Democrat, Liberal, Left-Winger, Big-Goverment Guy,
Socialist, Progressive, Communist, Statist, and the follower
of Sharia: A Lesson about Defining Bad People Properly--
Use "Enslavist" or "Enslaver"
by
Victor Edward Swanson,
publisher
The Hologlobe Press
Postal Box 5263
Cheboygan, Michigan 49721
The United States of America
copyright c. 2014
December 21, 2014
(Version 3)
(Draft version)
Today, there are a lot of good-hearted people who host regularly broadcast radio programs around the country and who are working to show up the rottenness of, for example, Barack Hussein Obama and the members of the Democratic Party and some members of the Republican Party. Those radio talk-show hosts regularly give evidence about the bad political policies being pushed upon the country by all the bad politicians, and the radio talk-show hosts regularly give facts and evidence and truth to their listeners about the bad politicians, such as through actual audio clips of the bad politicians. Despite all the work that is being done and has been done by the good radio talk-show hosts--often referred to as "conservative radio talk-show hosts"--they have yet to well define the bad politicians as bad and stigmatize the bad politicians well in the minds of radio listeners who are good persons, and that then means good Americans do a poor job of defining and stigmatizing the bad politicians in the minds of others. Let me mention some good-hearted radio talk-show hosts. Rush Limbaugh has hosted his nationally syndicated radio show--The Rush Limbaugh Program--for about twenty-six years, and Sean Hannity, Glen Beck, and Mark R. Levin have done their nationally distributed radio shows for many years. Many non-nationally syndicated radio talk-show hosts have been working to show up bad politicians, and some of those are Tom Marr and Inga Barks. Today, many Americans still do not really fear the politicians and others who call themselves such names as "Democrats," "liberals," "progressives," "statists," or "socialists." I state that the good-hearted radio talk-show hosts lack a unified attack plan that helps give good Americans a way in which to talk about bad politicians well or better. "Democrat," "liberal," "progressive," "statist," "socialist." and "communist"--these words have been used for many years, but when they are heard, they elicit no fear in the minds of most people who should be fearful upon hearing them. Look at some problems. "Democrat" (a member of the "Democratic Party" in the United States of America) is a word that has ties to the word "democracy," so many people, such as naive people or people new to the country, take up believing a "Democratic" cannot be bad. "Liberal" is a word that can make a person think of, for instance, an easy-going person or a non-strict person, so when the word is heard by a person does make, the person does take up being fearful or wary of anyone who calls the self a "liberal" or is defined as a "liberal." "Progressive"--this word has been used for around a hundred years by people who are working to mask was they are, such as socialists and communists, and "progressive" is a word that can make a person think that anyone who is a "progressive" is working to make things better--giving up old ideas (whether or not they are actually good ideas). Mark R. Levin since at least 2009 has been working to make "statist" a commonplace word in conversation (he decided to pick it up again, especially since U.S. President Ronald Reagan used it and tried to make it a commonplace word, such as in the 1980s, to define bad politicians), and the word has not come into commonplace use because, for instance, every time that it is used by a person, the person has to define what is really means to the listener, especially the naive--the problem with the word is what the word is based on in structure, which is something vague. "Socialist"--this word can put good thoughts into a person who hears it, especially the naive and such, because it hints that the person whom is described by the word is or could be, for example, "social" and "nice" and can work with others. "Communist"--this word is a vague word, because, for one, people who are "communists" have worked to put it into disuse, though "communist" defines a person who holds rotten political ideas, such as those that allow violence and high suppression of thought on peoples. In essence, bad politicians have been getting away with not having to defend themselves well for what they call themselves, and the good-hearted radio talk-show hosts have failed as a group to put a label on bad politicians that elicits fear in the minds of good people who hear the label. I report that the "Democrat," the "liberal," the "progressive," the "statist," the "socialist," or the "communist" is a person who wants a government to be all powerful and unlimited in