really, so that shows that Barack Obama is rotten.]Sunday, February 1, 2015 (an interview shown on NBC-TV during the pre-game show for the Super Bowl):
"...I was speaking about the fact that, ah, we've seen a faster drop in unemployment, ah, in past year as we've seen in thirty years...." [On Sunday, February 1, 2015, Savannah Guthrie interviewed Barack Hussein Obama in the kitchen of the White House. Really, all of the questions asked by Savannah Guthrie were fluff. For instance, Savannah Guthrie asked some questions related to football. One question resulted in Barack Obama giving the statement that exist with quotations marks for this paragraph. The statement was only one of the lies presented.]
"...My job is to present the right ideas. And if the Republicans think they've got a better idea, they should present them...." [Hey, were you awake for this? Barack Obama said that he presents only good ideas--"right ideas." So how can Republicans present any "right ideas" if he only presents "right ideas" or already presents the "right ideas"? What crap Barack Obama presented!]
"...Well, what I'd like to see is not only that the economy continues to grow but I also want to make sure that everybody's benefiting. And when you travel around the country, you see incredibly hard-working folks. They're doin' the right thing. They're lookin' after their families, but they haven't seen, ah, as much wage and income growth as they should have, given how high the stock market's gone, how well corporate profits are doin', so if, if we can make sure growth is comin' from the middle class up...." [Okay. Notice how Barack Obama dropped the "g" at the end of several "ing"-type words. I say that Barack Obama uses that tactic to make it seem to people--those he thinks are low class--that he is like them, and during a Super Bowl broadcast, Barack Obama probably thought there are a lot of low-class people (under-educated people and poorly educated people) are in the audience. What you may not notice is something really rotten that Barack Obama put forth. For several years, the Barack Obama administration has been propping up the stock market, such as by using "quantitative easing" and buying into the bond market (and buying debt created by the federal government). The stock market is being manipulated by, in essence, Barack Obama and his associates. The rise in the stock market is not really based on good work being done by people who work in the country or by increased productivity of people who work in the country. Yet, Barack Obama pushed forth the idea that the stock market is doing good! It is fake! Think about it--Your wage or pay is not based on the stock market, your wage and pay is based on people buying the product or service that you are involved in providing in the marketplace.]Tuesday, February 3, 2015 (a statement during a gathering):
"...I just got word of, ah, the video that had been released. Ah. I don't know the details of, ah, the confirmations. But, ah, ah, should in fact that the video be authentic, it's just one more indication of the viciousness and, ah, barbarity of this organization. And, ah, it I think will re-double the vigilance and determination on the part of a global coalition, ah, to make sure that they are degraded and ultimately defeated. Ah, and it also just indicates the degree in which, ah, whatever, ah, ideology they're operating off of is bankrupt...." [The Muslim Brotherhood has been around for decades, and it is a terrorist group--it promotes terrorism by followers of Mohammed and Allah and "Sharia" (Islamic Law) and The Quran, and the entity has offshoots, one of which is ISIS, which is an Islamic-based group that beheads its enemies (non-followers of their way of life, that focused on The Quran and the rest). This is fact--Barack Hussein Obama has supported the Muslim Brotherhood. On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Barack Obama commented on a recent incident in which ISIS killed a Jordanian pilot that it had held since December 2014 and had been using to maybe exchange for a captured female ISIS-type terrorist (who was being held in Jordan). The name "ISIS" has "Islamic" was the first word. Yet, Barack Hussein Obama did not put forth during the statement made on February 3, 2015, that ISIS is an entity following the ways of Islam. ISIS is an Islamic terrorist group. A smart person can see that Barack Hussein Obama wanted to make it seem that Sharia (Islamic Law) and The Quran and Allah have no ties to ISIS. As I said a couple years ago--We have a killer in the White House! (You are urged to see my document entitled We Have a Killer in the White House: A Killer of Minds and a Killer of Countries: A His Goal is to be King of the World, which can be reached by using this Killer link.)]Thursday, February 5, 2015 (at the National Prayer Breakfast):
"...Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that, during the 'Crusades' and the 'Inquisition,' people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ...." [In the morning of Thursday, February 5, 2015, Barack Hussein Obama addressed the people who were attending the National Prayer Breakfast, an event attended by a lot of "Christians" (a word that covers a number of groups), and the event was held a few days after followers of Sharia and Islamic Law--members of an entity called ISIS--had burned alive a Jordanian jet pilot. Hold it! Let me put in some history here before I attack the words spoken by Barack Hussein Obama, and it is a topic that you can look up for more details. The years between about 1095 and 1291 are known as the years of the "Crusades," and it was a time in which Christians were involved in trying to push back Islam (in essence, Sharia and barbarism). Now, I get to the material from Barack Hussein Obama that I have presented within quotation marks. Actually, I only take up one thought related to the quoted material, even though I could cover several topics. The main theme of Barack Hussein Obama's words is Islamic terrorists, though it is not stated (Barack Hussein Obama avoids saying "Islamic terrorists" and their rotten deeds, such as beheading people and burning people alive, as history shows). I state that Barack Hussein Obama is a supporter of Sharia, as can be seen by reading some of my documents that are available at the website for The Hologlobe Press, and history shows that he is willing to work with and support people tied to Sharia, such as the Muslim Brotherhood (a big Islamic terrorist group). By the way, Barack Hussein Obama had a Muslim father, which--based on Muslim ways--means that Barack Hussein Obama is Muslim (unless he disavows ties to Islam and being Muslim), and history shows Barack Hussein Obama received education focused on Islam when he was young. In the few words from Barack Hussein Obama that I have presented, Barack Hussein Obama was working to put down Christianity and make it appear to people that Christianity has been or, maybe, is bad or should not be seen as so great (especially in relation to Islam). In addition, a smart person can get the impression Barack Hussein Obama was trying to soften in people's minds the deeds done by the members of ISIS and was working to make people not condemn the deeds so much. I am going to go beyond that. Remember--The "Crusades" were centuries ago, and the "Crusades" were battles by Christians to beat down the rotten ways of the followers of Islam who were taking over societies and destroying societies in the general Middle East region or the Mediterranean Sea/Europe region of the world. It is clear that the rottenness of Islam is back, and rotten Muslims are working to destroy other societies and peoples. Based on the words spoken by Barack Hussein Obama that are presented in this paragraph, a smart person can easily get the impression that Barack Hussein Obama has hatred for Christianity that goes back to cover deeds done by Christians on Islam and Muhammad and Allah least to the time of the "Crusades," when Christians were working to beat down Sharia or Islam and protect themselves from evil invading Muslims. If that is true about Barack Hussein Obama's hatred, which would not surprise me, it shows Barack Hussein Obama truly has a rotten mind and an evil mind and a corrupt mind and an ill mind, and if that is true about Barack Hussein Obama's hatred, I can say that the insanity of Barack Hussein Obama is profound indeed and goes way beyond what many people think. My one thought for this paragraph is--It would not surprise me to learn Barack Hussein Obama is working today to avenge deeds done to Allah and Muhammad and Islam by Christians going back to at least the days of the "Crusades," even though during the "Crusades," the Christians were taking on people who can be likened to the members of ISIS (killers and rapists and destroyers and the like.]Friday, February 6, 2015 (in Ivy Tech Community College in Indianapolis, Indiana]:
"...So, so I think more than anything just helping young people understand that this stuff matters to them and that government is not something separate from you. It is you in a democracy! It's you that makes these decisions...." [Here was a rotten man--Barack Obama--working to teach nonsense to students. I report and say that you are separate from everyone else and that, even more, you are separate from the government. In the United States of America, you may vote for people to have government jobs--the people voted in are supposed to be your employees. Yet, the people who are voted into office are separate from you, and, for the most part, the people who are voted into office make laws without your immediate input or any input (given you are busy with your life). You are not the "government" in a democracy or in the United States of America--other people are, in essence, the government, which is why laws must exist to limit what the people in government can do to you, especially if bad people are able to get in government jobs and use their jobs to hurt people purposely. Keep in mind--The government is made up of people--often bad people, especially in this day and age of the Barack Obama administration--who are separate from you. Unless you are actually in a government job, you are not in government. By the way, Barack Obama's work to teach here was done to bring everyone together in a "collective" [a word often used by bad people like communists], and to have you not think of yourself as an individual, separate from others. That is the sign of a highly rotten man, a man who wants you to think of yourself as just another cog in the machine or just piece of meat like the next person! In the end, I say--What government decisions are you actually making on a daily basis? Really, you have little input or no input in the thousands and thousands of pages of law that are created every year. And, lately, the federal government has been making a lot of really bad laws, and that is a fact.]Monday, February 9, 2015 (the date on which interview of Barack Obama was officially offered on the Internet at and by Vox]:
"...A lot of it has to do with the fact that--'A'--the vulcanization of the media means that we just don't have a common place where we get common facts and a common world view the way we did twenty, thirty years ago, and that just keeps on accelerating. I'm not the first to observe this, but...you've got the Fox News/Rush Limbaugh folks, and then you've got the MSNBC folks...." [Polarization of politics and his being the most polarization U.S. President ever--this was the theme of a question that let to the material that I put within quotation marks. To me, it sounded as if Barack Obama was lamenting. In essence, Barack Obama wished he were back twenty or thirty years in time or wished he had a media industry like that of twenty or thirty years past, which basically was completely controlled by "liberals" (such as "communists" and "socialists"), and it was when Internet news entities that could show up his rottenness and rotten ideas about life did not exist. In addition, to me, Barack Obama was working to teach people the country would be better off if there was a unified main media with unified information, maybe a government-controlled media (which is what the collection of the main media--which is made up of such entities as MSNBC, CNN, and NBC--is today).]
"...Technology which brings the world to us, also allows us to narrow our point of view. That's contributed to it...." [The material within the quotations marks is related to the previous paragraph. Notice the nonsense of Barack Obama's idea. Technology has not allowed "us to narrow our point of view." Technology--particularly the Internet--has allowed entities opposed to liars and rotten politicians to sprout up and present other views of life. The range of information has become broader, and more truthful information has become available, such as from The Hologlobe Press, to Americans.]
"...Some people who just control enormous amounts of wealth, and...we don't really resent their success, but, on the other hand, just as a practical matter, you're gonna have problems making sure that we're investing enough in, in the common good...." [The interview from Vox had a lot of nonsense from Barack Obama, and the set of words within quotation marks for this paragraph is just one of the pieces. Ask yourself--What is the "common good"? Ask yourself--Who should determine the "common good"? I say that no one man is smart enough or will ever be smart enough to determine the so-called "common good" for millions and millions of persons. I state that, in essence, Barack Obama was pushing forth that one person, such as a government official, can determine the "common good" for millions and millions of persons and should determine the "common good" for millions and millions of persons. I state that, in essence, you know what is "good" for you and what is not "good" for you is having someone else tell you what is "good" for you, especially is that someone is a perpetual liar and a man who supports Sharia. In addition, ask yourself--What is the amount money that is "investing enough in, in the common good?" What is the amount? To date, the general-operating debt of the federal government is over 18,000-billion dollars, and Barack Obama is ted to about 6,000-billion of that. Where does the end to spending exist--when is it enough?]Wednesday, February 18, 2015 (at the State Department for the final day of two days focusing on terrorism):
"...There is a complicated history between the Middle East, the West, and none of us I think should be immuned from criticism in terms of specific policies, but the notion that the West is at war with Islam is an ugly lie, and all of us regardless of our faith have a responsibility to reject it...." [I state--The followers of Sharia (Islamic Law)--which is a hard-line enslavism political system--are at war with the non-followers of Sharia, and over the last few decades, the followers have attacked and bombed and killed non-followers, such as Christians, and there is indeed a war going on, and some people of the West are rightly at war with the followers of Sharia, and the followers have been infiltrating countries in Europe and pushing Sharia in to the societies. What Barack Obama said here within the quotation marks is rottenness. Barack Obama was acting like a teacher, working to give people the idea that Sharia is not a problem and working to make people not reject Sharia or even fear Sharia. Barack Obama--who has shown his support for Sharia, such as by, in essence, endorsing as good the Muslim Brotherhood, which is a terrorist entity--is a rotten man! And the rotten man spoke up for rotten people!]
"...We must to address the grievances that terrorists exploit, including economic grievances. When people especially young people feel entirely trapped in impoverished communities, where there is no order and no path for advancement, where there are no educational opportunities, where there are no ways to support families and no escape from injustice and the humiliations of corruption, that feeds instability and disorder and makes those communities ripe for extremist recruitment. and we have seen that across the Middle East, and we've seen it across North Africa, so if we're seriously about countering violent extremism, we have to get serious about confronting these economic grievances...." [Here is high-level rottenness. The United States of America has only been round since the 1970s, and, in essence, the societies of the Middle East have been around for centuries and centuries, and, yet, most of the societies of the Middle East have created nothing over the centuries and centuries (by the way, it took Europeans and Americans to really get the oil industry going in the Middle East). The quoted material seems to hint at only people in the Middle East (though I have heard Barack Obama push the idea about impoverished communities in the United States of America). I stick with the Middle East. The poverty problems--what poverty problems there are--of the Middle East have been caused by the political systems of the region, especially Sharia, where most people are subjects and expendable and must obey the rulers, and that has resulted in not much--except war and fighting--being in existence in many countries in the Middle East. A person who reads the material with the quotation marks from Barack Obama can get the idea that Barack Obama was pushing the idea that people in the Middle East--who are doing violence, such as burning people alive--have economic grievances caused by people not within their societies, such as the people of the United States of America. However, a person has to keep in mind, the United States of America has not stopped the creation of jobs in the Middle East, and the United States of America has not enslaved anyone living in the Middle East. In addition, when a person is out of a job, the person may steal, such as food and even money, or do looting (something like that done in the Detroit riots of 1967), but the person will not do such violence as behead people and burn people alive on behalf of "Allah" while guided by The Quran, as has been done by the followers of Sharia By the way, on Monday, February 16, 2015, a spokeswoman for the U.S. State Department--Marie Harf--pushed out the idea that the trouble with the terrorists [who, I note, should be known as "Islamic terrorists"] could be reduced by improving their job prospects or the employment conditions where they are, and I state that her thought is and was a nonsense idea, and on Wednesday, February 18, 2015, Barack Obama was following up on Marie Harf's nonsense idea, helping to sell it as good, though it is not. Oh, it is not uncommon for young people from rich families or well-off families around the world to take up the cause of Sharia and other rotten forms of government, such as communism, and get involved in fighting against the United States of America, and, in essence, the young people who take up the fight are simply misfits and deviants or mentally ill or anger with the world and such--it is not only poor people take up the fight with the followers of Sharia and communism and such other rotten political systems, and, in fact, many times, the leaders come from well-off families.]
[Note: I report that, when you look at both paragraphs above that make up this section, you can see that Barack Obama was "riding shotgun" for the followers of Sharia and working make you not fear Islam or make you less likely to fear Islam, and I report that the price for person's leaving Sharia or Islam can be--maybe for taking up another religion--death from the followers of Sharia or Islam, and Sharia even can allow the killing of those who are non-followers, if, for instance, the non-followers do not pay a tribute.]Wednesday, February 25, 2015 (a town-hall event broadcast by MSNBC):
"...If somebody's working for ICE, and there is a policy, and they don't follow the policy, there's gonna be consequences to it. So, I, I can't speak to a specific problem. What I can talk about is what's true in the government generally...." [Barack Obama was answering a question about what if ICE officers do not follow his rules regarding immigration. Barack Obama without authority, such as from The United States Constitution, sort of made his own law about immigration recently. Really, Barack Obama was now not following true immigration law, and he was making, in essence, others in the federal government follow his rules and not the real laws that exist. The answer from Barack Obama showed that he was working to coerce people in ICE to follow his rules and not the true laws of the country, and if a person followed the true laws of the country, there would be penalties imposed on that person. Barack Obama was being lawless and working to get others to be lawless. That is more rottenness of Barack Obama.]Tuesday, March 3, 2015 (at a press event):
"...I did not have a chance to watch, ah, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech, I was on a, ah, video conference with our European partners with respect to Ukraine...." [Late in the morning on Tuesday, March 3, 2015, the prime minister of Israel--Benjamin Netanyahu--spoke before the U.S. Congress; he had been invited to speak by John Boehner (the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives), and it was well known when the speech was going to be given so that all who wanted to pay attention and hear the speech could make plans that would allow them to hear the speech live. Benjamin Netanyahu worked to make the case that there was big trouble coming for not only Israel and the world because of pushers and followers of Sharia, the rotten political system that some people try to say is a "religion" (though it is not a "religion"). I wonder if Benjamin Netanyahu is aware Barack Obama is an "enslavist." It was not mentioned in the speech. By the way, around the time that Barack Obama started his first term as the U.S. president, I wrote the main Israeli embassy in the United States of America and reported that Barack Obama is Israel's enemy, and now we have World War III, which really began--if I have to pick a date--on the day that Barack Obama was first elected to be the U.S. president. Soon after taking the office of the U.S. president, Barack Obama went to Cairo, Egypt, and gave a speech, and to me, the speech hinted to rotten things to come from the followers of Sharia, and soon, the Muslim Brotherhood tried to take control of Egypt, and big-deal fighting showed up in Syria and Libya. Oh, let me get on track. The topic of this section is the quoted material, which was a response to a question that was asked Barack Obama some time after Benjamin Netanyahu had spoken before the U.S. Congress. The quoted material shows more rottenness from Barack Obama, who had all the time in the world to make sure to catch the speech. Of course, he probably avoided the speech so that he would not have to really comment on it. I say in jest--I believe Barack Obama [the perpetual liar] did not hear the speech, busy with important matters.]Friday, March 6, 2015 (at Benedict College, Columbia, South Carolina):
"...But the City of Ferguson will now have to make a decision--Are they going to, ah, enter into some sort of agreement with the Justice Department to fix what is clearly a broken and racially biased system or, if they don't, then the Justice Department has the capacity to sue the city for violations of the rights of the people...." [Here is coercion from a bad man--Barack Hussein Obama, a man who is supporting Islamic terrorists, who supports perpetual liars and is a perpetual liar, who has show his black-racism qualities.... Recently, the U.S. Justice Department had to release a report focusing on the police system of Ferguson, Missouri, a portion of which was focused on a police officer who had to protect himself from a rotten thug, who ended up getting killed. The report showed that there was no civil-rights case against the officer, but the report pushed the idea--a defective idea that the police department is a highly racist entity, such as because of the way traffic stops are made or based and because of some emails, at least one of which it seems compared Barack Obama to a "chimpanzee" ["Headlines: 'Racist e-mails.'" Detroit Free Press, 7 March 2015, 2A.] By the way, on this date, the U.S. Department of Justice was currently headed by a black racist, Eric Holder, and it had shown himself a man not to be trusted, such as because of his work to fuel racial hatred around the time of the shooting by the police officer in Ferguson, Missouri (and Barack Obama was involved in that fueling of racism tension and hatred). While the words placed within quotation marks for the start of this section were said, Barack Obama said the words in a mean tone--clearly showing anger. The words show that Barack Obama is working to "nationalize" and take control of the police force in Ferguson, Missouri, as he is working to do in other communities in the country, getting help from Eric Holder. By the way, on Friday, May, 6, 2015, at Andrews Air Force Base, Eric Holder said--responding to a question that wondered if Eric Holder was going to take action against the police department in Ferguson if the police department did not buckle under to Eric Holder (though--I say--the pressure was based on a phony claim of deep racism in the police department) and could his action be the complete dismantling the police department--"...If that's what's necessary, we're prepared to do it...." It is not the job of the federal government to dismantle police departments or control police departments, especially based on crap reasons. The words of both men show a high degree of coercion and rottenness! I note--Barack Obama is not good enough to be compared with a chimpanzee.]Saturday, March 7, 2015 (at Selma, Alabama):
"...In 2015, fifty years after Selma, there are laws across this country designed to make it harder for people to vote...." [This state is strictly bullshit, and it came from a man--that I say--has a shit-head mind, Barack Obama. In essence, Barack Obama was teaching lies and promoting voter fraud. The laws to which Barack Obama referred are voter-I.D. laws requiring people to prove who they are at voting time with "photo I.D."s, and such laws are designed to make it so that only U.S. citizens are voting and so that non-citizens are not voting, such as those from other countries, and such laws are designed to make it so that a person is not voting more than once in an election. Barack Obama was teaching shit!]Wednesday, March 18, 2015:
"...In Australia and some other countries, there's mandatory voting. It, it would be, it would be transformative if everybody voted. That would counteract money more than anything. If, if everybody voted, then it would completely change the political map in this country...." [Here is a load of crap from Barack Obama. On March 17, 2015, there was a national election in Israel, and a non-Sharia-supporter or non-communist--Benjamin Netanyahu--won the election; Barack Obama had been involved in trying to get Benjamin Netanyahu defeated and replaced by an "enslavist," and it looks as if Barack Obama had used U.S. taxpayer money in the work to get Benjamin Netanyahu defeated, and around the time of that election took place, an official investigation was being conducted in the U.S. Senate about whether or not the U.S. Department of State (which was under the control of Barack Obama) had indeed used taxpayer money illegally. Barack Obama brought up the idea of money in elections. Barack Obama spent $740.6-million for the 2008 election, beating the Republican candidate in the amount of money spent, and Barack Obama spent $774.4-million for 2012 (while Republican Mitt Romney spent only $460.2-million). Barack Obama has set the records as the biggest spender in U.S. history for a person involved in a U.S. presidential election. Yet, Barack Obama brought up the idea of money on March 18, 2015, hinting that, if more people were voting, it would "...counteract money more than anything...." [Note: A smart person knows the money that is being referred to is money from businesses and not money from unions and such--history shows that Barack Obama is working to stop businesses from donating money to campaigns or at least be restricted greatly]. In addition, the number of voters has no relation to money. The more people who end up voting will simply be that there are more people who can be affected by advertising--especially advertising from a big spender (Barack Obama and the like). At this time, about two-dozen countries of the world have "compulsory voting," though only about half of them enforce the rules. If mandatory voting showed up for, for example, national elections in the United States of America, how would it benefit Barack Obama or Barack Obama's goals for the "fundamental" changing of the country? To have mandatory voting, Barack Obama would probably want a penalty imposed on persons who do not vote that should vote, and to me, that means another tax would be created (not unlike the tax--fine or penalty--related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 for those persons who do not get health-insurance policies). If a mandatory-voting idea were set up in the United States of America, the federal government would have to spend more money to administer the program and would have to hire more people to see to it that citizens comply with the rules, and that means the federal debt could increase--the more work that has to be done, the more money that has to be spent (which can mean more taxes have to be collected by the federal government from the citizens). If a mandatory-voting idea were set up, there would have to be a way for a person to prove that a person is who the person is--maybe. More voting fraud can show up with a mandatory-voting system--if there is no true photo-I.D. system set up. To date, Barack Obama has spoken out against and fought against photo-I.D. systems, calling them, for example, "discriminatory." The idea that photo-I.D. systems are "discriminatory" is nonsense. Photo-I.D.-systems help to make sure alive U.S. citizens of the proper age (and not excluded for, for example, having committed some big federal crime) are the only persons voting. Barack Obama was right in one thing that he said--If everybody voted, the political map of the country would be changed, since more fraud would show up in the voting system, and that would benefit "Democrats" (a.k.a. communists and socialists and the other like people who promote voter fraud, as history shows). Some bad countries have mandatory voting, such as Brazil (which is headed by socalists) and Mexico, which has had a corrupt government and police system for decades. North Korea is another country with mandatory voting, and mandatory voting means nothing really for the citizens, since, really, the power of putting candidates in office is completely out of the hands of the citizens and is completely in the hands of the political-party system. Barack Obama did not mention the bad countries or really bad countries with mandatory or compulsory voting, such as North Korea [and, by the way, one article that I found from PBS Newshour that was published to show countries that have mandatory voting, which is listed in the bibliography of this document, did not list North Korea as one of the countries, and that shows the defectiveness of PBS Newshour. Oh, yes, I almost forgot. Since January 20, 2015, Barack Obama has done much traveling around the country, and he has regularly attended fund-raising events (for himself mostly), and Barack Obama has done that with help of taxpayer money--Barack Obama goes to something that is sort of related to his job and then also attends a fund-raiser at the same city or on the same trip.]
"...The people who tend not to vote are young, they're lower income, they're scewed more heavily towards immigrant groups and minority groups, and, you know, they're often the folks who are they're scratchin' and climbin' to get into the middle class and they're workin' hard...." [And the shit must kept on coming from Barack Obama!]Thursday, April 2, 2015 (in the Rose Garden at the White House, Washington, D.C.):
"...Today, the United States together with our allies and partners has reached a historic understanding with Iran, which if fully implemented will prevent it from obtaining a nuclear weapon...." [I say in jest--"And now the world is safer." Barack Obama noted that a "framework" for an agreement has been created related to Iran and nuclear power/nuclear weapons. On the same day, Mohammed Javad Zarif (the Foreign Minister of Iran) was involved in a public statement related to whatever agreement had been made--"...In the framework of the agreement, none of Iran's nuclear facilities as well as the previous activities will be stopped, shut down or suspended and Iran's nuclear activities in all its nuclear facilities including Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan, and Arak all continue...." The so-called breakthrough in negotiations was now called a chance for another three months of negotiations.]
"...After many months of tough principled diplomacy, we have achieved the framework for that deal, and it is a good deal, a deal that meets our core objectives...." [I say in jest--"I believe, I believe Barack Hussein Obama."]
"...This framework would cut off every pathway that Iran could take to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran will face strict limitations on its programs, and Iran has also agreed to the most robust and intrusive inspections and transparency regime ever negotiated for any nuclear program in history...." [I say in jest--"Yes, it is all historic!"]
"...Any key details will be finalized over the next three months, and nothing is agreed to until everything's agreed...." [I say in jest--"That inspires confidence." Yet, I note that Iran is till working on and making ICBMs (super-long-range missiles (weapons), which, to be useful as weapons, have to have something like nuclear-type warheads (since, for instance, TNT stuff will not work)). I note--If the so-called agreement really ends up in place, Iran could buy warheads from a rotten country in the world.]
"...Even in the face of unprecedented sanctions, should negotiations collapse because we--the United States--rejected what the majority of the world considers a fair deal, what our scientists and nuclear experts suggest would give us confidence that they are not developing a nuclear weapon, it's doubtful that we could keep our current international sanctions in place...." [Most of the countries of the world have rotten leaders, being communists and thug dictators, and, for instance, enough countries who makes up the Security Council of the United Nations (a rotten international entity) are rotten. Yet, Barack Obama pushed out the idea that the United States would be the bad guy if it did not follow what the majority of the world considers a fair deal. I say--not in jest--Barack Obama was working to sell that idea that the United States could be on the verge of being a bad guy, though Iran is a highly rotten country, which should be blocked from getting nuclear weapons, given wars in the Middle East, being pushed along by followers of Sharia (terrorists), are ranging in a number of countries in the Middle East.]Wednesday, April 22, 2015 (in the Everglades with the bugs):
"...So Climate change can no longer be denied. It can't be edited out, can't be omitted from the conversation. And action can no longer be delayed...." [Hey, on Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Barack Obama was in the Everglades to give yet another speech, and it was all a "croc." Well, actually, it was not a "croc" since there are only alligators in the Everglades. Crocodiles are in Africa.]
"...Climate change is threatening this treasure [the Everglades]...." [The big question to ask is--How is climate change threatening "this treasure"? Barack Obama never did not say how so-called climate change is changing "this treasure". Is the Everglades getting hotter and wetter, making it bigger and making it swallow up the rest of Florida, such as all the golf courses that Barack Obama could waste his time at? Is the Everglades getting colder and drier, making it a place for polar bears? I say in jest--Polar bears are desperate to find more colder places.]
"...If we don't act, there may not be an Everglades as we know it...." [In this set of words, Barack Obama does not hint when he believes there will be no Everglades as we know it. Will it be in a year? Will it be in two years? Will it be in ten years? Will it be in fifty years? Will it be in a century? Will it be in ten centuries? Will it be in one-hundred centuries? It does not matter since Barack Obama was only pushing out a "maybe statement" ("...there may not be....") or just another of his "maybe statements" of a long list of "maybe statements" (all make-believe things based on no real facts of life). His rotten world is--Maybe, maybe, maybe, maybe. With anything, a person can say "maybe." I could say--If we don't act, the moon may crash into the Everglades. I could say--if we don't act, the oceans could dissolve and all the water could disappear from the planet. Yes, it was all a "croc"--accented with lies, such as last year was the warmest year on record--from Barack Obama in the Everglades on April 22, 2015. Then again, maybe, I should say--It was all a bunch of useless "alligator clips" [audio clips] from Barack Obama.]Tuesday, April 28, 2015 (a press conference with the Japanese Prime Minister):
"...Since Ferguson and the task force that we've put together, ah, we have seen too many instances of what appears to be, ah, police officers, ah, interacting with, ah, individuals, ah, primarily African-American often poor, ah, in ways that raise troubling questions, and it comes up it seems like once a week now now, once every couple of weeks, and so I think it's pretty understandable why the leaders of civil-rights organizations, ah, but more importantly moms and dads, across the country might start...." [I have to note that this set of words was given in a long, drawn-out delivery by Barack Obama, and that is something that I cannot express well here--I say that Barack Obama was struggling to find a way in which to pass along crap. One of the pieces of crap in his set of words that leads off this section focuses on "...once a week, once every couple week....". The country has over 300,000,000 persons. If--if--a killing incident involving an innocent person and a police officer were to take place every week, you would have 365 incidents. But they do not happen every week, especially with innocent persons being killed, or the incidents would be in the newspapers and on television every day, given much of the main press in the country is rotten and on Barack Obama's side. In fact, with respect to most of the recent big cases of shootings that got publicity, such as that in Ferguson, Missouri, the police officers did right; for instance, in Ferguson, the police officer involved in the shooting was found to be justified in the shooting since the victim was a rotten person who had been attacking the police officer. Barack Obama through what he said was trying to sell the idea that police all over the country are doing rotten things, particularly killings of innocent persons, every day! That is bullshit! I note--Police officers deal with rotten police every day, and sometimes, over time, a police officer can go bad and do things wrong, but there are thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of police officers in the country. Of course, a few bad people can end up in any entity or organization or government. I can argue well today--Barack Obama is a rotten man, a piece of shit of a man, and he is doing more harm to the country than anyone in history ever has. Oh, I hope you noticed how Barack Obama tried to sell the idea that police are working to kill off the "poor," or Barack Obama was working to get the "poor" to hate police even more than they might. That shows that Barack Obama is pushing "hatred." Is not that "hate speech"?]
"...Now, the challenge for us--the federal government--is that we don't run these police forces. I can't federalize...." [It is good that the federal government--such as the U.S. president--does not run all the police entities in the country, since when a corrupt person becomes a U.S. president, all the police entities in the country become rotten, guided by the rotten rules of the rotten U.S. president, and there then is no higher authority counter the bad deeds of the police under control of the rotten U.S. president. In the United States of America, the police system is divided up into thousands and thousands of separate entities, and if one entity should go bad, it does not affect all the others, and when a police entity goes rotten or partially rotten, the people and politicians within the jurisdiction of the bad entity can work to get things straightened out. Note how Barack Obama pushed out the idea that he cannot "federalize" all the police entities in the country and put them under his control. Yet, he is already in the process of doing that. Within the last few years, the federal government has been taking police agencies to court and forcing them (through court decisions and agreements) to follow the rules of the federal government, taking control out of the hands of local citizens and local governments. Also Barack Obama's work of taking a few police entities to court is a form of coercion on all police entities in the country, which can lead to police agencies around the country having to sort of follow his rotten rules for fear of having to spend city funds to battle against the federal government in court, depleting city budgets and hurting communities. Barack Obama passed on misinformation about his work to federalize the police entities in the country!]