outreach, and such a person as a politician wants a government that can act on a whim and set rules on a whim, and such a person as a politician wants to be able to control well, even harshly through violence if necessary, the populous of the country in which the person lives, and such a person as a politician even wants to be "free" to hurt other people if necessary, and such a person as a politician can even love having the ability to be able to hurt others (a good example of whom is Barack Hussein Obama). Basically, the "Democrat," the "liberal," the "progressive," the "statist," the "socialist," or the "communist" is nothing more than a person who likes or wants to be able to "enslave" others. You should easily understand--"Enslave" is a word tied to the word "slavery." I put forth that the radio talk-show hosts should adopt the regular practice of calling the "Democrat," the "liberal," the "progressive," the "statist," the "socialist," or the "communist" something that the "Democrat," the "liberal," the "progressive," the "statist," the "socialist," or the "communist" will have to defend--"enslavist." Besides that, I urge good people who are not radio talk-show hosts to regularly use "enslavist" as a way in which to describe the "Democrat," the "liberal," the "progressive," the "statist," the "socialist," or the "communist." "Enslavist"--it is a word that does not have to be defined in follow-up sentences much when a person uses it while talking about bad politicians, unlike, for instance, "statist" and "liberal." To prove my idea is valid, try a test. Go to a bar or restaurant or bowling alley or store or whatever and say to a person (if the opportunity arises)--"Barack Obama is a statist." and then "Barack Obama is an enslavist." See which works best. There are times when a good person wishing to clearly describe a bad politician may use "enslaver," but it seems to me that "enslavist" works better than "enslaver" does in a wider range of potential statements and sentences. Now, I come to a form of "enslavism"--Islamic Law, which is also known as "Sharia" (or by other spellings, such as "Shariah"). Islamic Law or Sharia is what many Muslims of the world support, and it is a called a religion, but it is really a tyrannical political system, in which a few people--clerics--set the policies of society, supposedly guided by "Allah," which is called a "god" of some type (it was the invention of men a long time ago). What goes a good person call a person who supports and promotes "Sharia" or Islamic Law? The answer is not "Shariahist" or "Islamic Lawist". Those terms are defective. The word that works is "enslavist." For example, a good person can say the following two sentences and do well--"Barack Hussein Obama is an enslavist because he supports Sharia" or "Barack Hussein Obama is an enslavist because he supports the followers of Sharia, such as the leaders in Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood.". Incidentally, the Muslim Brotherhood--a terrorist entity--is pushing for Sharia for the world, and there are a number of off-shoot entities of the Muslim Brotherhood, and Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim and has indeed shown his support for the Muslim Brotherhood and Sharia-based governments. While I am on the subject of words, I report that such persons as Rush Limbaugh and Mark R. Levin have yet to tie well Barack Hussein Obama to his support of Sharia for radio listeners, so radio listeners are not fully aware of Barack Hussein Obama's enslavist tendencies, and that is a tactical error on the part of Rush Limbaugh, Mark R. Levin, and others like Rush Limbaugh and Mr. Mark R. Levin. A "progressive" is an "enslavist," pushing for, for example, a communistic government and society (which can be likened to an ant society, with a royal ruler and worker ants, who are easily expendable), and a "socialist" is an "enslavist," and some "Republicans" (members of the Republican Party in the United States of America) are "enslavists" and not simply "big-government guys" (as Rush Limbaugh has been known to say), and some of the "Republican" enslavists are John Boehner, Mitt Romney, Mitch McConnell, and John McCain, all of whom have shown disdain and have worked against those who are "anti-enslavists" (sometimes referred to as "conservatives"), who are people who support, for instance, following the ways of The United States Constitution (which is the basis for an anti-enslavism form of government--if it is followed, which it is not today)*. Really, not only good-hearted radio talk-show hosts but also other good-hearted people have failed for decades to label "enslavists" for what they are, and until good-hearted people take up calling "enslavists" what they are--"enslavists"--the tactical plan used by good-hearted people will always be second rate, if that.