"...We can't just leave this [the idea of straightening things out, at least as I (Barack Obama) see it] to the police...." [Hold it! The idiot--Barack Obama--ran off crap again. Police departments are not on their own. For example, in a town or city, the citizens and the local-government politicians have control over the police departments ultimately, and in one case, there can be community organizations that are like watchdogs of the police departments, and, also, the people or city officials of a city or town can elect or hire and fire heads of police departments, and then there are county entities and state entities that, indirectly at least, watch over local police departments, such as when special investigations of police departments need to be made (such as when a state-police investigation is called for to investigate someone within a local police department, such as in relation to some type of corruption, taking bribes).]Tuesday, May 12, 2015 (at Georgetown University yet again):
"...What's happened in our economy is that those who are doing better and better, more skilled, more educated--luckier--having greater advantages are withdrawing from sort of the commons. Kids started goin' to private schools, kids start workin' out at private clubs, instead of public parks. An anti-government ideology then disinvests from those common goods and those things that draw us together, and that in part contributes to, ah, the fact that there's less opportunity for our kids, all of our kids...." [This set of words is nonsense, and this set of words is rambling, and this set of words of flap doodle, and this set of words is idiocy, and this set of words is foolishness, and this set of words shows off the speaker is a follower of Marxism, communism, et cetera, and this set of words shows off the illogic of the speaker. I could say that the set of words--as a whole--cannot be understood, or I could say that a person cannot retell what was said to come up with something that makes sense, but a person can take parts of what was said and show the nonsense of the entire set of words and the defective mind of the speaker. Yet, some people would try to push out the idea that what Barack Obama said was so profound, though it was not. "Luckier"--Barack Obama really stressed this word, showing me that he much believes so much "luck" is involved in leading to others getting more than some do or showing me that, more likely, through some underhanded means, some people get more than others do, and it is unfair and it has to be stopped or compensated for by government (or him). "Anti-government ideology"--with this, Barack Obama was trying to sell the idea that people who do well or start doing well are anti-government, and that is not true, since, for instance, so-called rich people have supported the country under The United States Constitution, which defines a form of government, which is an anti-enslavism form of government--that which is against, for instance, a communistic or socialistic government--ever since the country was founded. "Commons"--this word is just another saying of "masses,"a term used by communists and such to define the people who they are believe are less in status than they are, and such people--the "commons" or "masses"--have to be ruled over, as if the "commons" or "masses" are ignorant animals, and the person who talks about the "commons" or "masses" is usually an "elitist.". Barack Obama said--"...Kids started goin' to private schools, kids start workin' out at private clubs, instead of public parks....". That statement from Barack Obama presented in the previous sentence is a contraction in relation to Barack Obama's life--Barack Obama, who has a lot of money already, has his two daughters in very private school, and Barack Obama regularly shows up or spends time at private clubs, such as golf courses, and that means Barack Obama was talking about himself when he was talking about "...Kids started goin' to private schools, kids start workin' out at private clubs, instead of public parks....". Barack Obama noted--"...An anti-government ideology then disinvests from those common goods and those things that draw us together, and that in part contributes to, ah, the fact that there's less opportunity for our kids, all of our kids....". How does one's person doing well block "kids"--other persons--from having less opportunity? As a rule, what one particular person does does not block another from having opportunity. In addition, ask yourself--What is the common good? Who sets the definition of what the so-called "common good" is or should be? Anyway, the things that draw people together are, for instance, as they have been for centuries, (1) family, (2) clubs, (3) churches and the like, (4), workplaces, (5), The United States Constitution (which sets down some basic rules of life for everyone), et cetera. By the way, there are people who are not so-called rich who like to withdraw from the group and live in solitude, and, in fact, I could argue well most people like to withdraw from other people at least from time to time, such as not to be bothered by idiotic problems or bad ideas or whatever--to get a rest from others or leave rotten people or losers, like Barack Obama, behind. Oh, in a way, Barack Obama put down those students in the audience who would like to be members of private clubs or are members of private clubs by saying "... kids start workin' out at private clubs....", since people--even people who are black--can like to be part of private clubs, which can be safe havens from rotten people or evil people, like Barack Obama, who might make a day horrid. Given what I have written set in your mind, go back a read the full set of words from Barack Obama, and see if you can figure out what Barack Obama said. [I have said enough, though I could say more.]]
"...And over the last forty years, sadly, I think, there's been, ah, an effort to either make folks mad at folks at the top or to make mad, ah, be mad at folks at the bottom, ah, and, ah, I think, the effort to suggest that the poor are sponges, leeches, are, don't want to work, are lazy, you know, ah, are undeserving got traction, ah, and, and, look, look it's, it's still being propagated. Ah, I mean, I got to say that, if, if you watch Fox News...." [Here is a collage of idiocy. Barack Obama, for example, talks about an effort by some to make people "...mad at folks at the top....." History shows that Barack Obama is one of those persons. For one, in public speeches, Barack Obama has put down doctors, saying, for instance, they will cut off a person's leg to get paid. In addition, Barack Obama has put down business people. Right from the start, Barack Obama's statement was crap. And then he got to the "poor." Well, I state that some "poor" are sponges or leeches or do not want to work and are lazy. I have learned over the years, how contractors or businesses can be trapped by government rules or union rules into hiring and paying people, such as minorities, for doing nothing or for just sitting around; for example, it is public knowledge that what can happen is workers at auto plants can show up for work and get paid for doing nothing, since, even though the people are rotten workers, they cannot be fire, so they simply sit off to the side or in a corner and goof off. And then Barack Obama started to drift off in to something about Fox News, which has nothing to do with, for example, the idea about some people working to make folks mad at folks at the top. The whole set of words from Barack Obama was nothing coherent.]
"...We're goin' to have to change how the media reports on these issues and how people's impressions of what, what's it's like to struggle in this economy looks like and how budgets connect to that...." [I note--It looks as if Barack Obama was working to sell the idea to "folks" that the federal government, which under him is rotten, should be able to censor the media and dictate what the media should report and say, and I say that would be a rotten idea.]
"...And I think it's important when it comes to dealing with issues of poverty to guard against cynicism and, and not, ah, buy the idea that the poor will always be with us and there's nothing we can do. 'cause there's a lot we can do. The question is--Do we have the political will...?...." [A smart person can see Barack Obama was hinting at the idea that "political will" is the will to adopt communistic ideas and such, in which the federal government is able to take from people to give to others on a regular basis and at the idea that people should embrace having the federal government more or regularly involved in determining how much a particular person should have while working to make everyone in society equal. I know--there is no way to completely eliminate poor people from the world, since some people wish to be poor or gain no skills, feeling they should not have to or having defective minds, and some people make bad investment decisions and lose money and become poor, et cetera, and then the world has "enslavists"--one of whom is Barack Obama--who purposely work to make others poor or poorer so that the others are not seen higher in stature in society than the "enslavist" is (that is the way of communists and such). I report that no one in life can make everyone equal in the world or remake the rules of nature! And some people will be hit by a car tomorrow, and some people will get a stoke tomorrow, and some people will have a heart attack tomorrow, and some people will cut a finger tomorrow, and some people will....]Thursday, May 14, 2015 (a press event at Camp David):
"...The first Republican president, ah, a proud native of, ah, my home state--named Mr. Lincoln--ah, even in the midst of civil war was looking at how we join the country together through our railways and our canals, ah...." [Around this date--May 14, 2015--Barack Obama's theme for speeches was we have to spend more money on infrastructure, and one reason for that was there was a recent Amtrak train crash, which was not caused by infrastructure under funding, and he wanted to exploit the situation--get the American public to support him in his efforts to spend more money and bankrupt the country. By the way, Barack Obama has been blabbing about infrastructure spending for at least six years, and although billions and billions and billions of dollars have been allocated for, for instance, road construction through federal-government laws, the Barack Obama administration has used, in essence, only peanuts of the billions and billions and billions allocated for infrastructure, such as road construction (a lot of money was diverted to other things). [Ask yourself--What happened to the Barack Obama's "stimulus plan" and "shovel-ready jobs"?] Yes, Barack Obama was talking about infrastructure for the purposes of making it better for commerce and such, moving things about [Vic note: I do not believe he really cares about making the infrastructure better, but the talked about it]. Now, let me go back to the 1860s, during the time of Abraham Lincoln as the U.S. President and the Civil War. Abraham Lincoln was thinking about infrastructure in the 1860s, but it was not the same infrastructure reasons as those talked about by Barack Obama. With the war on in the 1860s, Abraham Lincoln needed better transport systems, such as railroads, in the country so that supplies could be better moved each day to supply the soldiers of the "Union Army." Abraham Lincoln was not thinking about making better train systems and roads so that people could get to hardware stores, the movies, beaches, McDonald's, et cetera. So Barack Obama lied about what Abraham Lincoln was doing in relation to infrastructure in the 1860s. Also Abraham Lincoln's idea of joining "the country together" was different than what Barack Obama hinted at in his words. I state--Barack Obama let flow from his mouth more crap!]Wednesday, May 20, 2015 (a speech or lecture before graduates of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy, New London, Connecticut):
"...You know the beauty of the sea, but you also know its unforgiving power. Here, at the Academy, 'climate change,' understanding the science and the consequences, is part of the curriculum, and rightly so, because it will affect everything that you do in your careers. Some of you have already served in Alaska and aboard icebreakers, and you know the effects. As America's maritime guardian, you've pledged to remain always ready, Semper Paratus, ready for all threats. And 'climate change' is one of those most severe threats. And this is not just a problem for countries on the coasts or for certain regions of the world, climate change will impact every country on the planet--no nation is immuned. So I'm here today to say that 'climate change' constitutes a serious threat to global security, an immediate risk to our national security, and make no mistake it will impact how our military defends our country, and so we need to act, and we need to act now. After all, isn't that the true hallmark of leadership. When you're on deck, standing your watch, you stay vigilant, you plan for every contingency, and if you see storm clouds gathering or dangerous shoals ahead, you don't sit back and do nothing, you take action to protect your ship, to keep your crew safe. Anything less is negligence. It is a dereliction of duty! And so too with 'climate change.' Denying it or refusing to deal with it endangers our national security. It undermines the readiness of our forces...." [Okay, I was not in the U.S. Coast Guard. However, I know more about The Mackinaw WAGB-83 (originally known as The Mackinaw WAG-83), which was an icebreaker on the Great Lakes from December 1944 and June 2006, than any former U.S. Coast Guard person does or any group of U.S. Coast Guard persons does. I have done a lot of research on the ship, and I have a document about the ship that runs about 640-pages (in single-space form) at this time, and I have more than 1,400 photographs of the outside of the ship, and my research has allowed me to learn of the different ice conditions and weather conditions it had to deal with on the Great Lakes over the decades, and the winter weather varied from hard to easily over the years--1947 was a really hard year. I can probably tell you where the ship was on any date between December 1944 and January 1980, based on my having seen over 2,800 newspaper articles about the ship published from 1944 to 2006, the bulk of which were published between 1944 and 1980. I contend--Barack Obama knows nothing about the U.S. Coast Guard, or he does not know crap about the U.S. Coast Guard. And now I get to the quotes material from Barack Obama that is contained within this paragraph of this section. The whole thing is dysfunctional logic or defective logic or is illogic and is flap doodle. Just because a person goes to Alaska, it does not mean the person has any evidence about "climate change," the type that Barack Obama has in mind. "Climate change"--as pushed by Barack Obama means manmade use of carbon-based fuels, such as burning trees, that is leading to increased so-called carbon pollution and the death of the planet. It is all bullshit from Barack Obama. The facts do not show man is killing the planet through the use of carbon-based fuels. It is all a lie! So Barack Obama says that "climate change"--which does not exist as he professes--has to be dealt with. How do you deal with what does not exist? Barack Obama hints that Coast Guard officers have to be ready to fight it. What the hell are they going to fight? What the hell are they going to do? Every day, the climate of a particular area changes--it is dry one day, and it is wet another day, and it is snowy another day, and it is cloudy yet another, et cetera, and man has nothing to do with it. I now ask--Where is Barack Obama's proof of any prediction that he passes along can come true? His basic point is a lie, so his predictions are based on a lie. What does leadership have to do with anything that was said by Barack Obama, especially in being ready for "climate change"? How does a person get ready for Barack Obama's "climate change"? What vigilant stand can a person take? How does Barack Obama's "climate change" endanger national security? It comes down to--How does a person hold back the weather or hold back the sun from shinning to protect the national security? Are the U.S. Coast Guard guys and gals supposed to line up ships along the coast to beat back the waves of the oceans? Today, at Cheboygan, Michigan, The Mackinaw WLBB-30, a big icebreaker for the U.S. Coast Guard, is stationed. I say in jest--To combat Barack Obama's "climate change," I think the U.S. Coast Guard should decommission the ship and make it a museum piece (The Mackinaw WAGB-83 is a museum at Mackinaw City, Michigan). You cannot have a ship like The Mackinaw WLBB-30 running around the Great Lakes burning diesel fuel, making, for instance, carbon dioxide (which plants need to live). I say in an over-the-top jest--The Mackinaw WLLB-30 is killing the planet and get rid of the U.S. Coast Guard.]
"...There are folks, there are folks who'll equivocate, they'll say--You know, I'm not scientist. Well, I'm not either! But the best scientists in the world know that 'climate change" is happening. Our analysts in the intelligence community know climate change has happened...." [Who are the "best scientists" in Barack Obama's regularly lying mind. I have evidence that some 30,000 real scientists think Barack Obama's "climate change" is false. Why are "analysts in the intelligence community" involved in so-called information gathering on so-called "climate change"? Should not the "intelligence community" of the United States of America be involved in keeping track of the enemies of the United States of America, such as the communist countries, like China, which steals information from the United States of America through the Internet? Oops! Barack Obama is a communist! Well, there is a dead issue. Hey, wait! I know "climate change" is happening. It was rainy yesterday. Today, it is sunny. It was cold on January 1, 2015, in Michigan, and there was ice on the Great Lakes. Call for an icebreaker!]Thursday, June 18, 2015 (making comments about the shooting in North Carolina:
"...The dead of this sort is a tragedy. Any shooting involving multiple victims is a tragedy. There's something particularly heartbreaking about a death happening in, ah, a place in which we seek solace and we seek peace, in a place of worship. I've had to make statements like this too many times...." [On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, a person used a gun to kill nine persons in a church in Charleston, South Carolina, and the shooting was attributed to a young man named Dylann Roof Bond, who it seems can be deemed a racist (that has yet to be proven in court), and I will say that Dylann Roof Bond is a rotten man and one of many rotten men who exist on the planet. On Thursday, Jun 18, 2015, another rotten man and killer--Barack Hussein Obama--made comments in public about the shooting in Charleston, South Carolina, and he used the occasion to help push to get guns out of the hands of good citizens in the country to make his life safer--bad politicians, who like to hurt other people, which Barack Obama has demonstrated that he likes to do, as Mao did and Castro did, have to have their citizen unarmed so that they cannot fight back and stop the bad politicians from hurting the citizens or other people, especially in the millions. By the way, Barack Obama has proven himself a black racist, as has his wife (some proof of which exist in the document entitled T.H.A.T. #135 (which can be reached through this T.H.A.T. #135 link) and other documents of mine that are available on the Internet for free). Barack Obama's comments about the shooting were given in a long and drawn-out style, which, for example, had long pauses between the sentences (most of which were really short). The presentation looked staged and rehearsed and phony. And it was a phony presentation, for one, because Barack Obama pointed out that "...I've had to make statements like this too many times....". He has not made many statements about such incidents, especially when Muslims are the killers, such as at a U.S. military base, when military personnel are unarmed as a rule, and he says nothing about the black-on-black killings, often involving thugs, thieves, and such, which happen every day. A person can argue that one such statement is "too many," but that is to be discounted. Generally speaking, Barack Obama has only made a handful of statements, and Barack Obama makes such statements only if a group of people are killed and when usually the killing event can be tied to white racism (and he will even lie on behalf of a killed person, such as a black, as he did when a white police officer shot and killed a black man who had been doing harm to the police officer). Yes, on Wednesday, June 17, 2015, Barack Obama pushed for more enslavism in the United States of America.]
"...We don't have all the facts, but we do know that, once again, innocent people were killed in part because someone who wanted to inflict harm had no trouble getting their hands on a gun...." [I state--That happens every day all over the world, as it has for centuries, since there are bad people in the world and there always will be, and, by the way, people get killed every day through the use of clubs and knives and whatever.]
"...Now's the time for mourning and healing, but let's be clear--at some point we as a country will have to reckon with the fact that this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries. It doesn't happen in other places with this type of frequency. And it is in our power to do something about it...." [Bullshit! See the article--"If You Look at This Chart of Top 10 Nations in the World for Mass Shootings--One Thing Jumps Out" [Becker, Kyle. "If You Look at This Chart of Top 10 Nations in the World for Mass Shootings--One Thing Jumps Out" IJReview, 19 June 2015.]. And, by the way, mass killings have happened in Russia (such as at a school) and China, and the killers do not always have guns. And the killer--Barack Obama--has spoken! And we must remember, for instance, the "Benghazi Killings Scandal" (when Barack Obama let Americans die by doing nothing) and the "Fast and Furious Scandal" (in which an American border agent was killed and a number of Mexicans were killed, because Barack Obama and his associates were working to get more gun-control laws put in place in the U.S. by blaming easy access to guns in the U.S. as the reason for gun killings).]
[Note: Killers all around the world always seem to have access to guns.]Thursday, June 25, 2015 (making a comment to the press about a U.S. Supreme Court ruling about Obamacare):
"...After multiple challenges to this law before the Supreme Court, the Affordable Care Act is here to stay...." [On Thursday, June 25, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court released to the American public a ruling on a case informally called the The King v. Burwell case, in which the fight was about subsidies related to health-care exchanges and whatever. Once again, the U.S. Supreme Court as a body corrupted the English language, giving what meanings to words that it wanted to justify the decision, which, in essence, supported the Barack Obama administration; the ruling was six justices (John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan, one of whom is clearly a Spanish-type racist and all of whom are generally supporters of rotten political ideas, such as communism) to three justices (Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito) to keep the status quo. In addition, the thinking of the six justices who voted to keep the status quo was rotten and idiotic; for example, John Roberts wrote, in relation to why he voted how he had--"...Congress passed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not destroy them for instance. If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former and avoids the latter....". The quoted material is idiot thought. Basically, John Roberts pushed the idea that the intention by the members of the U.S. Congress was to make things better, and I note that "intentions" should have no basis on a decision to determine whether or not a law is "constitutional," and I note that John Roberts cannot determine what the intentions of all the people who put together or voted for the passage of the law had been--it is impossible. Anyway, history shows that the results of the law being passed have been rotten results for most American. The six U.S. Justices are rotten people, who deserved to be spit on and more. And then Barack Obama came out to make a statement to the American public and the decision., and he noted that the law has had "multiple challenges". And the decisions, more the most part, have been rotten.]
"...Because of this law and because of today's decision, millions of Americans--who I hear from every single day--will continue to receive the tax credits that have given eight in ten people who buy insurance on the new marketplaces the choice of a health-care plan that costs less than a hundred dollars a month. The point is this is not an abstract thing anymore. This is not a set of political talking points. This is reality. We can see how it is working. This law is working is, ac, exactly as it's supposed to...." [Liar!]
"...My greatest hope is that, rather than keep refighting battles that have been settled again and again and again, I can work with Republicans and Democrats to move forward. Let's join together--make health care in America even better. So this was a good day for America. Let's get back to work...." [Liar! You lying fuck-head! Go stick your head up Michelle's butt,. That is where shit like belongs! And may the shit out of your mind make her explode!]Wednesday, July 1, 2015 (at Taylor Stratton Elementary School, Madison, Tennessee):
"...The second problem is that because of the way that we've designed the payment system in health care, historically what happened was that, let's say, a hospital or a doctor had a patient come in, says--I've got diabetes or I have I think diabetes. The hospital and the doctor would get paid ta amputate the leg of a patient, but they wouldn't get reimbursed if they just hired somebody to monitor whether that individual was taking their medicines on a regular basis and monitoring their eating habits, right? So what ends up happening is that you don't end up helpin' the patient, who might've kept their leg if they were keeping up a regular regiment [regime] of, you know, looking after themselves, ah, The doctors don't feel good about that. The nurses don't feel good about it. But they just don't have time because of the economics of the health-care system...." [Taylor Stratton Elementary School has, for instance, white students (white children) and black students (black children). Forget about the white students (white children)! Think only about the black students (black students)! Now, look over the material presented in quotation marks, which, I say, make up only some of the rottenness that Barack Obama worked to teach black children in the speech at the school. Barack Obama taught crap to black students (black children). Barack Obama, as he had done several years ago, pushed out the idea that doctors are eager to cut off legs of people to get paid or that, for years, doctors have followed the idea of cutting off legs to get paid and not the idea of monitoring patients' eating habits and the way in which the patients take care of themselves. Bullshit! Bullshit! Bullshit! The United States of America is no African tribal village with witch doctors! Over the recent decades--I know--doctors who had patients with diabetes pushed patients to follow strict eating habits and take drugs (of various types) to, in essence, reduce the sugar supply in the bloodstream. There comes a time--sometimes--when legs have to be removed from patients with diabetes, such as when wounds will not heal and high infection sets in or the circulation in the legs cannot be improved. In the quoted material, Barack Obama was working to teach black children that the U.S. health-care system has been bad and that U.S. doctors have had it in their minds to cut first and do other things to help patients last, or Barack Obama lied by saying that doctors, as a rule, are eager to cut off legs so that the doctors can make money, and Barack Obama lied big time about doctors working to not get people to take care of themselves. That is the sign of a man with a shit-head mind. And the shit-head man was even willing to teach its nonsense to black children. Barack Obama is a killer. Now, think of the black students (black children) and the white students (white children). I have them in mind. To all, I teach--Barack Obama is a killer and a rotten man and a man who is insane and deadly, and you must fear him and learn to hate him greatly to protect yourselves and you must forever hate him greatly.]
[Note: On Wednesday, July 1, 2015, San Francisco, California, which is considered a "sanctuary city" because, in essence, it does not work to get illegal aliens (who are criminals) deported, was the site of a killing that made the national news, and the story was news for more than a week (at least in or at non-communistic or non-socialistic news services). Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez, who had been deported several times for being an illegal alien and a criminal and who is a Hispanic-type male, shot a woman named Kate Steinle in the back while she was walking on a pier with her father, and Kate Steinle--a white young woman--died from the gunshot wound. Over the next week at least, Barack Obama, a man who has proven in public that he is a black racist, made no public comment about the event--in the past, he had commented on shootings when the victims were black, such as in the case when a rotten black young man attacked a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, and ended up getting killed by the police officer.]Monday, July 13, 2015:
"...And now we're often told that Medicare and Social Security are in crisis. We hear that all the time. And usually that's used as an excuse to try ta cut spending. But here's the truth--Medicare and Social Security are not in crisis...." [This is bullshit! This is a lie! This is the sign of a rotten mind! This is the sign of a killer! And on Tuesday, July 13, 2015, the public would learne about of the agreement between the Barack Obama administration and the Iranian government about nuclear weapons and such, and it would be all bad for the United States of America and the good people of the world. Yes, you have heard in Barack Obama the mind of a killer--of millions and millions and millions. By the way, Medicare and Social Security make up a portion of what is called the "unfunded liabilities" for the country, and the unfunded-liabilities debt is way over 100-trillion dollars (or 100,000-billion dollars).]Tuesday, July 14, 2015 (a statement given at the White House):
"...Today, after two years of negotiations, the United States, together wer, in our international partners, has achieved something that decades of animosity has not--a comprehensive long-term deal with Iran that will prevent it from obtaining a nuclear weapon...." [On this day, for about fifteen minutes, Barack Obama (flanked by Joseph Biden, the vice president of the United States of America) publicly announced the finishing of an "agreement" between, in essence, the United States of America and Iran covering the topic of Iran and nuclear weapons. Of course, Barack Obama--a perpetual liar [as, for one, this document shows] and a supporter of Sharia and communism--talked about how great the agreement is and how historic the agreement is. Soon afterward, smart good people began to show up the nonsense of the agree, such as how it really does not stop Iran from working on nuclear weapons and how the U.S. gained nothing (such as four Americans held hostage by Iran). By the way, some good people, such as Rush Limbaugh (a nationally known radio talk-show host), were saying that Barack Obama made the agreement to enhance his legacy, being the first U.S. president to get such an agree that will supposedly lead to peace in the Middle East made, I was saying that Barack Obama made the useless agreement to help Iran, working as an enemy of the United States of America and also at least Israel, a country that Barack Obama has shown disdain for. I state--Based on all that I know about Barack Obama and about Barack Obama's actions, I know Barack Obama is insane and a killer. And I state--Barack Obama is not being an appeaser in relation to enemies of the United States of America. ["Obama questioned by CBS News' Major Garrett on Iran hostages." CBS News, 15 July 2015, 4:02 p.m.; Kant, Garth. "Sheer Insanity: Iran Deal Critics Go Nuclear on Obama." WND.com, 14 July 2015, 8:24 p.m.; Adesnik, David. "The Corner: The Nuclear Deal Gives Iran License to Resist Inspectors.: nationalreview.com, 14 July 2015, 1:53 p.m.; Pollak, Joel. B. "A 'Terrible Deal': Nuclear Agreement Reached with Iran." Breitbart.com, 14 July 2015.; Shapiro, Ben. "Everything You Need to Know about Obama's Iran Deal." Breitbart.com, 14 July 2015.; others]
"...Today, because America negotiated from a position of strength and principle, we have stopped the spread of nuclear weapons in this region. Because of this deal, the international community will be able to verify the that Islamic Republic of Iran will not develop a nuclear weapon. This deal meets every single one of the bottom lines that we established when we achieved a framework early this spring. Every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut off. And the inspection and transparency regime necessary to verify that objective will be put in place. Because of this deal, Iran will not produce the highly enriched uranium and weapons-grade plutonium that formed the raw materials necessary for a nuclear bomb. Because of this deal, Iran will remove two-thirds of its installed centrifuges, the machines necessary to produce highly enriched uranium for a bomb and store them under constant international supervision. Iran will not use its advanced centrifuges to produce enriched uranium for the next decade. Iran will also get rid of ninety-eight percent of its stockpile of enriched uranium. To put that in perspective, Iran currently has a stockpile that can produce up to ten nuclear weapons. Because of this deal, that stockpile will be reduced to a fraction of what would be required for a single weapon. This stockpile limitation will last for fifteen years. Because of this deal, Iran will modify the core of its reactor in Iraq so that it will not produce weapons-grade plutonium, and it has agreed to ship the spent fuel from the reactor out of the country for the lifetime of the reactor. For at least the next fifteen years, Iran will not build any new heavy-water reactors. Because of this deal, we will for the first be in a position to verify all of these commitments. That means this deal is not built on trust. It is built on verification. Inspectors will have twenty-four-seven access to Iran's key nuclear facilities. Iran will have access to Iran's entire nuclear supply chain--its uranium mines and mills, its conversion facility, and its centrifuge manufacturing and storage facilities...." [I stop here. I stop because you should have noticed the opening of the last sentence presented. Barack Obama did say--"...Iran will have access to Iran's entire....". Barack Obama should have said--"...Inspectors will have access to Iran's entire....". That was a mind flub from Barack Obama. Of course, the whole speech was flap doodle. It was more shit from a rotten man and a killer--Barack Obama, the insane.]Tuesday, July 21, 2015 (on The Daily Show, being interviewed by Jon Stewart):
"...The real scandal when, ah, there was that problem with the IRS--everybody jumped, including you--....". [I stop here--that is, I end the quoted material at "you", because Jon Stewart interrupted Barack Obama. The theme of the material from Barack Obama is the IRS practice--which did happen and was admitted to by the IRS--of blocking "conservative"-type entities from obtaining nonprofit status in the eyes of the IRS before, for example, the last national election. The IRS was running a corrupt scheme.]
"...And there're goin' after the 'Tea Party.' Well, it turned out no! Congress has passed, ah, ah...." [This material is what Barack Obama pushed out after Jon Stewart had interrupted Barack Obama. Notice Barack Obama pushed out the lie that the scandalous events did not happen. Barack Obama once again pushed out bullshit!]
"...The real scandal around the IRS right now is that it has been so poorly funded...." [Here was more bullshit from Barack Obama. Barack Obama has increased the budget of the IRS significantly. That is fact! And once again Barack Obama pushed out shit from his mouth and worked to force it in to the ears of the audience.]Monday, August 3, 2015:
"...Over the past six-and-a-half years, we've taken on some of the toughest challenges of our time, from rebuilding our economy after a devastating recession to ending our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and bringing almost all of our troops home to strengthening our security through tough and principled diplomacy. But I am convinced that no challenge poses a greater threat to our future and future generations than a changing climate, and that's what brings us here today...." [Liar! [Note: Did you notice Barack Obama said a nonsense sentence? Barack Obama said that "...no challenge poses a greater threat....". Yes, Barack Obama said nonsense. Barack Obama said the "challenge" (whatever that was supposed or is supposed to be) is a threat or the threat. The presentation was all defective and mixed up! That is what you get from a fucked-up mind.]]
"...Two-thousand-fourteen was the planet's warmest year on record. We've been setting a lot of records in terms of warmest years over the last decade. One year doesn't make a trend, but fourteen of the fifteen warmest years on record have fallen within the first fifteen years of this century...." [Liar!]
"...I don't want millions of people's lives disrupted and this world more dangerous because we didn't do anything...." [The theme in the quoted sentence is--Doing something to stop climate change (which Barack Obama was working to say will make the world more dangerous in some way). Barack Obama will say anything to killer others! I state that Barack Obama is a killer who is working to kill millions, and part of that is to satisfy his love for Islam and Allah. By the way, I say that Allah is shit, and that means Barack Obama is shit, having support for Allah. The fact is that Barack Obama just helped to the rotten people of the world let Iran--a country ruled by a followers of Sharia (the rotten political system)--get on a path to getting nuclear weapons, setting in place an international "agreement" related to Iran and nuclear weapons, and that means Barack Obama just helped make the world less save for good people--millions of people. See the bullshit from Barack Obama?]
"...Today, an African-American child is more than twice as likely to be hospitalized from asthma. A Latino child is forty more likely to die from asthma...." [Oh, I have yet to report something. The theme of the speech was on Barack Obama's work to put more regulations on coal-based electricity-generating plants in the country. The problem--according to Barack Obama's warped mind--is "carbon dioxide" from the plants is killing the planet, so the U.S. must stop using carbon-based fuels, like coal, while the reminder of the world gets to keep using carbon-based fuels (under no real restrictions to stop using coal and other carbon-based fuels). Do you see the bullshit from Barack Obama? He is a killer--an "enslavist" of the highest order. Now that I have covered that, I can note--So what does so-called climate change have to do with Latino kids and African-American kids and percentages of asthma I guess Barack Obama wants you to believe climate-change only affects African-American children and Latino children or climate-change affects African-American children and Latino children more than "white" children. Maybe, the deniers of Barack Obama's "climate change" are working to kill black children and Latino children. Do you see Barack Obama's work to push the idea of racism against black children and Latino children by "whites"? It seems Barack Obama was pushing the idea that you are a racist if you deny Barack Obama's belief of "climate change." Such an evil mind exists in the head of Barack Obama.]
"...Right now, our power plants are the source of about a third of America's carbon...." [Stop! Stop! Stop! Do you see the tactical move by Barack Obama? Carbon dioxide--it is not a pollutant. Carbon dioxide--it is what keeps living plants--like flowers and trees--alive. Barack Obama's tactic has nothing to do with saving the planet from carbon dioxide. Keep in mind--Barack Obama is working to attack and taken down the electricity-generating industry of the country so that the nation will be less defensible when under attack and more. You have more evidence that Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States of America.]Wednesday, August 5, 2015 (at American University, Washington, D.C.):
"...Just because Iranian hard-liners chant 'Death to America!' does not mean that that's what all Iranians believe. In fact, in fact, it's those hard-liners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It's those hard-liners chanting 'Death to America!' who have been most opposed to the deal. They're making common cause with the Republican caucus...." [For Barack Obama, it was probably wonderful that he was able to give a speech about Iran and the nuclear-weapons "agreement" at American University, since, really, the "agreement" is ultimately designed to kill the United States of America (or "America"), as a smart person can deduce. I state that Barack Obama is a killer, who goes way beyond labels given him by such persons as Rush Limbaugh and Mark. R. Levin, who are good men who have been working to expose the rottenness of Barack Obama through their nationally syndicated radio shows [Mark R. Levin, for example, describes Barack Obama as only a true-believing "Marxist" or is an "Alinsky-ite"]. Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States of America and good people of the world, such as those opposed to "Sharia" (or hard-line Islamic law), which Barack Obama supports (as shown through his pst actions), and during the speech on August 5, 2015, at American University, Barack Obama once again proved he is working for the enemy--Iran. Oh, one reason Barack Obama is working to take down the United States of America is so that the United States of America cannot block him from become the "king of the world"; history shows that Americans--the good Americans--have worked or died to put down rotten people who wish to be the "king of the world," such as Adolph Hitler. Before this speech on Augsut 5, 2015, would be given, Barack Obama supported the Iran leaders and not the protesting Iranians related to an Iranian election a few years ago and Barack Obama was tied to the "Benghazi Killings Scandal," in which Americans were killed. Yes, Barack Obama is more than only a "socialist" or a "communist" or a "Marxist." The first quoted material for this section shows one example of Barack Obama's rottenness exhibited in the speech. I note--It was the hard-liners in Iran who were involved ultimately in creating the deal, and the deal served them well and provided the U.S. with nothing good (such as the release of Americans held hostage in Iran), and around August 5, 2015, the Iranian leaders were promoting the fact that the "Supreme Leader" had a new book in the marketplace that talked about how Iran was going to, in essence, continue on with what plans it has had for the U.S. and Israel and all who are enemies or Iran (and "Allah"). In this speech, Barack Obama tried to sell the idea that the leaders of Iran--who are all hard-liners who are working push Sharia on the world--did not and do not want the deal (the "agreement"), and if they were the case, why did the "agreement" ever get made? Incidentally, what I cannot show in this document is how the audience laughed when Barack Obama finished saying "caucus," and I noted that the laughter showed the rottenness and idiocy of the audience. The event and the words spoken were not funny or about funny things! I state--The leaders in Iran are not in league with the "Republicans" in the U.S. Congress. Plus, it must be remembered the United Nations has already approved the "agreement," and the Iranian leaders have said that they won and the U.S. lost through the "agreement."]
"...Between now and the congressional vote of September, you are gonna hear a lot of arguments against this deal, backed by tens of millions of dollars in advertising. And if the rhetoric in these ads and the accompanying commentary sounds familiar, it should--The same people who argued for the war in Iraq are now makin' the case against the Iran nuclear deal...." [Okay! I have to report here that it was, in essence, all the Republicans and all the Democrats in the U.S. Congress who, in essence, gave U.S. President Bush the go-ahead to attack Iraq, creating the Iraq War. Barack Obama's argument, here--in the quoted material--is defective. Notice how Barack Obama worked to make you think rotten money--a lot of money--was going to be used to fight against Barack Obama's wanted-for "agreement."]