* = There are a number of examples that I could show to prove some "Republicans" can be defined as "enslavists" (even enemies of the United States of America), one of which is the inaction by the high-ranking Republicans in the U.S. Congress to expose well the Barack Obama scandal in which the IRS (the Internal Revenue Service) provided the White House with tax information of Americans (an unethical and unlawful event), but I will only urged you to read about an action by the high-ranking Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives that involved lying to members of the U.S. House of Representatives about the true nature of a bill called H.R. 5759 right before a vote wsa taken on the bill, and the story about the incident can be found in the article entitled "EXCLUSIVE: HOUSE GOP LEADERS TRICK 216 HOUSE REPUBLICANS INTO ACCIDENTALLY SUPPORTING OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY," which was published on breitbart.com on December 7, 2014 (Boyle, Matthew. "EXCLUSIVE: HOUSE GOP LEADERS TRICK 216 HOUSE REPUBLICANS INTO ACCIDENTALLY SUPPORTING OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE AMNESTY." Breitbart.com, 7 December 2014.).
P.S.: U.S. Senator Tom Coburn was presented in an interview on 60 Minutes (a weekly television program broadcast by CBS-TV) on Sunday, December 21, 2014, and Tom Coburn spoke words that should never have been spoken. At one point, Tom Coburn said--"...I love him [Barack Obama] as a man....". I state--Barack Obama is a rotten man, as history shows, and a person never gives praise to a rotten man, which might help promote the image of the man as good. Over several days before the interview would air, CBS-TV used the clip of Tom Coburn saying "...I love him as a man...." in a promotional announcement for 60 Minutes, which also noted that Tom Coburn was considered the "Godfather of the Tea Party," and that allowed CBS-TV to promote Barack Obama's image and Barack Obama as good. Tom Coburn's lack of thinking and poor tactical maneuver--using words to describe a person that should never be used--helped prop up Barack Obama, and that is failure. Remember--Words matter, and define bad people properly.
###
Note: This document was originally posted on the Internet on December 8, 2014.
Note: This document is known on the Internet as www.hologlobepress.com/defining.htm.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Conservatism for
Children and What Conservatism Means,
which can be reached by using this link:
Conservatism.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Conservatives and
The United States Constitution Versus
Enslavers and Enslavism (Communism,
Sharia, Socialism, et cetera), which can
be reached by using this link: Enslavism.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The "Enslavers" Want
Your Retirement Plan or Pension Plan,
which can be reached by using this link:
Pension.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Nonsense Statements
and Quotations of Barack Obama, which
can be reached by using this link: Quotes.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Madness in a President
and Other Matters of a Defective Mind,
which can be reached by using this link:
Madness.
For further reading, you should see my
document entitled Sharia Law, Shariah-
Compliant Finance, Radical Islam, and
Barack Obama, which can be reached by
using this link: Sharia.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Never Forget These
Media "Darlings" ?: A Guide for the
Individual in the United States of
America, which can be reached by
using this link: Media.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled A Little History of
Barack Obama Events: A Show of
Deconstruction, which can be reached by
using this link: History.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled Lessons for Children
about Politics and Dangerous People,
which can be reached by using this
link: Children.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled The Next Elections:
What Has to be Done to Protect the
United States of America, which can
be reached by using this link: Elections.
For further reading, you should see the
document entitled World Tyranny:
Warnings about the Insane Who are
Trying to Create a Communist World
Country, which can be reached by
using this link: World.Note: Many other documents exist at the
Web site for The Hologlobe Press that will
give you information about the bad that Barack
Obama and his associates are doing to the
United States of America, such as the Michigan
Travel Tips documents and the T.H.A.T.
documents that have been published since
the fall of 2008.To get to the Site-Summary Page for The
Site-Summary Page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may use this link: Summary.
To get to the main page for The Hologlobe
Press, you may click on this link now:
www.hologlobepress.com.###