"...So this deal is not just the best choice among alternatives, this is the strongest non-proliferation agreement every negotiated...." [Bullshit! It is public knowledge that the "agreement" will lead to Iran finally getting nuclear weapons and that the "agreement" does not reduce nuclear weapons, which is the normal way of "non-proliferation-type agreements." So, Barack Obama's statement is defective.]
"...And because this is such a strong deal, every nation in the world that has commented publicly, with the exception of the Israeli government, has expressed support...." [If all the neighbors or most of the neighbors in your neighborhood are rotten, they will very likely support tuff that is rotten and against you, and with that in your mind, you must remember most of countries of the world or in the United Nations are rotten, and what those nations have to say is useless thought and thought to be discarded.]
"...I know it's easy to play on people's fears, to magnify threats, to compare any attempt at diplomacy to Munich, but none of these arguments hold up. They didn't back in 2002 and 2003. They shouldn't now...." [I have no comment to make about this final set of quoted words, though I could [Note: I could talk about all the examples of Barack Obama playing on "people's fears, to magnify threats....".]. I use the set of words to simply bring up the idea that a lot of Marxists and communists and socialists and black racists and simple "liberals" (Democratic Party voters) in the United States of America support Barack Obama and work to help Barack Obama achieve his goals, unaware Barack Obama is using them to go way beyond what they have in mind, that simply changing the United States of America to a non-U.S. Constitution country--Barack Obama is working for the "Allah"-political system and people even more rotten than his supporters in the U.S. are. I believe everyone around Barack Obama can be deemed expendable to Barack Obama on his real quest and real goal in life. Barack Obama must say to hiimself--Hurray, for the useful idiots. Barack Obama's speech was truly more evidence of his like--and love--to hurt other people to reach his goal to be seen as the highest in society and the world and to gain as much as he can in life before he dies--Barack Hussein Obama is not about making others better. Barack Obama likes to kill too much!]Tuesday, August 31, 2015 (at a "climate conference" or really a "glacier confernce" in Anchorage, Alaska):
"...If we were to abandon our course of action, if we stop trying to build a clean economy and reduce carbon pollution...." [So the shit-head man named Barack Obama gave another speech, spewing carbon dioxide and more. He was working to kill the United States of America and good people, those who will not follow him on his quest to be king of the world. Based on Barack Obama's theme, every time Barack Obama talks he spews "carbon pollution" (a.k.a. "carbon dioxide"). See what shit comes out of Barack Obama's mouth and mind over and over again. I state--Barack Obama is insane and is a killer.]
"...glaciers from melting faster and oceans from rising faster and forests from burning faster and storms from growing stronger...." [Look at the crap that Barack Obama worked to sell! The idea about "...oceans from rising faster...." is tied to melting ice, but I noted that, if you melt ice cubes in a glass or jug partially filled with water, the water level will not rise. How does climate change make something burn faster? It does not. Barack Obama passed along shit purposely to teach lies and keep people--Eskimos, blacks, et cetera--ignorant. That is the sign of a rotten man!]
"...We know that human activity is changing the planet...." ["Changing the planet"--what does this mean to Barack Obama? Ants change the planet. Growing plants change the planet. Oceans and rivers change the planet. Wind changes the planet. And on and on, I could go]
"...That is beyond dispute! Everything else is politics. And people are denying the facts of climate change. We can have a legitimate debate about how we are going to address this problem. We cannot deny the science...." [Liar! Real-science facts show that Barack Obama is a liar. Barack Obama is denying the facts so that he can teach shit.]Wednesday, September 23, 2015 (in Washington, D.C., with Pope Francis):
"...You remind us that, in the eyes of God, our measure as individuals and our measure as a society is not determined by wealth or power or station or celebrity but by how well we hew to scriptures called to lift up the poor and the marginalized and stand up for justice and against inequality and to ensure that every human being is able to live in dignity because we are all made in the image of God...." [On this date, Pope Francis, who has shown himself through what words he has spoken to be a supporter of enslavism forms of government, especially communism, which is what he has been exposed to greatly during in life in South America, came to Washington, D.C., and Pope Francis met with, for one, Barack Obama, another enslavist, who supports not only communism but also the even more rotten political system called Sharia (Islamic law). The two men pushed along in their speeches this day their rotten beliefs, such as manmade climate change that is destroying the planet. No, the two men did not talk about real horrors of the world, such as the killing of Catholics or non-hard-line Muslims by pushers of Sharia, such as ISIS, in the world. It was two idiot men were on display, and they rambled on with flap-doodle and nonsense. The quoted material is only one piece of the mess that came from Barack Obama, and a smart person knew the words meant nothing to Barack Obama, who, for one, has shown himself to be a man who sees the measure of himself as a man comes down to his wealth and power and station and celebrity, as exhibited in all his actions putting himself above others.]Monday, September 28, 2015 (at the United Nations):
"...Part of that effort must be a continued rejection by Muslims of those who distort Islam to preach intollerance and promote violence and must also involve a rejection by non-Muslims of the ignorance that equates Islam with terror...." [Islam in the strict sense is "Sharia" (Islamic law). Really, Sharia is a political sytem masquerading as a religion. There is no tollerance in Sharia. Sharia does promote violence against non-followers. Barack Obama's words must be rejected since Barack Obama is a supporter of Sharia, as the history of his actions shows. Sharia is crap, and Barack supports Sharia, and that makes Barack Obama crap. That is fact!]Thursday, October 1, 2015 (a press statement):
"...But, as I said just a few months ago and I said a few months before that and I said each time we see one of these mass shootings, our thoughts and prayers are not enough. It's not enough. It does not capture the heartache and grief and anger that we should feel, and it does nothing to prevent this carnage from being inflicted someplace else in America next week or a couple of months from now. We don't yet know why this individual did what he did, and it's fair to say that anybody who does this has a sickness in their minds, regardless of what they think their motivations may be. But we are not the only country on Earth that has people with mental illnesses or want to do harm to other people. We are the only advanced country on Earth that sees these kinds of mass shootings every few months. You know, earlier this year, I answered a question in an interview by saying the United States of America is the one advanced nation on Earth in which we do not have sufficient commonsense gun safety laws...." [On Thursday, October 1, 2015, a man shot and killed nine persons and shot and injured seven other persons in Roseburg, Oregon, and way before anything would really be known about what had happened, Barack Obama made a press statement, which was nothing more than publicity push for more gun-control laws. The event was a killer using another killer's deeds to promote the ability to kill more. Remember--Barack Obama is a killer, having ties to the "Fast and Furious Scandal" and "The Benghazi Killings Scandal" and having worked to give Shariaists--the leaders of Iran--the ability to have nuclear weapons in the really near future, and history shows that Barack Obama is working to kill the economy of the United States of America and make the country a slave nation (also Barack Obama is a black racist). Killers like Barack Obama and Mao and Stalin who are politicians have to get guns out of the hands of "the people" so that they can be safe from "the people"--"the people" must not have the means to depose rotten politicians. By the way, it would be learned clearly later--after Barack Obama spoke--that the shooter was looking to kill those who were Christians, and history shows that Barack Obama is anti-Christian and a supporter of Sharia and communism. Barack Obama often dragged out his sentences for emotional effect, hoping to get people to side with him, his being compassionate, and, as usual, Barack Obama passed along bullshit. One lie that he passed along is that the United States of America does not have "sufficient commonsense gun safety laws....". A good person has to wonder about Barack Obama. In Barack Obama's mind--which is a mind with sickness--what is "sufficient" enough and what is "commonsense"?]
"...And each time this happens, I'm going to bring this up. Each times this happens, I'm going to say that we can actually do something about it. But we're going to have to change our laws, and this is not something I can do by myself. I've got to have a Congress, and I've got to have state legislatures, and governors who are willing to work with me on this...." [This set of words was only one of the sets of words in the speech that was used to persuade people to help reduce the numbers of weapons--particularly guns--in the country. Of course, no changing of laws to reduce guns in the country will stop killers from getting guns, which, for one, can be made at home by persons with a little machinery skills and some machines and can be smuggled in to the country. Look up "Saturday night specials" on the Internet. Bad people can always get guns and the other weapons. "Willing to work with me..." means that others have to take up his position--the only good position, as pushed by Barack Obama--and give up their positions, and it also means people have to vote for politicians who would only take up Barack Obama's position.Friday, October 2, 2015 (a press conference):
"...or that young men are inherently more violent in our nation than they are in other nations...." [On Friday, October 2, 2015, Barack Obama held a press conference, and several topics were covered, such as the shooting in Roseburg, Oregon, the previous day, and Barack Obama hemmed and hawed and stumbled along and rambled along and stuttered along, and Barack Obama's statements came off as boring and lifeless, and, as usual, Barack Obama passed along nonsense thoughts and ideas, which is the way of a bad man.]Tuesday, October 27, 2015 (a speech before police chiefs at the convention for the International Association of Police Chiefs in Chicago, Illinois):
"...The good news is the cops' program and other programs that your departments rely on to do your jobs may get some relief from the harmful spending cuts that Congress imposed a couple years ago, because, late night, Democrats and Republicans in Congress came together around a long-term budget agreement...." [What the hell does that mean? Hold it! Remember history shows that Barack Obama is working to nationalize the police departments in the country, putting them under direct control of the federal government. Police departments are entities of local governments, and money to run local police departments does not come from the federal government, so what does the budget agreement have to do with local police departments? By the way, the budget agreement, which was not yet finalized on this day, raises federal-goverment spending by many billions of dollars. It is more debt from Barack Obama and the other rotten people in the federal government. Oh, the budget increase being proposed is probably not for police departments [I have yet to see the agreement, but the increase in money for spending probably is not related to local police departments].]
"...I'm pretty happy about that...."
"...It's time more folks in Washington started valuing our cops, not just giving lip service to it...." [Here was a bullshit line! Show me evidence that Barack Obama supports cops. History shows that the Barack Obama administration has been taking police departments to court to get control of their workings!]Friday, November 6, 2015 (a press conference to announce, in essence, his killing of the Keystone XL pipeline project):
"...The pipeline would not make a long-term significant contribution to the country...." [Note: Basically, the Keystone XL pipeline was a proposed oil-carrying pipeline from Canada through the middle part of the continental United States of America to Texas. What proof does Barack Obama have to make his statement? Where are the facts? Where is the reality? How can he project into the future five years or ten years or twenty years or thirty years. I note that, in the past, such as over the last one-hundred years, oil pipelines have made contributions to the country, allowing oil or gasoline or simply fuel to be moved from oil fields to refineries to places where refined oil-based products could be used, such as, in the early 1900s, in oil lamps in lighthouses and such as, today, in the processes for plastics that might make up plastic spoons and computers and plastic buckets and cars and bicycle parts and dolls and....]
"...Shipping dirtier crude oil in to our country would not increase America's energy security...." [I state that the shipping of oil from Canada to the United States of America would increase the energy security of Canada and the United States of America, since, for one, oil from Canada would be changed into oil-based products, such as fine machine oil and gasoline, would could be used the United States of America and Canada (really, Canada would end up with money and refined products and the United States of America would get money from the sales of refined products and would get refined products). Notice the shit that Barack Obama passed on. Barack Obama used words to put down oil. What is "dirtier crude oil"? Does that mean that unrefined oil from Canada is dirtier than unrefined oil from Russia or Brazil or Iran? [Remember--Several years ago, Barack Obama gave Brazil--a socialistic/communistic nation--money (at least ten-billion dollars) to do drilling for crude oil.] Do you see Barack Obama's rottenness?]]
"...Because ultimately if we're gonna prevent large parts of this Earth from becoming not only inhospitable but uninhabitable in our lifetimes, we're gonna have to keep some fossil fuels in the ground...." [Study this shit from Barack Obama! Barack Obama is predicting large parts of the world are going to be dead areas with our lifetimes! What rotten mind would think to say such nonsense? Oh, remember--Barack Obama is an enslavist. Also remember--I say that Barack Obama is a man who is working to kill the industrial structure and factory structure of the country--not because he is a "no-growther" [which Mark R. Levin, a national radio talk-show host, pushes forth]--so that the country will have no good industrial and factory structure already set up when war breaks, which would allow the United States of America to create military equipment easily to protect the country [Note: At the start of World War II, the United States of America was able to quickly fight back because it had factories, such as established automobile plants, that could make protective weapons, such as guns, artillery, tanks, ships, et cetera]. I say that Barack Obama will go to any length to teach crap to blacks and whites and Asian-types and American Indians in the country, working to make them believe his shit ideas. Barack Obama is dangerous. Barack Obama is working against the United States of America as it was founded (a non-enslavism country). Barack Obama is a traitor! Barack Obama is a killer!]
[Note: During the press conference, Barack Obama passed along a bunch of lies, but I leave that crap unmentioned, given the three pieces of thought covered well show Barack Obama idiocy and hellish mind, aimed at hurting others, which--I say--Barack Obama loves to do, being a part of his nature and his way of life.]Monday, November 16, 2015 (a press conference given while in Turkey):
"...It's shameful. That's not American. That's not who we are...." [On Friday, November 13, 2015, Islamic terrorists attack France, particularly Paris, France, and at least 129 persons were killed by the terrorists and hundreds more were injured. People in the United States of America almost immediately called for the U.S. government to limit the numbers of persons allowed to enter the United States from the Middle East, especially non-Christians. Barack Obama rejected the argument, as noted in the quoted material that helps make up the first paragraph of this section. The set of words from Barack Obama makes up only some of the bullshit that Barack Obama passed along. In this case, Barack Obama pushed out the crap that the U.S., in the past, has not put limits on certain types of people entering the country; however, I noted that, for example, during World War I and World War II, certain types of person, such as Germans, were not welcome.]
"...At the same time, all of our countries have to insure our security, and as president, my first priority is the safety of the American people...." [Bullshit! Bullshit! Barack Obama has not set up a secure border between Mexico and the United States of America, allowing illegal aliens to flood in to the country, and Barack Obama worked to get the Muslim Brotherhood in control of Egypt, and Barack Obama has set up an international agreement that gives Iran the opportunity to nuclear weapons soon, and Barack Obama has worked to remove generals from the U.S. military, and Barack Obama has worked to cut the budget of the U.S. military.]
"...As we accept more refugees, including Syrians, we do so only after subjecting them to rigorous screening and security checks...." [Bullshit! Bullshit! Bullshit! For one, Barack Obama blocked Arizona--through a court case--from upholding immigration laws related to illegal aliens, and the FBI director recently reported that the U.S. government cannot do a good job of vetting people from the Middle East who are trying to enter the country, lacking, for example, enough useful information on people wishing to enter. [Ross, Chuck. "FBI Director Admits US Can't Vet All Syrian Refugees For Terror Ties [VIDEO]." The Daily Caller, 21 October 2015, 2;15 p.m.]]Monday, November 30, 2015 (in Paris, France, for an international climate conference involving about a whole bunch of nations):
"...I've come here personally as leader of the world's largest economy and the second largest emitter [of carbon dioxide]...." [On this day, members of nations got to make speeches--one after the other--and the plan was that each person was allowed or given no more than three minutes to speak. What I have in quotation marks for this paragraph is some of what Barack Obama said during his speech. And during the speech, Barack Obama passed along lies and crap, such as the idea that he is the "...leader or the world's largest economy....", though Barack Obama is not the "leader" as he might hopes you believe--Barack Obama is the president of the United States of America and the economy is under the control of operators of countless businesses and corporations and millions of customers, who makes decisions from moment to moment about what gets made, sold, and bought.]
"...This summer, I saw the effects of climate change first hand in our northern-most state, Alaska, where the seas already...swallowing villages and eroding shorelines, where permafrost thaws and the tundra burns and where glaciers are melting at a pace unprecedented in modern times, and it was a preview of one possible future, a glimpse of our children's fake if the climate keeps changing faster than our efforts to address it, submerged countries...." [That is all of that that I feel like presenting for this part, because many questions have to be answered already. Where are villages being swallowed? If there are villages being swallowed up--in Alaska--would not the "liberal" media--which is most of the media in the country--cover the problem so that the liberal media could try to prove the global warming--caused by man--was true? Where is the tundra burning--burning in mass amounts, as hinted through what Barack Obama presented? If there is such a big problem, would not the "liberal" media be on top of the story every night, trying to push along the lie of manmade climate change that man is killing and planet and the planet is dying? Wow, Barack Obama--a perpetual liar--is predicting that countries are going to get swallowed up in the near future. Maybe, it will happen like in a science fiction movie--where all of a sudden, a big bash of water will cover up Cuba or North Korea in an instant, as might happen if Gozilla would come out of the water and push a super-big tidal wave out toward the land, where tanks and soldiers wait and will be washed away if they do not run like the dickens. Hurray for Gozilla! Sink Cuba and North Korea and the jackasses, like Barack Obama, in Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C.,--as it is today-- will never be missed. It is full of shit, headed by Barack Obama.]
"...Here in Paris, let's reaffirm our commitment ["Ding!"] that resources will be there ["Ding!"] for countries willing to do their part to ["Ding!"]...skip the dirty phase of development, and I recognize this will not be easy, it will take a commitment to innovation ["Ding!"] and the capital ["Ding!"] to ["Ding!"] continue driving down the ["Ding!"] cost of clean energy...." [Okay, well, so, ah, the "["Ding!"]" that you see in the quoted text represents a dinging that was done by some person to indicate to Barack Obama that his time to speak was over and he was supposed to shut up. Well, Barack Obama--the big-headed jackass--kept talking, and, in fact, he kept talking and spouting out nonsense for another eleven minutes or so. Narcissist and egotist--these words do indeed suit the definition of what Barack Obama is. To bad, Gozilla was not near so that Gozilla could go crush the convention building.]Thursday, December 3, 2015 (a press event):
"...It is possible that this was terrorist related, but we don't know. And it's also possible that this was workplace related...." [The "this" to which Barack Obama referred was the shooting and killing of a little more than a dozen persons in San Bernardino, California, on the previous day, which had involved at least a man and a woman (who made up a married couple, who had, in essence, a new baby), and both the man and the woman had been killed by police authorities in shootouts. [Note: Later, it was found that the dead woman had been a big supporter of ISIS.]]Sunday, December 6, 2015 (a speech from the Oval Office of the White House):
"...But here's what we know--the victims were brutally murdered and injured by one of their co-workers and his wife...." [On this day, Barack Obama gave another fluff speech and useless speech about Islam and Islamic terrorists, and Barack Obama worked to present an image that stuff is going to be done to make things better, and he worked to sell the idea that Americans should not fear Islam, working to imply that terrorists tied to The Quran and Allah have nothing to do with Islam or the ways of Islam. Yes, Barack Obama gave the impression that the shooting event--an event that killed 14 persons--in San Bernardino, California, in the previous week should be seen as another "workplace-violence" event. The Quran is the basis for Islamic law, and The Quran does promote violence against those who are not followers of The Quran.]
"...But it is clear the two of them has, had gone down the dark path of radicalization, embracing a perverted interpretation of Islam that calls for war against America and the West...." [Yes, Barack Obama worked to sell the idea that "Shariaists" (the followers and promoters of Sharia (Islamic law) for the world) are not ISIS or ISIL people and are not to be feared, and Barack Obama worked to sell the idea that ISIS or ISIL people are not real followers of The Quran and do not represent Islam and Muslims, even though The Quran is the basic rule book for Muslims.]
"...The terrorist threat has evolved into a new phase...." [There has been no transition to a new phase! Islamic terrorists have been doing the same thing for at least several decades. They never went away. More are doing it, though.]
"...For seven years, I have confronted this evolving threat each and every morning in my ingelligence briefing...." [Bullshit! History shows Barack Obama misses many briefings or does not pay attention. Covering the period of January 20, 2009, to September 29, 2014, Barack Obama attended less than 50 percent of his intelligence briefings [Hall, Wynton. "REPORT: OBAMA HAS MISSED OVER HALF HIS SECOND-TERM DAILY INTEL BRIEFINGS. Breitbart.com, 29 September 2014.]]Tuesday, January 5, 2016 (at the White House):
"...Thank you...." [On January 6, 2016, Barack Obama gave a speech about his effort on controlling guns in the country. For one, early in the speech, Barack Obama mentioned places where there had been mass shootings recently, such as some military places (one of which was Fort Hood). By the way, Barack Obama did not mention how, especially at the military places, the deadly killers could have been stopped if others at the scenes of the shootings had guns. By the way, how come military places were grouped in with private places, given military places do not let civilians on the property with guns? Also, by the way, terrorists, such as those driven by the ways of Sharia and "Allah" and The Quran, were involved in some of the mass shootings. Barack Obama passed along filler, such as talking about an astronaut, and, in essence, he paraded out victims of shootings to gain sympathy. Barack Obama mentioned how more than 30,000 Americans are killed in gun violence every year, and he noted how suicide was one reason for deaths (and he would note late in the speech that two of three guns deaths are related to suicides, which hints to me that 10,000 deaths are related to other things, such as gang shootings involved in, for instance, criminal stuff), and I note that suicide by guns will not be stopped by any gun laws. Barack Obama worked to make people emotional and make them then think about having more gun control. Barack Obama chastized the members of U.S. Congress--Republicans mostly--who might not follow him and his actions. Barack Obama once again passed along him and lies and propaganda and bullshit, and it was another long a labored speech (it was boring).]
"...But we are the only advanced country on Earth that sees this kind of mass violence erupt with this kind of frequency. It doesn't happen in other advanced countries. It's not even close...." [France had a big killing recently. France is a much small country--in relation to size and population. It is not possible--really--to compare countries. Anyway, Barack Obama lied about the frequency thing.]
"...I believe in the Second Amendment, there written on the paper that guarantees the right to bare arms...." [History shows that this statement from Barack Obama is a lie. Notice Barack Obama said--"...there written on the paper....". What "paper" is that Barack Obama? Could you not think of the name of the "paper"? Did you not want to mention the name of the "paper", disliking the "paper"? ]
"...I taught constitutional law...." [Of course, Barack Obama has proven numerous times that he likes to violate The U.S. Constitution, and, in fact, by using the Executive Order" process to create legislation about controlling guns is a violation of The U.S. Constitution.]
"...Some of you may recall, at the same time that Sandy Hook happened, a, a disturbed person in China took a knife and tried to kill with a knife a bunch of children in China, and most of them survived because he didn't have access to a powerful weapon...." [Yes, Barack Obama would bring up "China," given he has proven he likes communists and communistic countries, and China is a communistic country, in which the citizens have no guns so that they can fight back against the government of China, which is a rotten government based on coercion and violence and which will use killing citizens to keep the people enslaved. This part of the speech was bullshit! Guns are important for citizens, and the biggest reason for citizens to have guns is to beat down and defend against bad politicians, which have been commonplace in world history, even in the United States of America [Note: Woodrow Wilson was a horrible man--an "enslavist" (and a racist)--and Barack Obama is a horrible man].]
"...And you know what?--research, science, those are good things, they work...." [Barack Obama passed along this crap. If Barack Obama believed in following real science and research, he would not push the lie that manmade global climate change is leading to the death of the planet. This statement was more bullshit from Barack Obama.].
"...That's why we're going to invest $500-million to expand access to treatment across the country...." [Yes, Barack Obama is going to spend even more money, particularly in this case to mental-health treatment.]
"...Number four, we're gonna boost gun-safety technology...." [Wow! That sounds good. But is it?]
"...We need to develop new technologies that make guns safer. If we can set it up so you can't unlock our phone unless you got the right finger print, why can't we do the same for our guns?...." [The statement made--it is an idiot's idea of something great. Hey, let us have finger recognition for triggers [I say that in jest]. Really, it comes down to spending more money on an idiot idea. Remember--A big purpose of a gun is to protect against bad people in usually spur-of-the-moment moments, and making it harder for a person to use a gun against an enemy is a bad idea.]
"...The right to peaceful assembly--that right was robbed to moviegoers in...." ["The right to peaceful assembly"--this term was distorted by Barack Obama, once a teacher of "constitutional law"; the term relates to peaceful assembly and not being restricted from such by the federal government.]
"...Thank you!" [And it was finally, finally over.]Tuesday, January 12, 2016 (a morning interview with Matt Lauer, which was shown on Today (of NBC-TV)):
"...There's been times where it's been pretty rough, but there's no doubt that politics in Washington are so much more divided than the American people are. A part of what I want to do in, in this last address is to remind people--you know what?--we got a lot of good things gonna for us, and if we can get our politics right, it turns out that we're not as divided...." [Look at again---"...if we can get our politics right....". Think about it. What does Barack Obama mean by this? For one, to me, it means Barack Obama does not like the underlying politics--based on The United States Constitution--that the country is founded on. I think--To him, it just is not "right" (a.k.a. good or correct or the way it should be--to suit him and benefit him). I say--To him, communism and such are "right," since, for one, one man--a dictator--gets to run things so much more easily and do things on a whim (good and bad), having not to be at odds with people who do not support an "enslavism" form of government with bad laws and idiot ways and who do support The United States Constitution. Yes, I believe--To Barack Obama, the good way is, if we could only get the country like a one-party political system in which, basically, one person gets to lead the way unchallenged, then everything would be "right." Then, the politics would be "right." Of course, in essence, the federal government of the country is already like a one-party system because the people who make up the Democratic Party (especially those in the U.S. Congress) are rotten people (being communists, socialists, black racists, et cetera) and many of the people who make up the Republican Party are as bad as Democrats are or nearly as bad as Democrats are, and Democrats and Republicans have as a team imposed bad things on the good people of the country over the last seven years or so at least, and the proof can be seen in how Republicans in the U.S. Congress have done little to protect the good citizens of the country from new bad laws over the last seven years or so, and Republicans have even been instrumental in guiding through the U.S. Congress and passing bad laws, such as a recent giant budget law that adds to the federal debt of the country. I report again--To Barack Obama, the politics would be "right" if it was all the way that he wants it to be--for his sake.]Tuesday, January 12, 2016 (a "State of the Union Address"):
"Thank you so much...." [On Tuesday, January 16, 2016, Barack Obama--in front of what I saw as a lot of ugly people (because of their minds and faces) in the Chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives--gave another "State of the Union Address." Some topics were equal pay for equal work, raising the minimum wage, free community college for two years, the so-called broken immigration system [which is not broken and is only not followed by Barack Obama], and wage insurance. Those are commonplace topics from him and other Democrats (communists and such). There were odd statements--Barack Obama passed along that he was going to find a way to help people who want to write computer code, and Barack Obama noted that he was doing to work to help people who use mind-altering drugs, such as heroin. Barack Obama noted that the economy of the United States of America is rigged--rigged in favor of the rich; that lie showed more of his dislike for the country. One really big lie--of the many lies that Barack Obama passed along--was that he was going to work to cut "red tape" in government. Barack Obama said that people who take up or hold to the position that [manmade] climate change is not real will be "pretty lonely," because almost all others (the military members, most business leaders, the majority of Americans, almost the entire scientific community members, and the leaders of 200 nations) agree climate change is a problem and the big group will be at odds with the tiny amount of people who do not agree; that is how Barack Obama belittled people who do not or will not follow the herd of ignorant and rotten people around the world who are pushing what has publicly been shown to be a fraud movement (Oh, for instance, Barack Obama lied again about how many in the "scientific community" in the United States of America believe the planet is dying because of manmade climate change). Barack Obama pushed out the lie that, by making the nuclear agreement with Iran, he avoided another war. The speech was yet another time during which Barack Obama taught crap!]
"...I want to focus on the next five years, the next ten years and beyond. I want to focus on our future...." [Through this set of words, I got the feeling Barack Obama is not going to ever leave the White House (I bet he would love to stay till he becomes the leader of the world). In truth, I can say that Barack Obama wanted people listening to him to forget the past and what is going currently, which is not good, and think about some mirage way in the distance--that illusive whatever. Given Barack Obama--at this point--is only going to be the U.S. president for about another year, a person has to ask--Why was Barack Obama working to get people to focus on some mirage of five years or ten years from now or on some mirage in the far, far future? I state--It was a diversionary tactic from Barack Obama, which pushed a dream of some unknown type and not the reality of the moment [Note: It is a communistic tactic].]
"...First, how do we give everyone a fair shot at opportunity and security in this new economy? Second, how do we make technology work for us and not against us, especially when it comes to solving urgent challenges like climate change? Third, how do we keep America safe and lead the world without becoming its policeman? And, finally, how can we make our politics reflect what's best in us and not what's worst?...." [These were the four main themes of the speech from Barack Obama. All; of it was and is a lot of nonsense. For instance, what is the crap that we are going to work to make technology work for us, given for decades man has made technology work to help man, from water treatment systems to typewriters to furnaces to trains to cars to computers? That second theme, of course, was used to push the nonsense of manmade climate change, hinting that--as he wants you to believe--we are using bad technology (carbon-based technology). Oh, every day is a new economy really--it is a new day. But Barack Obama was pushing the idea of having a new economy that is controlled more by the federal government. And, for example, the fourth theme was and is truly defective--What does we have to "make our politics reflect what's best in us and not what's worst...." mean? Really, the four themes were just a set of words with vague overall meanings.]
"...The United States of America right now has the strongest, most durable economy in the world. We're in the middle of the longest streak of private-sector job creation in history--more than 14-million new jobs--the strongest two years of job growth since the 1990s--an unemployment rate cut in half...." [Bullshit!]
"...That's just part of a manufacturing surge that's created nearly 900,000 new jobs in the past six years, and we've done all this while cutting your deficits by almost three-quarters. Anyone claiming that America's economy is in decline is peddling fiction...." [Bullshit!]
"...Let's make America the country that cures cancer once and for all...." [And here is something that will never happen while he is the U.S. president, but it was said to make it seem as if he was taking on a challenge as big as or bigger than the challenge to go to the moon, which was done back in the 1960s. I say in jest--Is not Barack Obama great? I say in jest--Barack Obama is going to take on something beyond the ability of "mortal men." I say in jest--Can Barack Obama leap over buildings with a single bound and is he faster than a speeding bullet...? By the way, Barack Obama has talked about getting rid of cancer in past speeches.]
"...Rather than subsidize the past, we should invest in the future, especially in communities that rely on fossil fuels. We do them no favor when we don't show them where the trends are goin'. That's why I'm going to push to change the way we manage our oil and coal resources so that they better reflect the cost they impose on taxpayers and our planet, and that way we put money back into those communities and put tens of thousands of Americans to work building a Twenty-first Century transportation system...." [Let me translate this quoted material and show up the material. Barack Obama is going to "force" people ["show them" how] to follow him--period. Barack Obama shows that he is going to dictate what will happen with people involved with oil and coal and they are going to have to accept the rules. I note--Of course, everyone in the country is involved with fossil fuels, so everyone is going to be affected by his nonsense. In addition to that, a person has to ask the self--Exactly what money--from where?--is going to be put back into the communities? And what did Barack Obama mean by "subsidize the past"? I do not know; I cannot come up with logical answer. It is more idiocy and rottenness from Barack Obama. Then, I have to note that Barack Obama worked to mix "subsidizing" (something or other) with "investing" (something or other) in the future with a "twenty-first Century" transportation system. [What was being "subsidized" and what investing of what by whom was Barack Obama talking about?] It was a mix of nonsense. Hold it! So tens of thousands of dollars will lead to a "Twenty-first Century transportation system"? A simple construction contract for road repair can involve millions of dollars! For instance, a new mile of road can cost more than a half-million dollars. Look up on the Internet what it can cost to put in one mile of freeway. If my explanation in this section seems a bit confused, it is because Barack Obama's words added up to a mess.]
"...It only happens if we fix our politics...." [Note: See the previous entry or section in this document--a statement made on Today--to see more about this.]
"...Our Founders distributed power between states and branches of government and expected us to argue, just as they did--fiercely--over the size and shape of government, over commerce and foreign relations, over the meaning of liberty and the imperatives of security. But democracy does require basic bonds of trust between its citizens. It doesn't, it doesn't work if we think the people who disagree with us are all motivated by malice. It doesn't work if we think that our political opponents aren't unpatriotic or try to weaken America. Democracy grinds to a halt without a willingness to compromise or when even basic facts are contested or when we listen only to those who agree with us...." [Teaching foolishness and preaching down to people--this was the goal of this section of the speech (not all of the section of which is presented). One purpose was to get Republicans in the U.S. Congress to continue to compromise and follow his ways of government and life. The set of words has many rotten things. For instance, one piece of crap was "..democracy does require basis bonds of trust between its citizens.....". History shows already that Barack Obama is not trustworthy (being a perpetual liar), and history shows that Barack Obama has violated the ways of "democracy" by acting as a dictator and not following the ways of The United States Constitution. He is not the only one! Not everyone involved in a "debate" (a word that Barack Obama loves to use regularly) in the United States of America is working to promote real "democracy". If you were to debate with Barack Obama--who has shown himself to supporter communism and Sharia, which are not forms of "democracy" for the "people" in any way--you should not trust him, and you must distrust him, and you must even see him as "unpatriotic" fully [Note: History shows his interests are more in league with the people of Iran than with the people beholden to The United States Constitution]. I state that Barack Obama has "malice" as a motivating force in what he does, and for him to even talk about the idea shows that he feels people see malice in him and he must work to displace that [Note: No recent U.S. president has had to have say a topic in a "State of the Union Address."]. I state that time comes--when enemies are around in government--that a democracy must come to a halt to block the enemies from imposing rotten laws on the people (the citizens).]
"...We have to change the system to reflect our better selves. I think we've got to end the practice of drawing our congressional districts so that politicians can pick their voters and not the other way around...." [When a rotten man--especially a known rotten politician--proposes something, be wary. Although what Barack Obama proposed is vague in meaning, as is basically everything that he proposes in a public statement, a person should see it as something that most likely is something bad and is designed to benefit him and his kind and not good people (anti-enslavists). Ask yourself--What does what Barack Obama said mean? Consider--How will his proposal mean voters will now be able to pick their politicians better? People pick politicians through the voting process, as they have for ages in this country. How will what Barack Obama hints at be better and how can it be better? Yes, I know particular politicians or political parties when in power set up congressional districts in ways that will keep them in power more easily--by consolidating their potential supporters in groups, and even Democrats have used the tactic. But when Barack Obama makes such a proposal, which it would seem would result in a new federal law controlling districting, it will be bad. Today, voting districts are tied to state or local governments and not the federal government; that is, the voting districts within a particular state are not and have not be set up by the federal government, and the voting districts in a particular state are in some way under state control, such as through a legislature. It looks as if Barack Obama is working to get federal-government people involved in determining the boundaries of voting districts. That would be bad and terrible! By the way, notice how Barack Obama talked about how the political power in the country is distributed among various entities, and yet here--within the quoted text of this paragraph--Barack Obama seemed to be working to give more power to the federal government. And let me continue on. Over the last one-hundred years, the Democrats have had more control over the U.S. Congress than Republican have, and now the thought is to--it seems--put the U.S. Congress in control of making voting districts, and that is even though the Democrats of today are clearly upholders of communism and socialism and Sharia and care little for the American system of politics as guided by The United States Constitution, and that means, basically, Barack Obama would like to make it so that the communists and socialists and Shariaists would control how voting districts are set up, which would be highly favored toward the Democrats.]
"...Our brand of democracy is hard!...." [I do not believe any U.S. president has ever worked to push the idea--in a "State of the Union Address"--that the form of democracy in the United States of America is hard, and to me, Barack Obama's even saying such words shows Barack Obama's dislike of the form of democracy of the United States of America, that which is based on The United States Constitution, which--history shows--Barack Obama has violated numerous times.]
"...I believe the state of our union is strong! Thank you! God bless you! God bless the United States of America!" [The speech ended. Little was said in the speech to prove that the "state of the union" was strong, and what facts he gave were either lies or deceptive pieces of information (such as the piece about the unemployment rate, which has been lied about by the Barack Obama administration for months and months or really years). And when Barack Obama said his final words, his face was angry, and Barack Obama showed no pleasantness or likableness.]Monday, March 21, 2016 (in Cuba):
"...The United States recognizes the progress that Cuba has made as a nation, its enorm, enormous achievements in education and in health care, and, perhaps most importantly, I affirm that Cuba's destiny will not be decided by the United States or any other nation. Cuba is sovereign and rightly has great pride, and the future of Cuba will be decided by Cubans, not by anybody else...." On Sunday, March 20, 2016, Barack Hussein Obama--the support of communism and Sharia and more that is rotten--arrived in Cuba, and on the following day, Barack Obama was doing what he does best--he gave a speech with lies and nonsense. For six decades or so or whatever, the "destiny" of Cuba has not been decided by the "Cubans," except a few, who get to be dictators and thugs ("enslavists"), and there is no great health care for most of the people, and there have been no "enormous achievements" in education, and there is democracy, and there has been a stalled economy really (which was propped up by, for instance, the Soviet Union for many years), and the people are not "free" to travel in the country, and the people are not "free" to travel to other counties (which is why for decades people have had to, for example, risk their lives in make-shift floating crafts to get away from the country), and there is no "freedom of speech," and there are no real elections related to the heads of the government, and there is no real industry. Cuba is a "police state." The people are not allowed to become better off than the leaders, such as the famous Castro brothers, are by creating industries and developing things. Cuba has developed nothing that over the last six decades or so that is noteworthy. And Barack Obama reported that the United States of America will not decide the future of Cuba, except by allowing money to enter the country from the United States of America and get under the control of the dictators--really, the dictators get to have more money to use--and Barack Obama said, in essence, the rulers of Cuba will be "free" to be what they want to be, unhindered by the United States of America or Barack Hussein Obama.]Thursday, March 24, 2016 (in Argentina):
"...I, I guess ta, ta make a broader point. So often in the past, there has been a sharp division between 'left' and 'right,' between capitalist and communist or socialist, and especially in the Americas that's been a big debate. Right? Ah, you know, you're, you're a capitalist Yankee dog, and, oh, you know, you're some, you know, crazy communist, you know, who's gonna take away everybody's property. And, I mean, those are in, in, interesting intellectual arguments, but I think for your generation, you should be practical and just choose from what works. You don't have to worry about whether it neatly fits into socialist theory or capitalist theory. You should just decide what works. And, and I said to President Castro in Cuba. I said--...look, you've made great progress in educating, ah, chil, young people. Every child in Cuba gets a basic education. That's, that's, a huge improvement from what it was. Medical care. You know, the, the life expectancy of Cubans is equivalent to the United States, despite it being a very poor country because they have access to health care. That's a huge achievement. They should be congratulated. But you drive around Havana, and...this economy's not working. It, it, it looks like it did in the 1950s. And so you have to be practical in asking yourself how can you achieve the goals of equality and inclusion, but also recognize that the market system produces...." [Okay, that is enough of the shit from the mind of Barack Obama, which is a shit-head mind. The shit-head mind passed that crap along to a group of young persons. By the way, while Barack Obama spoke, he stammered and stalled and grasped for words. I could spend hours reporting why this quoted matgerial idiocy, but I only will spend so much time, wishing to get back to other things. For all time, an apple is an apple and not an orange, and a cow is a cow and not a horse, and a piece of glass is a piece of glass and not a piece of steel, and a lake is a lake and not a mountain, and communism is communism and not capitalism. Communism can be defined, and values can be placed on it, and communism is different than capitalism is, and communism will always be different than capitalism is. The two cannot be made to come together in definition. Communism is an enslavism form of government in which a few persons--rulers--decide what gets done in the long run, and the decisions are designed to benefit the rulers first. History shows that communism involves taking from people--money and assets and property--and some of the recent examples are tied to Venezuela and Cuba. Years ago, the younger Fidel Castro took from others to gain control of Cuba and make it so that others could not challenge his power (such as by using wealth to put him down), and the people in Cuba have remained poor, and that is the way of communism. Communism involves violence and coercion, and it involves the rulers putting people in jail who wish not to be stolen from--by the rulers. Through the talk, Barack Obama lied about the quality of health care in Cuba, and he used false information (from the United Nations, a communistic entity overall) to report on the "life expectancy" of Cubans in relation to Americans. History shows what works, and having a person just guess about what will work by guessing and going on beliefs and emotions is rottenness, but Barack Obama just wants people to simply "...just decide what works....". To understand what will work, a person has to have information from past history trials and errors or successes. Why do Cubans work to flee the country in make-shift boats or water crafts? People die leaving Cuba, and people in Cuba can get jailed or killed for talking against the rulers in Cuba. Yes, everybody in Cuba is equal--almost--and the place in all inclusive. Almost all the people are trapped in the same crap, and the rulers, such as the Castro brothers, live above the most. No rulers can make everyone equal without using violence, and when the equality is achieved, it can not be equality in which all are rich and well off! Barack Obama's theme was and is illogical, and it goes against nature, and it is all the lie that communism is. Cuba does not work for "the people"! Barack Obama taught shit to his audience! And Barack Obama is a man to be hated for all time, since he is a killer of minds and people and countries!]
[Note: To see the idiocy that Michelle Obama passed along the young people on the same trip to Argentina, you should see the document entitled Idiot Thought: A Collection of Nonsense Comments and Ideas from Democrats (such as Communists and Supporters of Sharia) and Others (such as Republicans Who Are Actually "Rhinos" (Fake "Republicans" or Are Not "Conservatives")), which can be reached through this Idiot link.]Friday, May 27, 2016 (in Hiroshima, Japan, at a wreath-laying ceremony):
"...Seventy-one years ago, on a bright, cloudless morning, death fell from the sky, and the world was changed. A flash of light and a wall of fire destroyed a city and demonstrated that mankind possessed the means to destroy itself...." [Japan is far from the United States of America and far from Iran, and that means it is very unlikely the people of Japan know about the day-to-day happenings in the United States of America and Iran, and that is to be expected. Given that, it seems very unlikely to me the people of Japan who saw Barack Obama give the speech on this day or heard the speech (such as a translation from English to Japan) were aware that the man doing the speaking actually help set it up so that the government of Iran--headed by Shariaists, who are "enslavists," who aim is to make all the people of the world bow down to Allah and the Shariaists--get nuclear weapons. Remember--History shows that Iran is a terrorist-supporting country. Barack Obama passed along crap to the people of Japan, as he has to the people of the United States of America for over seven years. It is public knowledge in the United States of America that Barack Obama is working to disarm the United States of America, such as by getting rid of the nuclear weapons that exist in the United States of America and reducing the amount of military equipment, such as ships, and men, and that is being done while helping other countries, such Russia, keep their nuclear weapons or get more, and that shows that Barack Obama is just another rotten man who is helping to make it possible for the rotten people to continue to have the "means to destroy" mankind or at least their enemies--Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, et cetera (but not followers of Allah and Sharia).]
"...How often does material advancement to our social innovation blind us to this truth, how easily we learn to justify violence in the name of some higher cause? Every great religion promises a pathway to love and peace and righteousness, and yet no religion has been spared from believers who have claimed their faith as a license to kill...." [Years ago, from a book entitled Modern American Usage, which is partially attributed to Wilson Follett, I learned that, if a writer writes a sentence that, generally speaking, readers have to read more than once to understand it, then the writer has failed. The material within quotation marks for this paragraph fits the theme noted in the previous sentence. Some people might say that the quoted material is "high thought." I report that it is not. The material, which can make a reader or listener come up with all sorts of meanings, all of which could be wrong, is junk and foolishness and just a collection of words. The quoted material is idiocy from a defective mind and a freak of nature! A person can read the quota material over and over and never really understand what Barack Obama was working to pass along. "Higher cause"--What the hell is this really? I do note on August 6, 1945, the reason that the United States of America dropped a nuclear weapon on Hiroshima, Japan, was to try to end a big-time war. It must be remembered, for instance, a big fire-bombing raid of March 1945 on Tokyo, Japan, by several hundred B-29 bombers--a raid that killed somewhere around 100,000 persons in one day--did not cause the Japanese leaders to think about giving up their fight. The "great cause" for dropping the "bomb" during World War II was to end World War II, during which millions of persons had already died. By the way, the death-toll count for World War II is unclear, but it is publicly understood that at least 50-million persons died at the hands of war. I do have to make a few clear notes about the quoted material. Was Barack Obama putting down Christians because they [the United States of America, the Canadians, the Australians, and others] did killings during World War II, believing they had a "license to kill"? Of course, Barack Obama's idea was probably mostly focused on the United States of America and the "bomb." Oh, what does "material advancement to our social innovation" mean? Try to explain it to someone. With Shariaists, the "greater cause" is all about "Allah" and pushing "Sharia" on the world--it is all about death. Okay, I know Barack Obama uses speech writers, as he has for years. However, Barack Obama does have ultimate control over what he says all the time, and during this speech, Barack Obama showed more of what is mind is about.]
[Note: It must be remembered Barack Obama's speech was given, in essence, during the Memorial Day Holiday Weekend of the United States of America, during which Americans pay respect to the persons (soldiers and such) who died in war, such as World War II. Why did not Barack Obama wait to show up in Japan around August 6, 1945? It could be argued well, for Barack Obama to be in Japan for the holiday, Barack Obama was indeed putting down America and American soldiers--past the present.]Wednesday, June 1, 2016 (in Elkhart, Indiana):
"...So their basic story is America's working class--America's middle class--families like yours have been victimized by a big bloated federal government, run by a bunch of left-wing elitists like me. The government's taking your hard-earned tax dollars, and it's given 'em to freeloaders, welfare cheats, and we're strangling business with endless regulations, and this federal government is letting immigrants, foreigners steal whatever jobs Obamacare hasn't killed yet...." [The people to whom Barack Obama was referring are anti-enslavists and "conservatives" or people who oppose his ways of communism and socialism and Sharia--"enslavism." Of course, some of the opposition is made up of people who are members of conservative talk radio. In this speech, which seemed to me to be designed to teach children crap, Barack Obama was working to dispel the truth of what he is actually doing, and Barack Obama worked to do that by joking about the truth.]
"...And I haven't, you know, turned on Fox News or listened to conservative talk radio yet today, but I've turned them on enough over these past seven and a half years to know I'm not exaggerating in terms of their story...." [Here, Barack Obama's teaching that was designed to make "conservative talk radio" the enemy in the minds of, for instance, children, who can be easily impressed to follow the teachings of a U.S. president, even though the man is a bad man.]
"...We have been hearing this story for decades--tales about welfare queens, talkin' about takers, talkin' about the forty-seven percent. It's the story that is broadcast every day on some cable news stations. On right-wing radio, it's pumped into cars and bars and VFW halls all across America and right here in Elkhart. And if you're hearin' that story all the time, you start believin' it. It's no wonder people think big government is the problem...." [For seven years and a half, Barack Obama has been speaking lie after lie, as I prove in documents that I have available on the Internet for free, and it seems many people in the country have come to believe the lies over the years, despite the true facts that exist. Barack Obama uses that old "communistic" tactical ploy (which can work well for people who are cloaked in the image of "authority")--Say the lie over and over, and people will think it is the truth. I state--The federal government of today--under the direction of Barack Obama and his associates--is a big problem, and that is what you get with liars and cheats and defectives, such as sexual defectives.]
"...And I'm gonna start with the biggest myth, which is that the federal government keeps growing
and growing and growing and wasting your money and giving your tax dollars to people who don't deserve it...." [Actual federal-government documents exist that show the federal government has grown a lot under Barack Obama, such as the Internal Revenue Service, and that the federal government has billions in waste and abuse every year, such as related to welfare or Social Security (such as Social Security disability). By the way, the military has been getting smaller, though--purposely. In addition, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (or "Obamacare") does give freebies to illegal aliens. Yes, Barack Obama told more lies here..]
"...Government spending is not what is squeezing the middle class!..." [Bullshit!]Sunday, June, 12, 2016 (speaking about the big shooting in Orlando, Florida):
"...Today marks the most deadly shooting in American history. The shooter was apparently armed with a handgun and power assault rifle. This massacre is therefore a further reminder of how easy it is for someone to get their hands on a weapon that lets them shoot people in a school or in a house of worship or a movie theater or in a nightclub, and we have to decide if that's the kind of country we want to be...." [On Sunday, June 12, 2015, early in the morning, a man went to a dance club-type place in Orlando, Florida, that is frequented by, for instance, gays and lesbians, and the man shot a killed dozens and shot and injured dozens more. The killer was a supporter of ISIS, which is a Islam-based terrorist entity, and ISIS is working to make Sharia (Islamic Law, a rotten political system masquerading as a religion) the way of the world, and people who support or are members of ISIS kill gays and lesbians, such as by throwing them off roofs (which happens in the Middle East), and Barack Hussein Obama is a supporter of Sharia, which, by the way, is followed by the Muslim Brotherhood, an entity that Barack Husssein Obama has shown support for and that, indirectly, has ties to ISIS and the ways of ISIS. This is a day and age when good Americans must have guns to protect themselves from the federal government of the United States of America, especially all the Democrats in it, who are supporters of such enslavism forms of government as communism and socialism (which is temporarily restrained communism) and Sharia, and Barack Hussein Obama is most certainly one of the Democrats--Barack Hussein Obama has shown is work to kill the United States of America, and that makes him an enemy of the United States of America. On Sunday, June 12, 2016, Barack Hussein Obama spoke more crap about gun control in the United States of America, and he passed along defective thought. Barack Hussein Obama said--"...This massacre is therefore a further reminder of how easy it is for someone to get their hands on a weapon....". That is defective thought! There is no evidence of how easy or hard it was for the killer to get weapons. The country is large, and, for instance, guns can be smuggled in to the country easily. Maybe, it was easy for the killer to get guns, but Barack Hussein Obama's statement is based on no facts. The statement was designed to get people to accept gun control, having the federal government take weapons from good Americans, who must have them to fight against what is now a highly rotten government, headed by Barack Hussein Obama. I state--Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton and other rotten politicians know that they are rotten and have to block good Americans from being able to fight back against their ways, one of which is to purposely hurt others because they like to hurt others, if not love to hurt others (it is one of their traits). In addition, since the country is, in essence, a free society, creeps and killers and members of ISIS can sort of roam free, and good Americans need to be able to protect themselves in moments or minutes and not an hour or hours. It seems very likely to me fewer persons would have died if someone could have been able to fight back against the killer in Orlando, Florida, quickly.] [Note: "Hussein"--that is a name adored by the followers of Islamic law or Sharia.]
[Note: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (which is also known as "Obamacare") has a provision that notes that a person who does not buy a health-insurance policy--at least that which is designed or approved by the federal government--the federal government gets to fine or tax the person. That means the federal government today believes it gets to force a person to buy, in essence, at least the federal government's policy, and if the person does not follow the rule, the federal government gets to attack the person, and, also, the person has to accept the standards of policy designed or approved by the federal government, which can be defective and not as good as the person may wish to have for the self (the federal government can even tax persons who buy policies that are greater than those designed or approved by the federal government). The federal government (like a god or the shit thing known as "Allah," an imaginary thing in the minds of the supporters of Sharia, one of whom is Barack Hussein Obama) did not create any person, and that means the federal government has no right to determine what a person has to buy or may not buy as health care or as a health-insurance policy, and if federal-government members come to take money or force money out of a person who does not buy the federal government's policy or pay the federal government's tax or follow the law known as "Obamacare," that person can assume the person is under threat of death, given the federal-govenment members are indeed threatening to harm the person's life through coercion and an illegitimate law, or it is logical that, if the federal government believes it has the power of life and death over a person--shown by its willingness to force money from a non-follower of "Obamacare"--the non-follower may act accordingly (such as refuse to pay at the very least) and claim self-defense for the action taken. Any government is a killing threat when it believes it is allowed to determine how a person may or may not take care of the self medically and when it believes it may set down in law the only ways in which a person may get health care and the types of the quality of health care that may exist and the times during which a person may or may not get health care! I state that, when a government gets to set the rules about how and when the citizens get to have health care, the country is rotten! Inote, in essence, Barack Hussein Obama believes he gets to kill you when he wishes, as shown by his having signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, a sham of a law. Hold it! I will restate my theme. The government is made of people, and government people did not create you, and you did not create them, and government people--being, in essence, equal to you--then may not tell you and have no power to tell you how to get health care, when to get health care, how much or how little to pay for health care, the ways in which you can work to get health care, and such (since they are not your creators), and if government people believe they can do all that, they believe they have the power to kill you or let you die when they wish, and that means you have the right to defend yourself against the government people, and if government people believe they get to tax you for not letting them determine all related to your health care and life and death, they are your potential killers--especially when the government people are Democrats like Barack Hussein Obama--and you may defend yourself against them at all costs. Think about this--Are you going to let government people tax you for your not allowing them to determine when you get to live?]Tuesday, June 14, 2014 (at the White House on "Flag Day"):
"...Let me make a final point. For a while now, the main contribution of some of my friends on the other side of the aisle have made in the fight against ISIL is ta criticize this administration and me for not using the phrase 'radical Islam.' That's the key they tell us. We can't beat ISIL unless we call them 'radical Islamists.' What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed ta tryin' ta kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this? The answer is none of the above. Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction...." [On this day, Barack Obama made a press statement, which showed off the rottenness of the man, and it showed that Barack Obama is indeed an enemy of the United States of America, and this quoted set of words from Barack Obama was the most defining moment of the speech, and it is all that I need to talk about in this section. Over the years, Barack Obama has regularly used one of the attack rules of Saul Alinsky (a hard-line communist and writer), as shown in Saul Alinsky's book informally entitled Rules for Radicals, which is a book designed to show the insane and other rotten people how to tear down a society so that the radicals can become the leaders. The rule is roughly--Find an enemy (such as a person), and target it, and isolate it, and attack it. Over the history of man, it has been commonplace for good persons to work to define enemies as they really are and to describe the enemies in ways that reinforce the idea that the enemies are enemies for the good persons' associates or followers; for example, during World War II, the United States of America, Canada, England, Australia, and other countries worked to describe, for example, the Germans in terms that degraded the Germans, and, for years, good people in the United States of America worked to describe communists as they are--rotten and evil. In this speech by Barack Obama, Barack Obama worked to counter the Alinsky rule--he was working to stop people or Americans, especially good Americans, from using a term or terms to describe the members of ISIL (or, as most people say, ISIS) in a bad way. I say--If Barack Obama can keep people from describing the people of ISIS and ISIL in bad terms on a regular basis, then people will not fear the people of ISIL or ISIS as much. In the quote material, Barack Obama talked about a "military strategy" idea. Barack Obama was using "military strategy" to get people to use mushy terms to describe their enemies--the members of ISIL or ISIS. I note that no one has reported that simply using "radical Islam" or the "radical Islamist" would lead to the defeat of "radical Islam" or the "radical Islamist". Barack Obama passed along crap with his idea related to "military strategy". After using the term "military strategy", Barack Obama rambled on with dysfunctional thought--"...What exactly would using this label accomplish? What exactly would it change? Would it make ISIL less committed ta tryin' ta kill Americans? Would it bring in more allies? Is there a military strategy that is served by this?...." Barack Obama was pooh poohing the notion that using "radical Islam" or "radical Islamist" would do any good, though a smart good person knows using the two terms does define the enemy and puts down the enemy or a smart good person knows the military tactic is designed to get more people--those who are naive about the enemy--to understand the enemy as an enemy and define the enemy properly and forcefully. Barack Obama also had this set of words--"...Calling a threat by a different name does not make it go away. This is a political distraction....". I state that no one expects an enemy to go away because the enemy is described in a negative way--a negative describing term is not designed to make the enemy feel bad and stop doing bad things. In the speech, Barack Obama knew what he was doing. Barack Obama is not naive. Barack Obama was working to protect his friends or the image of his friends--the members of ISIL or ISIS. It was a public-relations speech for the enemies of the United States of America. And Barack Hussein Obama is an enemy of the United States of America.]Tuesday, July 12, 2016 (at a funeral for five police officers, who had been killed by an assassin on July 7, 2016, in Dallas, Texas):
"...We allow poverty to fester...." ["Poverty" or allowing "poverty to fester"--these had nothing to do with the sniper who had killed the five police officers, and that means Barack Obama pushed out bullshit.]
"...We refuse to fund drug treatment and mental-health programs...." [Funding or not funding of "drug treatment and mental-health programs"--this had nothing to do with the sniper who had killed the five police officers, and that means Barack Obama pushed out bullshit.]
"...We flood communities with so many guns...." [Flooding "communities with so many guns"--this had nothing to do with the sniper who had killed the five police officers, and that means Barack Obama pushed out bullshit, especially since we are not flooding communities with so many guns, and that means Barack Obama pushed out bullshit.]
"...We cannot simply turn away and dismiss those in peaceful protest...." [Dismissing "those in peaceful protest"--this had nothing to do with the sniper who had killed the five police officers, and that means Barack Obama pushed out bullshit.]
"...We also know that centuries of racial discrimination, of slavery and subjugation, and 'Jim Crow,'...." [This set of words, like most of the words spoken in the speech, had noting to do with the sniper who had killed the five police officers--men who got, basically, little respect from Barack Obama, based on the tone and format of the entire speech from Barack Obama, who, once again, showed off his mentally disturbed mind in public.]Friday, December 16, 2016 (a press conference):
"...Long term with respect to the Electoral College, ah, the Electoral College is a vestige, it's a carry-over from, ah, an earlier vision of how our federal government was goin' work...." [The Electoral College is a part of The United States Constitution. Given what Barack Obama said, I can say that Barack Obama showed that, to him, The United States Constitution is a "vestige" and a "carry-over" from the past, which--since it is in the past--is to be forgotten and thrown away. [By the way, in the past, Barack Obama has worked to put down things of the past, since things of the past cannot be good, at least in his mind.] The idea expressed in the quoted material shows the rottenness of the mind of Barack Obama. For one, The United States Constitution was designed to be a blocking document--that which would block a rotten mind, like that of Barack Obama's--from being king of the country or the king of the world. Barack Obama once again put down The United States Constitution, and he was teaching listeners to look down on The United States Constitution and forget The United States Constitution, which restricts him (at least a little) and blocks him (at least a little) from being "free"--"free"--to do what he wants with others.]Tuesday, January 10, 2017 (at Chicago for his "farewell speech"):
"Hello, Chicago! It's good to be home...." [This was the opening line to Barack Hussein Obama's roughly one-hour talk. The talk passed along lies, such as the thought about shutting down Iran's nuclear-weapons program, and the talk passed along idiocy, such as his getting people to adhere to facts, though he has discarded facts related to climate change, and the talk passed along foolishness, such as his work that was instrumental is saving the planet through an international agreement, and the talk indirectly put down the idea that the country should have voter IDs (with photographs) because that blocks people from voting (making the voting process harder), and the talk had bullshit, such as that hinted at through his mentioning of climate refugees. And, finally, Barack Hussein Obama ended the speech, and I was glad, knowing I could finally stopped adding tons junk thought and shit from Barack Hussein Obama into this document.]
"...shut down Iran's nuclear-weapons program without firing a shot...."
"...and because of you, by almost every measure, America's a better, stronger place than when we started...."
"...Democracy does require a basic sense of solidarity...."
"...the unemployment rate is near a ten-year low...."
"...health-care costs are rising at the slowest rate in fifty years...."
"...Our economy doesn't work as well or grow as fast when a few prosper at the expense of a growing middle class...."
"...If every economic issue is framed as a struggle between a hard-working white middle class and an undeserving minority then workers of all shades are gonna be left fighting for scraps while the wealthy will draw further into their private enclaves...."
"...But without a common baseline of facts, without a willingness to admit new information and conceded that your opponent might be making a fair point and that science and reason matter, then we're gonna keep talking past each other...."
"...we've led the world to an agreement that has the promise to save this planet...."
"...Our children won't have time to debate the existence of climate change, they'll be busy dealing with its effects--more environmental disasters, more economic disruptions, waves of climate refugees seeking sanctuary...."
"...When voting rates in America are some of the lowest in advanced democracies, we should be making it easier not harder to vote...."
"...Thank you."Wednesday, January 18, 2017 (In Washington D.C., doing a "farewell press conference"):
"..." [Barack Hussein Obama had to say good-bye to the press (though--I believe--he will be in the press regularly for a long time to come, given the press is filled with rotten people who are willing and eager to promote Barack Hussein Obama, though Barack Hussein Obama is a highly rotten man). During the "farewell press conference," Barack Obama passed along a lot of bullshit, one piece of which pushed along the idiocy that the United States of America is a country where it is hard for many people to vote, and he implied that that was because the voting process in the United States of America involves voter-ID stuff (with, for example, photographs). If you want to learn what Barack Hussein Obama said during this event, look it up for yourself, given I have done enough to show up Barack Hussein Obama has a shit-head man over eight years or so.]
In opening paragraph of this document, I use the term "enslavist," and the term identifies a type of person, particularly a type of politician, and the type of politician is a person who supports and pushes for "enslavism," which is a political system in which a country has a few persons who are rulers (grouped together on one political party) and all the others who are like subjects and pawns for the enslavers. "Enslavism" as an umbrella title encompasses such specific types of bad government systems as communism, socialism (which is nothing more than soft-line communism, which is evolving into communism), and Sharia (a Islamic-law-based government), and all the types of government described are really nothing more than what can be likened to as "ant society" government systems (the ant society has a queen ant and all the other ants (worker ants), and the enslavism society has a few rulers and all the other workers (who, by the way, believed the rulers are looking out for the "workers"). The "ant society" format does not work and cannot work for man, since the society of man is more complex than the ant society is (humans are more complex than ants are). Only persons with sick minds, such as those who try to push the idea that all men can be made economically equal and who try to push the idea that they can make the world better than what nature really is, would push to have a country be like an "ant society," and examples of such sick minds are those that head the societies known as Haiti, Cuba, and North Korea (which are some of the worst of the entire group from the world that I could present). For a country to exist in the "ant society" form and be maintained, the leaders must use violence and coercion and killing to keep the citizens under control and keep the leaders in power, and why the "ant society" form fails is much of the decision making is done by only a few minds--those of the rulers--which are defective right from the start because they uphold the idea of the "ant society" form and suppress the minds of the remainder of the country. Barack Obama has shown himself to support "enslavism," showing support for the leaders of Iran (who run their country by the ways of Sharia Law) and the leaders of China (who are communists), and Barack Obama, who has actually accomplished nothing worthwhile for others in his life and has made no one other person better (though he has passed on welfare money and food stamps to people, which are not measures of making people better), is a narcissist and megalomaniac, who, for one, seems to think he is the smartest person around, evidence of which is shown in this document, Nonsense Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama (Part Two), and other documents that I have posted at the website for The Hologlobe Press. When you think of Barack Hussein Obama, think of "enslavism" and an "enslavist" (or an "enslaver").
P.S.: In essence, an "enslavist" is only concerned with the self and in gaining the highest position in society as possible or to be seen by others as the highest in stature, even if it means destroying and belittling others and the stature of others, such as business people and doctors, who gain high stature in a community for actual worthwhile deeds done.
Note: From time to time, I will update this document.
- - - Bibliography - - -
"Compulsory Voting." Wikipedia.com, 20 March 2015.
"22 countries where voting is mandatory." PBS Newshour, 3 November 2014, 3:01 p.m. EDT.
The Associated Press. "President Obama: Football better for fans, players if less violent." SportingNews NFL, 27 January 2003, 9:10 a.m. EST.
Ashkenas, Jeremy, Matthew Ericson, Alicia Parzapiano, and Derek Willis. "The 2012 Money Race: Compare the Candidates." The New York Times, 2012.
Bronnre, Danielle Wiener. "Yes, There Are Elections in North Korea and Here's How They Work." The Wire, 6 May 2014, 11:59 a.m. EST.
de Rugy, Veronica. "Wasteful Federal Spending: %125 Billion in Improper Payments Is Just the Beginning." National Review Online, 21 February 2013, 4:35 p.m.
Robillard, Kevin. "Bob Woodward blasts President Obama 'Madness.'" Politico, 27 February 2013, p. 7:32 a.m. EST.
Ross, Chuck. "FBI Director Admits US Can't Vet All Syrian Refugees For Terror Ties [VIDEO]." The Daily Caller, 21 October 2015, 2;15 p.m.
Salant, Jonathan D. "Spending Doubled as Obama Led First Billion-Dollar Race in 2008." Bloomberg, 26 December 2008, 14:50 EST.
Terkel, Amanda. "Federal Gun Registry Is The New Death Panels." The Huffington Post, 17 April 2013, 1:21 p.m. EDT (updated 4:33 p.m. EDT).
- - - Additional materials - - -
For further reading, you should see A Little
History of Barack Obama Events: A Show
of Deconstruction, which can be reached
by using this link: History.
For further reading, you should see Madness
in a President and Other Matters of a
Defective Mind, which can be reached
through this link: Madness.
For further reading, you should see THE CRUD
AROUND BARACK OBAMA: My rule--"Like
Minds Get Together", which can be reached
by using this link: Crud.
For further reading, you should see We Have
a Killer in the White House -- A Killer of
Minds and a Killer of Countries: And His
Goal is to be King of the World, which can
be reached through this link: Killer.
For further reading, you should see Conservatives
and The United States Constitution versus
Enslavers and Enslavism (or Communism,
Sharia, Socialism, et cetera), which can be
reached though this link: Enslavism.
For further reading, you should see Sharia Law,
Shariah-Compliant Finance, Radical Islam,
and Barack Obama, which can be reached
by using this link: Sharia.
For further reading, you should see "La Raza":
Yet Another Enemy in the United States of
America, which can be reached by using
this link: La Raza.
For further reading, you should see Political
Lessons for the Individual Woman and
the Individual Man in the United States
of America, which can be reached by hitting
think link: Lessons.
For further reading, you should see THOUGHTS
AND PIECES OF LOGIC for the individual
woman and the individual man, which can be
reaching by hitting this link Thoughts.
For further reading, you should see Barack Obama's
Women -- Ugly Through and Through: Facts,
Information, and Opinion (A Lesson for Hoped-
to-Be Men), which can be reached by using this
link [Parental Discretion is Advised!]: Ugly.
For further reading, you should see Nonsense
Statements and Quotations of Barack Obama,
which can be reached at this link: Quotes.
To go to the main Web page of The Hologlobe Press,
you may use this link: www.hologlobepress.com.
To learn how many television news entities betrayed
the American public in 2008 in relation to the
election of November 2008, you should see the
document entitled T.H.A.T. #55, which can be
reached at this link: T.H.A.T. #55.Note: You should see my document entitled T.H.A.T. #58, which has information about actors who made a "pledge" to do things in relation to the Barack Obama administration. For one, one actor said that he pledged to be a "servant to Obama." That is a dangerous idea and like how children of China were made to sing the praises of Mao, a communist. To see the document, you can use this link: T.H.A.T. #58.
Note: The first version of this document was posted on the Internet on January 21, 2013.
###